Trump Shows Preference for European Immigration? Looks Down Upon 3rd World countries

There's a stir of fake news controversy over Donald Trump referring to countries such as Haiti and El Salvador as "Sh*tholes. Trump has also expressed desire for more immigration to come from countries such as Norway. This is very encouraging as massive immigration both legal and illegal has made America more divided and less prosperous.

Trump's administration has immediately began ordering the expulsion of over 200,000 El Salvador nationals who have been on TPS(Temporary Protective Status) since 2001 and have overstayed their welcome.

Why did Trump call Haiti and El Salvador terrible countries? Trump has been frustrated with lack of Congressional efforts to enact meaningful America First immigration reform.

Given the revelations of Trump's opinion being made into a media circus for days, now the left will be forced to defend their preference for Black African immigration over White European immigration. While the left has praised Scandinavian countries for their social welfare state and socialist principles, the left is being forced to take a position on whether it's better to live in Norway or Haiti. The picture above shows the average Norwegian(left) vs. Haitian(right).

I want to be completely honest here as it is essential to shifting the Overton Window further to the Right in saying the reason why Norway is one of those countries with the best quality of life and high standard of living is in part because it has been racially White Nordic European since the beginning of Western Civilization. The reason why virtually every Black African majority and Black African run country has the worst standards of living and worst qualities of life are in part because the average IQ of Black Sub-Saharan Africans is 70-80.

Sure there are plenty of Black Africans who are close to having the same intelligence as White European and East Asians but the massive immigration of non-Whites into White majority countries has caused division and strife. Plus, different peoples will be more or less likely to assimilate than others. America is not a mere "idea" as those who founded America were not merely of the White European stock but specifically the Anglo-Saxon stock.

The Immigration Act of 1790 restricted all immigration and naturalization to "White me of good character". What that means is this system was designed specifically to favor those closer to Anglo-Saxon heritage without explicitly banning non-Nordic immigration. A majority of immigration under this system was to insure the Nordic Anglo-Saxon culture remained the dominant culture in the United States of America.

With the immigration of Eastern & Central Europeans, Mediterranean Caucasians(Christians mainly), and even East Asians during the mid 19th century until the 1920's, there were no specific ethnic quotas until the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The Chinese immigrants during the 19th century failed to assimilate, causing panic and fear among the American population. The Chinese Exclusion Act banned further Chinese immigration to the United States, not out of bigotry or racism but out of concern of having parts of the Pacific coast colonized by Chinese settlers. While the Chinese settlers of the 19th century were lower skilled and less organized than today's People's Republic of China, China is becoming a rising power and it's important to point out the potential for PRC to encourage mainland Chinese immigration to countries like Canada, United States, Australia, and New Zealand as a method of economic & even cultural colonization where Caucasians could be made 2nd class citizens much like Blacks were in the Deep South from 1870's-1960's.

While I do feel a merit-based immigration approach is miles better than the pro-3rd world immigration system equipped with chain migration and diversity visa lottery(both of which Trump wants abolished), I also want pro-assimilation to be part of this as anyone with high skills and high IQs can still easily immigrate to America without having to assimilate into the value system America was founded on. America was founded on Western & Christian values, and if America still accepts too many high IQ Asians, Muslims, and even Black Africans, not only will it still contribute to a scenario where Whites are not only made 2nd class citizens but also a politically powerless minority group that could see more of the declining White population living similarly to Poor White Appalachians. I did mention Muslims because there are plenty of wealthy Muslims, especially from Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and even Oman. Plus, these Muslim countries have some forms of Sharia Law and favor Arab Muslim interests.

There's a reason why Democrats will NEVER agree to any immigration reform deal that includes an actual wall, end to chain migration, abolition of diversity visa lottery, and merit based immigration, and that's because Democrats rely on unlimited 3rd world immigration to increase their votes in hopes of one day flipping states like Texas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Virginia, and North Carolina solid Democrat, effectively establishing a permanent Democrat stronghold over the Executive branch.

Any kind of amnesty can easily morph into a demographic bomb due to massive rates of fraud and poor vetting of amnesty applicants. DACA for example has an over 50% fraud rate plus 70% of DACA recipients are low-skilled and are a net loss economically.

Certainly a merit based immigration system where ability is the highest virtue for immigration such as self-sufficiency is a great leap forward to stopping America from becoming 3rd world, there are problems associated with allowing so many high IQ Asiatics given they're harder to assimilate than White Europeans. Plus, Mainland Chinese are more tribalist and neo-communistic and if there is no system implicitly limiting or barring this type of immigration, then more of these tribalists whether they be mainland Chinese, Muslims from Pakistan, Indians coming to replace American White Collar workers, or even African(not including Whites) doctors, the character and face of America will be radically transformed but with a more intelligent touch.

