Total Pageviews

About Me

United States
I'm informing readers that video games and politics are what I follow. I follow up on new video games and hope that oppressed peoples will secede from the U.S. Yankee Empire. I'm a big fan of the Wii U Gamepad style controls as I own a Nintendo 64, PlayStation 2, Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, and Wii U with plans on owning a PlayStation 4 by receiving it for Christmas.

Blog Archive

Saturday, April 18, 2015

What is the best hope for White Liberation?

As this world seems more concerned with accepting more Mud People who will damage the superior European ways of life, Argentina has become a safe haven for Europeans seeking a better economic future. Brazil and Australia have stricter immigration policies unlike last century.
Ukraine is also a White friendly nation that overthrew the pro-Russian Semi-Asiatic regime in Kiev. Should the fight for Ukraine be about more than just Ukraine or about a fight for the revival of White population risings? While the Kirchner regime in Buenos Aries has lacked the concern to fight for fellow oppressed White Europeans, Argentina does have great potential, given that disgruntled White nationalists could simply move to Argentina temporarily and protest the government's non pro-White actions, demanding greater pro-white policies.
Possible partition could include a Pro-Russian Eastern Ukraine, a Nationalist Ukraine in the Far-East ruled under a one part Svoboda-Right Sector coalition, and the current Ukrainian regime. The real question is should the yet to be established White Nationalist regime of West Ukraine try to incite White nationalists in Baltic States to cause their governments to resign and their Judeo-Democratic systems will collapse. Nationalist leaders will emerge like Napoleon and begin a process of National Reconstruction, expelling the Jewish Colonial era non-White immigrants and reserving the Heartland of the master race for White people.

What does Right Sector in Ukraine stand for?

The Great Ukrainian Reconquista: What is the Right Sector fighting for?

We, the warriors and commanders of the Right Sector are actively fighting the regime, remembering the heroism of King Svyatoslav the Courageous of Kyiv, King Danylo of Galicia, of Bohdan Khmelnytsky and the warriors of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army; implementing the right of a people to rise against injustice; and aware of our responsibilities before the dead and injured heroes of the Maidan.

For the right of every Ukrainian to human dignity...

For a fair criminal trial of Berkut and other dogs of the occupational system...

Against the humiliation and impoverishment of the Ukrainian people...

Against the war of the government with its own people...

For responsible voters and politicians...

For the election of judges...

Against corrupt and marginal democracy...

Against degeneracy and totalitarian liberalism...

For traditional folk morality and family values...

For Ukrainian families having many children...

For a spiritually and physically healthy youth...

Against a culture of consumerism and eroticism...

Against any form of "integration" on terms dictated from outside of Ukraine...

For unity and worldwide greatness of the Ukrainian nation...

For a great Ukrainian and European Reconquista... Everything is only beginning! From our Maidan, the rebirth of Kyivan-Rus/Ukraine commences, the rebirth of Europe commences.

Glory to Ukraine!

Glory to our heroes!

My kind of organization, fighting for the Glory of the European Master Race. Right Sector must increase it's base and spread it's wings not just to Europe but also South Africa, Australia, and America. Right Sector revolution will tear down the cancers of liberalism and Marxism that are destroying our once dominant White race.
Oleh Tyahnybok September 2014.jpg
Will we see Oleh Tyahnybok and Dmytro Yarosh emerge as the Napoleon Bonaparte of the White Race?
Ukrainian Nationalists are dismantling Soviet Idols and fighting to purge Ukraine and eventually Europe of this Marxist Cancer.
I really like Right Sector's paramilitary style! Parties with paramilitary groups get taken more seriously. Glad to see some Nordic like beauties in Ukraine fighting for freedom.
Embedded image permalink
The labels of "Democracy" and "Dictatorship" mean nothing of substance. In fact, Assad's dictatorship is much more preferable than Obama's democracy. Above chart makes the point. Assad is more a legitimate ruler than Obama will ever be. It's not just majority of votes either but how much support leaders have. Plus, Syria doesn't have a Zionist controlled press as the Syrian people are the strongest nationality I have ever seen.
Right Sector during a march on the 72nd anniversary of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army in Kiev.(RIA Novosti / Alexandr Maksimenko)
Could we finally see total liberation from Zionist control over Ukraine?
Ruptly video still
It appears over the past year Right Sector has grown into an anti-communist terror machine, avenging the humiliating defeat of the Aryan Race. Ukrainians shall liberate Germany by 2019 just as Germany liberated Ukraine in 1941.

Question is, will Ukraine make Aryans the master elite of Ukraine and Europe through Revolutionary Nationalism or will it be defeated by the Zio-Imperial European Union and NATO?

Thursday, February 5, 2015

How to Resolve the Ukraine conflict for a White Western future?

