Creativity Movement: The NAACP of the White Race

The Creativity Movement is an organization fighting for the Survival, Expansion, and Advancement of the greatest race humanity has ever known. The White Aryan Race!

For all you anti-Whites pretending to be Anti-racists I am here to say that there just so happens to be an organization fighting for the preservation and expansion of the White race, refusing to be overpowered by the lesser races.

If you feel it's racist to point out that non-Whites are of an inferior dialect, it is just the natural order and it has been proven that no other race has been able to bring more culture, prosperity, and security than the White Aryan race. Though a handful of Asian ethnicities(such as Japs, Turks, and Singaporeans) have been able to attain First World status, it has been the White Aryan Christian man that has made the greatest contributions to civilization.

Keep in mind that creativity advocates the use of legal and non-violent tactics.

the Anti-Whites want to bully White Aryans to hate themselves and even ruin their self-esteem while enabling the inferior races to rise about the natural order and conspire against the White Aryan race. Of course, this is not some powerful god like being that we're dealing with. This is just some bully behind a curtain who needs to be defeated with common sense and courage.

Though it lies in protest, sometimes protests are unfeasible with police breaking up protests(no matter how peaceful), lack of soldiers, and even lack of effective physical strength. Point here will be that solutions NEED to be effective and result in victory for the White race. If it does, then the solution is a must to complete. If not, then there shall be no point in ever doing such actions. sometimes non-violent resistance works when time is not a crucial issue such as Gandhi's quest for an independent India but when dealing with hordes of barbarian biological enemies, it's time to acknowledge that "The Barbarians are at the gate!" and that armed and militant resistance is a mandatory action.

 Did politicians really believe criminals would be unarmed? Law abiding citizens are just trapped in prison of the mind. Law enfrocement enforcing gun control measures will use intimidation such as SWAT teams and indiscriminate murder. To them, this is war and the ones serving to enforce gun control measures should not be thought of as human beings but as enemy combatants.

It should be remembered that not only did April 19, 1775 Battle of Lexington and Concord start the American Revolution and a long road to liberation from tyranny but also a day to treasure and cherish the right to keep and bear arms, something foreign to most foreign countries. Hell, you couldn't just go to Switzerland and buy enough guns to arm a militia legally. Armed revolutions with unarmed civilians have had to rely on raiding of police armories for guns. SWAT armories have gold mines of armor and ammunition guarded under lock and key.

How could heavily guarded armories be raided and cracked? Someone has to have access to the armory locks. I recall under Obama, department of Homeland Security obtained enough hollow point bullets to kill every American 5 times over! That's a gold mine! Imagine how many anti-whites, anti-fascists, and anti-racists we could eliminate with that much gold. We could build empires and overthrow anti-white governments. These weapons could come in handy for the ethnic cleansing of non-white invaders.

What's really got my eye is Weapons of Mass Destruction. Chemical Nerve Agents and Biological Viruses act as pesticides against the biological enemies of belligerents. Atomic bombs seek to eradicate enemy targets overnight. The only times in history an Atomic Bomb has been used to cause massive harm was on August 6 & 9, 1945 with bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki(both despicable war crimes).


Guerrilla warfare could possibly be the only way to destroy the Anti-White system and create a White future for humanity, even if it means the elimination of other inferior races that threaten the existence of White people. What White people need to understand is that we are at war with inferior irresponsible breeding mud races who threaten the existence of White races via immigration, anti-White hate speech laws, affirmative action, integration, and the Jewish lobby(ADL). Before forced integration and universal suffrage, Whites had less of a reason to fight Blacks and other non-Whites as Whites were treated as the rulers of the lands they inhabited while Blacks, Mongoloids, and other non-Whites were segregated but still recognized as legally equal. Literacy tests were based on ability, proving how superior the White race is when it comes to academics.

Every White nationalist should be flying quadcopters, quadcopters are the future of guerilla war, learn to upgrade, enhance and develop them. When the war comes use them to observe enemy positions, use them to deliver bombs. A heat-seeking quad armed with a light landmine could take down a helicopter or destroy the regime’s own drones, it could be armed with a shooting weapon, it could initiate the primary explosion for an enemy weapons dump. Thanks to advancements in technology(due to White civilization) White guerrillas can easily eliminate enemies and deal with tyrannical politicians and law enforcement. Sending petitions will do nothing and some regimes have arrested people for merely complaining about grievances. 


A fully armed White Patriot is the anti-White and anti-fascist's worst nightmare! That's why gun control has been a mostly Talmudic, Leftist, Anti-White movement. Anti-whites will use so many tactics to defeat the Aryan race. What Creativity has is fighting spirit and hopefully the will to kill, die, and fight like a brave heroic Aryan soldier regardless of consequences. With the Barbarians at the gate, we need soldiers and generals, not lawyers and ambassadors. The only way the inferior races should ever dominate White people is after a bloody World War style race war!

We need an Alexander the Great. while Negros have warrior souls of lions, they have the overall intelligence of sheep. But we Aryans have both the spirit and intelligence of a Lion! There is no enemy we shall spare. No enemy we shall submit to. For the Aryan man has the intelligence to outsmart the unintelligent mongrel hordes and easily exterminate these verminous cancer cells. While Europeans had rifles, Indians had spears and arrows, leading to the latter's fall.