However, if immigration were to be shutdown for nearly a decade while immigrants already here either assimilate or leave, this would help solve the demographic crisis America and many Western countries are having so Whites are not replaced in the countries their ancestors have cared for centuries.

Is it truly in America, Canada, Europe, or Australia's best interests to have high IQ non-white immigration become so numerous that Whites would be likely to become a minority? Even birthrates alone need to be addressed given non-hispanic whites are the only ethnic/racial group dying at a faster rate than being born thus making them also below the 2.1 fertility rate.

However, should immigration be shutdown for several years plus the expulsion of unassimilated 3rd world immigrants as well as implicitly pro-white natalist policies, White Americans as well as Whites in Canada, Europe, and Australia should see themselves preventing their own replacement, adopting similar policies Israel has to preserve it's Jewish identity.

2018 U.S. Senate seats likely to be flipped(GOP edition)

Though Republicans have just 8 seats to defend in 2018, there is a slight chance Democrats will be able to reclaim the U.S. Senate after 2018(especially after Doug Jones' victory in Alabama). While Democrats must defend 10 seats won by Donald Trump, Republicans will have to defend just one seat won by Hillary Clinton. However, even GOP held seats won by Trump can be flipped if there are not strong and robust MAGA Republican candidates.

Here is the list of GOP held seats that could be flipped by Democrats in 2018:

Dean Heller(pictured left) of Nevada is without a doubt the most vulnerable incumbent Republican if not the most vulnerable incumbent senator come 2018. Not only that but Nevada is the only state where a Republican seat is up for election in 2018 that Hillary Clinton won. Jacky Rosen(pictured right) is likely to be the Democrat nominee to try and flip Nevada's U.S. Senate seat.

God forbid if Dean Heller makes it to the general election ballot he will have an abysmally slim chance of winning re-election, why? Just look at the broken promises when it comes to immigration and healthcare. Heller won the 2012 U.S. Senate race for Nevada by 1.2 points at just 45.9% of the vote by promising to block amnesty for illegal aliens and to repeal and replace Obamacare.

Heller broke BOTH of those key promises by first voting for the 2014 Immigration "Reform" bill which would give amnesty to millions of illegal aliens and increase the immigrant population to record levels(due to chain migration).

Another broken promise on immigration is Dean Heller joining Democrats in 2015 to protect Obama's executive quasi-amnesty. The picture above as well as former U.S. Senator Harry Reid(D) giving Dean Heller praise for betraying the GOP base definitely points to a pro-amnesty position for Heller when it comes to Immigration.

When Dean Heller was given the opportunity to vote to repeal Obamacare back in July 2017, he voted no despite even voting for an identical bill back in 2015 when Obama was president. I bet Heller will try to distract GOP primary voters by pointing to his "yes" vote on the "Skinny" repeal of Obamacare(failed thanks to McCain's "no" vote).

Dean Heller has also broken other promises besides immigration and healthcare such as gun control where he supported a bill put forward by U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein of California that would enact burdensome and anti-privacy gun control provisions.

To make matters worse, Dc Dean Heller has also joined the NeverTrump bandwagon even up to the very last hours of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Heller has only just recently been supportive of Trump's MAGA agenda chiefly because of Danny Tarkanian's rise in the primary polls against Heller.

Should Heller win the GOP primary in June 2018, he will revert to his NeverTrump position in a murder-suicide type mission against Nevada's GOP held Senate seat. What alternative is there to repeal and replace DC Dean?

Danny Tarkanian is running against Dean Heller to take on whatever Democrat challenges Nevada's GOP held U.S. Senate seat.

Since Tarkanian announced his U.S. Senate campaign back in August 2017, Tarkanian has polled several points against the unpopular Dean Heller.

Unlike DC Dean, Tarkanian will be a more reliable candidate to keep Nevada's U.S. Senate seat GOP. Unlike Dean Heller, Danny Tarkanian is someone Trump can depend on, someone Republicans and Conservatives can trust, and someone who actually has a shot at winning.

The swamp in DC must be drained and Dean Heller is definitely part of the swamp. Even if Tarkanian has some flaws, he's still more electable than DC Dean. The only way for Republicans to prevent Democrats from flipping Nevada's U.S. Senate seat is by throwing their support behind Danny Tarkanian. Tarkanian's primary victory over Dean Heller does not guarantee GOP victory for Nevada's U.S. Senate seat but makes it much more difficult and challenging for Democrats to win Nevada's U.S. Senate race.

Up until former Governor Phil Bredesen(pictured right) decided to enter Tennesee's U.S. Senate race to replace Bob Corker back in December 2017, Tennessee's U.S. Senate seat up for election in 2018 is no longer just Solid GOP. This race now either leans GOP or is a tossup. GOP frontrunner Marsha Blackburn(pictured left) is likely to replace Bob Corker in most circumstances but the MAGA GOP base shouldn't just assume victory here(remember Roy Moore lost). Blackburn is however the strongest candidate that will make Bredesen's chances of flipping Tennessee's U.S. Senate seat slimmer.