Flag of Right Sector.svgLogo of the All-Ukrainian Union "Svoboda"
Two far-right groups known as Right Sector and Svoboda advocate an ultra-nationalist Ukraine. Following last year's Euro-maiden, a pro-EU and pro-NATO government was established in Kiev. What troubles me here is why aren't Right Sector and Svoboda advocating a Single-Party State ruled by fascist parties? Also, why hasn't Right Sector and Svoboda denounced liberal democracy and NATO? Why are these groups fighting for a puppet government of a Zionist Empire company known as the European Union?

Are Right-Sector and Svoboda just stunt parties intended to deceive and trap White Nationalists or do they truly want a free and independent Ukraine? Countries not part of the European Union have more sovereignty than countries under EU rule. Ukraine is among the best battlegrounds for White nationalism. The conflict with the less politically correct Russia however is creating diplomatic problems.
Both Russia and Ukraine's far-right in some way have conflicts with the European Union either politically or ideologically. The problem here is the Jewish Empire's secret influence over Europe as well as their golden opportunity to expand their evil empire with Ukraine. The above cartoon is a battle of Union vs. non-Union Workers while the Billionaires hold imperial power over the middle class. That is exactly what democracy is, divide and conquer. There is only one dominant elite that gives the illusion of competition and opposition.

Democracy, Mass rule, and Politics; a perfect divide and conquer strategy. The rich and powerful not only get more rich and powerful but also more greedy as they expect impunity for their crimes against the White middle class. Democracy does not bring unity, peace, and the rule of law, it gives politicians, robber baron bankers, and foreign subversives excuses to commit their crimes of stealth.
Petro Poroshenko's pro-EU Pro-Zionist West sect is in control in Ukraine but real power is vested with Marxist Jewry. Dmytro Yarosh and Oleh Tyahnybok are part of the Far-Right Nationalist sect. Unlike Poroshenko, Yarosh and Tyahnybok oppose Judeo-Marxist-Stalinist imperialism.

While many european and American countries have accepted Cultural marxism, Political Correctness, and unknowingly accepted Jewish Imperialism, Ukraine's Far-Right appears to be fighting back and wants a free and independent Ukraine, without any control by the Judeo-Communist Imperialists.

Olel Tuahnybok is a role model for any civil minded peoples fighting for freedom and independence against marxist imperialism. Quotes here prove it:
"[You are the ones] that the Moscow-Jewish mafia ruling Ukraine fears most"[13]
and
"They were not afraid and we should not be afraid. They took their automatic guns on their necks and went into the woods, and fought against the MuscovitesGermansJews and other scum who wanted to take away our Ukrainian state."
Tyahnybok considers not just Russian loyalists and Germans to be foreigners but also Jews. Tyahnybok has also advocated re-arming Ukraine with nuclear weapons, despite such action being a violation of so called "international law". International Law is used to deny the sovereignty of nations international Jewish imperialists disapprove of. One such victim was South Africa's Afrikaner Nationalist Apartheid regime. Would the inferior African Civilization have triumphed over the superior Western Civilization if colonial powers viewed the inferior mud race civilizations as biological and political enemies?

Tyahnybok was even investigated one decade ago for the zio-imperialist invented crime of "inciting ethnic hatred" but fortunately he was never prosecuted. Tyahnybok was however destroyed morally by the malicious Jewish Owned media's slander but Tyahnybok was vindicated and even more motivated to fight for national sovereignty.

Why am I showing support for the Ukrainian side over Russia? I consider both the Ukrainian and Russian people to be victims of Jewish Bolshevism yet Putin reveres Svoiet history too positively and has failed to work in making Russians the dominant ethnic group while excluding untrustworthy foreigners from participating in changing Russian society. Ukraine's far-right is angry that Russia hasn't owned up to it's horrible past(Holodomor) and has refused to denounce KGB war crimes.

Putin however is at war with the cultural marxist forces of the supposed "west" while Ukraine's far-right is fighting the Stalinist revering Russia. But what Right Sector and Svoboda want is an independent Ukraine, free of foreign influence. The White Aryan Christian people of Ukraine will be the master people under Ukraine's far-right world(should such be a reality) .

Who is my favorite character in the Ukraine-Russia conflict? I have to give hats off to Oleh Tyahnybok. Unfortunately, Poroshenko will betray Ukraine's far-right eventually when it becomes pragmatic for him to do so by potentially passing more laws calling for stricter measures against "inciting ethnic hatred" which is nothing more than a suppression of expressing nationalism and concern for the White Christian race.

However, many Ukrainians don't share the far-right views Tyahnybok and Yarosh share. The Right Sector however is paramilitary and a Svoboda-Right Sector merger can be constructed to form an alliance in overthrowing the Jewish Democratic System of Ukraine and install a Fascist but Organic Democratic Ukrainian State,
Royal Standard of the Hetman of Ukraine (1918).svg
Ukraine's best political hope is a nationalist single-party authoritarian dictatorship under the Ukrainian State with a dictator. The reason "inciting ethnic hatred" and "hate crime" legislation is used is not to prosecute acts but to eliminate political opposition. The Ukrainian State should not be just Ukrainian nationalist but also White nationalist, sharing a bond of brotherhood with fellow White Slavs and creating a force dedicated to defeating international Jewish imperialism and White Genocide.

