I've never heard of Afflluenza in my life before hearing of a 16 year old rich kid from Texas who drunk-drove killed 4 people and ruined more lives. Affluenza is a bullshit defense in which the kid dodges responsibility on account of being pampered in a rich family. This slaps the face of what responsibility is and points out just how retarded treating teenagers as children is. In the 18th century, a 14 year old could purchase firearms, drink and purchase beer, seek employment, drive carriages, buy and smoke cigarettes, and even live on their own if financially independent and people didn't complain. They felt teens having adult rights gave them a stronger sense of responsibility and are also to be held as responsible as an adult.
Millions of teenagers are forced into adult responsibility while being presumed irresponsible for many adult rights. Rights come from birth, not when surpassing a designated birthday. Knowing right from wrong is evidence of being responsible enough to make adult decisions. The reason a 6 year old has no responsibilities nor adult rights is because the child can't distinguish right from wrong. Morality has to be taught through guidance and when caretakers fail to guide the child to being responsible, they are just as guilty of irresponsible behavior as if the child actually did know right from wrong.
Ethan Couch was given a mansion by his father without sense of responsibility so the father was the real owner since he was taking responsibility for the mansion. I don't feel couch was pressured into taking responsibility for his actions and when the justice system had the opportunity to do what mom & pop didn't do, Judge Jean Boyd stupidly sided with the defense during sentencing and sentenced Ethan Couch to just 10 years probation and treatment.
How can anyone seriously presume under 21 year olds to be irresponsible on some adult accounts while forcing maximum adult responsibilities on them? As for children, aren't parents more responsible for their children since they know the child better than anyone else? Driving a car is a major responsibility and in driving you are taking adult responsibility for your actions. If the youngster can't be held responsible to adult standards, then the parents for example are usually responsible. For example, February 29, 2000 a school shooting in Michigan occurred in which a 6 year old Negro boy from a troubled family took his uncle's gun to school and shot a classmate with it. The 6 year old boy couldn't be charged even in juvenile court because of his age and 6 year olds don't have any legal responsibilities. The youth can't be held legally accountable even after 50-90 years. The uncle was however charged with involuntary manslaughter because he neglected to keep the 6 year old boy from accessing the firearm.
Do we seriously need laws that put law abiding citizens on trial? The fact that someone can be put on adult trial and receive adult sentences is evidence enough of responsibility for firearm ownership, alcohol consumption, cigarettes, and gambling.
The most irresponsible group of people in our society is Congress! Yes, congress like the rest of the federal government refuses to take responsibility and a lack of effective consequences at deterring tyrannical government violating the U.S. Constitution is only maintaining the problem. You have to use force against tyrannical government and that's where armed insurrection(should be used rarely), nullification, and citizen's enforcement of the U.S Constitution and our unalienable rights.
What about government agencies? Over 5,000 have been killed by violent law enforcement since September 11 attacks. Can you honestly say that we need more gun control against private citizens while arming law enforcement jack booted thugs with fully automatic machine guns? Gun control proponents are willing to overlook abuses by government thugs such as accidental contraband raids. If guns caused violence, why can't EVERYBODY including law enforcement and our military disarm? Elitists will never do so since that would jeopardize their grip on power and control of people.
I can just compare laissez-faire markets vs. planned centralized economies and you will see how government industry is less responsible than free market private economies. Take the dysfunctional Oakland Police Department which blames victims for violence, particularly back in 2012 with a 16 year old girl shot by a 36 year old maniac. The 36 year old maniac had more just treatment under the law than the 16 year old victim as the latter couldn't even purchase a handgun let alone carry one. Police have no obligation to protect you but they're better at threatening you with arrest if you do not obey whatever laws politicians make.
How can a public servant(legislator, judge, district attorney, law enforcement officer) demand their masters obey whatever law is passed with the threat of violence? Just look at how Mexican government handles the drug cartel violence and has strict gun control. Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster made the Ukrainian city of Prypiat uninhabitable since the mid 1980's, then under the Soviet Union.
What's the panacea for violence in society? Responsibility! Forcing wrong doers to take responsibility for evil is the best option for combating terrorism, substance abuse, gun violence, and government abuse of power. You can't have a rule of law without armed citizens checking government tyranny. You have to view and treat government thugs like cancerous cells.