However, the GOP establishment led by Mitch McConnell will work hard to get former Congressman Stephen Fincher(pictured right of Corker) to stop Marsha Blackburn from making it to the general election. A supermajority of GOP voters have no idea who Stephen Fincher is and even though I feel his chances of stopping Marsha Blackburn from winning the GOP spot in the general election are very small to virtually non-existent, this is not reason for MAGA to ignore this threat.

The GOPe has yet to endorse and raise money for Fincher but he's a potential GOPe agent willing to allow Phil Bredesen to easily flip Tennessee's U.S. Senate seat. Mid-December 2017 polling has shown Marsha Blackburn leading Phil Bredesen 43-34% while Stephen Fincher trails Phil Bredesen 42-30%.

Therefore, Marsha Blackburn is the strongest candidate to not only keep Tennessee's U.S. Senate seat GOP but also use her power as a U.S. Senator to force the GOP majority to act like one. What could be better than to replace a GOPe hack like Bob Corker with a strong conservative like Marsha Blackburn who has the favorable policy positions and ratings to fight for the American people in the U.S. Senate.

For Arizona's U.S. Senate race, I'm supporting Kelli Ward(pictured left) who if she wins the GOP primary will likely challenge Democrat Congresswoman Kyrsten Sinema(pictured right) to succeed unpopular pro-amnesty Jeff Flake.

GOP Congresswoman Martha McSally has announced she would also be running for Jeff Flake's vacated seat. Though have no position on whether McSally is GOPe or not, Kelli Ward is still the stronger candidate as she was the one whose campaign pressured Jeff Flake to retire due to double digit losses behind Ward.

The only reason for Martha McSally to run in this race is if she was secretly recruited by the GOP establishment to stop Kelli Ward from being in the U.S. Senate to Make America Great Again and do what Jeff Flake would never do.

Kelli Ward is the strongest and most reliable GOP candidate to replace unpopular RINO Jeff Flake. It was Kelli Ward's campaign that resulted in Jeff Flake's decision not to seek re-election in 2018. Therefore, McSally needs to step aside and allow Kelli Ward to make it to the General Election.

Orrin Hatch has announced he will not seek re-election, making 2018 his final year in the U.S. Senate. Speculation has been going on for months that Mitt Romney has considered running for the U.S. Senate to replace Orrin Hatch. God please compel a MAGA Republican to rise up and run to replace Orrin Hatch and stop Mitt Romney from becoming the GOP nominee for Utah's U.S. Senate seat!

President of the Sutherland Institute and former Chief of Staff to Senator Mike Lee; Boyd Matheson should be the first to come to mind for any Trump/Bannonite Republican replacement to retiring Orrin Hatch. I know Matheson has decline to seek this now open seat but now that Orrin Hatch is not seeking re-election, Matheson should seriously reconsider. Hopefully either Matheson or some other pro-Trump Republican in Utah will run for Orrin Hatch's U.S. Senate seat.

Texas is supposed to be solid R right? Well there could be some freak circumstance when Democrat Congressman Beto O'Rourke(pictured right) manages to unseat Ted Cruz(pictured left) if the GOP base has it's guard down. I don't worry too much about Ted Cruz losing his U.S. Senate seat but it's always good to be cautious, especially after Roy Moore's defeat in Alabama.

Although I did have bones to pick with Ted Cruz, especially during his 2016 U.S. Presidential campaign, Cruz has proved himself a valuable asset to the Trump agenda in the U.S. Senate.

As for the U.S. Senate seats held by Republicans John Barrasso(Wyoming), Deb Fischer(Nebraska), and Roger Wicker(Mississippi), Steve Bannon was planning to have primary challenges against them but it's best to just leave their seats alone as neither do they pose a serious threat to President Trump nor are unelectable. If I were Bannon I would save the primary challenges in Nebraska and Mississipi for example against Ben Sasse and Thad Cochran respectively. While Ben Sasse will need to be primaried to stop his NeverTrump stance, Thad Cochran will be likely retire after 2020 due to his health problems.

Who knows, we might see a change with the GOP establishment, realizing that taking a NeverTrump stance is not worth it unless Trump asks for it. Republicans no matter what wing need to understand the need for party unity behind Trump going into 2018 and 2020 and the need to defeat the obstructionist Democrats, including achieving a filibuster proof GOP majority in the U.S. Senate.

What the 2018 Midterms need for a MAGA GOP success

Despite the passage of historic tax relief, much more of the MAGA agenda is in need of enacting as well as making policies securing a White majority for future generations and defeating cultural marxism. It's far more difficult to get MAGA agenda passed in the U.S. Senate due to the tools of obstruction that Senate Democrats use such as filibuster(60 votes needed to dismiss), stonewalling, prolonging of debates, blue slips, etc.

