Nationalism, Conservatism, and Populism win big in Italy

The results are in and the Centre-right coalition and the Five Star Movement outperformed my expectations as the governing centre-left coalition suffered a humiliating defeat as a result of their pro-migrant, anti-white policies! I remind you that 62% of Italian Parliament is elected through proportional method while 37-38% are elected by single-district first-past-the-post. Both chambers of Italy's parliament were up for election.

Matteo Salvini's Lega Nord won a plurality within the centre-right coalition and as a result ousted Forza Italia's Silvio Berlusconi as the leader of the coalition. This surprised me as Lega Nord won a plurality within the centre-right coalition, gaining 17.3% of the vote.

Meanwhile, the Five Star Movement outperformed my expectations, winning 32.6% of the vote. Luigi Di Maio is the political head of the Five Star Movement, hopefully should the Centre-Right coalition & Five Star Movement enter an agreement to form a government, this would be a powerful force against the EU's plan to Genocide Whites in Europe. The floods of Africans/Muslims into Italy has ignited anger against the governing anti-White centre-left coalition.

Five Star in my view could also be known as the "Lone Star" movement given their platform and ideologies differing from the competing coalitions. However, the Centre-Right & Five Star Movement both agree Italy has the duty to preserve her natural racial & cultural heritage from kaffirization, both from the Middle East & from Africa.

From what I know as of March 8, 2018; the Centre-Right coalition with the following parties got the # of seats for both chambers of Italy's parliament:

• Lega Nord: 126 deputies/57 senators
• Forza Italia: 101 deputies/57 senators
• Brothers of Italy: 33 deputies/17 senators
• Us with Italy: 0 deputies/4 senators

The Centre-right coalition has a total of 265 deputies(42%) & 137 senators(42.6%).

The Five Star Movement has a total of 227 deputies(36%) & 112 senators(34.9%).

Combine the centre-right & Five Star Movement and they have a combined total of 492 deputies & 249 senators, comprising 78% of the Chamber of Deputies & 77.5% of the Senate.

The centre-left coalition suffered possibly the worst loss for a governing coalition since the mid 1990's. The Democratic Party of Italy(pictured left) became the only major party in the centre-left coalition to win seats. There's another left-wing party that elected 14 deputies and 4 senators known as Free & Equal, being a more severe version of the centre-left coalition.

The centre-left was left with 122 deputies(19.3%) and 60 senators(18.7%), having previously held a majority in the Chamber of Deputies. Even if you combine both the centre-left & Free & Equal, they would only have 136 deputies(21.5%), and 64 senators(19.9%).

What can I say? The Africanization and de-Whitening of European cities has cause angst and fear among Caucasian Christian Italians, especially with the recent migrant crisis. This is not to say every non-White in Italy is to be targeted for exclusion and eventual expulsion as having a very small amount of these peoples will not harm Italy's national identity, should these individuals not hold anti-White, pro-invasionist sentiments.

As small Italian villages have been flooded with African/Muslim migrants, causing Caucasian Christians to flee these villages either for major cities or for other countries. Whenever a foreign/alien race floods a town, city, or country in such massive numbers and the demographics shift so severely, the identity of such city, town, or country is affected and reflects the dominant racial group. When South Africa's White minority government surrendered their sovereignty to the Bantu majority in 1994, non-bantus(Whites, Coloureds, Asiatics, Khoi-Sans) were considered less important and even alien to the ruling ANC Bantu-majority elite.

Lombardy & Sicily regions have been hurt the most by the migrant crisis, with a majority of Sicilian youth unemployed. Very much how the rise of Communism and economic depression have fueled the rise of ultra-nationalism in Germany under Adolf Hitler, the migrant crisis plus economic depression have caused the rise of national populism in Italy and the severe downfall of the centre-left and left wing in Italy.

Calling the Italians racist and bigoted will not work on them as the Italian nation through the recent election have fiercely rejected the subjugation of the White Caucasian race within their country. The kaffir invaders will NEVER subjugate nore demand equal footing with the Italian nation. In fact, Salvini has pledged to expel hunderds of thousands of kaffir savages from Italy back to their bantustans in Africa!

Another election taking place on March 4, 2018 was the Lombard regional election where the centre-right coalition led by Attilio Fontana won 49 of 80 seats in Lombardy's regional parliament compared to centre-left's 29 seats(lost 4 seats to Five Star Movement).

Fontana campaigned on expelling the African migrants in order to "Save the White Race". Now that's the kind of boldness needed to wake White people up around the world. The White race is under attack around the world and White people need to organize to repel and exterminate this threat against them.

It's wonderful to know there are powerful people openly defending the White race! South Africa is about to have a bloody race war where Whites will be pushed off their farms as they have been clandestinely for years. It's great to see Italy has joined several other European countries that favor Whiteness over other races. Just as African countries like Liberia favor Negros and Israel favoring Jews, European countries should open their hearts to persecuted White Africans being dispossessed and deprived of an identity by forced integration.

The other two major parties in the centre-right coalition include Forza Italia led by Silvio Berlusconi(pictured left), and Brothers of Italy led by Giorgia Meloni(pictured right). Forza Italia is a more traditionalist Conservative party having been led by former Prime Minister and political veteran Silvio Berlusconi(now over 81), having been overshadowed by Matteo Salvini's League. Forza Italia does have a strong populist streak, making talks to form a government with the Five Star Movement very possible. Since the Five Star Movement is focused most on opposing government corruption and populism, Berlusconi could be seen as an elitist from several years ago, having been leader of centre-right coalition during the 2013 Italian election that put the centre-left into power.

Brothers of Italy in contrast is closer to Salvini's League by having a more Nationalist-Conservative structure. Brothers of Italy was founded in 2012, 3 years after Five Star Movement was founded. Giorgina Meloni is much closer in political ideology to Matteo Salvini.

Though Forza Italia net gained 3 deputies, they suffered a net loss of 41 senators, so it's clear from this that Forza Italia is the closest non-left party to the elitism that was defeated in the recent election.

Brothers of Italy however net gained 24 deputies and 17 senators. It's very clear from the net gains achieved by the Five Star Movement, League, and Brothers of Italy that Italy has rejected the elitism and pro-migration policies of the centre-left Democratic Party and to a certain degree centre-right Forza Italia. Forza Italia avoided greater losses by opposing mass immigration of 3rd world Africans and Muslims.

Issues uniting centre-right & Five Star Movement include opposition to centralization of economic and political power in the European Union, seceding from the Eurozone, and making Italy sovereign again.

Can Travis Allen be California's Next Governor? Examples of much tougher races say so.

I sometimes read about or hear about when surfing the internet about the chances of a Republican Governor of California. Some will tell you California is a lost cause and that Conservatives and even Moderates should simply leave the state altogether. If you were to listen only to these sentiments, you wouldn't bother trying to Take California Back from the Semi-Communist Democrats. However, Republicans since the late 1990's have failed to have a true principled Republican who acts like a true opposition leader to the San Francisco Democrat machine. The 2003 recall that brought Arnold Schwarzenegger to become GOP Governor of California was a short lived and long-term failed attempt to make the GOP in California more competitive in fighting the corruption of California Democrats.

In both 2010 & 2014, Governor Jerry Brown was elected twice mostly because his two GOP challengers Meg Whitman(2010) & Neal Kashkari(2014) were RINOs who supported Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama for president respectively. What kind of self respecting Republican or Independent would vote for someone who acts half-Democrat? Why would Democrats and left-leaning Independents vote for Democrat-Lite when they can get the full meat? Also, the California GOP has failed to have proper direction nor a battle plan to become more competitive in California elections.

Fortunately, there is a GOP crusader running for Governor of California who is not only a principled Republican but also fully supported Donald Trump for President in 2016. Travis Allen is campaigning to Make California Great Again by cutting taxes, getting tough on crime, fixing roads & reducing traffic, massively improve education, & complete state water storage project. Travis Allen tells voters in a straight forward way of what must be done to make California great once again.

Travis Allen is the leading Republican in most polls and has gotten lots of statewide news attention and an army of volunteers.

I'll give you a brief political history of Travis Allen here. Back in 2012 when he was first elected to the CA state assembly, he was not expected to win against a very well known and power establishment GOP candidate(top two) and was massively outspent. However, Allen performed a massive upset against the hand-picked GOP establishment candidate winning 55.7% of the vote. Allen also led a volunteer effort to get GOP candidate Andy Vidak elected in a vacated State Senate district that was 20-22% Democrat advantage over GOP in 2013 but won with 51.9% of the vote(by 3.8%). Plus the district Vidak ran in had a greater Democrat advantage than statewide in 2018. Allen's volunteer army were responsible for electing GOP councilman Kevin Falconer as Mayor of San Diego in 2013 after Bob Filner(D) was ejected from office for sexual harassment. Plus, his volunteer army participated in 12 assembly and senate races, winning 11 of them and breaking the 2/3rd Democrat supermajorities in both legislative chambers. In 2016, Travis Allen won re-election with 58% of the vote(16% margin) when Hillary Clinton won Travis Allen's district(72nd assembly) with 51.4% compared to Trump's 43.1%.

The 2016 72nd assembly district results alone should show that supporting President Donald Trump does not damage your ability at re-election. http://news.gallup.com/poll/181475/massachusetts-maryland-democratic-states.aspx

The other major GOP contender businessman John Cox voted for Gary Johnson in the last election. BTW, Gary Johnson is a hardcore social liberal favoring legalized drugs, legalized prostitution, and open borders! Cox has tried acting like one of MAGA but has failed miserably to get the affection of delegates and spectators watching him at debates. Plus, Cox has lied about Travis Allen being Pro-Choice as well as lied about his Neighborhood Legislature being on the ballot. Cox has also lied about winning debates, while Travis Allen get's overwhelming support from Republicans!

Also, John Cox in a political sense is a big loser. Cox has been a typical milquetoast centre Progressive Republican wen he lived in Chicago, Illinois. Cox has only lived in California for less than 7 years while Travis Allen is California born, having family and friends leave to states like Oregon, Arizona, and Texas.

Cox has bold ambitions to become a career politician, having lost EVERY race he ran in, and lost miserably. John Cox not only has a legacy of failure in the political arena but resembles a typical GOPe RINO, relying on the broken and unreliable consultant class. Travis Allen received the endorsement of the California Republican Assembly. Conservatives and even Moderates see John Cox as Democrat Lite, which fails most miserably in Solid Democrat states.

Now it's time to mention examples of races won by Republicans when not expected to win:

State Senator Andy Vidak(pictured left) & Mayor Kevin Faulconer(pictured right) won races they were never expected to win for both State Senate & Mayor of San Diego respectively.

Andy Vidak was running for State Senate in a district with 20-22% more Democrats than Republicans in a 2013 special election. In fact, he managed to win 49.8% of the open primary vote as the only Republican in that race, then won with 51.9% of the vote, by a 3.8% margin. Vidak won a full term in 2014 with 54.1% of the vote, by an 8.2% margin. BTW, Vidak's State Senate district is more than 70% Latino population. In 2014, Governor Jerry Brown won Vidak's district with 55.5% of the votes, double-digit margin.

Kevin Faulconer ran for Mayor of San Diego after Democrat Mayor Bob Filner resigned due to backlash over sexual harassment. Faulconer would poll at 22% September 2013 but rose to 40% by November 2013, winning 1st place in top two as the only major Republican in the race. He faced off against Democrat David Alvarez and won with 52.9%, a 5.8% margin. Faulconer won re-election in 2016 with 57.2% of the vote.

Massachusetts and Maryland had the greatest Dem-Rep margins in 2014 yet elected Republican governors.  http://news.gallup.com/poll/181475/massachusetts-maryland-democratic-states.aspx

In fact, these states are more liberal than California. Without furtherado, I will present you with Governors Charlie Baker(Massachusetts), and Larry Hogan(Maryland).


Charlie Baker(pictured left), and Larry Hogan(pictured right) were elected Governor in 2014 in Massachusetts & Maryland respectively. Charlie Baker had an easier time getting elected Governor than Larry Hogan did.

I want to mention Maryland's 2014 Gubernatorial election in a state that had 20% more Democrats than Republicans. Larry Hogan trailed between 12-18 points behind Democrat Anthony G. Brown(who was Lt. Governor) until just 3 weeks before the election with the final poll released(internal poll) showing Hogan leading Brown 44-39, the only poll to show Logan leading Brown.

The results came in on November 4, 2014 showing Larry Hogan winning with 51% of the vote compared to Anthony Brown's 47.2%, a 3.8% margin of victory for Hogan, a larger margin than Charlie Baker winning 48.4% of the vote compared to Martha Coakley's 46.5%, a 1.9% margin of victory for Baker.

A bonus to give an example of how a Safe Democrat U.S. Senate seat was flipped Republican:


Scott Brown would go on to win not just a Safe Democrat U.S. Senate seat but the same seat held by Ted Kennedy(who died August 25, 2009).

On approx. December 30, 2009, Scott Brown aired a remarkable ad starting out with JFK announcing and explaining tax cuts to America with the picture fading to Scott Brown while still in classic 1960's black & white, reminding Massachusetts of the economic benefits tax cuts bring.

Coincidentally, Scott Brown went from trailing an average of between 25-30% behind Martha Coakley(D) in November of 2009 to making the race a "tossup" and even polling ahead by an average of 4-9% ahead of Coakley by Mid-January 2010(just days before the special election). Massachusetts' U.S. Senate special election 2010 became nationwide news due to the fact a Republican was never intended to win that seat. Scott Brown polled as much as 30% behind Coakley just weeks before but managed to have a higher chance of winning just several days before the January 19, 2010 election.

January 19, 2010 came and Scott Brown was announced the winner of the special election to replace the late Ted Kennedy. Scott Brown didn't receive any assistance from the RNC yet managed to win with 1,168,107 votes, winning 51.9% of the vote, winning by a 4.8% margin. Scott Brown won more popular votes in that special election than John McCain received in Massachusetts during the 2008 U.S. Presidential election(McCain received 1,108,854 votes, just 36% of the vote).

Scott Brown received roughly 5% MORE of the votes than John McCain while Martha Coakley(received 1,058,682 votes compared to Obama's 1,904,098 votes for Massachusetts in 2008) received just 55% of the votes Obama won in 2008 Massachusetts.

Jerry Brown received roughly 4.3 million votes in his 2014 re-election bid, Donald Trump's nearly 4.5 million exceed's Jerry Brown's 2014 count.

In fact, Travis Allen in my view could win as much as roughly 5.2 million votes while Newsom could receive as little as 3.8 million.

California patriots must however not assume this race to be an easy battle as they must turnout enough Republicans, Independents, and even some moderate Democrats to vote for someone independent of the tyrannical mono-party regime of the Democratic Party. In my opinion, the Republican Party of California needs to be transformed into the Independent-Republican Alliance to attract Independents into a coalition with Republicans against the Democrat Juggernaut.

California's Republican Party has failed to act as a true opposition party and challenge the Democrat regime for more than 20 years. California has failed to be a competitive state since the mid to late 1990's because leading Republicans have cowered and failed to fight a real fight. CaGOP has been shirking it's responsibility and duty to Make California a better state to live in once again!

Fortunately, Republicans and Independents have had enough of milquetoast, low-energy RINOs letting the Democrats get away with ransacking California dry. As California's primary season gets hot this Spring, Republican and Independent voters will follow and cast their votes for Travis Allen, seeing him as a true outsider California has waited for over 20 years to have.

Under the leadership of Travis Allen, the California GOP will be radically reformed along with California, becoming a true populist big-tent party opposing the radical leftist and communistic agenda of the vile Democrats.

Mental Illness, Psychotic Drugs, lax Background Checks, & Omissions: A School Shooting Tragedy in Florida

Usually what happens after major school shootings is Democrats will call for gun control and the NRA is mentioned as a big bad wolf obstructing "common sense" gun control. Before I ask some questions as to why this school shooting was able to happen, I want to describe the deranged manic who would kill as many as 17 at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School(pictured above).

Nikolas Jacob Cruz(pictured both left & right) had been expelled from two private schools for violent and anti-social behavior. In fact, Cruz had an uncanny fixation with guns & other weapons, loving to kill animals and wished to be a "professional school shooter"

on Nikolas Cruz's social media pages and youtube channel he said to have fantasized about being a mass shooter with the FBI knowing such threats were being made but failed to even prevent Cruz from purchasing the AR-15 he used to kill 17 and injure 15.

In fact, someone even warned about Cruz's violent tendencies and threats to commit mass murder. The FBI knew about these threats and the fact police were called to Cruz's residence 36-39 times. Seriously, why has the FBI been so incompetent to stop would be mass shooters who post disturbing content on the internet indicating they will harm others? Can anyone tell me that?

In fact, Gov. Rick Scott(pictured right) has called on FBI director Christopher Wray(pictured right) to resign for not doing his job as FBI director to stop crazies like Nikolas Cruz who left numerous red flags spanning over a period of several months. Why couldn't "director" Wray direct the FBI to arrest crazy would be shooters who leave red flags before they go on a rampage? The FBI was warned about these threats yet failed to act and failed to ensure the background checks were efficient enough to prevent deranged prohibited persons from purchasing firearms.

Even before Wray, the FBI has failed to react to warnings about dangerous future mass murderers.

There were once shooting ranges in the basements of U.S. Schools before the 1990's. Why have shooting ranges in school basements disappear? There were never any major shootings in frequency before psychotic drugs were over prescribed and mental asylums were closed. Also, proper law enforcement has failed the victims of mass shootings in the past 25-30 years.

Some leftist Democrats are already calling for a complete elimination or several curtailment of the Second Amendment's right to keep and bear arms, believing guns themselves are the problem. No, the problem surrounding mass shootings from Fort Hood(2009), Orlando nightclub(2016) for examples including killers able to purchase firearms despite red flags indicating they are dangerous individuals. Plus, the clips used on the guns used to kill multiple victims were more than 20-40 round clips that are not needed to hunt deer or for self-defense in most circumstances.

Also, Trump has called for some teachers and some staff(military trained) to be armed in schools. Not to crazy about his alleged proposal favoring raising the semi-automatic rifle age from 18 to 21(didn't even know 18-20 year olds could purchase them), since a better idea would be to limit gun magazines to 10 rounds per clip or only allow under 21s to purchase guns with fixed rounds to prevent 12+ clips from being installed.

I did however like Trump bring up the issue of mental asylums being closed down given certain mentally ill people have been pouring into the streets when mental asylums prevented them from harming themselves and/or others. Seriously, have America's streets become outwards for mentally ill individuals?

So much has been asked here and what is needed is to address psychotic drugs being over prescribed and the interlocking corporate directorships of major news networks(which should be illegal).

The Wall America needs on the U.S.-Mexico border

The cartoon above illustrates how Democrats would build their wall if illegal aliens voted Republican. However, illegal aliens vote Democrat and that's why the Democrats not only want to encourage safe environments for illegal immigration but also encourage unlimited 3rd world immigration to increase their electoral chances.

The cartoon above not only includes a wall but also turrets, deadly electric fence, and a mine field! That would insure that not only would future border crossings(illegal that is) would lower dramatically to virtual zero, but also viciously deter any future illegal immigration, including those who have been previously deported.

Why would Democrats oppose ANY immigration policies that restricts any amount of 3rd world immigration, whether it be legal or illegal? In fact, Democrats even rejected a generous immigration deal proposed by President Donald Trump of allowing 1.8 million so called "Dreamers" a chance to be legalized and have a 10-12 year path to citizenship provided they meet certain work & education requirements as well as have goo moral character & no criminal record in exchange for adequate border wall funding, ending chain migration, mandatory e-verify, and abolition of diversity visa lottery.

Link below is an article by "The State of the Union" blog made by Arthur Schaper about why Democrats don't even care about the DREAMers themselves:
http://aschaper1.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-democratic-party-doesnt-care-about.html
The Democratic Party has gone so far-left that moderate voting blocks have began refraining from voting for Democrats simply because Democrats have lost touch with issues that truly matter, giving Republicans a massive opportunity to court these moderate and conservative Democrat voters.

What do the Democrats rely on the most to ensure they are able to have majority control over both chambers of U.S. Congress and a majority of the state legislatures once again? The Democrats need to have as many 3rd world immigrants come to America as possible and inflate the voter rolls to replace the normative White majority of America. The Democrats never wanted to do anything for the illegal aliens but use them for political gain and graft.

Even the illegal aliens themselves have figured out the Democrats have lied about promising them a clean DREAM act. In fact, virtually any type of amnesty is unlikely to pass the U.S. House of Representatives regardless of how much of a vote it gets in the U.S. Senate. Also, even if any kind of amnesty were to be passed by the U.S. House, President Trump could simply veto the measure if it fails to have even one of Trump's main immigration goals, though the veto could be overridden in the U.S. Senate but not the U.S. House.

Plus, there are 12-13 U.S. House seats held by Democrats in which Trump won as well as the 10 U.S. Senate seats up for 2018 re-election in states Trump won plus the bonuses of Minnesota, Maine, and Virginia. Trump's approval ratings just keep rising and Democrats still don't have a platform to run on in 2018.

Democrats have demonstrated their will to put illegal aliens before the American citizenry. Plus, Democrats support of illegal immigration shows they have no respect for the value of legally immigrating to America. Legal immigrants should be upset about this as Democrats put cheaters and sneaks before the hardworking of America.

DREAMers are feeling hopelessness and defeat as they are threatening to leave the United States if Congress does not pass any form of legalization for the children of illegal aliens. plus, Democrats have never cared about illegal aliens making a better life for themselves and their families but about inflating as many 3rd world migrants into the voting rolls who will vote for leftist Democrats without hesitation. This is why California has shifted more left and more Democrat in the past 20-30 years(and no California is still not a lost cause in 2018) but fortunately the Democrats are far from having enough 3rd worlders to sway elections in Democrat's favor, especially in states with vulnerable Democrat incumbents.

The more the Democrats continue resisting Trump's generous "offer", the more Democrats are being exposed as unreasonable fringes. If Trump's MAGA vision grows stronger and the demographic situation of America improves(by increasing the White birthrate, shutting down non-1st world and non-Western immigration, deporting illegal aliens, encouraging unassimilatable migrants and descendants to leave America, favoring White European immigration), Republicans will become a dominant party in federal politics, with Democrats becoming the Federalist Party of the 21st century.

As a bonus, I would like to list the GOP senators who in 2013 voted for the Amnesty bill who are still serving in the U.S. Senate as of February 2018:

• Lisa Murkowski(Alaska)
• Jeff Flake(Arizona)*
• John McCain(Arizona)
• Marco Rubio(Florida)
• Susan Collins(Maine)
• Dean Heller(Nevada)*
•  John Hoeven(North Dakota)
• Lindsey Graham(South Carolina)
• Bob Corker(Tennessee)*
• Lamar Alexander(Tennessee)
• Orrin Hatch(Utah)*

*=Seats up for re-election 2018. Also, Jeff Flake, Bob Corker, and Orrin Hatch have announced retirement while Dean Heller has been seeking re-election as of February 2018.

Should all 4 of the GOP held seats up for 2018 election be replaced by MAGA Republicans, there will still be 7 GOP senators that voted for Amnesty 2013.

America must decide who can or can't come here and what it means to be an American after nearly 53 years of pro-3rd world immigration. America can't be simply about ideas but about culture, language, traditions, historical norms, and even race.

Trump Shows Preference for European Immigration? Looks Down Upon 3rd World countries

There's a stir of fake news controversy over Donald Trump referring to countries such as Haiti and El Salvador as "Sh*tholes. Trump has also expressed desire for more immigration to come from countries such as Norway. This is very encouraging as massive immigration both legal and illegal has made America more divided and less prosperous.

Trump's administration has immediately began ordering the expulsion of over 200,000 El Salvador nationals who have been on TPS(Temporary Protective Status) since 2001 and have overstayed their welcome.

Why did Trump call Haiti and El Salvador terrible countries? Trump has been frustrated with lack of Congressional efforts to enact meaningful America First immigration reform.

Given the revelations of Trump's opinion being made into a media circus for days, now the left will be forced to defend their preference for Black African immigration over White European immigration. While the left has praised Scandinavian countries for their social welfare state and socialist principles, the left is being forced to take a position on whether it's better to live in Norway or Haiti. The picture above shows the average Norwegian(left) vs. Haitian(right).

I want to be completely honest here as it is essential to shifting the Overton Window further to the Right in saying the reason why Norway is one of those countries with the best quality of life and high standard of living is in part because it has been racially White Nordic European since the beginning of Western Civilization. The reason why virtually every Black African majority and Black African run country has the worst standards of living and worst qualities of life are in part because the average IQ of Black Sub-Saharan Africans is 70-80.

Sure there are plenty of Black Africans who are close to having the same intelligence as White European and East Asians but the massive immigration of non-Whites into White majority countries has caused division and strife. Plus, different peoples will be more or less likely to assimilate than others. America is not a mere "idea" as those who founded America were not merely of the White European stock but specifically the Anglo-Saxon stock.

The Immigration Act of 1790 restricted all immigration and naturalization to "White me of good character". What that means is this system was designed specifically to favor those closer to Anglo-Saxon heritage without explicitly banning non-Nordic immigration. A majority of immigration under this system was to insure the Nordic Anglo-Saxon culture remained the dominant culture in the United States of America.

With the immigration of Eastern & Central Europeans, Mediterranean Caucasians(Christians mainly), and even East Asians during the mid 19th century until the 1920's, there were no specific ethnic quotas until the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The Chinese immigrants during the 19th century failed to assimilate, causing panic and fear among the American population. The Chinese Exclusion Act banned further Chinese immigration to the United States, not out of bigotry or racism but out of concern of having parts of the Pacific coast colonized by Chinese settlers. While the Chinese settlers of the 19th century were lower skilled and less organized than today's People's Republic of China, China is becoming a rising power and it's important to point out the potential for PRC to encourage mainland Chinese immigration to countries like Canada, United States, Australia, and New Zealand as a method of economic & even cultural colonization where Caucasians could be made 2nd class citizens much like Blacks were in the Deep South from 1870's-1960's.

While I do feel a merit-based immigration approach is miles better than the pro-3rd world immigration system equipped with chain migration and diversity visa lottery(both of which Trump wants abolished), I also want pro-assimilation to be part of this as anyone with high skills and high IQs can still easily immigrate to America without having to assimilate into the value system America was founded on. America was founded on Western & Christian values, and if America still accepts too many high IQ Asians, Muslims, and even Black Africans, not only will it still contribute to a scenario where Whites are not only made 2nd class citizens but also a politically powerless minority group that could see more of the declining White population living similarly to Poor White Appalachians. I did mention Muslims because there are plenty of wealthy Muslims, especially from Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and even Oman. Plus, these Muslim countries have some forms of Sharia Law and favor Arab Muslim interests.

There's a reason why Democrats will NEVER agree to any immigration reform deal that includes an actual wall, end to chain migration, abolition of diversity visa lottery, and merit based immigration, and that's because Democrats rely on unlimited 3rd world immigration to increase their votes in hopes of one day flipping states like Texas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Virginia, and North Carolina solid Democrat, effectively establishing a permanent Democrat stronghold over the Executive branch.

Any kind of amnesty can easily morph into a demographic bomb due to massive rates of fraud and poor vetting of amnesty applicants. DACA for example has an over 50% fraud rate plus 70% of DACA recipients are low-skilled and are a net loss economically.

Certainly a merit based immigration system where ability is the highest virtue for immigration such as self-sufficiency is a great leap forward to stopping America from becoming 3rd world, there are problems associated with allowing so many high IQ Asiatics given they're harder to assimilate than White Europeans. Plus, Mainland Chinese are more tribalist and neo-communistic and if there is no system implicitly limiting or barring this type of immigration, then more of these tribalists whether they be mainland Chinese, Muslims from Pakistan, Indians coming to replace American White Collar workers, or even African(not including Whites) doctors, the character and face of America will be radically transformed but with a more intelligent touch.

However, if immigration were to be shutdown for nearly a decade while immigrants already here either assimilate or leave, this would help solve the demographic crisis America and many Western countries are having so Whites are not replaced in the countries their ancestors have cared for centuries.

Is it truly in America, Canada, Europe, or Australia's best interests to have high IQ non-white immigration become so numerous that Whites would be likely to become a minority? Even birthrates alone need to be addressed given non-hispanic whites are the only ethnic/racial group dying at a faster rate than being born thus making them also below the 2.1 fertility rate.

However, should immigration be shutdown for several years plus the expulsion of unassimilated 3rd world immigrants as well as implicitly pro-white natalist policies, White Americans as well as Whites in Canada, Europe, and Australia should see themselves preventing their own replacement, adopting similar policies Israel has to preserve it's Jewish identity.