The Zionist Elites in the US and EU are disgruntled over Putin's influence over the organically Russian region of Crimea, currently occupied by Ukraine. The Zionists are upset cause Vladimir Putin is righting the wrong that was done to Crimea by the USSR when it transferred it over to the Ukrainian SSR. Now the US-EU ZOG want's to strike Russia with sanctions, even though such actions would have negative impact on the economies of the West.
Russian troops marching into Crimea is nothing compared to the numerous atrocities committed by other historical and current regimes.
The Muslim Conquests swallowed beyond the Arabian peninsula into the Roman World where the Levant, Anatolia, Balkans, North Africa, and even Hispania and Sicily became occupied by Arab forces from the 7th century until the 19th century. Should the Levant & North Africa be considered Arab? I have nothing against Arabs but this invasion would be considered illegal and sinful under both international and natural law. Some damage was undone with notable events such as Reconquest of Hispania of the 15th century by Catholic monarchies. Plus, the Fall of Constantinople of 1453 would be considered under international law as an illegal assault on national sovereignty, making Turkish presence outside of 13th century borders of Seljuk Sultanates of Rum illegal. This means that some of so called "Turkish territory" such as Constantinople and Smyrna are truly part of Greece under natural law. I will say however that Egypt and the Levant are both truly and naturally of Greek and Arab societies. There was a Roman Province called Arabia Petraea which is today part of the Levant, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. There was a Roman Emperor from Arabia Petraea called Philip the Arab who ruled Rome from 244 to 249 AD.
As for indigenous persons of the Americas, Oceania, Africa, and Greater India you may find the last paragraph hypocritical but the Levant, Europe, and North Africa have already been settled by the Roman Times while the New World plus Africa were unsettled frontiers until the late 19th century to early 20th century. Some colonies that were once part of their true organic empires were stolen by other empires. examples include the British expulsion of French Acadians, British annexation of the Afrikaner Kaapland, Spanish occupation of Louisiana and French handover of Louisiana to the United States, annexation of a free and independent Texas, the annexation of Oregon Country by the USA from the British, the Union victory over the Confederate States of America, Union army slaughter of Native Americans, Alaska annexation by US from Russia, the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii and subsequent annexation by the US, the Spanish-American Wars, occupation of Hispaniola from 1916 to 1924, and so much more! In fact the United States of America has been the worst offender in the Western World
Germany following it's defeat from World War I was unfairly punished with reparations and loss of colonies as well as it's forfeiture of contiguous land despite the fact that there was no legitimate reason for World War I to occur as Zionist NWO bankers financed both sides of the war. The French and British eventually obtained the German colonies by force. with Adolf Hitler's rise to power and defeat of World War II, Germany was punished even further with innocent Germans being displaced and harmed by Allied misconduct, especially from the Red Soviet Army. The Soviet Union annexed East Prussia and Russianized it while Poland's borders were shifted further West. Plus, the German Confederation system worked better than Otto von Bismarck's unified one-nation Germany. Germany is actually several different nations with some being Lutheran and others being Roman Catholic. Prussia was the most powerful of the German nations and was Lutheran along with Oldenburg, Mecklenberg, Hanover, and Hesse while Baden, Wurttemburg, and Bavaria being Roman Catholic.
Italy is another example as the Italian nations were forced through violence to join a unitary state with the House of Savoy(King of Sardinia) as the only monarchy in Italy. The Papal States of Latium were forced into this illegal state against their will and stripped of territory with only a small manor sized territory delegated back to the Vatican in 1929. Italy was rightfully the sovereign of Libya, Somalia(not counting British and French Somalilands), and the once Turkish occupied Albania but sinfully invaded the Christian Ethiopian Empire both in 1895-96 and 1936-41. There are several Italian states that were illegally forced to dissolve such as the Most Serene Republic of Venice which had a proud and independent culture until 1797 when Napoleon forced Venice into annexation with a Napoleonic satellite state. Others include Naples, Sicily, Modena, Tuscany, Milan, and of course Sardinia. Tyrol also relates more to Austria than other Italian states and Austria is a federal republic. San Marino was spared from forced annexation by the Judeo-Masonic Italian conquerors.
While the British Empire is considered the greatest empire in history for having improvements in quality of life and high standards of living occur within the empire, it should not be free of any criticism. The British Empire should be credited with bringing the Pagan Third World into the Christian First World but it has some events in history that compromise it's overall proud history. Examples of British tyranny include expulsion of French Arcadia, military regime installed in Massachusetts, subjugation of Dutch descending Boers, occupation of German colonies, occupation of Cyprus, and even the betrayal of the First World government in Rhodesia in favor of a Jewish Second World influenced Pagan Third World Zimbabwe led by "Negro Stalinist" Robert Mugabe. The British have also participated alongside the United States in the invasion and rape of Iraq.
Israel is truly the most evil of any state in existence to date as it is a satanic Jewish state. Israel under Jewish rule paints a portrait of how Jewish Freemasons are able to survive being held accountable and avoid falling down to rightful(or illicit) owners. In fact, Hitler and Mussolini were Freemasons who betrayed and hijacked Nazism and Fascism in attempt to not only smear the reputation of true nationalists but also raise morale for Talmudic and Kabbalist Masonic Zionist Jews in creating a Jewish state in Palestine, the land Jesus Christ lived in nearly his whole life. I understand that there are Islamic Extremists but they corrupt the true buried version of Islam. Islam is truly another sect of Christianity much like Orthodoxy, Catholicism, and Protestantism. Mohammed originally started out being tolerant and Christ-like but it turns out Mohammed was a sinner and his words cannot overrule Jesus Christ. I feel that ancient Zionists sabotaged the Islamic Movement of the early 7th century to make it as evil and barbaric as Talmudic Judaism. The Ahmadiyya Movement founded in the 19th century is closer to true organic Islam as a religion of peace in following the divine Jesus Christ than the Zionist contaminated cults of Al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, and other Muslim Brotherhood groups. Jewish terrorist organizations have existed as well such as Lehi, which was first supported by Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy during World War II but then supported by the Soviet Union. The Jewish Soviet State of Israel not only committed atrocities against Palestinians and non-Jews but also committed the unspeakable act of deicide, just like the Jewish elders that deceived Pontius Pilate into crucifying Jesus Christ during the Passover of 33 A.D. The Jewish Regime in Israel cannot survive without U.S. foreign aid. Besides, most Jews of the illegal State of Israel originate from the ancient Kingdom of Khazaria(which is today Southern Russia(Europe)) which existed as the first Jewish State. Only a few indigenous Jews such as Mizrahi Jews should truly be morally considered of Palestinian nationality. True Judaism does not have a nationality but is more Nomadic-like and Jews have historically have lived in different lands. Force Israel to abide by the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan and keep an eye on it!
The United States of America under the 1787 Constitution was pushed by the Masonic Federalists who wanted the federal government to have vast powers at the expense of the states and people. Though the US Constitution clearly limits the federal government, activist judges and tyrannical law enforcement have changed the meaning of the document's clear words, going as far as to have 4,000 federal criminal laws, the military preventing states from seceding, hundreds of military bases worldwide, infringement of civil liberties, executive tyranny, special interests(including Zionist Illuminati bankers) pushed legislation, and subjugating states with activist judges and police force. Numerous states(even right-wing christian ones) have been forced to recognize homosexual marriages even though the courts can't force policy on governments.
I realize Russian military presence in Crimea is scary to people but Crimea should have never been part of Ukraine in the first place. In fact, Crimea looks and feels a lot like Greece and Turkey. Crimea has been part of Roman, Byzantine, Khazar, and Russian culture. Something tells me Crimea is naturally diverse as the Levant.
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
Is America Really A Nation?
I've been looking at the alternate history wiki and came across the 13 Fallen Stars timeline which described what the political and geographic outlines would be if the 1787 Constitutional Convention failed and the former 13 rebellious colonies(New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia) agreed to dissolve the Articles of Confederation in favor of several less centralized and more independent republics.
What would the political situation be after 1788 and how would relations be? Why would it have been better for the Constitutional Convention to never be successful? For one, each of the colonies had separate cultures and attitudes.
Examples distinguishing the colonies would include issues of slavery, foreign policy, language, and religion. For example, New England was pro-British and has historically supported British causes while New Netherland and Virginia were anti-British. John Adams of New England was Pro-British and a Federalist, supporting the Northern interests of the New England states while Thomas Jefferson of Virginia was anti-British and pro-Revolutionary in his policies. Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Carolina would appear neutral but the first of these three mentioned would be anti-British while the last of the three would be pro-British.
The War of 1812 was a major indicator of which states supported British causes. New England states were upset with the U.S. Government's rivalry with the British since it would hurt the interests of New England. New England states even threatened to secede from the United States over this war. It was the Upper Southern States near Virginia that were at odds with the British.
Another issue is slavery. Massachusetts was the first of the former colonies to abolish slavery. New England would be the most anti-slavery American Republic as many abolitionists including Frederick Douglas, William Henry Garrison, David Henry Thorneau, and Harriet Beecher Stowe lived in New England. New Netherland and Pennsylvania were part of the anti-slavery crowd and the norther American Republics resisted efforts by the southern States to spread the legality of slavery. The Northern states even defied the Fugitive Slave Act passed by the U.S. Congress in 1850. Who says states nullifying federal laws is racist? In fact, runaway slaves would have been safer and freer in the northern republics if not for the existence of the U.S. government.
Third issue is trade and the economy. The northern states were pro-merchant and industrial with Alexander Hamilton of New York favoring a more centralized government for protection of northern manufacturing industries. Thomas Jefferson by contrast favored agrarian interests as the southern states were agrarian. The American republics of Virginia and Carolina would be more agrarian and have high exports of cotton. Maryland would be the only republic not to unite with other states while managing to be both agrarian and industrial much like Pennsylvania. One of the causes for the American Civil War was economic as the Southern states felt threatened by the GOP's proposals to unfairly tax southern states in favor of northern manufacturing states. The southern states were pro-free trade while the northern states were protectionist. The American Civil War was caused by economic concerns, not slavery.
Culture was also a distinguishing factor as not all of the American states agreed on what American culture was. With independent American Republics, New England would be more like the British Isles and Ireland with French influences as New English culture would be influenced by Methodist and Catholic religions as well as bordering the Maritime provinces of British North America. New Netherland(union between New Jersey and New York) would base it's culture on both English and Dutch cultures with English and Dutch as official languages. Part of the full New Netherland(NJ & NY) would be first colonized by the Dutch colonial Empire. Pennsylvania would be influenced by more Germanic influences than Anglo as the southeastern and northernmost lands in Pennsylvania and Delaware respectively were part of the Swedish colony of New Sweden from 1638 to 1655 before being dominated by the Dutch. Pennsylvania actually has it's own language known as Pennsylvania Dutch. Unless I'm mistaken, New Netherland and Pennsylvania would be Dutch as well as English with Pennsylvania possibly being Swedish. Both New Netherland and Pennsylvania were prominently Protestant.
Maryland & Virginia would be the only former U.S. States not to unite with other states in forming an independent republic as Maryland had it's own republic. Maryland is considered to be the only state in which Roman Catholicism is the largest religion. Virginia formed it's own independent commonwealth republic but unlike Maryland, Virginia had larger territorial expansions that extended as far west as the Mississippi River, bordering Louisiana Territory. The Mason-Dixon line would establish the borders between Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Canada(United Britannic Commonwealth). Maryland and Virginia would be unitary states. Carolina would include the Deep South which included North & South Carolina plus Georgia. The Carolinian Confederacy would be considered the most conservative republic in North America and the most free trade friendly country as well.
As for countries formed in the 19th century, the final border disputes between the American Republics would be resolved by the Napoleonic Wars. Louisiana was a French colony and part of New France from the 17th century till 1763, when it came under Spanish occupation. Spanish occupation would end in 1801 with the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. Louisiana would become an independent republic in 1812. Louisiana's main culture would be based off that of French and Creole cultures.
As for Texas, the Southwest(California, Arizona, Utah, Nevada, West Colorado, most of New Mexico, Far West Texas, Baja Califronia peninsula, Senora, and North Chihuahua), the Midwest north of Mason-Dixon, Canada, Alaska, and the Northwest; Texas would become a free and independent republic since 1836, the republics of Rio Grande and Yucatan would be formed in the early 1840's from their respective regions but out of the three new republics seceding from New Spain, Texas would be mostly English and Baptist while Rio Grande and Yucatan would retain the Hispanic and Roman Catholic roots of New Spain.
The Southwest mentioned in previous paragraph would form the present day Latin Republic of California. My opinion here would be that instead of Latin American nations becoming independent of Spanish Crown in the 1810's-1830's, they would become dominions with self-governing parliaments starting with the Latin American Revolutions of the 1820's. New Spain would be partitioned in 1848 due to the California Gold Rush in which New Spain would be divided into numerous dominions, especially California and Mexico.
The Midwestern US north of Mason-Dixon, Northwestern U.S., Canada, and Alaska would be part of the 1876 established United Britannic Commonwealth which would create a confederation based on the US Articles of Confederation. Dominions would overtime include Britain, Ireland, Acadia, Newfoundland, Canada, Borealia, Columbia, Patagonia, India(and Princely States), Natal, Australia, Westralia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Bahamas, Jamaica, Windward-Leeward Islands, Barbados, Trinidad along with protectorates of Hawaii and Maldives plus the numerous Crown Dependencies.
The Spanish-American War would actually be a series of revolutionary republican wars in Latin America lasting from 1885-1920's with Venezuela, New Granada, Ecuador, California, Cuba, Guatemala, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Mexico, and Santo Domingo becoming independent republics between 1885 to 1924.
My point being here is that the United States of America is as much of a nation as the Soviet Union and the European Union. The USSR dissolved peacefully due to independence of it's Soviet Socialist Republics and even then you could clearly see the USSR is less deceptive at passing itself off as a nation-state than the USA has.
Despite the USA starting out as a humble republic, the 1787 Constitution was truly a victory for big government federalists as it would eventually be misinterpreted to green light an imperialistic federal government which has since it's inception invoked aggressive wars to prevent states from seceding from the USA, plundered natural resources of sovereign lands, killed millions of innocents, controlled the entire monetary system via Federal Reserve, extorted trillions from incriminated people via IRS and income tax, accumulated over $17 trillion debt, passed a barrage of regulations crippling economic freedom such as New Deal, Great Society, and Obamanomics, and massive violations of civil liberties with a growing police state.
My point here is that the USA can no longer be a massive unified republic and still be prosperous and free. The Soviet Union declined and dissolved due to separatism. In fact some states have not legally been part of the USA since the 1860's and cannot be subject to U.S. jurisdiction and these states include that of the Confederate States of America. Plus, despite Thomas Jefferson being an ardent classical liberal, the Louisiana Purchase violated the U.S. Constitution and made the USA an empire. I realize the benefits the purchase provided the USA with but Louisiana would eventually lose it's true organic culture based on that of French and Creole cultures. Same goes for the Southwest known in my heart as California. California went from being a Roman Catholic, Conservative, Latin society during the early to mid 19th century to a Zionist controlled socialist puppet state in the 21st century. The degenerate cutlures of Hollywood and San Francisco would have never been tolerated in 19th century Hispanic California. If anyone thinks that California would just be part of Mexico, California had it's own culture and it's people were called Californios.
If the US Constitution was never ratified and the US states instead became independent republics, the numerous differences would have been better dissolved so this way no state(s) could use the federal or central government as a weapon to impose their agenda on other states. The best hope for America is for states to start seceding and for the $17 trillion debt empire to collapse, done with as little insurrection as possible. I think the former Confederate States of America is a great place to start cause it would void the forced annexation by the US that occurred in 1865.
What would the political situation be after 1788 and how would relations be? Why would it have been better for the Constitutional Convention to never be successful? For one, each of the colonies had separate cultures and attitudes.
Examples distinguishing the colonies would include issues of slavery, foreign policy, language, and religion. For example, New England was pro-British and has historically supported British causes while New Netherland and Virginia were anti-British. John Adams of New England was Pro-British and a Federalist, supporting the Northern interests of the New England states while Thomas Jefferson of Virginia was anti-British and pro-Revolutionary in his policies. Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Carolina would appear neutral but the first of these three mentioned would be anti-British while the last of the three would be pro-British.
The War of 1812 was a major indicator of which states supported British causes. New England states were upset with the U.S. Government's rivalry with the British since it would hurt the interests of New England. New England states even threatened to secede from the United States over this war. It was the Upper Southern States near Virginia that were at odds with the British.
Another issue is slavery. Massachusetts was the first of the former colonies to abolish slavery. New England would be the most anti-slavery American Republic as many abolitionists including Frederick Douglas, William Henry Garrison, David Henry Thorneau, and Harriet Beecher Stowe lived in New England. New Netherland and Pennsylvania were part of the anti-slavery crowd and the norther American Republics resisted efforts by the southern States to spread the legality of slavery. The Northern states even defied the Fugitive Slave Act passed by the U.S. Congress in 1850. Who says states nullifying federal laws is racist? In fact, runaway slaves would have been safer and freer in the northern republics if not for the existence of the U.S. government.
Third issue is trade and the economy. The northern states were pro-merchant and industrial with Alexander Hamilton of New York favoring a more centralized government for protection of northern manufacturing industries. Thomas Jefferson by contrast favored agrarian interests as the southern states were agrarian. The American republics of Virginia and Carolina would be more agrarian and have high exports of cotton. Maryland would be the only republic not to unite with other states while managing to be both agrarian and industrial much like Pennsylvania. One of the causes for the American Civil War was economic as the Southern states felt threatened by the GOP's proposals to unfairly tax southern states in favor of northern manufacturing states. The southern states were pro-free trade while the northern states were protectionist. The American Civil War was caused by economic concerns, not slavery.
Culture was also a distinguishing factor as not all of the American states agreed on what American culture was. With independent American Republics, New England would be more like the British Isles and Ireland with French influences as New English culture would be influenced by Methodist and Catholic religions as well as bordering the Maritime provinces of British North America. New Netherland(union between New Jersey and New York) would base it's culture on both English and Dutch cultures with English and Dutch as official languages. Part of the full New Netherland(NJ & NY) would be first colonized by the Dutch colonial Empire. Pennsylvania would be influenced by more Germanic influences than Anglo as the southeastern and northernmost lands in Pennsylvania and Delaware respectively were part of the Swedish colony of New Sweden from 1638 to 1655 before being dominated by the Dutch. Pennsylvania actually has it's own language known as Pennsylvania Dutch. Unless I'm mistaken, New Netherland and Pennsylvania would be Dutch as well as English with Pennsylvania possibly being Swedish. Both New Netherland and Pennsylvania were prominently Protestant.
Maryland & Virginia would be the only former U.S. States not to unite with other states in forming an independent republic as Maryland had it's own republic. Maryland is considered to be the only state in which Roman Catholicism is the largest religion. Virginia formed it's own independent commonwealth republic but unlike Maryland, Virginia had larger territorial expansions that extended as far west as the Mississippi River, bordering Louisiana Territory. The Mason-Dixon line would establish the borders between Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Canada(United Britannic Commonwealth). Maryland and Virginia would be unitary states. Carolina would include the Deep South which included North & South Carolina plus Georgia. The Carolinian Confederacy would be considered the most conservative republic in North America and the most free trade friendly country as well.
As for countries formed in the 19th century, the final border disputes between the American Republics would be resolved by the Napoleonic Wars. Louisiana was a French colony and part of New France from the 17th century till 1763, when it came under Spanish occupation. Spanish occupation would end in 1801 with the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. Louisiana would become an independent republic in 1812. Louisiana's main culture would be based off that of French and Creole cultures.
As for Texas, the Southwest(California, Arizona, Utah, Nevada, West Colorado, most of New Mexico, Far West Texas, Baja Califronia peninsula, Senora, and North Chihuahua), the Midwest north of Mason-Dixon, Canada, Alaska, and the Northwest; Texas would become a free and independent republic since 1836, the republics of Rio Grande and Yucatan would be formed in the early 1840's from their respective regions but out of the three new republics seceding from New Spain, Texas would be mostly English and Baptist while Rio Grande and Yucatan would retain the Hispanic and Roman Catholic roots of New Spain.
The Southwest mentioned in previous paragraph would form the present day Latin Republic of California. My opinion here would be that instead of Latin American nations becoming independent of Spanish Crown in the 1810's-1830's, they would become dominions with self-governing parliaments starting with the Latin American Revolutions of the 1820's. New Spain would be partitioned in 1848 due to the California Gold Rush in which New Spain would be divided into numerous dominions, especially California and Mexico.
The Midwestern US north of Mason-Dixon, Northwestern U.S., Canada, and Alaska would be part of the 1876 established United Britannic Commonwealth which would create a confederation based on the US Articles of Confederation. Dominions would overtime include Britain, Ireland, Acadia, Newfoundland, Canada, Borealia, Columbia, Patagonia, India(and Princely States), Natal, Australia, Westralia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Bahamas, Jamaica, Windward-Leeward Islands, Barbados, Trinidad along with protectorates of Hawaii and Maldives plus the numerous Crown Dependencies.
The Spanish-American War would actually be a series of revolutionary republican wars in Latin America lasting from 1885-1920's with Venezuela, New Granada, Ecuador, California, Cuba, Guatemala, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Mexico, and Santo Domingo becoming independent republics between 1885 to 1924.
My point being here is that the United States of America is as much of a nation as the Soviet Union and the European Union. The USSR dissolved peacefully due to independence of it's Soviet Socialist Republics and even then you could clearly see the USSR is less deceptive at passing itself off as a nation-state than the USA has.
Despite the USA starting out as a humble republic, the 1787 Constitution was truly a victory for big government federalists as it would eventually be misinterpreted to green light an imperialistic federal government which has since it's inception invoked aggressive wars to prevent states from seceding from the USA, plundered natural resources of sovereign lands, killed millions of innocents, controlled the entire monetary system via Federal Reserve, extorted trillions from incriminated people via IRS and income tax, accumulated over $17 trillion debt, passed a barrage of regulations crippling economic freedom such as New Deal, Great Society, and Obamanomics, and massive violations of civil liberties with a growing police state.
My point here is that the USA can no longer be a massive unified republic and still be prosperous and free. The Soviet Union declined and dissolved due to separatism. In fact some states have not legally been part of the USA since the 1860's and cannot be subject to U.S. jurisdiction and these states include that of the Confederate States of America. Plus, despite Thomas Jefferson being an ardent classical liberal, the Louisiana Purchase violated the U.S. Constitution and made the USA an empire. I realize the benefits the purchase provided the USA with but Louisiana would eventually lose it's true organic culture based on that of French and Creole cultures. Same goes for the Southwest known in my heart as California. California went from being a Roman Catholic, Conservative, Latin society during the early to mid 19th century to a Zionist controlled socialist puppet state in the 21st century. The degenerate cutlures of Hollywood and San Francisco would have never been tolerated in 19th century Hispanic California. If anyone thinks that California would just be part of Mexico, California had it's own culture and it's people were called Californios.
If the US Constitution was never ratified and the US states instead became independent republics, the numerous differences would have been better dissolved so this way no state(s) could use the federal or central government as a weapon to impose their agenda on other states. The best hope for America is for states to start seceding and for the $17 trillion debt empire to collapse, done with as little insurrection as possible. I think the former Confederate States of America is a great place to start cause it would void the forced annexation by the US that occurred in 1865.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)