Another thing Creativity rejects in "Equality". Where did Universal Suffrage originate from? The French Revolution of 1789-99 had the motto "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity". However, this redefined Equality to a very new and extreme level. This meant that all humans were considered fully equal without regards for nature. Examples would include universal suffrage for the least deserving denizens of society such as low IQ peoples. Problem with the universal globalist concept of equality is that inferior people with negative value threaten the livelihood of higher worth and more intelligent human beings if both are considered of equal worth.

Despite being attracted to Creativity, I must make clear that I remain Christian and the goal should be peace for the White race. Creativity sounds like that organization, willing to do anything for their White humanity. Peacemakers are blessed as said in Matthews 5:9 and if Whites are to ever have security, they must be willing to make peace with those who are also willing to make peace as well. Despite whites being a minority in most Latin American countries, they are one of the best off Whites in the World as Amerindians and even Negroes have made peace with the Whites. Latin America and East Asia are the new frontiers for saving the White race from the enemies of humanity, the Zionist Jewish Supremacist Bankers and Media kingpins.

True peace can only come with a guarantee of preservation and safeguards. In nearly every land Jews have been expelled from, their hosts have welcomed them with open arms. Sadly, once the Jews began subverting their host country including usurious practices and infiltration of government and academic institutions, the only option the host countries could have was to either expel these nomadic parasites, force them to assimilate, or restrict them to certain areas of the land.

You can't make peace with an enemy that seeks your destruction and suffering. The White Pride movement will not be about wanting the other races to be annihilated but will be about guaranteeing a secure future for Westernized peoples. Since White people created Western civilization, their interests should be considered first but people of other races that pose no danger to White Western civilization should be protected and could even be potential allies.

If you think acting in the interests of White people over other races is "racist" consider the fact that societies built by White Aryans have reduced or even eliminated the 3rd world problems. Aryans being just under 1/10 of population is unacceptable and a Social Nationalist regime in the West with superpower abilities is the anti-White's worst nightmare.

If there is a lack of faith in rebuilding the White race, take the Siege of Jerusalem for example. From June 7-July 15, 1099 Old French Catholics liberated the City of Jerusalem from Muslim hands and ruled over the city for several decades. The Crusaders didn't fear what the international community thought of them nor did they worry about being tried for "war crimes" under a ZOG established international court(very ineffective at REAL justice). The only thing Crusaders feared was the Lord Jesus Christ, and that is what gave them victory. The Jewish tribalists sided with the Caliphate but the Crusaders sided with nobility and destiny, for the greater good of Western civilization.

The White Race will not be restored to it's former glory with begging the international community for help as the international community has displayed time and time again that it will not act on human rights abuses unless it is in their own interests. Why should people follow the laws of people who will not protect them and give them aid? What right do international globalist bodies in Brussels, New York, and Hague have to use force against powers that simply oppose the globalist agenda. The international community will always chose winners and losers. The Rwanda Genocide was allowed to happen because the international community lacked motivation to stop such as genocide. Why should White people act to give aid to their biological enemies who will in return threaten their existence and given the White race cancer. Would you want to help a parasite who will give you cancer as a token of gratitude?

Why should White people pay taxes and give aid to a regime that works against them. The point of the violent American Revolution was to send a message that NO foreign power had the right to tax and dictate them. Foreign powers were responsible for Serbia, Iraq, South Africa, Rhodesia, Germany, and Japan's fall. Though Japan has a better society than Europe, it lacks the strength to give aid to and strengthen the White race. Though Europeans and Japs have different facial features, our standards of living, IQ, and parts of culture have similarities. What if Japan were to once again become a superpower and revive the East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere?

Throwing rocks has been found to be ineffective for the Palestinians. Oppressors will never just voluntarily surrender their dominion over you as most independence wars have been fought with violence.

the international community's strength depends upon it's member's cooperation and if there is a strong enough force able to oppose the enemies of Aryans, than the chances of victory are great. By realizing that nature is the highest force, victory can be achieved and all we need to fear is the White Aryan Goddess herself.

It took a mere 3% for the American Revolution to gain victory. Not only that but victory was also accomplished by endurance. Make the enemy's cause a lost one by forcing it to go through extreme tribulation and turmoil, forcing it into surrender.

For those who have given up on greatness, just learn about the Crusades and Reconquista.

History: Bashing Zionism and Jewish Extremist Racism.

Let me be clear that this does not target any race, not even Jews. This targets the racist, Talmudic, tribalists that display anti-American, anti-Western hate towards the host countries they inhabit. This post is targeted at those who believe Israel should come first and not America, Europe, or Canada come first.

Anti-Racists will have bash White People fests where they make non-Whites want to hate Whites and even make Whites hate themselves, much like bullying. In fact, what culture has a history of racial hatred and contempt for those not of their race?

Though this is the flag of Israel, the Talmudic Jewish tribalists have had a history and culture of hatred towards whom they call "Goyim". Goyim is a Talmudic-Cabbalist term for Gentiles.

If you think I'm just some vile Nazi Anti-Semite, Quote the Jewish Babylonian Talmud on what it has to say about Gentiles.

 “When it comes to a Gentile in peace times, one may harm him indirectly, for instance, by removing a ladder after he had fallen into a crevice.” (Shulkan Arukh, Yoreh De ‘ah, 158).

If you don't believe words, you'll believe actions. Israel has committed numerous genocidal campaigns against the Arabs of Palestine. Israel is a JEWISH state, meaning that any Jew who can prove Jewish ancestry can become a citizen of Israel. Israeli citizenship is based on race, not religion as Atheist Jews have the same rights as Orthodox Jews. In fact, some Atheists and orthodox Jews follow much of the same Talmudic crap when it comes to worshiping their race and despising other races. I would like to commend any Jew that has assimilated into their host society and this post does not target ordinary everyday Jewish customs such as Hanukkah and Passover, the Jewish equivalent to Christmas and Easter.

Any religion can be reformed as in deed movements in Judaism and Islam have reform movements. Christianity has met reform movements such as the Protestant reformation.

Jewish supremacy speaks for itself. How often do you hear a White group refer to the best of non-whites still being worthy of extermination? What's with the hatred against Whites? Whites have been the creators of civilizations from Ancient Greece to Modern America. Blacks have been mostly employed in menial agricultural labor during the late 19th century as their best skills have included physical labor, given that the typical African-American was like an Ox. Whites and Asians have been best in the merchant and intellectual fields such as civic duties, medical care, business, and management. Whites and Asians have mostly been more expert at management than Negros and Amerindians.
For any Jew who has the courage and integrity to stand up against the tribal-cabbalist mindset of the Zio Jewish extremists and their minions, I must commend them for their efforts. Mordechai Vanunu, an Israeli blew the lid on Israel's weapons of mass destruction, revealing to the press that Israel did indeed have WMD. Vanunu was hunted down by Mossad(Motto: By Way of Deception) in 1986 and imprisoned for 18 years. He has been re-imprisoned for violating conditional release numerous times, and has even been treated more harshly due to his conversion to Christianity.

Hell, white privilege means nothing when the Israeli Firsters and Jewish Supremacists control 90% of everything! How could these people possibly cry victim when they are so fracking wealthy and have the World under their thumb? With the Israeli bombing of Gaza and the murder of Arab civilians, how could Israel possibly be considered the victim claiming to be defending itself?

With the Israeli bombing of Gaza and thousands of Gentiles in Gaza murdered by sophisticated Israeli weaponry, Israel will typically claim to be defending itself.

Hell, the most outrageous point any racist zionist jew has ever made was by the Times of Israel's own Yochanan Gordon, who wrote an article titled I shit you not "When Genocide is Permissible". While Jewish supremacists and Zionists have barrages of media dedicated to telling the Hollywood story of the Holohoax, this douchebag definitely exposes that there are plenty of these Zionists who are just lying, manipulative, racist, evil cunts who will use anyone who is useful to them while disposing of anyone who has no use for them. Times of Israel removed the post after caving into pressure.

will the Anti-Whites be inspired by this "Israeli" or American Jew racist's post?(which has now been removed of course, as of August 1, 2014). Before you want to shame Afrikaners for wanting to preserve South Africa as an Afrikaner Republican state, Israel wants to be recognized as a Jewish Democratic State. Difference between South Africa and Israel is the former never had any organized ethnic cleansing or genocidal campaigns against non-Boers while Israel has ethnically cleansed Palestinians from the land of Palestine that much of Palestine now has a Jewish majority. South Africa with it's entire land NEVER had an absolute White majority. South Africa did establish Black Homelands for non-Afrikaners. The reason I say non-Afrikaners is because not all Boers are Whites. Coloureds can also be Afrikaners as well. Afrikaner/Boer means farmer in Dutch or Afrikaans.

Final point to be made is the Jewish Supremacist role in third world immigration. Demographic displacement. I also use the White Genocide argument against universal suffrage as there are some groups who should not be permitted to vote, such as immigrants. If you based democracy on the Athenian model, people of alien origin would not be allow to vote, ever regardless of assimilation. Only natural born Athenians could vote.

South Africa is no longer an Afrikaner state because of universal suffrage. Problem with universal suffrage is an alien majority could use their civic strength in their votes to conquer the host nation. this happened in South Africa in 1994, depriving Afrikaners of self-determination due to being out voted. Israel complains about Palestinians being able to out populate Jews but pro-immigration Jewish supremacists and Zionists will keep Israel ultra-nationalist while White countries will have massive immigration.

Just goes to show how the Jewish supremacist infiltrates government and begins a stealth conquest. Conquests don't need to be done through military might. They could simply be done through majoritarian voting and demographic displacement.

Before I close this post, I must point out a day that will live in infamy not only for the Palestinians slain by a deranged madman but also for any decent Jew who opposes such racist, vile attacks on humanity. On February 25, 1994 Israeli Medical Doctor Baruch Goldstein, a follower of Jewish Extremist groups such as Kach and Jewish Defense League slaughtered around 40 Muslim Worshipers at the Cave of Patriarch's mosque. This day also happened to be Purim, a Jewish holiday celebrating not just Jewish victory from genocide against the Jews but also victory and slaughter of over 75,000 Persians as well as death of Haman and his sons.

Jews and Zionists have been divided over this issue and then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin denounced Goldstein as a "Degenerate Murderer" and called this vile, vicious act "a shame on zionism and an embarrassment on Judaism." Rabin's statement does ring true as any violent incident based on some form of extremist thought does make people think about a certain ideology a certain way. As with all ideologies, there are people having different opinions on certain issues and Judaism appears to be no exception.

There were even some people who considered Goldstein a martyr and hero. In my opinion, there shoudl have never been settlers on the West Bank and I don't feel that such a tragedy like that of Cave of Patriarchs would have occured had it not have been for Israel's expansionist actions starting with the breach of the 1947 U.N Partition Plan during the Israeli War for Independence. Israel has still failed to address the root issues leading to the militant ideologies that attracted Baruch Goldstein and other Jewish Supremacists as despite efforts by the Israeli Government to stop the flow of hatred towards Arabs the Israeli Defense Forces still commit atrocities against Arabs to this day.

Human rights vs. Political Authority; Ability vs. Democracy

What border do you think these officers are guarding? Mexico? No dice! It happens to be USA border! Yes, foreigners guarding the border for Barry Soetoro(AKA President Obama). They aren't even guarding the border but allowing illegals to cross. Now there's a major difference between Whites, Mestizos, Negroes, Jews, Asians, and Amerindians having equal human rights but Whites having more preferential treatment in terms of government and politics than other races.


What's the reasoning here? Reasoning here is something to do with nationalism and culture. If muslims became a majority in Europe, what would stop them from imposing Islamic culture in Europe? White minority rule in South Africa helped preserve Afrikaner culture. Allowing blacks to vote in South Africa paved the way for destroying the White culture established in South Africa. Same happened with Rhodesia. When I refer to Blacks, I don't mean Blacks as in the coloureds of America, I mean Blacks as in the tribal and more primative dark skinned negroes. In South Africa, not all dark skinned Negroes are the same as Bantus. There are also coloureds which have African ancestry but are more westernized and have adapted more to White European descending society.

It's hard to believe that Afrikaans speakers could also be non-White but take the case of Griqua people. Griqua people are a coloured ethnicity that adopted much of Boer culture but have remained segregated from Whites. Adam Kok III was a 19th century example of an individual of this ethnicity. Though coloured are more friendly to White Europeans, integration between Whites and Coloureds may not be in South African society's best interests. Blacks on the other hand are fundamentally different from coloureds. Blacks possess less intelligence overall than coloureds and are unlikely to accept westernization. The Apartheid government of South Africa designated a Bantustan system based off the Native American policy taken by the United States of America and Aboriginal policy of Australia. Unlike the reservations of America and Australia, Bantustans had more autonomy and enjoyed status as independent nations.

was Apartheid so horrible that it required granting voting rights to the alien races(Blacks)? Couldn't these Blacks have just moved to neighboring countires that were intended to be Black Bantu homelands? The United Nations even committed mass murder and destruction against the newly independent black country of Katanga during the early 1960's. The Congo became independent on June 30, 1960 but went into a violent warzone frenzy within days. Katanga was considered part of the Congo. In 1965, the Congo was renamed to Zaire but became the Congo again in 1997.

I don't need to explain the differences between Western and African countries as you can clearly see that African countries have average IQ's of 60-80, have more violent and tensions, more poverty, overpopulation, higher rates of illiteracy, and more animosity towards other races.

Compare Norway vs. the Central African Republic. Norway's Human Development Index is 0.955 while CAR's Human Development Index is a mere 0.352. That's like Norway passing the final exam at 95.5%, an A but CAR failing the exam with a disappointing 35.2%, an F-! Another issue is leadership. Nearly all European powers before the 19th century had monarchies. Republics would be formed between both World Wars, many of them communist dictatorships such as in Eastern Europe(minus Greece and Turkey).

 

I cannot say that White people have been the only ones to have made contributions to mankind nor develop other less privileged and less developed races as the Japanese deserve credit for being the most developed non-White country in the world. I would also include Singapore. In fact, America once competed with Japan for the best automaker in the World but as America's auto industry is failing, Japan definitely has the best auto industry in the World. Japan can also relate to white nationalists as both Japan and Nazi Germany were ultra-nationalist and anti-communist during World War II.

This blog post illustrates that it's ability that foremost counts as Whites and Sino-Japanese Asians have possessed more overall intelligence to improve human development than Negros and Aborigines. I almost forgot about India. Though India looks like a third world country with overpopulation and poverty, Indians have lots of potential and have shown great intelligence when it comes to human development.

India even has it's own major movie industry. Bollywood, rhymes with Hollywood. Despite Indians having a darker or more oriental skin color, there are rumors of them descending from Aryan tribes.

But how come China and India have low PPP Per Capitas? Though violence is less of a problem than in Africa, China and India suffer from wage slavery, poverty, and overpopulation. Seriously? Do less than 5% of population control over 90% of both China and India's wealth? It's easier for corporations to get away with wage slavery in China than in Canada.

How will America do when it has Mestizos become the majority? America is already made a laughing stock when compared to Australia, Singapore, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Canada, Norway, Japan, and Korea. All of these countries have higher hopes for economy prosperity than the United States of Amerikuh! America has more than half it's population of frickin welfare! In fact, if a literacy test was required to vote and it highlighted ability and character, I predict over 70% of Americans would be ineligible to vote.

democracy today relies on universal suffrage, which treats voting as an inalienable right like the right to life rather than a civic responsibility and privilege. Would anyone in 1800 have ever imagined that illiterate welfare parasites could be allowed to vote in ANY election? How about 1900? or 1950? With universal suffrage, Democracy really puts society at the mercy of a parasitic majority. The Civil Rights Movement has been made a laughing stock as welfare Negros from ghettos in crap cities like Detroit can vote in elections as long as they're of age and have no major criminal record.

There used to be more stringent qualifications for voting before the 1960's. Though it has been unconstitutional for elections to deny voting privileges to people based on their race, literacy tests were passed in not only the Southern states but out West and even in the Midwest to keep those who would abuse voting for their own selfish desires. In fact, it's not even the will of the majority that truly casts an informed decision but the mass media has worked to undermine the political system for their affiliate's self interest.

 

Isn't it a coincidence who owns more than 90% of America and Europe's media? Jewish supporters of Israel of course! While not all Jews are supportive of the bullshit that Jews have put America through, it just so happens that Israel has been portrayed positively and as a victim by the mainstream media. The Jews actually invented and controlled Hollywood. There was once a major movie industry called Walt Disney Pictures, which was run by Walt Disney himself until he died. Disney has been controlled by Jewish oligarchs since the 1970's, producing bullshit inconceivable to the mind of Walt Disney.

Why do the Jewish oligarchs in their mainstream medias ignore non-establishment candidates and push for so called "immigration reform", a code-word for legalization of illegal immigration? Funding comes primarily from Jewish sources. It's difficult to find a non-Jew running a media outlet.

Anyway, back to voting. How could voting be the only way of change if the majority is a tyrannical alien race voting in elections? Why aren't felons and Children allowed to vote? Society has considered felons and children without the character and literacy to take the democratic process in a respectable manner.

Speaking of that, I've also noticed how the Jewish run media says Hamas is firing rockets into Israel but these Israelis here are watching the Israeli bombing of Gaza. NO one in their right mind would view this as entertaining if rockets were being fired at them. Palestinians don't find this entertaining at all.

Talk about human rights and bashing Adolf Hitler when you can clearly see that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians for no reason other than that they oppose Jewish doctrines and are in fact "Goyim". Goyim is a Jewish term for non-Jews. I don't mean Goyim as someone who doesn't practice Judaism, I mean Goyim as in someone outside the Jewish race.

If Israel was really defending itself, why would it go all this way to ethnically cleanse Arabs from Arab designated homelands?

The UN Plan in 1947 would have made Jerusalem, Nazareth, Bethlehem, Acre, and Gaza part of the Arab State of Palestine but all of these major cities but Bethlehem and Gaza fell into Zionist hands. The UN designated Palestinian territories were the lands Jesus Christ lived his whole life on. In fact, the Jews of today aren't even part of the Semitic races. Arab Muslims and Arab Christians have lived in harmony for centuries under Ottoman rule but the Zionists turned Muslims and Christians against each other. The Zionists despised non-Jews and committed massacres and ethnic cleansing terrorist missions that made Arabs the minority in Palestine. Jews make up 76% of Palestine's population(which is Israel and occupied territories).

I just want to jump to the final point. The final point I wish to make is that Human rights don't mean allowing a feral majority to have equal political power as high IQ Whites. In fact, the most severe case of egalitarianism occurred in 1975-79 Cambodia where the Khmer Rouge tried to create an absolute egalitarian utopia but it resulted in 1/3 of Cambodia's population being eliminated. Intellectuals were targets of Khmer Rouge terror.

Communism opposed the natural order of hierarchy in favor of materialistic egalitarianism. History has proven the natural order theory right as Negros will inherently resort to warrior style reasoning, contrary to the peaceful reason based decision making of White Aryans which is why integration is dangerous for any races involved, even if Negros do manage to adopt some Westernization.

This is not to say I oppose treating non-Whites as human beings but I do believe that not all human beings are created equal and neither does every human being have equal worth. For example, Whites have the most worth due to their universal scarcity and high intelligence, reason, and high ability while Negros(Tribal Africans) are universally abundant yet have little worth due to not only their abundance but due to their very low intelligence and inability to compete in the global market, making them worse off independent than under European colonial rule.

I favor natural solutions instead of compromising the system God created for humanity by integrating races and pretending that all races behave the same. The reason for racial segregation is to keep a balance of harmony between different races and reduce racial conflict. Integration actually creates conflict as Blacks harbor animosity towards Whites and therefore we have not only Whites and Asians being victimized not only by alien races but have lower standards to accommodate the Negro and non-European Mestizo races.

I say this not to be a racist but to oppose cultural Marxism and defend the heritage and race that made White civilization the best humanity has ever known.

My Views on Race, Fascism, Nationalism, and Politics.

Keep in mind that I am writing this post to clarify my support for many different cultures that have brought cultural, social, and economic significance to their respective nations. I want to explain to you what I really think about race, fascism, national socialism, nationalism, politics, and such.

I have to admit I have Asperger syndrome but it is mild even though It affects my ability to communicate. Even though Nazi Germany euthanized the disabled(which I admit pushes the envelope too far), Hans Asperger successfully convinced society that Autistic people can still contribute to society. People with Down Syndrome have been contributors of society and have been employed in menial and even higher level jobs.


On this issue of Racism, what is Racism? What does it mean to be a racist? Racism can have different meanings to different people. For example, my kind of racism is realizing the achievements each race has made in civilization and realizing that it is the White race that has made the most achievements while the black race has made the least achievements. Thanks to White people, blacks in America have lived higher standards of living than their caveman like ancestors. Did Frederick Douglas, George Washington Carver, and Thurgood Marshall become the successful men they were without the guidance of the White race? wasn't it the White race that not only educated and developed the black race but also advocated the abolition of their enslavement in the Jewish dominated slave trade?

Just look at the above graph and you'll see that the slave trade was dominated by Jews. I'm not saying this to be hateful to Jews but it's fact that Jews are not really white but are mostly Khazars of Turkic-Mongolian blood. Abolitionists such as Harriet Beecher Stowe, William Henry Garrison, & Henry Thoreau were White European descendants from New England.

There's a difference between America and Europe. Unlike America, Blacks have never had a historical significance in nearly all of Europe. While there is black French comedian Dieudonne who has acted like a Frenchman more than Jews, having mass immigration of non-Whites into European countries is not in Europe's best interests. Being demographically displaced is genocide. Just look at the UN Genocide Convention.

..any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

— Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2

Leaders telling people to allow mass uncontrolled immigration into European countries is considered genocide and those responsible for trying to demographically displace the founding race of the nations affected are in violation of the convention as whites are being made a minority in the lands their ancestors created.

What would my views on segregation be? As a matter of fact, segregation is good for all races because it reduces conflict and allows countries to maintain order and prevent violent conflict. With the cultural marxist policy of integration, Whites and Asians are forced to go to school with Blacks, Mestizos, and Amerindians.  Given the nature of black people, forcing them into an environment with alien races has made Blacks more violent, more prone to committing crimes and has victimized Whites as much as Blacks. While Whites and Asians have been victims of lower educational standards and violent attacks by Blacks, Mestizos, and Amerindians; Blacks and Mestizos have been victims of corruption by Jewish Media oligarchs who promote drugs, thug culture, violence, and abuse of women through the Hip-Hop industry. I want to be perfectly clear that there are some White rappers such as Eminem but the Hip-Hop industry is mostly African-American. Hip-Hop artists such as Biggie Smalls and Tupac Shakar have been put in prison for violent and/or drug related crimes and both of them were victims of gang style drive by shootings. The killer of Tupac Shakar has not been brought to justice after nearly 18 years because instead of identifying the killer's name, Tupac's last words to the White police officer helping him was "F*ck you!". That's nice, a White person helping even a low life dirtbag such as Tupac and the thanks Tupac gives to the officer who could have brought Tupac's killers to justice was a rude remark!

While there are some non-Whites who have appreciated the help given to them by Whites, others have still remained hostile despite the generosity given to them. For example, the Pan-African terrorist organization African National Congress has members who have open called for blacks to murder Whites and have used barbaric methods such as necklacing, which was endorsed by Marxist terrorist Nelson Mandela's ex wife Winnie Mandela.

If you want to know my views on non-Whites, I say not all non-whites are depraved savages as there are numerous blacks who are potential allies to our nationalist crusade. As for matters on blogging about Jewish people, history has shown that they've been made second class citizens for their behavior and their refusal to assimilate with the kind and wonderful White Christian governments who allow them to assimilate with society.

The fact of the matter is that I don't hate any race personally but I feel that it is important for Western civilization to protect what it has built and It can't do that if they give absolute power to non-Whites and allow massive immigration from non-White countries. The idea that we should just disregard racial realism for egalitarianism is a dangerous cultural Marxist dogma as it leads to dangerous multiculturalism, sectarian violence, and loss of liberty. The reason for South Africa denying nearly all non-White Afrikaners the right to vote and have absolute equality with Whites was not because they were bigots but because the White South Africans wanted to protect the society they've built and not have South Africa become a third world hellhole like other black ruled countries. Sure there have been blacks who have showed most of White intelligence but the situation in South Africa for the past 20 years has been a complete handover of power to the terrorist African National Congress.

South Africa only proves point that democracy is the worst form of government as it fails to safeguard national culture and puts elected officials at risk for doing things merely to be elected or re-elected. The ANC has been the absolute majority in South Africa's parliament since 1994 and it's no surprise that South Africa is now a dangerous place to be. I wouldn't condone the abuses against any race as it would be cruel to do so but South Africa was built by Afrikaner/Boers mostly and while there have been a few blacks who have contributed to South Africa's development, I highly doubt that less than 93% of non-Whites are actually fit to govern anyone let alone influence who governs.

My conclusion on the issue of race is that there are many different countries that have different immigration policies and while some have been built exclusively for blacks(Liberia, Nigeria, Kenya, etc.) countries that have been built by White people should stay White and whites should not be made a minority by non-White immigration. Race is not just some social construct as history alone proves this to be a myth. The reason Haiti became worse off than before 1804 and outside the U.S. occupation(1916-1934) is because Haiti's independence was gained through terror and genocide against Whites. I call Haiti's dire situation of poverty as "the Curse of Haiti" for the genocidal actions of the negro rebels back in 1804.

If you want to know who the most racist people have been, it would have to be the Jews as while I don't view all Jews as racist, Jewish history, culture, and norms are centered around the purity of the Jewish race and the refusal to accept other races as deserving of humane treatment. Israeli-Jewish Rabbi Ovadia Yosef(1920-2013) has made an inflammatory racist comment back in 2010 stating  "The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews". This kind of comment implies that slavery is acceptable when Jews own slaves. Do you hear Catholic Priests, Protestant Ministers, or Orthodox Bishops make inflammatory comments defending slavery? Yosef's comments prove my point that Jewish civilization has not only been more racist but has also defended the practice of slavery more than any other civilization in history.

• "Fascism means first of all defending your nation against the dangers that threaten it. It means the destruction of these dangers and the opening of a free way to life and glory for your nation." --Corneliu Codreanu

Fascism and Nazism have been given bad names by a media dominated by a civilization that vows to destroy Western civilization. The truth is that Fascism is a nationalist economic system where the interests of the people of a nation are put before anything else. The economic system America has is crony capitalism where corporations are free to do what thy wilt instead of serving the common good of a nation's economy. If Australia was a fascist country, it wouldn't be losing it's Auto manufacturing plants as Australia has been historically a proud, nationalist country.

Fascism also stands against alien culture and ideologies. Pro-EU politicians are the most likely supporters of Austerity and Bailouts. The most extreme of Pro-EU politicians have called Eurosceptics "terrorists". Sweden recently passed a law making it a crime to complain about immigration. Will democracy save Sweden from White's becoming a minority? Has democracy saved Europe?

While Nazi Germany made plenty of mistakes that I disapprove of, Nazi Germany did encourage a high birthrate among the ethnic German people. In contrast, so called "Free Democratic Capitalist" societies don't care if their main ethnic group's birthrate is lower than number of immigrants invading. Even if Adolf Hitler needed to be stopped, should German have been forced to accept an alien political system known as Democracy and Capitalism? Such as system ruined Germany from 1919-1933 and again while the Nazis did some bad things I do applaud them for their socio-economic system for creating a sense of national pride in the German people and making Germany stronger.

There's nothing wrong with ethnic nationalism in countries where it is appropriate. While America has been more racially neutral than most other countries, Nordic countries have historically remained White and have not opened their borders as required by the Soviet style EU. Western civilization hasn't had a fascist country since the early 1990's. Portugal fell to pro-democracy terrorists in 1974, King Juan Carlos I betrayed Spain in 1977 with the revival of much of what the Spanish Republic was, the Military Juntas of Greece and Brazil fell in 1974 and 1985 respectively, South Africa fell to the terrorist pan-African ANC as a result of forced universal suffrage in 1994, and Augusto Pinochet was toppled in 1990.

Have people ever thought that most of America's wealth is in the hands of Jewish oligarchs who support Israel(despite it's crimes against humanity)? Has anyone dared to question the usury practiced by the Jewish dominated banking system?

Bottom line on Fascism and National Socialism is that both systems have been smeared to mean anti-freedom while capitalism, democracy, and communism have been even more responsible for the loss of individual freedom. China is an example of cronyism that combines corporate capitalism with communism and forces Chinese workers into wage slavery. Developing countries have people living on less than $2 a day. Would fascist and national socialist countries allow big business to usurp the national economy and allow jobs to be lost to slave driving big business?

In fact, from the way I see it, fascist countries have the highest sense of national pride than democratic and communist countries. Hell, even communist countries had more national pride than "democracies". What works for the United Kingdom doesn't work for Greece and I am talking about culture and politics. While the United Kingdom has a proud tradition of parliamentary democracy, Greece has been more restrictive in sense of democracy. Athens did create the first democracy but it was construed so that decision making was for those who understood civics and had an appreciation for the culture of Greece and only Golden Dawn has that appreciation.

Nationalism, Democracy, and Politics collide. Universal Suffrage is a democratic value in which every Tom, Dick, and Harry Barry should have the right to vote regardless of their intelligence and character. Democracies have been considered the worst form of government for good reasons as I quote America's founding fathers Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and John Adams.



Democracies in pure forms are doomed to fail. The Weimar Republic ended with Adolf Hitler's rise to power and the situation could have been worse as Communists were a militant and strong force in German politics. Fortunately, the German people wanted a leader who stood for their interests and not a minority who was less than 2% of the population. While Hitler was not infallible, I still would regard him as a great leader for his numerous accomplishments in science, culture, economics, and nationalism. Germany under Hitler would experience superpower status as had German Reich survived after World War II, Germany would be seen as the leader in science and technology for accomplishments in film and TV industry, weaponry, and would have even had astronauts of their own land on the Moon and even reach Mars.

This is not to say I condone any terrible actions taken by Nazi Germany but I reject the idea that we should hate Nazis and Germans for a few terrible crimes committed. If the Western Allies cared about human rights and justice, they would have never collaborated with the murderous and genocidal Soviet Union let alone condone the crimes committed by the Red Army.

Was Stalin ever tried for crimes against humanity when millions of Ukrainians were being deliberately starved by having their crops stolen by Red Army thugs? Who was the Ukrainian's voice? Did Adolf Hitler ever engage in the same barbaric crimes or at least the same degree of barbarity that Stalinist Soviet Union engaged in? Did the Allied Powers ever condemn Stalin for having the Red Army brutally invade and annex Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, let alone invade Finland?

Would Winston Churchill have supported the Allied Powers if he was outraged by the crimes committed by the Stalinist regime in Moscow? In fact, I don't even think of the Soviet Union as being ruled by Russians. I think of it as being ruled by Atheist Jews! While I don't hold all Jews to account for the horrific crimes of the 20th century, Jewry overall has been responsible for the most evil political system to ever exist in history and that is Communism(Marxism-Leninism-Maoism) considering that Hitler never deliberately starved his own people in a manner done by the Stalinist regime in Moscow.

When Germany invaded Ukraine in the early 1940's, Hitler would be seen as a liberator to the Ukrainian people  given what they've been put through by Josef Stalin.

Compare the crimes of Nazi Germany to the Soviet Union. Though Nazi Germany has committed some crimes, many of these crimes have been over-exaggerated while the Soviet crimes have been beyond ignored and even watered down. While the Nazi's cared very much about sanitation and removing deadly disease carrying lice, the Soviets would allow Gulag inmates to die from starvation, overwork, and disease.

 

How could America overlook the crimes committed by Josef Stalin? Does anyone know of the American workers who migrated to the USSR only to be imprisoned in harsh gulags? While the Nazi "Extermination" camps existed only during World War II, the Soviet Gulag system has existed even before Hitler's rise to power.

Why the Turner Diaries is the most Important Literature Patriots Will Ever Read Part I

http://aryanvanguard.blogspot.com/2010/12/turner-diaries.html

Excuse me for pointing out a "racist" book as it is more than just about White Supremacy. This book is more about armed militant resistance to a tyrannical federal government with an anti-government organization known only as the "Organization" fighting against the government known as the "System".

What makes this book so compelling that I am blogging about it? This book tells a heroing tale of a band of brave and heroic patriots who fight to liberate America from the Tyrannical Federal Government ruled by Zionist Jewish Interests. Not only must the Organization fight an ever more increasingly tyrannical government that has become as tyrannical as the one ruled by Big Brother in George Orwell's book 1984, but the Turner Diaries also takes place when nearly all Americans are unwilling to fight back against tyrannical government, just as the Patriots of 1776 did.

But what tyranny does America face in this book? The Cohen Act would be passed by Congress, outlawing firearm ownership and authorizing massive police crackdown on firearm ownership while confiscating firearms people owned. Earl Turner and his organization would resist such confiscation and hide weapons in secret bunkers. BTW, police in this book are totalitarian Stalinist thugs who would imprison White Americans for possessing firearms. Hundreds of thousands of Americans would be arrested and detained for refusing to surrender their firearms despite jails being overcrowded beyond belief so the Stalinist thugs imprison detained gun owners in harsh Soviet Gulag style camps until new jails can be built.

As the Organization grows larger and more sophisticated, it begins to engage in militant guerrilla action against the System. The first example of the Organizations attack on government facilities included the bombing of the J. Edgar Hoover FBI Headquarters which was blown to hell with a massive truck bomb. As a result of the bombing of the FBI Building, the Organization was closer to liberating America from Zionist anti-White tyranny. With FBI headquarters blown to rubbish hell, the System was in a system of septic shock that would take weeks to recover from.

How did the FBI building fare in The Turner Diaries after being bombed? Smoke was rising, rescue crews were pulling out bodies of victims. Now first thing people think about when a terrorist made bomb hits a building is whoever did this is a monster and needs to die. However, these are just casualties and in war most casualties have been civilian casualties. The Organization did not intend to harm innocent people but could not be held liable for whatever unintentionally happens to people whether they be enemy belligerents or innocent civilians. Plus, the bombing received heavy news coverage. 700+ people would be killed. This appeared to be a smashing victory for patriots as the Matrix Americans have been living in has finally been penetrated with a massive explosion.

The Organization would kill thousands of innocent people not because they're cruel and evil monsters who love to cause carnage and hell for the hell of it but because they understand the realities of war and that freedom in most circumstances is only going to be gained by engaging in massive and bloody warfare where thousands or even millions die. But what other choice does humanity have? If the Organization had to punish members for killing innocent victims whether intentional or not for every incident, they would lose their War on Tyranny.

In extreme situations of war, you have to send a very powerful message that scars and badly affects millions of lives. If you're at war, don't you want to do whatever it takes, even if such a result is deadly for a handful of the population? What truly matters is achieving a plan for victory that will produce a greater outcome for the greater and more humane public. The corruption of humanity by the Jewish-liberal-democratic-egalitarian plague which  afflicts the world is more clearly manifested in society's soft-mindedness, our unwillingness to recognize the harder realities of life, than in anything else.

The Turner Diaries rightfully illustrates that the bombing of a government building is justifiable regardless of the number of innocent victims killed. This is because the organizations working in that building are enemy belligerents and their elimination is the only solution to victory. Creating a psychological effect that will last for weeks or even years is important because it sends a message that God has judged and will continue judging and people will realize they are at war and will have to fight for their freedom instead of living in a fantasy world. Violence and Terrorism are unfortunately the most effective ways of bring people out of their fantasy world and into reality.

The good part about this is the outcome with the righteous forces being victorious and rebuilding society after the war. Also, after the bombing of FBI headquarters, soldiers for the Organization raided a government armory but had to engage in a shootout with the guards defending the stash. The raid was successful and the truck the Organization used was filled with many guns and explosives.

As time flew by, the Organization has also pulled off over 200 separate terrorist incidents across the country. This is what I would call "producing results!" What makes Islamist militants more successful than Combat 18 is that the former has committed countless acts of terror while Combat 18 has yet to get anywhere close to causing massive 9/11 style pain and suffering. The Organization however just doesn't execute militant attacks lightly. They have careful planning strategies that were sure to result in victory if done according to plan.

the Organization attacked media outlets working for the System such as the Washington Post. With the bombing of Washington Post, people were unable to be poisoned by the vile propaganda perpetrated by the tyrannical government. The bombing of the Washington Post wouldn't stop some vile evil monster from writing a nasty editorial slandering the Organization. This sick F*** would say that anyone belonging to the Organization should be hunted down like bane dogs while black thugs who kill, rob, and rape are given victim status as victims of police brutality.

Clearly, the ones pressing tolerance are intolerant of certain viewpoints. Back to the Organization. The Organization doesn't attack simply for the sake of it but it instead carefully plans out the attack and ensures it has a devastating effect on the enemy. The Organization would anticipate the military might and security of the System and the Organization is finding more ways to undermine security.

There was a traitor in the Turner Diaries who refused to eliminate a rabbi and apostate priest who promoted the Marxist egalitarianism known as racial integration. Powell was asked to carry out the elimination order but refused and was even back-talking by claiming that violence and terrorism has neither benefited America's founding race nor advanced individual liberty. My theory is Powell could have been a government mole.

I'm going to split this blog post into two or three posts with this being Part I.