Though Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has used the nuclear option to get Neil Gorsuch confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court with less than 60 votes(only 3 Democrats voted yay), McConnell still has yet to ensure the GOP will have a filibuster proof majority following the 2018 midterms. Instead, McConnell would through his Senate Leadership Fund superPAC endorse lame establishment hacks unlikely to connect with the Trump base and thus be likely to lose to Democrats.

McConnell has had a history of not only betraying true conservative GOP candidates for U.S. Senate with examples ranging from failing to support Daryl Glenn of Colorado's race against incumbent U.S. Senator Michael Bennett back in 2016 as well as neglecting to have Harry Reid unseated in Nevada back in 2010. McConnell undermining Roy Moore's efforts to win is only the most recent example and a sign of McConnell trying to dodge MAGA GOP efforts to establish a filibuster proof majority in the U.S. Senate.

I will admit that Roy Moore was too naive to the attacks waged against him by the GOPe and left-wing media as well as woefully assuming victory. I myself never thought Roy Moore would lose but he did and I'm thinking there's a positive advantage to this. The MAGA GOP base should take Roy Moore's loss as a warning never to assume victory and campaign hard against the obstructionist Democrats.

Although I have disdain and contempt for the McConnell/Ryan wing of the GOP, it's not wise to fight against the GOPe during the General Election after the primaries. One of the reasons I feel Roy Moore lost was the Bannonite wing didn't fight hard enough against the Democrats and instead focused too much on the GOPe. In fact, the GOPe spent time and effort undermining Roy Moore's campaign.

GOP Senate leadership should be seeking and supporting strong candidates in it to win it against the Democrats but instead Mitch McConnell it taking a "my way or the highway" approach to endorsement and support of GOP candidates, supporting lame and unappealing establishment hacks.

It's fine Mitch McConnell should have a say in what candidates to support but he is neglecting whether or not such candidate can compel the conservative base to vote and defeat Democrats. McConnell's past actions have shown he is more willing to defeat true national conservative candidates than defeat liberal marxist Democrats. McConnell would rather Democrats have supermajority control of the U.S. Senate and be able to obstruct MAGA than have a strong 60+ GOP Senate majority.

Americans don't just need anti-establishment Republicans but serious and victorious ones sharing the MAGA agenda. The GOPe is likely to pull out all stops necessary to prevent a filibuster proof majority for the GOP but unlike having just one target in December 2017(Roy Moore), the Dems and GOPe will have to go after 10+ MAGA candidates in 2018 and thus have a more difficult time achieving the same success as 2017 Alabama.

Had Doug Jones not have defeated Roy Moore, the MAGA GOP base would not be more fearful, aware, and knowing of the threat the Democratic Party and GOPe pose to Trump's MAGA agenda. Any seat could be flipped depending on the circumstances and in this war for control of America's destiny, Patriotic Americans must not assume respective victory.

In Texas for example, you'd think Ted Cruz will automatically win re-election in November but there's a small but possible chance Democrat Congressman Beto O'Rourke(likely Democrat nominee) could unseat Ted Cruz if the GOP base is not active in securing a permanent solid GOP future.

Another example of a previously thought to be Safe Republican seat is in Tennessee. If Phil Bredesen(pictured right) stays in the U.S. Senate race in Tennessee, this seat vacated by Bob Croker's retirement could be flipped by Democrats if Republicans fail to get behind strong conservative candidates like Marsha Blackburn(pictured left).

There are also two other major GOP contenders in the race to replace Bob Corker with these two gentlemen being Stephen Fincher(pictured left) and Rolando Toyos(pictured right). Fincher will likely be the establishment favorite given his liberal voting record for a former Republican member of congress as well as being the milquetoast RINO type . I don't know much about Toyos but he could be used as a spoiler by GOPe to split the vote with Blackburn and get Fincher the nomination. However, I think this is unlikely as Marsha Blackburn has polled at 58% compared to Stephen Fincher's 11% and Toyos' 3-4%.

Marsha Blackburn's massive lead over Stephen Fincher as well as Fincher's weak showing should not automatically mean Marsha Blackburn will be the GOP nominee to replace Bob Corker. Mtich McConnell with his Senate Leadership Fund will be very tempted and brazen to give as much support to Fincher as possible, just to stop a true national conservative iron lady like Marsha Blackburn from reaching the U.S. Senate.

Why wouldn't GOP leadership favor the strongest candidate in any U.S. Senate race, for Tennessee as an example being Marsha Blackburn, who has polled 9 points ahead of Phil Bredesen at 43%-34% while Fincher has been trailing Bredesen by 8-12 points.

Don't expect McConnell to support the strongest GOP candidate regardless of establishment or anti-establishment status.