A union with Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Kalinigrad should be established to counter anti-white imperialism. The official ideology of this Balto-Slavic Union should be White Nationalism, Anti-Communism, Anti-Marxism, Pro-Independence, Pro-Gun, and Anti-Zionist. Jews should be viewed as a hostile foreign elite as well as depriving hostile foreigners from obtaining access to strategic positions of influence over Ukrainian society. Only White Christians should have positions of influence over Balto-Slavic society.
Euromaidan collage.jpg
I know this goes against previous beliefs I held on Ukraine but the Ukrainian Revolution brought unity through strength, disregarding political wings in favor of demanding accountability, justice, and resistance to Russian Imperialism. The best hope for a Whiter future is the victory of Ukraine's Far-Right and to unite Belarus, Baltic States, Kalinigrad, and Ukraine into a superstate with White Brotherhood as it's national ideology.

Saturday, January 24, 2015

Will Russia Liberate Europe from the Anti-Westerners?

Who is the true leader of the Free World? It's certainly not the United States. It's Putin's Russia. Given the situation in the Ukraine involving pro-Russian rebels and the pro-EU ZOG regime in Kiev, Ukraine; Vladimir Putin is the leader of pro-Christian resistance to third world cancers such as Islamic supremacy, which Europe experiences. The United States has refused to use it's status as a superpower to defend the first world rights of first world Europeans around the World.

You see, making such a remark as Putin has made could land you in jail in Western Europe. While the Jew run West is making Putin look as if he is evil, Christians have much more freedom and safety in Russia than Sweden for example. France is soon to have a nationalist revolution with Marine Le Pen as it's leader.
The U.S. Government is a disgrace to freedom and western civilization, fighting wars for Israel under false pretenses. Israel is no friend of Christians either and has condoned abuses by multicultural regimes in Europe. Would the Jewish State of Israel ever send arms to nationalist rebels resisting multicultural and cultural Marxist tyranny? The nature of the Jews is a chauvinistic, selfish, and unsympathetic attitude while claiming to be part of Western Civilization. In fact, the Jewish nation and Judaism has done more to destroy Western Civilization than any other foreign threat ever did.

What if America was a Christian supremacist empire fighting for the supremacy of the First World? What if the U.S. Constitution was made to grant supremacy to people of Western Faiths(regardless of denomination) and excluded people of non-Western religions from having any influence over American society? In fact, the problem with America is that it failed to prevent exploitation from foreign subversives(mainly the Jews). Once Jews were given equal access to influence over society, Jews began having the most influence over society and abused the freedoms America was founded on.

How disgraceful is America for allowing Christians to lose their cultural and political supremacy? How could Jews be considered White Europeans despite their history of subversion and animosity towards their host nation?

Do I hate Jews and non-Westerners? Of course not. The fact of the matter is that Jews have displayed themselves as untrustworthy to occupy occupations that affect society as a whole. Banking for instance, I have never known of a single Jew in interest banking that is truly an honest and loyal patriot. In fact, the banking system of the Western World is full of Talmudic scum who aren't worthy of having their pathetic lives saved.

Logo Front National.svg
Marine Le Pen is rising in popularity and it is very possible for her to become president of france. a front National regime in France will help liberate Europe from cultural marxist tyranny, dismantle the EU and NATO, and make France a power for White liberation.
Will 2015 be like 1848? I hope so cause faith in "democracy" means trusting a failed and broken electorate and Jew run media. Political change will not come from elections alone and sometimes cannot come from elections. With Whites in South Africa being harmed, killed, or having to flee, democratic options for a separate state are time consuming and is confirming to a system that is controlled by the enemy(the ANC and Jewish financers).

Besides, why not defy a political system that rewards scoundrels, cheats, liars, criminals, degenerates, and scammers while penalizing the honest, kind, Christ-like, statesmen, leaders, and saviors. No wonder these same politicians funded by mostly Jewish political machines keep getting elected. With modern democracy, elected officials are more concerned with being elected than defending their country from it's mortal enemies.

While Stalin remains the agent of the mortal enemies of Christendom and Western Civilization, Stalin's quote is more true than all the lying "American""Australian"and "European" politicians. Elections only given the illusion that people can alter their government. People will never be given an effective choice in that matter.
File:Birth of the Irish Republic.jpg

April 24-29, 1916 known as the Easter Rising will be remembered as the start of effective armed resistance and the Irish Republic. No doubt I express my admiration of the brave, heroic, and valiant Irish who during this period may have lost but inspired the Irish War of Independence three years later, even after Great Britain won World War I. Ireland like much of Europe is being threatened by a force greater than the British and that is International Jewry's institutions. NATO, EU, and UN have threatened the sovereignty of nations exercising it's sovereignty and much be stopped. Putin's Russia is beyond perfect but his Russia is the best we've got to dismantle the globalist institutions that hold leaders hostage and prevent patriots from leading their country to victory.

The best hope for Europe, America, South Africa, and Australia is to support Putin's Russia in giving aid to nationalist insurgents just as Russia aided the Bulgarians in their fight for independence from Ottoman rule in 1877-78.

What the Texas Secession Movement should be doing is consulting with Vladimir Putin's Russia to discuss giving aid to Texas rebels against Jewmerican rule. The Civil War proved lesson in survival of the fittest as the North was more industrialized and has superior weapons than the Agrarian South. Putin's Russia has a higher morale among it's people while America and much of Europe have a low morale. Could there be a mutiny?

An Independent Texas could become a great power that could be the messianic state of the White Race. An Independent Texas could dismantle the real evil empire, the empire run by international Jewry. An Independent Texas should not make the same mistake the Founding Fathers made in the 1780's in construing religion freedom and equality to mean Jews have to be allowed to own more media than Patriotic Christians. Only people of Western religions should be entrusted with strategic positions of Texas society and this includes finance, politics, media, etc. Apartheid should be instituted against non-Whites and undesirables to make White European Texans the dominant racial group in Texas. Jews will be excluded from this classification and be considered a foreign ethnicity. Any Jew who becomes a devoted Christian for 15 years can be fully classified as White European unless their Christianity is false and against Texan values. During the 15 year period, the converted Jew will be classified as transitioning White Christians.

Texas will be a Christian nation, NOT a Judeo-Christian nation as the Christian Zionists falsely claim. Keep in mind that any supposed "Christian" who says Jews are "God's Chosen People" or are no different from us should be treated as blasphemy.


Russia has to support separatist movements in America as it is the main hope of saving Western civilization. As all empires have fallen, America has certainly made itself an empire, risen during the late 19th century to early 20th century but will be fallen by early 21st century.

Friday, December 12, 2014

Keeping What Civilization has Earned


1. Ciseki
2. Transeki
3. Lesotho
4. Kwazulu
5. Swaziland
6. Lebowa
7. Gazankulu
8. Venda
9. South Ndebele
10. Botswana


This map is an alternate history map I found outlining what could have been a separate homeland for Black Bantus that could have become the Azania League while creating a less polarizing federal South Africa where Afrikaner interests are first to be considered while local communities that deal with everyday life such as work, education, and social life can have more power over those issues. Is having racially segregated communities such a bad thing it needs to be denounced as a "crime against humanity"? After all, should Whites eventually become minorities in their own homeland their ancestor nation earned in building? Should Whites be forced to live in fear of higher crime rates from non-whites due to integration of communities originally intended to be reserved for a specific race?

While the Bantustans were slovenly drawn and should have been expanded to give Blacks true independence, I disagree with the notion of making it seem as if Bantustans are like concentration camps. Freedom of Movement is a fundamental human right and if someone has to fear being attacked by vicious predators, then that right comes under attack. Should so called "asylum Seekers" who are truly a disgrace to genuine asylum seekers be considered fully equal so that they can eventually attack beautiful Westernized peoples? It's not just Whites who come under attack but also non-Whites who embrace Western civilization and pose no threat to the national identity of the country's soil they walk on.

I understand that racial segregation can have some social and economic consequences but is segregation so bad that people need to essential be at risk for having their communities be demographically altered by alien races? Integration not only threatens White people but also Blacks, Asians, Jews, etc. since they risk demographic injustice.

Has the Rainbow Nation solution been a perfect Final Solution to the Apartheid problem? Evidence shows that as the most diverse of races, Bantus find themselves at war with each other. The Bantustans were intended to correct these tribal issues by granting Bantus their right to self determination similar to decolonization of Africa that occurred mostly in 1960.

The international community is failing White people but only a few countries have potential to give White Civilization a fighting chance.
А.Р.Лукашэнка (выразка).jpgBashar al-Assad (cropped).jpg
I actually consider these men the Four musketeers. Alexander Lukashenko, Serzh Sargsyan, Vladimir Putin, and Bashir Al-Assad could be as of right now most likely to express solidarity as Heads of State with victims of White and Western Genocide. Lukashenko has been declared Europe's final dictator. Though he has held on to many Soviet institutions, may I remind you that he will not be one to allow massive third world immigration. Belarus also has potential for arms dealing and his regime could supply right-wing resistance movements with as much advanced weaponry as possible.

In a race against time, compromise is the only option. When strength gets higher, the enemies of Western Civilization will start fleeing and retreating. Finances are a problem as states who have a vested interest in giving aid to White cause. Lukashenko, Sargsyan, Putin, and Assad are all targets of the Judeo-Marxist Democratic establishment headquartered in Washington D.C. and Brussels, capitals of the evil empires of the United States and European Union respectively. The enemy of my enemy is my friend in this case as I hate the U.S. government and the European Union for being responsible and complicit in White Genocide. While not all who oppose the U.S. govt. and E.U. have solidarity with White Power, my favorite form of government is a fascist leaning dictatorship that fights for Western Civilization and the White race, defying the international establishment and standing up to it. Lukashenko is taking on the EU.

Putin's Russia is also having heated relations with the U.S. and E.U. and Obama has even gone further as to impose sanctions on Russia. I'd like to see World War III as a war between Globalists and Sovereignty with Russia and Belarus leading the anti-globalist crusade.

The United Nations is not as harmless as you may think. The UN's institutions strike terror into those who dare defy it's agenda. Thank God UN does not have the institutions to be a superpower empire of evil. However, evil people(mainly international Jewry) believe they have the power to override the sovereignty of any real nation without consent of the governed. When Apartheid was declared a quote "crime against humanity" in 1976, this was a declaration of war against the Afrikaner people as Apartheid was not only part of Afrikaner national identity but was an alternative to genocide of Bantu peoples.
File:Afrikaner Vryheidsvlag.svg
Why do I focus on South Africa first? The Afrikaner people are among the most endangered White people as the tyrannical ANC has refused to consider them sometimes as part of political society. Afrikaner cultural needs are met with financial and social compromise as they are forced to fend for themselves without enough firearms. South Africa created a better society under apartheid, becoming a developed country. Why does South Africa even under Black rule seem more developed than other Black countries? White people still have enough influence over society! The 1992 South African referendum allowing for multiracial elections was a fraud as intimidation, foreign influence, and abuse of power was used. If only some brave Afrikaner Nationalists overthrew the government and began a campaign of expelling Black inhabitants of Afrikaner lands.

There is a small town called Orania home to virtually Afrikaner people only and could be the ticket to reclaiming Afrikaner sovereignty. Integration has proven to be a cancer and forced integration is a violation of sovereignty and self-determination! Given the events in Donetsk and much of East Ukraine, it is possible to self-proclaim a state. The Irish War for Independence was pretty much a grassroots uprising against British rule and starting with Orania is a great start.
File:GeraldoGeraldesSemPavor.jpgFile:Painting of Santiago Matamoros.jpg
Why stop with Orania? These Bantu-supremacist cockroaches have stolen Afrikaner land and must feel the vicious and brutal wrath of god! The above map outline's Bantu lands in the peace deal between Afrikaner nationalists and the ANC government demanding the return of lands previously having White majorities(such as Pretoria, Johannesburg, Bloemfontein, Cape Town, Port Elizabeth, Windhoek, Durban, and other Western built cities) or face extreme bloody wrath! If massacres of millions of the enemies of White people must occur with brutal heated passion, it will be the anti-Whites fault as well as the fault of the international community for denying White people justice!

Separate Development and separate nations on appropriate lands are the only peaceful solution. Things must get worse before reaching victory and conflict is a great way to gain attention and bring about a peace process. Some compromises can be met such as demilitarization and condominium status of certain lands, even sharing of natural resources under international treaty supervision but the White man's civilization must not except the deprivation of justice for his brethren. When one White Western nation is threatened, all White Western nations are threatened.

How would the re-conquest be fought? What artillery is needed? Since Orania will have to start small, appropriating funds by engaging in deals with organized crime syndicates or even heists in covert operation, even engaging in activities organized crime syndicates engage in to raise money. Much of the supplies needed can come from humanitarian organizations and items captures from pillages of enemy holds. Targeting armories, military bases, and airports is a very important step in this White Liberation Movement.

White racial loyalists, no matter who they are should be a part of this crusade and able bodies males should fight in combat. White loyalist organizations should give charity to the White crusader cause including donations, firearms(if possible), healthcare, armored vehicles, and information. This cause will also be successful by soliciting wealthy White Gentiles to donate wealth for our cause, particularly celebrities of Afrikaner descent.

BTW, it's not just White people who share Afrikaner heritage but Coloreds as well. When I think of Coloreds in South Africa, such as Basters and Griqua, I think of African-Americans(the more Westernized Blacks). Griqua people once had their own state, with cities such as Kokstad and Kimberly.

What must be done about this Bantu occupation of historically Afrikaner White Communities? The Bantus must be expelled from Western built cities such as Johannesburg and should such Bantus refuse, they should be forced to leave by any means and at all costs. A message should be sent Mafia style to the ANC hogs that have stolen White built institutions and have destroyed South Africa that such an occupation will not be tolerated and brutal plus swift action will be taken against them, including giving them the same respect you'd give your enemies. ANC would not have power had it not have been for the criminal traitors(F.W. Klerk) who failed to safeguard Afrikaner power and instead allow Mandela and ANC to gain power.

A network of wealthy individuals who care about the plight of White people should fund the paramilitary resistance to ANC tyranny.

It is clear that co-existing under the same land and government has made blacks a cancer to White Afrikaners. You don't co-exist with a cancer. Apartheid only treated the symptoms of the Bantu cancer and did not do enough to expel this cancer from Boer society. Black majority rule is like living with mad rabid dogs and cancer.

The final solution to the Bantu problem is the partition of South Africa with the lands enclosed in thick black lines, establishing a federal state, naming it Azania. The rest of the land will be reserved for Whites and Colored, establishing itself as an Afrikaner Republican State, with the State President having no authority to compromise Boer power. Protecting national sovereignty is more important than abiding by "international law" which is in reality made by foreigners who have no concern or understanding of the particular country's issues. The international community had no idea why Apartheid was really adapted. International justice, if it means anything, refers to a state of affairs where the world’s ethnic groups, races and religions are given the independence to develop according to their own historical tradition, not the ideological slogans of the current hegemon. For those who supported the transfer of power from the rightful holders of power(Afrikaners) to the Bantu majority, a lack of understanding and any kind of meddling(such as economic sanctions) has eroded the meaning of justice, opting instead for a multicultural path to a one world government and abolition of nations.

When borders and nations are established, it is Apartheid. With nations, each country decides who can and cannot become a citizen. The real issue is who has true independence and who doesn't. The 1994 election in South Africa was a humiliating defeat for Western civilization as the once conservative and proudly sovereign Afrikaner nation was conquered by the inferior monkey races. Non-violence and democratic elections have no effect because the ANC have passed affirmative action, reducing Afrikaner influence over South African society. There is a good reason Hitler's regime prohibited Jews from having influence over German society as Jews are inherently less trustworthy than Aryans of protecting German interests(even though certain Jews however have proven themselves trustworthy enough to be part of German society).

If only Apartheid excluded Jews(who mostly came under British commonwealth rule) from being part of South African society and instead expelled these foreigners as a corrupt influence on society. Since nature demands people protect their own kind, international laws concerning population expulsions should be ignored as nature's law is the highest law of the land. Apartheid is simply a natural response to the concerns of foreign infiltration.


Afrikaners and Bantus have never been integrated under a multiracial democracy and are not meant to be naturally integrated, unlike Tutsis and Hutus of Rwanda for example. I commend Gregory Stanton of Genocide Watch for documenting South Africa as on it's way to Genocide but I feel his idea of a transcendent human race theory, rejecting the human diversity of races is an unnatural position, leading to a one world government tyranny. Plus, I myself can tolerate some criticism of Apartheid but not the most extreme such as opposing any form of segregation as apartheid is again a natural response to prevent clash of civilization.

Any ethnic conflict problem to a nation must be dealt with humanely as possible. The most humane possible solution to the Bantu problem while reviving and preserving Afrikaner identity is population transfers, with transportation and compensation being offered for those who comply with evacuation orders. those who fail to comply should be forcibly removed from lands they are not a nationality of(for example Bantus will be expelled from non-Bantu lands while non-Bantus will be expelled from Bantustans). I do however favor an option where under certain circumstances Bantus can live like foreign residents in the non-Bantu ruled South Africa while facing the same consequences of deportation if they pose a danger to Afrikaner society.
Inkatha.jpg
On the other hand, the Inkatha Freedom Party is a Zulu led conservative opposition party that is a potential ally to the Afrikaner cause as the proposed larger bantustan will include making KwaZulu larger than it's historical land. A pact can be made between Afrikaner and Zulu nationalists to form an alliance and partition KwaZulu-Natal between the Afrikaner and Zulu states.
Are we as White people and other westernized minorities going to fight to defend our race and civilization or shall we be stuck voting over and over without any hope or change. Future blog posts will give out peaceful and effective solutions and plans on how to smash the anti-White system. History is on White man's side. all that's missing is the will to fight but technology has made spreading the will less challenging. Boers have already been made social outsiders in many parts of South Africa, their homeland and we all known the cause of this problem. Simply expelling Blacks to bantustans would create a better society in South Africa as the United Boer Republics it has the natural right to be.

Monday, November 24, 2014

The Mad Dogs known as ISIS and the Rise of Barbarity

http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2014/10/15/isis-sold-muslim-women-to-jews-kuwaiti-cleric-charges/#more-72258

ISIS is waging a war of brutality against the great cultures of the Middle East. The Middle East was historically a place for peace and tranquility. ISIS is engaging in the same civilization destroying madness that Nazi Germany, Soviet Union, Khmer Rouge, Communist China, and many aggressive powers throughout history such as the Ottoman Empire destroying Remnants of Roman society.

Before World War I existed the late, great German and Austro-Hungarian Empires. The Hohenzollern and Hapsburg dynasties ruled these great powers. Would German Nationalism spill into such extremes as it did had the German Empire never fell?

A more mild form of what could be considered Social Nationalism is Volksgemeinschaft which means people's community. This ideology favored curbing elitism in favor of uniting people among class lines to achieve a greater national purpose. While the Nazis adopted this policy, the Nazi regime became too ambitious, seeking to take things too far such as annexing Poland and the Netherlands, two countries that have not only been historically a safe haven for Jewish paradise, but would also have been safe havens for Jews fleeing Nazism. When the Nazis occupied Poland, virtually nobody cooperated with Nazi authorities on rounding up Jews.

I feel that while Germany was right to respond to Poland's defiant behavior concerning territory unjustly taken from Germany, annexing Poland(therefore depriving Warsaw of it's right to self determination) was a huge mistake that Germany paid dearly for. The Jewish Question was a major issue in Interwar Germany that could have been more humanely solved by leaving Congress Poland(plus Galicia) and the Netherlands for example out of the Nazi's purification plans. When the Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492, many found safe haven in the Netherlands. Historically, the Holy Roman Empire(Germany) and Italian States accepted Jews but they had less rights than the Christian population and for a good reason, though Jews were still able to practice their religion in peace without interfering with the affairs of their host country.

The reason Neo-Nazism has attracted some people for instance is because they fear Whites will eventually lose power within their own homelands to descendants for immigrants from the developing world. Immigration is never restricted to race but rather has to do with economics and national identity.

Torture is against the Western Christian way. Human Rights since the end of the Cold War have become a way of life for the Western World but importing more third world immigrants without proper checks and balances to ensure they are treated like aliens but with dignity and respect, respecting the host as the one in control.

To test if your country is ruled by those who deserve to rule over it, the above quote from Voltaire should be a good bet. Many Western "democracies" are abridging free speech in the name of "tolerance". What tolerance really means is advancing Talmudic cultural marxist agenda, mainly having Jewish interests in society be put first instead of German interests for Germany. The problem with Jews in government is the tribalist nature of the Jewish nation. While some Jews will assimilate and accept that White Christians have the right to rule over their countries without infiltration and laws against criticizing alien peoples, Jewish supremacy has bankrupted Europe both morally and economically.

I have nothing against Israel wanting to preserve itself as a Jewish Democratic State but why do the Jewish tribalists want to deny White people their rights to have nations run by their own race? Some societies such as Brazil can cope with being multi-racial but Europe has never hosted a nation of immigrants. The Talmudic reptilian racists infiltrated and took advantage of governments with Western Democracy and open that conquered country's borders. Will White people have control of their governments if non-Whites become enough of the population to subjugate the interests of the founding race?

We don't need to gas anyone based on their ethnic background but I refuse to believe that it's wrong to consider Aryans as the rightful exclusive rulers of Germany. I want to say that ignoring nature has serious consequences. Will liberal democratic societies such as Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Australia survive if Whites become a minority? Is South Africa better off with Black majority rule?

What I'm saying here is that I have much concern that importing non-Western cultures into Western countries and making Whites a minority by not securing their needs first will lead to barbarianism. You can't understand human rights without understanding race and nature. Since the West has been the leader in human rights, then Whites should effectively be in control of European governments and also help their White brothers and sisters. Non-White led governments have proven themselves to have worse human rights records as overcrowding and brutality have become norms in societies such as post-colonial Africa and India due to those societies lacking a proper superior hierarchy.

We can only have a more civilized and human rights oriented society if we abandon cosmopolitanism and adopt a nature based system of merit, rather than a guilt based system that gives people of alien races preferential treatment.

JUST FOR THE RECORD, PEOPLE HAVE THEIR GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO PRIDE IN HERITAGE SO LONG AS THEY REFRAIN FROM IMPOSING THEIR VIEWS FORCEFULLY ON OTHER PEOPLE AND NATIONS, DEPENDING ON WHICH IS INVOLVED HERE(EITHER INDIVIDUALS OR NATIONS).

Friday, November 21, 2014

Let Me Be Clear

To anyone thinking my postings are akin to inciting uncalled for racism, there's a difference between preserving and expanding Western Civilization, the greatest civilization on Earth and inciting hatred as you must love and preserve your people even more than you hate your enemies. Without love of your kind, you cannot achieve a better future for them and certainly not victory over your enemies.

Establishing morale at home and abroad is very important as failing to achieve desirable morale results in lack of effort and falling vulnerable. Being too extreme will repel potential allies.

Just because you moderate your views to a more cooler level doesn't mean you can't effectively fight for your cause. Though former South African general Constand Viljoen believes in Afrikaner separatism, he still had the power to bloodlessly take control of South Africa's dying White minority government and secure South Africa's provinces(Cape, Natal, Transvaal, Orange) as part of an Afrikaner Republican State ruled by the White Afrikaner elite while preparing the Bantus for their own independent nations. Why did the United States reject the idea of separate development, the most peaceful solution to phase out apartheid while securing a future for White Afrikaners? South Africa would be better off under separate development for all races as Whites and Blacks can operate under their own systems suited based on their civilizations.

For those of you who blast David Duke over his past affiliation with the Ku Klux Klan, he truly does not support the radical fringe elements of White Supremacy. He instead exposes how Zionism has not just enslaved America but enslaved many other countries around the World and not just in Europe and Australia but also Asia has felt the damaging effects of having a foreign ideology rule over their respective society. Best thing about David Duke is he doesn't lower the bar the same way the Israel firsters or anti-white cultural Marxists do as Duke displays a level of grandfatherly maturity and compassion unlike the wide eyed, big mouthed race-baiters at the Anti-Decency League(oh, I'm sorry, I mean Anti-Defamation League) and Stupid Poverty Law Center(ou oh! I forgot to say Southern Poverty Law Center) who will ignore tragedies that involve Jewish tribalist crimes against White Christians(Armenian Genocide and Holodomor).

The most important part about being a White nationalist/separatist is yearning for peace and making peace with your neighbors. Every nationality, race, and people have a human right to self-determination and to rule over lands they have earned in making a civilization, culture, and history.
Julius Malema 2011-09-14 cropped.jpg
A frightening example of Black supremacy and hatred includes left-wing Azanian politican Julius Malema, who was convicted of hate speech offenses in 2009 for chanting a hate filled song "Kill the Boer". Do White nationalists have mottos, songs, or anthems about wanting to kill Jews, Blacks, or Asians? While White nationalists are more concerned about preserving their own kind, Maoist scum like Julius Malema are busy trying to be masters of African brutality. If Malema ever became President, he would make South Africa another Cambodia or Rwanda.

BTW, the Afrikaners earned the right to govern most of South Africa, including their holy cities(Johannesburg, Pretoria, Durban, Pietermartizburg, Bloemfontein, Cape Town, Windhoek) just like the settlers of the Americas and Australia who built great civilizations and made it possible to expand the first world and western civilization as a whole, something other civilizations couldn't accomplish. Land should not be allocated based solely on population but on how much each nationality has contributed to the care and foundation of the inhabited land.

Sad injustice in this world includes the irony of South Africa losing it's right to be an Afrikaner state despite decades and centuries of care and contribution to the industrialization and creation of society in Southern Africa while Israel get's to continue existing as a Jewish state despite being founded on terrorism and violent ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from lands that were agreed to be left for Arab inhabitation by the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan. The 1947 U.N. Partition Plan carefully considered the needs and environmental suitability of both Arabs and Jews. Jerusalem was to be made an internationally guarded free city in order to resolve any conflicts Christians, Jews, and Muslims may have.

There's nothing hateful or racist about having pride in heritage but there is something hateful and racist about depriving one group of lands and properties they've rightfully earned as well as their heritage. If White pride is racist and hatefilled, then so is all other racial prides, given that the Chauvinism of Israel has led to the hatefilled murders of countless Palestinians while Hutu power led to the slaughter of over one million Tutsi and moderate Hutu people in just three months(April-July, 1994) and keep in mind that Hutus are black people.

You can't preserve and enhance the welfare of your own kind if it is spent hating those different from it more than it is spent loving and preserving your own kind. Let's give the White Aryan race a noble cause by striving to preserve, expand, and enhance the well being of our glorious White heritage as White Unity, the same unity the Jewish people have, only White people will continue improving a civilization that needs to be pulled up from decline.

What should be desired from the White Pride movement is for Whites to have control of their won government, based on humane nationalist policies that ensure the founding and creative race and/or ethnicity has a government that put's their interests first, and not the interests of foreigners such as American politicians relying on special interests.

Saturday, November 15, 2014

88 Precepts-Credit Given to the Late, Great, and Persecuted David Lane

I just think these 88 principles hold true as the need to post these truths is to give a better understanding to the issue of White survival and expansion.


1. Any religion or teaching which denies the Natural Laws of the Universe is false.

2. Whatever People’s perception of God, or Gods, or the motive Force of the Universe might be, they can hardly deny that Nature’s Law are the work of, and therefore the intent of, that Force.

3. God and religion are distinct, separate and often conflicting concepts. Nature evidences the divine plan, for the natural world is the work of the force or the intelligence men call God. Religion is the creation of mortals, therefore predestined to fallibility. Religion may preserve or destroy a People, depending on the structure given by its progenitors, the motives of its agents and the vagaries of historical circumstances.

4. The truest form of prayer is communion with Nature. It is not vocal. Go to a lonely spot, if possible a mountaintop, on a clear, star-lit night, ponder the majesty and order of the infinite macrocosm. Then consider the intricacies of the equally infinite microcosm. Understand that you are on the one hand inconsequential beyond comprehension in the size of things, and on the other hand, you are potentially valuable beyond comprehension as a link in destiny’s chain. There you begin to understand how pride and self can co-exist with respect and reverence. There we find harmony with Nature and with harmony comes strength, peace and certainty.

5. