Several Senate Democrats likely or unlikely to cooperate with Trump's Agenda

The 115th Congress is set to have 52 Senate Seats held by Republicans. However, Senate Democrats can in some instances filibuster legislation from making it to President Donald Trump's desk if such legislation does not reach 60 votes.

So many issues in need of solving whether it be healthcare, gun rights, appointees, the economy, taxes, immigration, culture(Yeah, I mean it!). Of course, the most left-wing of Democrats and even a handful of Republicans in the Senate are very likely to oppose some to most of Trump's agenda, but many seats held by Democrats are up for re-election in 2018 were in states where Donald Trump won. in fact, Democrats running for re-election in either 2018 or 2020 in Solid Red states are very likely to be swayed to support Trump's agenda on pain of facing electoral defeat at the hands of a Republican challenge.

Here are a list of Democrats in either Toss-up or Solid Red states running for re-election in 2018(whether they will support Trump's Agenda or not).

Joe Manchin(West Virginia) is known for being one of the most Conservative Democrats in the U.S. Senate. Manchin sides more with Republicans on social issues and is very popular with the people of his home state. Manchin understands that not only has Trump won that state by more than 40 points but also owes it to his Conservative majority constituency to support Trump's Agenda.

Pro-Trump Probability: Very Likely


Joe Donnelly(Indiana) represents another Solid Republican state and is up for re-election in 2018. Donnelly is a Moderate Democrat and can be persuaded to support Trump's Agenda so as to not upset Indiana's voters into supporting any Republican challenger seeking to unseat Donnelly.

Pro-Trump Probability: Very Likely


Jon Tester(Montana) hails from one of the most Conservative states in America. For Tester to betray the voters of Montana by opposing Trump's MAGA agenda would surely be political suicide on Tester's part as a Republican challenger would easily defeat Tester, depending on whether he supports or opposes Trump's agenda.

Pro Trump Probability: Very Likely


Bill Nelson(Florida) has been considered a Moderate Democrat and is likely to vote opposite the Democrat leadership in certain issues. Though Donald Trump narrowly won the State of Florida, Bill Nelson could face a suitable challenger seeking to unseat Nelson should he oppose Trump's agenda.

Pro Trump Probability: Likely to Very Likely


Bob Casey Jr.(Pennsylvania) has adopted some Conservative positions on certain issues and can be persuaded to support the Trump agenda considering that not only did Trump win the State of Pennsylvania but some Republican challengers could threaten Bob Casey for his senate seat.

Pro Trump Probability: Likely to Very Likely


Heidi Heitkamp(North Dakota) would look like the biggest loser on Earth if she opposed Trump's agenda, given the fact that North Dakota is one of the most Conservative state in the country. Any Republican challenger could easily defeat her should she be not supportive of Trump's agenda enough.

Pro Trump Probability: Very Likely


Angus King(Maine) caucuses with Democrats in a state that Donald Trump almost won(though Trump did win Maine's 2nd Congressional District). King is however a Moderate and can be persuaded to a certain degree to support some of Trump's agenda. Though any Republican challengers are less likely to defeat Democrat challengers in states Trump narrowly lost compared to states Trump won, it's safe to say that should King be supportive enough of Trump's Agenda, he'll be safe.

Pro Trump Probability: Likely

 
Tim Kaine(Virginia) has had the displeasure of being the Vice-Presidential candidate to the losing team! Despite Trump's loss in Virginia, Tim Kaine could face a hefty Republican challenger should he be too opposed to Trump's Agenda. In some instances, Tim Kaine can be persuaded to support parts of Trump's Agenda as to break any Senate Democrat filibusters. Perhaps some of Tim Kaine's policy positions in the past could come back to haunt him.

Pro Trump Probability: Unlikely


Sherrod Brown(Ohio) would have to be a moron to not be supportive of even a fraction of Trump's agenda, especially in a state where Trump won by 8 points. Brown will most likely be in line most of the times with the left-wing Democrat leadership and is likely to oppose most of Trump's Agenda. Whether Brown will shift towards the center to fend off any possible GOP challengers is unknown at this time but from what I see here is that Sherrod Brown is set to be the second or third most vulnerable incumbent in 2018(behind Tammy Baldwin and Claire McCaskill).

Pro Trump Probability: unlikely to somewhat unlikely


Tammy Baldwin(Wisconsin) is one of the most liberal senators in the U.S. Senate and what makes it even worse is that fact Donald Trump won the State of Wisconsin. What also makes Tammy Baldwin a candidate for the most vulnerable incumbent of 2018 midterms is when her colleague in the Senate Ron Johnson(R) won re-election despite the odds being against him and another fact being that the Republican Party of Wisconsin is only growing stronger with no signs of stopping. Plenty of Republican challengers could easily defeat this ultra-liberal.

Pro Trump Probability: Very Unlikely


Claire McCaskill(Missouri) has been one of Crooked Hillary's most loyal supporters in the Senate throughout the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election in a state where Donald Trump won by a landslide. Not only will McCaskill's fierce and unapologetic support for Hillary Clinton(who lost Missouri by 15-18 points) make McCaskill the most vulnerable incumbent in 2018 but also her uncompromising liberal positions make her the most vulnerable of the 2018 incumbents in a Solid Republican state. I expect any well known Republican challenger to defeat her with almost no effort whatsoever. I don't expect McCaskill to be supportive of Trump's Agenda in the slightest(given the fact McCaskill has been one of the most pro-Hillary Clinton Senators running for re-election in 2018 in a Solid Republican state).

Pro Trump Probability: Very Unlikely


Debbie Stabenow(Michigan) not only represents a state Trump won narrowly but will also be chairwoman of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee when the 115th Congress begins. This means Stabenow will be one of the Senate Democrats responsible for the policies of the Democratic Party in the U.S. Senate. I anticipate Stabenow to be one of the most liberal senators running for re-election in a state Donald Trump won. However, Stabenow will not be considered that vulnerable but a well known Republican challenger could easily threaten her chances for re-election should she go too far to the left and be too obstructive of the Trump Agenda.

Pro Trump Probability: Very Unlikely to Unlikely

Though at least one or two senators from states such as Virginia, New Mexico, & New Hampshire could be persuaded to break away from cooperation with the Democrat filibusters, even Solid Blue states could be shifted towards Toss-Up status should Trump deliver on many of his promises.

Ideas for more Feasible California partition

I've noticed how venture capitalist Tim Draper of California advocated partitioning California into six states. However, some signatures were considered invalid and therefore his proposal failed to be considered for a 2016 ballot measure.

However, more realistic proposals in terms of having them be passed by Congress as well as solicit more valid signatures would be to stick with Three states instead of six. Two proposed states should be merged to make three out of the 6 proposed. South and Central California should be merged to form the State of East California with the counties from both South and Central California forming East California. West California and Silicon Valley should merge to form the State of West California. Finally, North California and Jefferson should be merged to form the State of Shasta/Jefferson.

This proposal would be less like a pipe dream and more of a reality. Though it's not guaranteed to succeed in sense of establishing two new states from California, the impact could be so great that California could be forced to re-establish itself and start over with a more balanced system where it becomes more politically competitive.

Thanks to Donald J. Trump becoming President of the United States of America, his administration will tackle issues such as voter fraud, Big Labor Unions, Religious Freedom, stopping and reversing illegal immigration, enhancing and enabling school choice, and other issues; California is up for a seismic change up as California Democrats are running scared over the upcoming Donald Trump presidency and what effect he will have on extreme liberalism.

Democrats have now become more and more reliant on third-world immigration, both legal and illegal(especially) as well as other minorities(African-Americans) since Donald Trump won Midwestern states that have been won by Democrats throughout the 1990's and 2000's.

 

In fact, White America is the far-left Democratic Party's worst enemy politically as the latter has learned that unless Whites become a minority outnumbered by anti-white non-whites, then left-wing politics will almost never succeed.

The GOP relies on Non-Hispanic Whites more than any other racial group. Though reaching out to Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians who are U.S. citizens is a very great idea, the GOP must not allow Whites to be the most divided electorate in America. Donald Trump has changed the Republican Party by winning the nomination for U.S. president and defeating Crooked Hillary Clinton and the Democrat machine at the national level.

Under President Barack Obama, Hispanics have outnumbered non-Hispanic Whites in California thanks to not just the decades long pro-third world immigration policy but also thanks to attracting illegal aliens to this country. Not only has President Obozo allowed unknown numbers of illegal aliens to come to this country without fear of any consequences but California itself has made it so an illegal alien is not different than not just U.S. citizens but also legal immigrants(who worked harder to come to the United States the proper way).

Now back to the proposed states. East California would Lean Republican as most counties there have Republicans outnumbering Democrats. Plus, East California will be closer politically to Arizona and Nevada. Though San Diego County used to have more Republicans, Democrats lead Republicans now by around 3-5%. That'll change when Republicans start moving back there.

West California would be roughly between Lean Democratic to Solid Democratic. San Luis Obispo and Ventura Counties have been the only two counties within the proposed state of West California to be either within competitive margin or having Republicans leading Democrats. Los Angeles County alone is home to one-third of California's illegal alien population, meaning that should a Justice Department under Jeff Sessions as Attorney General intervene to preserve voter integrity and ensure that only U.S. Citizens are voting in State and Federal elections, the Democrat-Republican gap would close tighter due to the drop in registered Democrats. Also, automatic voter registration with drivers licensing would be banned as this contributes to more voter fraud. Trump has also met with Silicon Valley executives in hopes of swaying them to support more business friendly GOP candidates, further weakening Democrat support.

Should Republicans become as competitive as Democrats in West California, the West California GOP would be more Centrist while adopting some social liberal policies.

Shasta and Jefferson could range anywhere from Tossup to Lean Republican and would be the most competitive out of the Three Californias. North of San Francisco and being home to the Bay Area's northern counties, Shasta/Jefferson will be politically closer to most Battleground states in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election, but geographically be closer to Colorado and Oregon. Republicans political strength in Shasta would be somewhere between Washington State and Alaska.

Even if California is not partitioned, Trump's presidency will have such a major impact on even California as much of the Democrat's successes there are due to not just federal immigration policy designed to make Whites a small minority but also federal inaction against measures designed to retain the Single-Party Democrat state such as Forced-Unionism and dues paid to benefit the Democratic Party(even if union member is a Republican), massive voter fraud and illegal voting(voting by non-citizens including illegal aliens, computerized voting machines improperly counting votes, voting multiple times, absentee ballot stuffing, automatic voter registration with drivers licensing, no voter id, no proof of citizenship for voter registration, etc.), anti-growth regulations, lack of drought relief, unreasonably high taxes, and GOP flight.

Threats for secession in California will not even half succeed as too many people in California would not only oppose such a measure but also motivate a Trump administration to bus Republicans who left California to return and politically challenge the Democrats.

Ts the Season! Christrumpmas is Here!

Donald Trump's 2016 election victory could very well be compared to the birth of Jesus Christ. Donald Trump unexpectedly ruined the plans of the Zio-World Order to conquer the Office of the Presidency of the United States, the most powerful executive office in the Western World.

This wasn't just a victory for Republicans but a victory for America and Western Civilization. Thus, the war is not yet won, for this victory only puts the West on the offensive against it's enemies. Our enemies will continue to seek our destruction by hoping Trump will not be able to save Western Civilization. While Western Europe sees crippling defeats with the election of a communist as President of Austria as well as the Islamic Jihad Rampage in Berlin, Germany, Eastern Europe is becoming the new homeland for many Western Europeans, particularly Germans.

2017 brings about a turnaround for Western Civilization as well as a new foreign policy objective. Trump's presidency will shed the Post-Reagan and Post-Cold War foreign policy that has led to flooding of Europe and North America with Third-World invaders who have no business breathing in America and Europe.

We will see the United States under a Trump led Foreign policy team work to install and elect nationalist and populist pro-White leaders into executive, judicial, and legislative positions similar to how the U.S. Department of State and CIA were responsible for overthrowing far-left communist leaders in Latin America.

Can California be split by the 36th parallel just by Congressional Approval in 2017?

California, the Pacific Jewel of the United States, has gone to trash thanks to not only the Democrats AND the labor unions but also due to California's massive size and illegal alien population that votes Democrat. Republicans are stronger in Southern California and should California split North-South, Southern California could be as competitive as Ohio and Florida, freeing the GOP from having to deal with the heavily left-wing North.

New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
Article Four, Section One

The most successful effort to partition California was in 1859 when Assemblyman Andreas Pico authorized to split California along the 36th parallel. Believe it or not, this proposal has already passed the "Consent of Legislature" stage but Congress failed to approve of separate statehood due to the American Civil War.

Should Congress pass separate statehood for Southern California, it could likely be challenged by CA Democrats though a Trump Administration could pressure California's state government to allow partition of states. Plus, a barrage of new Trump administration policies such as combating voter/electoral fraud, fair labor union practices as well as national right-to-work protections, religious freedom restoration initiatives, de-funding of sanctuary cities and crackdowns on illegal immigration, and expansion of school choice and defense of charter schools could eventually put Democrats on the defensive as their support bases dry up.

If a legal challenge is mounted against any Congressional action to establish separating California by the 36th parallel without consent of current state legislature, just remember what the Pico Act established in 1859 and unless those challenging California's 36th parallel partition have any proof a deadline was established for how long the Pico Act could remain effective, then Southern California needs no approval from the California State Legislature to move forward with new statehood. However, adding additional counties would need approval from CA State Legislature or could simply have enough signatures to propose a ballot initiative.

However, if the CA State Legislature tries to repeal the Pico Act(which is not unlikely), it will have to go before the voters again and BTW, voters back in 1859 or 1860 voted 75% in favor of partition.

Not only can a Trump administration pressure CA Democrats to back-down by convincing them they would have more power if Southern California seceded(most Republican legislators and Congressman are in Southern California), but also impose new conditions for Southern California statehood such as strict voter id, English only elections as well as proof of citizenship for voter registration, no welfare benefits and/or jobs to illegal aliens, provisions in constitution providing right to keep and bear arms as well as freedom from regulatory and government imposed financial burdens, etc.

Who could possibly propose a bill allowing for Southern California statehood? Republicans like Darrell Issa and Kevin McCarthy would have some interest in establishing a state for their constituents that is safe from the wrath of California Democrat's supermajority. Plus, why would any California Republican not support South California statehood? If SoCal became it's own state, SoCal Republicans would not have to worry about the ultra liberal San Francisco Bay Area/San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland combined statistical area with a population of 8.7 million.

Though Los Angeles County has a population of approx. 10 million and Democrats outnumber Republicans by almost 30%, taking non-citizens off rolls as well as encouraging diaspora Californians to move back to Southern California will balance out the Democratic stronghold in Southern California, giving Republicans a greater chance. Plus, Republicans could work on regaining their lead back from Democrats in San Diego, San Bernardino, Ventura, and Santa Barbara counties as well as strengthen Republican leads in San Luis Obispo, Riverside, Orange, and Kern Counties.

This would leave just Los Angeles and Imperial counties with a Democrat lead over Republicans in just a few short years. These two counties have significant Hispanic population though Los Angeles has some significant Asian populations as well.

Strengthening Conservative/Republican holds can be done by encouraging more White Europeans to settle in unsettled lands in SoCal and by encouraging illegal aliens to leave SoCal. Plus, should Southern California ever become a state in either 2018 or 2020, depending on whether such statehood can make it through a Senate filibuster by the Democrat minority. In the meantime, county governments should rebel against the CA state government, making most SoCal counties de facto separate from Sacramento's rule. The only counties in SoCal that would side with the CA state government would be Los Angeles and Imperial counties, both with Democrat leads over 25-30%.

Though six counties in SoCal have more Democrats than Republicans, with the exception of Los Angeles, Imperial, and Santa Barbera, the Democrat leads in Ventura, San Diego, and San Bernardino are just 2-5%, meaning these counties are competitive battlegrounds for Republicans to challenge Democrats. Plus, seven out of ten of SoCal's counties have Republican majorities in their Board of Supervisors, so most of Southern California landmass-wise could 

Also, California's 8th, 23rd, 25th, 39th, 42nd, 45th, 48th, 49th, and 50th congressional districts held by Republicans have their representatives living in California south of the 36th parallel. This makes 8 congressional districts held by Republicans in Southern California vs. 23 held by Democrats in SoCal. However, if Republicans play their cards right and set sights for districts with 24th, 26th, 31st, 36th, and 52nd congressional districts, Republicans would have opportunity to gain 5 seats before the 2020 census is completed. That would make the number of Democrats-Republicans ratio in SoCal to be 18-13, or a 58%-42% ratio. Who knows, with non-citizens(both legal & illegal) off the voter rolls as well as English the only election language, republicans could gain even more congressional seats.

Plus, illegal aliens are counted in the census for Congressional Representation, which should be stopped and a law needs to be passed by Congress that only allows U.S. citizens to be counted for U.S. House Representation. This would starting with the 2022 elections reduce the number of "Safe Democrat" districts, giving Republicans greater opportunities to outnumber Democrats with respects to Congressional Districts.

Maybe a bargain could be laid out allowing Los Angeles County to become it's own state, granting even greater Republican power over the rest of Southern California. Though Los Angeles becoming it's own state would create two new Democrat senators, the rest of Southern California would likely have at least one Republican as Senator from Southern California.

Honestly, should America surrender California to the pits of hell just because Democrats have destroyed it so much? With a Trump presidency, a Republican Controlled Congress, a Conservative U.S. Supreme Court, and a robust administration, Southern California could become the North Carolina of the Pacific in just a few years if things go according to plan.

How Trump Can Make California Great Again

I found this amazing article on Townhall

http://townhall.com/columnists/arthurschaper/2016/12/05/how-trump-can-make-california-great-again-n2255012

Dear Governor Robert Bentley of Alabama, appoint Congressman Mo Brooks to Replace Jeff Sessions(to be Attorney General) as Senator from Alabama

Given that President-elect Donald J. Trump has nominated Senator Jeff Sessions to be Attorney General and will likely be confirmed once Trump takes office after January 20, 2017; Sessions will have to resign as Senator as soon as he becomes Attorney General. This means as Governor you will have the duty of nominating an interim replacement until a special election can take place(in this case 2018 midterm elections), I recommend Congressman Mo Brooks.

Why you might ask? For one, since Mo Brooks appreciates Whites, the G.O.P's strongest and most supportive electoral base, he would be one of the most powerful assets to Senate Republicans as they rely on a strong and united White electorate(which is declining).

Had it not have been for a stronger and more awakened White Blue-Collar working class voting surge in battleground states like Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Florida, and Pennsylvania(states Obama won in 2008 & 2012), Hillary Clinton would be the next President of the United States.

Why would any Republican not want to not only keep Whites as the majority but also increase their birthrates so their majority is not only retained but also boosted to being roughly 85% of the U.S. population at the very most?

The Democrats rely primarily on not just minority voters but also a divided White electorate. Since the Democratic Party is collapsing with no signs of regaining a majority of not only Congressional seats both House & Senate but also most state legislatures. The Democratic Party has become that of communists, social justice warriors, illegal aliens, welfare parasites, anti-whites, feminists, and people who hate what America stands for.

BTW, I can predict the future of the Democratic Party by the fact Nancy Pelosi(former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives;2007-11) was re-elected the leader of the House Democrats. The average age of the top three House Democrats is 76(making Donald Trump 6 years younger than that despite being the oldest person elected to the U.S. Presidency).

Plus, with Keith Ellison as the only well known candidate left for DNC Chairman, the Democratic Party is sure to go as so far left that Republicans will have a better shot at attracting Moderate voters, who are almost 50% of the national electorate. Ellison is a Bernie Sanders style far-leftist Muslim who opposes everything most of White America stands for.

Keith Ellison is the poster boy for why over 70% of White Americans should vote Republican in EVERY state. The way things are going for Democrats now shows that Republicans are headed for super-majority status in Congress following the 2018 and possibly 2020 elections.

However, if Whites are suffering from net loss population as well as being outnumbered and outvoted by non-Whites, Republicans chances of winning elections declines to a point where they become a super-minority, like in California.

Also, Brooks has been hardcore and consistent, recognizing the negative impacts illegal immigration has brought to America, especially California. If Whites are not fighting for their interests as a group, those who hate Whites will feel emboldened to commit harm against White people and authorities in corrupt cities and states will feel less obligated to investigate crimes against Whites.

Having Mo Brooks in the U.S. Senate is a near must to solve the problem of illegal immigration more strongly as well as make Republicans the dominant party in U.S. federal politics by unifying and strengthening the White electorate.