As for Democrat held seats up for re-election in 2018(especially states Trump won) the GOPe has already began establishing their gang of establishment RINO hacks to block pro-Trump candidates from challenging vulnerable Democrats.

If the loss of Roy Moore has taught MAGA anything is that there can be assumption of victory and that all threats against MAGA whether by leftist Democrats or GOPe must be taken seriously.

MAGA GOP has certain advantages going into 2018 with a strong economy, unpopular and bad ideas coming from the Democratic Party(including constant calls to impeach President Trump). Americans must also be reminded of what's at stake in 2018 as the outcome of the 2018 U.S. Senate elections will determine how much of Trump's MAGA agenda can pass.

How to get a Republican in California's Top Two for Governor(and even win the General Election)

I know I said John Cox was my first pick but come to think of it, Travis Allen seems to be more able to be elected Governor of California than John Cox given that Allen has made a name for himself as a State Assemblyman who not only can communicate and turnout the Trump/GOP base but also authored the ballot initiative to repeal the 2017 gas tax. Travis Allen even sued Attorney General Xavier Beccara for putting misleading titles on the gas tax repeal initiative and won.

Travis Allen is not just someone in it for attention but in it to win it as he even paid the $2,000 fee out of his own pocket to have the Gas Tax Repeal Initiative on the 2018 ballot as well as suing the hell out of the Snakeocrat AG of California Xavier Beccara over the dishonest labeling of the Gas Tax Repeal Initiative. Allen doesn't just talk a good talk but also establishes a hardcore record of opposition to tax increases, illegal immigration, as well as openly having supported Donald Trump.

Given Travis Allen's record and personality, he appears as someone who genuinely wants to save California from it's final economic demise being perpetrated by the Democrats. Though I like John Cox's positions, Travis Allen has better qualities suited for getting out disaffected voters such as charisma, party connections, social media following, and statewide media attention.

To all the nay Sayers who believe a Republican will NEVER win a statewide race in California and even fail to make it to the Top-Two, I say to these nay sayers that they can just frack off cause there's still two months left until the filing deadline and five months left until the June primary.

 

As of early November 2017, Travis Allen has polled at 15% with just 6% undecided. You might think immediately that the GOP is doomed to never reclaim the Governor's office in California but if John Cox were to drop out of the Governor's race for example and run for either State Treasurer of State Comptroller for examples, Travis Allen would be the obvious GOP choice for Governor as GOP and Independent Republicans would no longer be confused and fearful of Two Democrats being in the Top Two due to vote splitting(what happened in 2016 Senate Race California).

However, polls are becoming less accurate as turnout is one of the biggest deciding factors in U.S. elections with polls being used more to influence public opinion and voting patterns rather than accurately projecting voting patterns.

Though the California GOP has failed to gain traction in trying to win a statewide election, I believe the effect of the Gas Tax Increase as well as the High Cost of Living in California gives the GOP a major advantage and a compelling reason for voters to elect a Republican governor. This doesn't make GOP chances of Governorship an easy task but it increases the chances of Republicans winning statewide offices in California.

CaGOP has lacked a plan for victory on how to truly take back California from the Democrats, given the 2014 California Gubernatorial election's GOP candidate Neal Kashkari was unappealing, uncompelling, had no message, and was known for embarrassing events.

Now with grassroots pressure and endorsements for Travis Allen from fellow GOP officeholders, the CaGOP could very soon be compelled to endorse Travis Allen for Governor and even help him financially given he has a better chance of winning due to his message of resisting tax increases and fighting to lower the cost of living as well as expand highway lanes to relieve traffic congestion.

Here's my list of strategies to virtually guarantee Travis Allen can make it to the Top Two:

Unite and Consolidate the GOP base by having a clear frontrunner:

While the Democrats have 4 major candidates, Republicans have just two but don't breathe a sigh of relief as Democrats have much greater strength in numbers despite not being politically invincible. The 2014 California Gubernatorial election, the two major GOP candidates(Neal Kashkari & Tim Donnelly) netted a combined 34.23% of primary vote, excluding the extra 5.7% wasted on minor GOP candidates. 34.23+5.7=39.93%. 39.93% of all primary votes when to GOP candidates both major and minor.

From what I've heard, GOP figures in California were divided on whether to support Tim Donnelly or Neal Kashkari with many GOP figures giving attention and assistance to Kashkari over Donnelly. Kashkari's 2nd place virtually guaranteed Jerry Brown's re-election. Had the GOP been more principled and united behind Tim Donnelly back in 2014, Donnelly could have unseated Governor Jerry Brown just by turning out many angry and disaffected Republicans, Indpendents, and even Democrats to vote Donnelly.

I don't see the CAGOP trying to stop Travis Allen from making the Top Two given that there are too many in the CAGOP leadership(including Chairman Jim Brutle) who want to see a stronger and more prosperous party.

I remember back this summer reading about former one term Assemblyman David Headley running for Governor but dropped out after just 2-3 weeks. The controlled opposition sect of Los Angeles County's GOP supported and funded part of Headley's campaign in an effort to split the GOP vote and make the nightmare of Two Democrats making top-two more possible.

I don't live in California but I remember flip-flopping between John Cox and Travis Allen and have until recently favored Cox, believing that he had a better chance of winning but now that I've taken the time to learn more and more about Travis Allen and his accomplishments and record, I can see a favorable pattern leading to Travis Allen being the GOP front-runner.

Also, I believe John Cox can be successfully persuaded to drop out of the Governor's race and instead run for either Comptroller, Treasurer, or U.S. Senate just as former Congressman Tom Campbell dropped out of the 2010 Governor's race, opting instead to run for U.S. Senate. Plus, Campbell dropped out in January 2010, and it's still 4-5 weeks until the end of January 2018 from the date of this blog post.

Use of "Slate Mailing" and Social Media such as Landslide Communications

http://www.landslidecommunications.com/

You may be asking, What is Slate Mailing and What is Landslide Communications? Slate Mailing is a form of campaigning where likely voters are given convincing guides to inform voters of certain ballot measures and candidates.

Landslide Communications has had a proven success of swaying the outcomes of elections as well as using cost efficient slate mailing campaign methods. Not only does Landslide Communications targets voters likely to vote for anti-tax, conservative measures and candidates, but also has the most reliable and most cost effective slate mail campaigning tools in California.

Pop culture and the Mainstream Media would have you believe California is as liberal as can be but in fact, Landslide Communications has found that 65% of likely voters in California identify as either Conservative or Moderate. That means that just barely one-third of likely voters in California are stereotypical leftists.

In fact, Jerry Brown back in 2010 ran as a Fiscal Moderate and even promised not to raise taxes without a public vote. Brown broke that promise in April of 2017, passing the dreaded Gas Tax hike with California's legislature passing it across party lines with a couple GOP votes. In fact, not only do 58% of Californians oppose the 2017 Gas Tax Hike but also feel taxation in California is too oppressive.

If the Democrats in California haven't broke the last straw with California's less fortunate, the 2017 Gas Tax will surely put the heat on politics of California and help insurgent Republican Travis Allen in 2018.

Discredit Democrats and exploit Democrat weaknesses
This strategy's very important as California's Democrat machine is starting to crumble. As revelations of sexual misconduct hits Democrat legislators and party leaders combined with cover ups by even female Democrat figures to retain political power, Democrats will no longer be able to use the "War on Women" card given they will look like hypocrites(embarrassing). These sexual misconduct scandals coming from the Democratic Party as well as cover ups from other Democrats will make the Democrats look not only elitist but also hypocritical.

Democrats in California have had their 2/3 Super-majority in both chambers hanging by a thread and are projected to lose their 2/3rds majority in 2018 and may have already done so with the resignation of two assemblymen. Plus, the potential recall of State Senator Josh Newman could definitely eliminate the 2/3rds majority in the State Senate and given the way both parties in that chamber vote, that could complicate Democrat efforts to raise taxes.

Also, the rising cost of living, recent gas tax hike, and $10,000 cap on SALT(State and Local Taxes) deductions could further balkanize and neutralize the usual Democrat voting base in California, giving anti-tax conservatives an opportunity to take back the Governor's office and Make California Affordable Again. Also, the sexual misconduct revelations with CaDems could cause many Democrat voting women to not vote based out of distrust and heartbreak from a party they once trusted.

Antonio Villaraigosa represents the biggest obstacle to Travis Allen making it to the Top Two but given Allen's record of fighting for a ballot initiative to repeal the gas tax, this challenges Villaraigosa's stance on economic issues. Villaraigosa's stronghold is Los Angeles County, what I will call the "Bleeding Kansas" of the 2018 CA Governor race round one.

Los Angeles has the worst traffic problem in the U.S.A. and many people in Southern California are growing frustrated about it. Travis Allen has proposed opening up and expanding California's highways to provide more room for traffic and reduce congestion, something Villaraigosa should be addressing given Los Angeles is his home city.

In my opinion, I don't believe most taxpaying wealthy liberals in California are so insane they would simply vote Democrat no matter what but vote Democrat because they are selfish, nihilistic, and spoiled. Capping the SALT at $10,000 will hit them where it hurts the most and change their voting behavior.

Jerry Brown ran as a fiscal moderate in 2010 and 2014 and even "Moonbeam" himself knows what he can't get away with. For example, Governor Jerry Brown has repeatedly threatened to veto any attempts to establish a Single-Payer Healthcare system in California due to the $400 billion required to fund it. Brown obviously understands when he can and cannot fund programs.

The capping of SALT deductions at $10,000, gas tax hike, and high cost of living could spell meltdown for California Democrats as they will be divided over taxation as California will no longer be virtually subsidized for it's bad government and high taxes. If there's anything that changes the behavior of selfish, nihilistic, and spoiled liberals it's no longer rewarding them for their bad behavior and capping SALT at $10,000 will put pressure on wealthy Democrat voters to re-examine their voting patterns and demand taxation & spending be brought to reasonable and affordable levels.

Cite more liberal states that have elected Moderate and Conservative GOP Governors and Senators
When naysayers will tell you that a Republican has no chance of winning a statewide office in California again, tell them about more liberal and more Democratic states that have elected GOP governors like Larry Hogan(Maryland, 2014), Charlie Baker(Massachusetts, 2014), and Phil Scott(Vermont, 2016).

In Maryland, Democrats not only have a 30 point advantage over Republicans but are also comprise the majority of registered voters. Yet Larry Hogan won the 2014 Maryland Gubernatorial Race by almost 4 points simply by addressing high taxation, high cost of living, and out of control regulations. In fact, Larry Hogan's governorship has been so successful in a state with 55% Democrat registration that he has an approval rate of 65-70% and is likely to win re-election.

Massachusetts is much more liberal statewide than California yet elected a fiscally conservative GOP governor in 2014. Republicans only comprise 10% of Massachusetts registered voters and Democrats have a 25 point advantage over Republicans. Charlie Baker won by just 2 points in 2014 yet he has the highest approval rating of any Governor in America, no less than 70% approval. Baker's even openly opposed any attempts to make Massachusetts a "Sanctuary State" despite Massachusetts being the second most liberal state in America.

Vermont is as liberal as it gets for any U.S. state yet Phil Scott won the 2016 Gubernatorial election by 8-9 points. Phil Scott is socially liberal yet he's a fiscal conservative fighting out of control spending and higher taxes, giving him praise even from some liberals.

As for U.S. Senate races, the most notable and prime example of how a Republican has gone from being a long shot 4 months before election to being ahead and predicted to win within just 2 weeks of election is the 2010 U.S. Senate special election for Massachusetts where Scott Brown won by almost 5 points. Scott Brown ran as a fiscal conservative vowing to vote against Obamacare(a bill in it's form which caused concern among Massachusetts voters), hold Washington accountable, and make "Kennedy's Seat" the People's Seat(a populist line from Andrew Jackson). Scott Brown didn't even get help from national Republicans at all(believing it was Solid Democrat) and had to rely on Conservative bloggers, Conservative activists, and online moneybombs.

Elections can have turning points that defy previous predictions such as Scott Brown's December 30, 2009 "JFK" ad that gave Scott Brown statewide and national attention. This ad stated lower taxes give more incentives to create jobs and for consumers to spend more. Travis Allen has already gained some statewide attention for filing the ballot initiative to repeal the 2017 gas tax hike and can do a whole lot better by arguing tax cuts=more incentives for companies and businesses to create more jobs, consumers to spend more, and revenues to increase due to higher economic growth.

When Scott Brown said during one debate about the 2009-10 Healthcare bill being bad for Massachusetts and arguing for better alternatives as well as arguing he'll be an independent voice for Massachusetts, Brown immediately boosted his chances of winning about his Democrat opponent Martha Coakley.

Understand Americanized Latinos economic concerns
The Mainstream Media will have you believe that Latinos are most concerned about granting amnesty to illegal aliens and that opposition to illegal immigration is Hispaniphobic. Hog wash! One of the strongest points of Hispanic/Latino identity is the family unit. The amount of dedication, love, and importance Latinos have for their families outmatches any other ethnic or racial group in America.

Latinos no matter what state they live in care deeply about their families and want their families to be successful, have food to eat, have a decent and safe place to live, send their children to decent and safe schools, and for their children to be raised with a decent quality of live and good morals.

It's easier for Republicans to win over Hispanic voters than Blacks. I do realize Hispanics comprise roughly 25-30% of California's electorate while Non-Hispanic Whites are just 50-60% of California's electorate. However, New Mexico has the highest percentage of Hispanics at 48% and has had a Republican governor ever since 2011.

Some nay sayers will point to the low percentage of Trump's vote in 2016, including Hispanics. Keep in mind, John McCain received 1.1 Million votes in Massachusetts with 36% of the vote while Scott Brown received almost 1.17 million votes with 51.9% of the vote in the 2010 special election for Massachusetts U.S. Senate seat.

Fact of the matter is Hispanics have high rates of Small Business ownership and prefer small businesses due to the ability of them to be operated primarily by family. Also, most Latinos oppose the 2017 gas tax hike given they are affected by higher gas prices as they use gas automobiles much more than the Bay Area liberals.

Travis Allen needs to present himself as a better alternative than Antonio Villaraigosa to the Latino community by talking about economic issues such as the gas tax increase, small business development, regulations, and the high cost of living.

Debunking Trump concerns
The Mainstream Media wants Americans to believe California is the epitome of Resistance to Donald Trump's presidency but keep in mind California's 2018 Gubernatorial election won't be about Trump but about the economic issues affecting everyday Californians. Just because Travis Allen voted for and supports Donald Trump doesn't mean he approves of everything Trump's presidency does.

Travis Allen is concerned about making California more affordable, business friendly, and once against the greatest state of live in once again. Don't forget the economic opportunities California can bring not just to Californian's but also to the rest of America by unleashing energy extraction in oil and gas which California has more of than Saudi Arabia.

As the State and Local Tax deductions are capped at $10,000; what is Jerry Brown's gang of Democrats to do about funding their bloated pensions, welfare of illegal aliens, and useless pet projects? Jerry Brown knows the gravy train is running dry as SALT is capped at $10,000 and might have to make sacrifices to stem the tide of anti-tax outrage.

Wealthy liberal Californians have merely tolerated high taxation cause they could deduct unlimited amounts of State & Local taxes and felt no pressure to vote tax & spend Democrats out of office. Now these wealthy liberals in California will have to make sacrifices to reduce their tax burden either by leaving California, voting these tax hiking Democrats out of office, or by simply not voting for Democrats plain & simple.

It wouldn't surprise me that if Travis Allen makes such a surge as to pose a threat to Democrat rule in California, Jerry Brown would call upon the State Legislature to reduce some of the excess taxes and for Jerry Brown himself to exercise some fiscal responsibility by cutting some unneeded regulations and reducing unneeded spending. If Jerry Brown can threaten to veto Single-Payer Healthcare, Brown could possibly be open to making some fiscal sacrifices given he'll no longer be able to get away with overtaxing Californians.

Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown isn't too stupid, just nihilistic and immoral, doing what he can get away with. The SALT deduction limit set at $10,000 could pressure Gov. Brown to exercise some restraint.

Travis Allen has fought for lower taxes, safer communities, better roads, better schools, and a higher quality of life, fighting to make California more affordable. With California's economic and taxation problems getting worse, Travis Allen has a great opportunity to win the CA Governor's race just by campaigning on his main issues of cutting taxes, getting tough on crime, fixing roads and reducing traffic congestion, improving public education, and finishing the state water storage project. While California Democrats provide excuses, Travis Allen provides solutions and is un-afriad to blame the Democrats in California for causing California's problems in the first place.

Come Spring of 2018, the same pundits and political scientists who predicted no Republican would make the top two in California's Gubernatorial race will change their predictions and talk about Travis Allen's possible place in the top two. 2018 will be a change election in California and the change candidate has a massive advantage to win.

California has everything to gain from electing Travis Allen as Governor while voting for Democrats means voting for the status quo of higher taxes, less affordability, higher crime, crappy infrastructure, cover-ups of sexual misconduct for the sake of maintaining absolute power, etc.

Merry Trumpmas: Economic Achievements of 2017

America actually got all of the listed things, including tax relief!

Tax Relief Victory 2017! GOP pulls this off! Democrats Resist and Obstruct; Merry Christmas Cheer!

The biggest tax relief in decades has finally become law, passing Congress on party lines. Earlier this year I believed that not only will Moderate Democrats in competitive and Republican leaning districts vote for Tax Relief bill but that the Tax Relief bill could also get the votes of Moderate to "Conservative" Democrats running for re-election 2018 in states such as West Virginia, North Dakota, and Indiana for examples.

Economic growth and more disposable income are coming to the American people as this historic tax overhaul will create such a lasting positive effect in swaying Americans who haven't viewed GOP favorably. As FDR's New Deal of the 1930's was able to convince more Americans to support the Democratic Party, Trump's Republican Party of the late 2010's and going into the 2020's will win over new voters who previously disapproved of Trump the Candidate.

Trump's victory last year shattered the political alignment established between 1989-2010's that favored the GOPe and Left-wing Democrats. Three major Midwestern states that hadn't been won by a GOP candidate for President since the 1980's included Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Trump could have also flipped Minnesota, Virginia, Nevada, Colorado, and New Hampshire as well with Minnesota having had the longest continuous stretch of not having voted for a GOP candidate for President(Richard Nixon last won Minnesota in 1972).

Trump was going to wait until January to sign the Tax Cuts bill but felt it better to sign it just before Christmas to finally close this chapter of his MAGA agenda. Plus, the Mainstream Media was trying to gaslight America into thinking Trump was not going to keep his promises. Well, Trump proved these liars in MSM wrong!

The presidential election after the Reagan Tax Cuts, Reagan won in a massive landslide. Reagan's presidency was so great that Vice President George H.W. Bush was able to add 4 more years of GOP control of the White House. Reagan after finishing two terms was succeeded by another Republican.