Conclusion here is if someone harms another, punish them, don't put prior restraints on gun purchases. Prior restraints only seek to help those in power evade being accountable to the people.
Sunday, January 26, 2014
Tuesday, January 14, 2014
Individual Rights vs. Government Powers
What exactly is natural conception of individual rights and what makes something an individual right? Also, what makes an action a power or privilege?
For individual rights, an individual right is one which someone is at natural and moral liberty to do. Who decides what individual rights are? The individual him/herself does as the rights to life, liberty, and property are of individual nature meaning no other person nor government can abridge or redefine any right that has an individual nature. What is individual nature anyway? If activity is solely consensual and not done with malicious, reckless, or deliberate harm to others and society, then it is an individual right. Some individual rights also check against state tyranny such as freedom of speech, assembly, press, right to keep and bear arms, due process, privacy, trial by jury, freedom of worship, etc. But where do we draw the line between Liberty and Policy? What about "welfare" rights? A person is not automatically entitled to healthcare or education as these services need to be provided by someone. Being served at a restaurant is not an inalienable right since the business has a right to serve whom they wish. A person does have the right to have a contract respected such as having insurance terms respected according to the contract signed.
A power is something delegated to authority by a higher source, the people. God remains above the people so God gives people rights, privileges, and immunities. Government is run by man and any ideas coming from man are not infallible. Science is not always reliable and scientists have abused science to fit agendas. Jews in Nazi Germany were portrayed as sub-human vermin and that the Aryan race was the master race, calling discrimination and genocide science. Science doesn't give government powers and no government can receive powers if the people don't have the power at all. If a person can't murder another human being absent reasons of defensive action, then how can government be given the power to kidnap and kill people without due process? Democracy doesn't have regards for freedom as it can negatively affect freedom just as it had in 1928-33 Germany. Governments have even delegated powers to themselves without regard to people's consent. How can a government claim power to decide individual rights on someone's behalf? Plus, how can government also claim the right to tax anything it wants if people don't know where the money is flowing or if it's being used merely to carry out a delegated power?
How can you tell what powers government legitimately has? For starts, check it's laws such as statures and constitution. If you notice anything either left out or stained in legal documents, you'll know how your government respects rights. If government doesn't recognize certain rights(right to keep and bear arms) yet claims others(Abortion, Same-Sex Marriage, Healthcare, etc.) as rights, you know something's wrong. What if government makes you fear it more than they fear you? Who has the power or rights to defend your rights? Individuals retain right to defend themselves and rights, even if it means slaying dozens of government law enforcement officers and thuggish soldiers.
People have usually relied on the courts for redress but rarely does redress come. Did the Glorious Revolution of 1689 happen through the courts? The British courts had no litigation presented to it because people confronted British troops and succeeded due to the unrestricted right to keep and bear arms and accepting nothing more than victory at all costs, even if it meant harming and killing many British Troops. George Washington also would accept nothing less than Victory as there is no compromising with tyranny at all. You either kill tyranny or let it flourish more. Though the courts have sometimes ruled in favor of freedom, the other two branches and even other jurists ignore these decisions and continue violating people. They do this because they can get away with it and feel no physical or psychological threat.
When do you forfeit your rights? Since early civilization, if someone were to harm another, the perpetrator would if convicted through fair trial be sentenced to loss of freedom such as incarceration and all sentences are handed down by the courts of justice as legislated by the legislature. Due Process is the concept that ensures fairness, justice, and freedom including freedom from coercion. Without due process, government will become arbitrary and people will have no freedom from coercion. The massive confiscation of firearms in Australia in 1996 did not constitute due process as it was Port Arthur Shooter Martin Bryant who was guilty of that crime, not Australia's gun owners. Why didn't Australian gun owners protest and attack law enforcement officers or call for the overthrow of administration? Haven't Australians throughout the 20th century been braver and have more sense of individualism than Americans? Even though Australia lacks a bill of rights, courts have protected some rights and I feel if people had faith in God, rights would be exercised whether government approves or disapproves. You can't be forced to forfeit your rights unless there was an injured party that you were directly responsible for injuring. A convicted criminal being sentenced for a crime with an injured party is considered part of justice, but not if the convicted person is innocent.
Does someone go to jail or face any legal consequences because their neighbor robbed a bank or went on a shooting spree? No, doing so would violate due process which requires that the person be at fault for the crime commit via fair trial. How are people unfairly forced to forfeit their rights such as keeping and bearing arms due to assumption of mass shootings and abuse of weapons? Confiscation without due process of course. Of course you could always appeal but it puts you in the position of being presumed guilty and must prove innocence.
Plus, how could public servants decide what's best for us, especially children, who are known better by family than anyone else? Can government honestly assume it knows best when it comes to child care and how can there be any laws in which you can be treated as a child due to restrictions and prohibitions such as buying guns, alcohol, drugs, tobacco, and sometimes mature entertainment yet be considered fully responsible for adult consequences such as adult prison time? The reason a 6 year old can't vote, drive, buy guns, alcohol, tobacco, sign into contracts, get a full time career, or do many things outside parental consent is because they normally do not have the capacity to be held responsible for their actions. Politician's law says a 17 year old is presumed mostly as irresponsible as a 6 year old yet unlike the 6 year old who can't be charged in any court(not even juvenile) the 17 year old can be tried as an adult.
Does this sound like due process to you? How about armed thugs arriving at your house without proper warning coming to take your guns? No due process hearing just that you fit criteria for prohibited person.
what is the denominator in this? Denominator here is that government cannot act in powers it doesn't have and nor can people delegate powers they themselves lack. Does a person naturally have the right to kill an unborn child? Abortion has been forced on us by the U.S. Supreme Court despite the U.S. Constitution giving courts nor other branches no such power. The courts have also attacked the God of the Bible by prohibiting prayer and bibles in class. Where does the judicial system have authority to make law?
For individual rights, an individual right is one which someone is at natural and moral liberty to do. Who decides what individual rights are? The individual him/herself does as the rights to life, liberty, and property are of individual nature meaning no other person nor government can abridge or redefine any right that has an individual nature. What is individual nature anyway? If activity is solely consensual and not done with malicious, reckless, or deliberate harm to others and society, then it is an individual right. Some individual rights also check against state tyranny such as freedom of speech, assembly, press, right to keep and bear arms, due process, privacy, trial by jury, freedom of worship, etc. But where do we draw the line between Liberty and Policy? What about "welfare" rights? A person is not automatically entitled to healthcare or education as these services need to be provided by someone. Being served at a restaurant is not an inalienable right since the business has a right to serve whom they wish. A person does have the right to have a contract respected such as having insurance terms respected according to the contract signed.
A power is something delegated to authority by a higher source, the people. God remains above the people so God gives people rights, privileges, and immunities. Government is run by man and any ideas coming from man are not infallible. Science is not always reliable and scientists have abused science to fit agendas. Jews in Nazi Germany were portrayed as sub-human vermin and that the Aryan race was the master race, calling discrimination and genocide science. Science doesn't give government powers and no government can receive powers if the people don't have the power at all. If a person can't murder another human being absent reasons of defensive action, then how can government be given the power to kidnap and kill people without due process? Democracy doesn't have regards for freedom as it can negatively affect freedom just as it had in 1928-33 Germany. Governments have even delegated powers to themselves without regard to people's consent. How can a government claim power to decide individual rights on someone's behalf? Plus, how can government also claim the right to tax anything it wants if people don't know where the money is flowing or if it's being used merely to carry out a delegated power?
How can you tell what powers government legitimately has? For starts, check it's laws such as statures and constitution. If you notice anything either left out or stained in legal documents, you'll know how your government respects rights. If government doesn't recognize certain rights(right to keep and bear arms) yet claims others(Abortion, Same-Sex Marriage, Healthcare, etc.) as rights, you know something's wrong. What if government makes you fear it more than they fear you? Who has the power or rights to defend your rights? Individuals retain right to defend themselves and rights, even if it means slaying dozens of government law enforcement officers and thuggish soldiers.
People have usually relied on the courts for redress but rarely does redress come. Did the Glorious Revolution of 1689 happen through the courts? The British courts had no litigation presented to it because people confronted British troops and succeeded due to the unrestricted right to keep and bear arms and accepting nothing more than victory at all costs, even if it meant harming and killing many British Troops. George Washington also would accept nothing less than Victory as there is no compromising with tyranny at all. You either kill tyranny or let it flourish more. Though the courts have sometimes ruled in favor of freedom, the other two branches and even other jurists ignore these decisions and continue violating people. They do this because they can get away with it and feel no physical or psychological threat.
When do you forfeit your rights? Since early civilization, if someone were to harm another, the perpetrator would if convicted through fair trial be sentenced to loss of freedom such as incarceration and all sentences are handed down by the courts of justice as legislated by the legislature. Due Process is the concept that ensures fairness, justice, and freedom including freedom from coercion. Without due process, government will become arbitrary and people will have no freedom from coercion. The massive confiscation of firearms in Australia in 1996 did not constitute due process as it was Port Arthur Shooter Martin Bryant who was guilty of that crime, not Australia's gun owners. Why didn't Australian gun owners protest and attack law enforcement officers or call for the overthrow of administration? Haven't Australians throughout the 20th century been braver and have more sense of individualism than Americans? Even though Australia lacks a bill of rights, courts have protected some rights and I feel if people had faith in God, rights would be exercised whether government approves or disapproves. You can't be forced to forfeit your rights unless there was an injured party that you were directly responsible for injuring. A convicted criminal being sentenced for a crime with an injured party is considered part of justice, but not if the convicted person is innocent.
Does someone go to jail or face any legal consequences because their neighbor robbed a bank or went on a shooting spree? No, doing so would violate due process which requires that the person be at fault for the crime commit via fair trial. How are people unfairly forced to forfeit their rights such as keeping and bearing arms due to assumption of mass shootings and abuse of weapons? Confiscation without due process of course. Of course you could always appeal but it puts you in the position of being presumed guilty and must prove innocence.
Plus, how could public servants decide what's best for us, especially children, who are known better by family than anyone else? Can government honestly assume it knows best when it comes to child care and how can there be any laws in which you can be treated as a child due to restrictions and prohibitions such as buying guns, alcohol, drugs, tobacco, and sometimes mature entertainment yet be considered fully responsible for adult consequences such as adult prison time? The reason a 6 year old can't vote, drive, buy guns, alcohol, tobacco, sign into contracts, get a full time career, or do many things outside parental consent is because they normally do not have the capacity to be held responsible for their actions. Politician's law says a 17 year old is presumed mostly as irresponsible as a 6 year old yet unlike the 6 year old who can't be charged in any court(not even juvenile) the 17 year old can be tried as an adult.
Does this sound like due process to you? How about armed thugs arriving at your house without proper warning coming to take your guns? No due process hearing just that you fit criteria for prohibited person.
what is the denominator in this? Denominator here is that government cannot act in powers it doesn't have and nor can people delegate powers they themselves lack. Does a person naturally have the right to kill an unborn child? Abortion has been forced on us by the U.S. Supreme Court despite the U.S. Constitution giving courts nor other branches no such power. The courts have also attacked the God of the Bible by prohibiting prayer and bibles in class. Where does the judicial system have authority to make law?
From Modern Militia Movement: MILITIA MOBILIZATION ACROSS THE NATION UNDER WAY
Keep in mind that this is not mine and that I am merely reiterating a fellow militia member patriot
Dear Save America Foundation Members and all Patriots across the United States,
Be advised that I am in the process of notifying and contacting all legal and constitutionally created militia groups across the United States to mobilize on Washington DC for “Operation American Spring” currently scheduled for May 16th, 2014 and commanded by my friend Colonel Harry Riley US Army Intelligence (Retired) Silver star.
1.8 million people have already responded in kind and are mobilizing and or supporting this effort. We need 10 million.
The Senate and the Congress feel it is in the best interest of this nation to fund illegal immigrants and keep them sustained with free health care, tax breaks, free education in our schools, EBT cards, public housing and the like. They wish to keep sending tax payer money to foreign countries that hate us. They wish to fund bogus global warming projects in the billions and they refuse to take a pay cut themselves.
Yet they will now deny the wounded veteran his pension COLA increases which he or she earned and depends on while struggling to survive day to day, some are in wheel chairs and without arms and legs. Mr. Politician you are now going to be held accountable.
This vote, to first deny and then block the able bodied and disabled veterans their earned pension COLA raises is unacceptable and an act of treason against the Republic from the Marxists in the government. They must want a war against 25 million veterans. Mr. Communist, Mr. RINO, Mr.. Democrat, Mr. Republican. So be it. You got it.
I called the Marxist Senator (comrade) Harry Reid this morning at 0430 hours and left him a message notifying him that we are now mobilizing and coming to see him soon in Washington. We are not leaving the grounds surrounding our White House or the Congress until Mr. Barry Soetoro, the Muslim imposter, has been removed from office for treason and/or impeached for crimes against the constitution.
Speaker Boehner you may want to start reconsidering his decision not to investigate the inaction by our government in regards to Benghazi too. We are coming to town. Your on the visitation list too. We will NEVER forget Benghazi.
If you would like to call Senate Leader Comrade Harry Reid and relay your own message his number is 202-224-3542. Do not threaten, we come in peace, but we are not leaving Washington DC until Mr. Barry Soetoro, the illegal immigrant from Kenya, who studied as an Indonesian foreign student in this nation, who flew to Pakistan in 1981 on a foreign passport, has been removed from office.
We have the resources, the money the training and the Constitutional protections to take this country back. And we will. You have pushed us too far Mr. Marxist, now you will see who runs this country. It is we the people.
We live in a Constitutional Republic not a Marxist dictatorship. It’s time.
33 million Egyptians took back their country from the terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization supported by and propped up by Barry Soetoro and the former Secretary of State (born again Communist) Hillary Clinton. This is also treason against the United States for aiding and abetting the enemy.
Impeachment charges have been drawn up in the past and presented to the Congress against Mr. Barry Soetoro with NO ACTION, no response. They are spineless gutless cowards with as much intestinal fortitude as a rotting possum run over by a semi.
I want all Tea Party groups – Militia groups and like minded individualswho have the courage (and understand and know) that God and the constitution are on their side, to start to prepare NOW to mobilize for“Operation American Spring” May 16th 2014. location Washington DC.
1.8 million people have already responded in kind and are mobilizing and or supporting this effort. We need 10 million.
The Senate and the Congress feel it is in the best interest of this nation to fund illegal immigrants and keep them sustained with free health care, tax breaks, free education in our schools, EBT cards, public housing and the like. They wish to keep sending tax payer money to foreign countries that hate us. They wish to fund bogus global warming projects in the billions and they refuse to take a pay cut themselves.
Yet they will now deny the wounded veteran his pension COLA increases which he or she earned and depends on while struggling to survive day to day, some are in wheel chairs and without arms and legs. Mr. Politician you are now going to be held accountable.
This vote, to first deny and then block the able bodied and disabled veterans their earned pension COLA raises is unacceptable and an act of treason against the Republic from the Marxists in the government. They must want a war against 25 million veterans. Mr. Communist, Mr. RINO, Mr.. Democrat, Mr. Republican. So be it. You got it.
I called the Marxist Senator (comrade) Harry Reid this morning at 0430 hours and left him a message notifying him that we are now mobilizing and coming to see him soon in Washington. We are not leaving the grounds surrounding our White House or the Congress until Mr. Barry Soetoro, the Muslim imposter, has been removed from office for treason and/or impeached for crimes against the constitution.
Speaker Boehner you may want to start reconsidering his decision not to investigate the inaction by our government in regards to Benghazi too. We are coming to town. Your on the visitation list too. We will NEVER forget Benghazi.
If you would like to call Senate Leader Comrade Harry Reid and relay your own message his number is 202-224-3542. Do not threaten, we come in peace, but we are not leaving Washington DC until Mr. Barry Soetoro, the illegal immigrant from Kenya, who studied as an Indonesian foreign student in this nation, who flew to Pakistan in 1981 on a foreign passport, has been removed from office.
We have the resources, the money the training and the Constitutional protections to take this country back. And we will. You have pushed us too far Mr. Marxist, now you will see who runs this country. It is we the people.
We live in a Constitutional Republic not a Marxist dictatorship. It’s time.
33 million Egyptians took back their country from the terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization supported by and propped up by Barry Soetoro and the former Secretary of State (born again Communist) Hillary Clinton. This is also treason against the United States for aiding and abetting the enemy.
Impeachment charges have been drawn up in the past and presented to the Congress against Mr. Barry Soetoro with NO ACTION, no response. They are spineless gutless cowards with as much intestinal fortitude as a rotting possum run over by a semi.
I want all Tea Party groups – Militia groups and like minded individualswho have the courage (and understand and know) that God and the constitution are on their side, to start to prepare NOW to mobilize for“Operation American Spring” May 16th 2014. location Washington DC.
Pass this around.
Just for the record, the Tea Party and Militia Movements as well as my self do not support any terroristic nor criminal behavior as these are the sins we are fighting against. We are fighting against a self-righteous, terroristic, and criminal government. The rule of law has been decided by those who abuse power and therefore people have every right to use aggressive yet defensive force against such criminals.
I intend no copyright or harm to anyone as the Militia Movement's mission is to reclaim self-determination and the rule of law from cynical and tyrannical politicians.
Saturday, January 4, 2014
A New Years Message and Resolution
I'm thinking 2014 should be the year of revolution where people realize that taking up arms against tyrannical government is the ONLY way to solve government coercion. It was the only way to solve government coercion back in the 1770's and 1780's. Do you think a democratically elected legislature should get away with violating the higher laws such as that of the Constitution and God? America has been given a lawless and murderous government due to lack of visible Egyptian style protests like the summer of 2013.
Before I mention the Birth of Lord Savior Jesus Christ, I want to mention the "End Times" biblical verse Matthew 24:21-22 - For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
I have been recommended the King James Bible since it is the most logical and correct one, unlike the demonic NIV for example! Now for a verse stating God giving humanity his only son to save humanity from Lucifer.
John 3:16 - For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
I mentioned Matthew 24:21-22 cause I wanted to shed light on what could happen to Western civilization if good people didn't do enough. It's not enough to vote benevolent politicians into office but fighting police and armies is what brings victory and sends a powerful message of freedom, a definition distorted by the satanic evils pushed through war, casual sex, drug abuse, communism, tyrannical government, moral decay, and occultists.
I also want to mention The Hunger Games Catching Fire as it teaches an excellent story just like in The Hunger Games about how America became totalitarian Panem due to collapse of modern civilization. Do people seriously believe this shit can't happen in America that they're willing to stand idle as people like David Olofson, Adam Kokesh, and Brian Aitken have been prosecuted and jailed for mere possession of supposedly illegal firearms? Gun grabbers want you to forfeit your right to own firearms to the unholy mercy of bureaucrats. Other rights have been put on lockdown by government tyrants such as manipulative jurists undermining the role of a jury such as hearing crucial arguments such as constitutional matters. What power does any sworn jurist have to have final say on legal and constitutional matters?
Also, what does Romans 13 say about authority? BTW, this verse will be from the King James Bible
Romans 13:1, “Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.”
Romans 13 states here that no force is higher than God and that the natural hierarchy falls behind God. If political power is inherent of the people, how come people must rely on politicians for security of rights? Doesn't government receive powers instead of rights? How can government decide what's best for individuals as if the former was God compared to it's citizens? Politicians are less honest than the decent and righteous people(such as Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Robert Rhett, Stonewall Jackson, Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, Grover Cleveland, Calvin Coolidge, John F. Kennedy, Barry Goldwater, Ron Paul, etc.). these men were historical figures known for having integrity and selflessness in fighting for American values, both North but also mostly Southern values.
Would Jesus Christ be in favor of democracy? If democracy was unrestrained without the holy boundaries, that would bring the END TIMES! Abortion, homosexuality, gun control, socialist regulations, unconstitutional wars and taxes plus deficit spending, and corrupt justice systems are law! Jesus Christ roamed Palestine as one with deity, virgin birth, and lack of sin. It was Christ who would be known as the Prince of Peace. No other human being in history was able to achieve what Christ achieved by his departure from the Human World into the spiritual heavens and then resurrected to rise into the heavens by age 33.
American nationalism is a farce as New England, Mid-Atlantic, and Midwestern states unfairly influence American nationalism over the objections of the Southern and Western states.
While America was founded mostly by Northern Freemasons, the Southern states were more Christian than the merchants and bankers of New York, Philadelphia, and Boston.
What should be the new years resolution? For starters, the Arab Spring was considered both a smash hit and a perilous nightmare as while strongmen in both the Arabian peninsula and Levant were ousted but mostly replaced with Islamist governments. However, the Modern Militia Movement would fight for constitutional government and freedom. To tell you the truth, I'd rather have a Goldwater Republican take presidency through a military coup than have an Obama Democrat democratically elected. In Egypt, General Sisi overthrew Islamist President Mohammed Morsi and this is how constitutional republics are preserved and dictatorships are halted, depending on who takes power. Sisi has been a populist hero to the Egyptian people while Obama is a communist tyrant.
America and the West are facing End Times that can only be addressed by taking back our governments, similar to the Arab Springs of 2011. I would mostly recommend civil disobedience tactics that are mostly non-violent by nature but should be able to use counter-force against mobs or police interfering with such actions. A police state has been created via instilling fear and discouraging resistance through militarization of law enforcement and destructive manpower of law enforcement.
The only way to regain lost freedoms is to assert yourself as if you had more authority than the so called "authorities". The Civil Rights Movement was made assertive, successful, and inspiring because people asserted themselves and taking a stand through civil disobedience and keeping pride in their actions. As a result, the Civil Rights Movement of Civil Disobedience became a success, lasting from 1955 to 1964, though the Civil Rights Movement as a whole lasted for decades.
Civil Disobedience can only be victorious through the unity of people who believe in fighting for a noble cause. United We Stand! Southern Nationalists must unite to overthrow DC rule in the Southern States by arming themselves regardless of the illegal DC regime's "laws". Conspiracy theorists must unite regardless of political beliefs to save humanity from illuminati terror and government deception! Gun rights crusaders must unite in fighting not for guns but for seeing this as a fight for freedom noting that with every gun control law interferes with one's ability to fight tyrannical government.
If only many people just started following in the peaceful footsteps of Egyptain protestors back in 2013. Just look at how the Real ID Act of 2005 has been doing it's whole pathetic life. Nullification worked more than the courts and the Real ID Act seems to be as if it isn't law anymore. What about gun control, regulations, and drug prohibition? Complying with government regulations will only subject you to a higher risk of abuse as bureaucrats can more easily abuse you since they know your information. If just 20% of gun dealers refused to license with either the ATF or state agency, gun control laws would be nearly as crippled as government thugs will find it harder to harass and intimidate gun dealers and pot dispensaries out of business.
They key is to follow the mostly non-violent resistance movements that occurred in 1990 Eastern Europe and 2013 Egypt. I recommend millions of regional nationalists walk like Egyptians on their state capitols and peacefully clog the streets just as the Egyptians did in both 2011 and 2013. The message is best sent through such a manner. Obama and the elitists were foaming mad at the overthrow of Mohammed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood. People may need to used armed force to defend their lives and freedoms but peaceful protests are key to gaining some attention.
Before I mention the Birth of Lord Savior Jesus Christ, I want to mention the "End Times" biblical verse Matthew 24:21-22 - For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
I have been recommended the King James Bible since it is the most logical and correct one, unlike the demonic NIV for example! Now for a verse stating God giving humanity his only son to save humanity from Lucifer.
John 3:16 - For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
I mentioned Matthew 24:21-22 cause I wanted to shed light on what could happen to Western civilization if good people didn't do enough. It's not enough to vote benevolent politicians into office but fighting police and armies is what brings victory and sends a powerful message of freedom, a definition distorted by the satanic evils pushed through war, casual sex, drug abuse, communism, tyrannical government, moral decay, and occultists.
I also want to mention The Hunger Games Catching Fire as it teaches an excellent story just like in The Hunger Games about how America became totalitarian Panem due to collapse of modern civilization. Do people seriously believe this shit can't happen in America that they're willing to stand idle as people like David Olofson, Adam Kokesh, and Brian Aitken have been prosecuted and jailed for mere possession of supposedly illegal firearms? Gun grabbers want you to forfeit your right to own firearms to the unholy mercy of bureaucrats. Other rights have been put on lockdown by government tyrants such as manipulative jurists undermining the role of a jury such as hearing crucial arguments such as constitutional matters. What power does any sworn jurist have to have final say on legal and constitutional matters?
Also, what does Romans 13 say about authority? BTW, this verse will be from the King James Bible
Romans 13:1, “Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.”
Romans 13 states here that no force is higher than God and that the natural hierarchy falls behind God. If political power is inherent of the people, how come people must rely on politicians for security of rights? Doesn't government receive powers instead of rights? How can government decide what's best for individuals as if the former was God compared to it's citizens? Politicians are less honest than the decent and righteous people(such as Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Robert Rhett, Stonewall Jackson, Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, Grover Cleveland, Calvin Coolidge, John F. Kennedy, Barry Goldwater, Ron Paul, etc.). these men were historical figures known for having integrity and selflessness in fighting for American values, both North but also mostly Southern values.
Would Jesus Christ be in favor of democracy? If democracy was unrestrained without the holy boundaries, that would bring the END TIMES! Abortion, homosexuality, gun control, socialist regulations, unconstitutional wars and taxes plus deficit spending, and corrupt justice systems are law! Jesus Christ roamed Palestine as one with deity, virgin birth, and lack of sin. It was Christ who would be known as the Prince of Peace. No other human being in history was able to achieve what Christ achieved by his departure from the Human World into the spiritual heavens and then resurrected to rise into the heavens by age 33.
American nationalism is a farce as New England, Mid-Atlantic, and Midwestern states unfairly influence American nationalism over the objections of the Southern and Western states.
While America was founded mostly by Northern Freemasons, the Southern states were more Christian than the merchants and bankers of New York, Philadelphia, and Boston.
What should be the new years resolution? For starters, the Arab Spring was considered both a smash hit and a perilous nightmare as while strongmen in both the Arabian peninsula and Levant were ousted but mostly replaced with Islamist governments. However, the Modern Militia Movement would fight for constitutional government and freedom. To tell you the truth, I'd rather have a Goldwater Republican take presidency through a military coup than have an Obama Democrat democratically elected. In Egypt, General Sisi overthrew Islamist President Mohammed Morsi and this is how constitutional republics are preserved and dictatorships are halted, depending on who takes power. Sisi has been a populist hero to the Egyptian people while Obama is a communist tyrant.
America and the West are facing End Times that can only be addressed by taking back our governments, similar to the Arab Springs of 2011. I would mostly recommend civil disobedience tactics that are mostly non-violent by nature but should be able to use counter-force against mobs or police interfering with such actions. A police state has been created via instilling fear and discouraging resistance through militarization of law enforcement and destructive manpower of law enforcement.
The only way to regain lost freedoms is to assert yourself as if you had more authority than the so called "authorities". The Civil Rights Movement was made assertive, successful, and inspiring because people asserted themselves and taking a stand through civil disobedience and keeping pride in their actions. As a result, the Civil Rights Movement of Civil Disobedience became a success, lasting from 1955 to 1964, though the Civil Rights Movement as a whole lasted for decades.
Civil Disobedience can only be victorious through the unity of people who believe in fighting for a noble cause. United We Stand! Southern Nationalists must unite to overthrow DC rule in the Southern States by arming themselves regardless of the illegal DC regime's "laws". Conspiracy theorists must unite regardless of political beliefs to save humanity from illuminati terror and government deception! Gun rights crusaders must unite in fighting not for guns but for seeing this as a fight for freedom noting that with every gun control law interferes with one's ability to fight tyrannical government.
If only many people just started following in the peaceful footsteps of Egyptain protestors back in 2013. Just look at how the Real ID Act of 2005 has been doing it's whole pathetic life. Nullification worked more than the courts and the Real ID Act seems to be as if it isn't law anymore. What about gun control, regulations, and drug prohibition? Complying with government regulations will only subject you to a higher risk of abuse as bureaucrats can more easily abuse you since they know your information. If just 20% of gun dealers refused to license with either the ATF or state agency, gun control laws would be nearly as crippled as government thugs will find it harder to harass and intimidate gun dealers and pot dispensaries out of business.
They key is to follow the mostly non-violent resistance movements that occurred in 1990 Eastern Europe and 2013 Egypt. I recommend millions of regional nationalists walk like Egyptians on their state capitols and peacefully clog the streets just as the Egyptians did in both 2011 and 2013. The message is best sent through such a manner. Obama and the elitists were foaming mad at the overthrow of Mohammed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood. People may need to used armed force to defend their lives and freedoms but peaceful protests are key to gaining some attention.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)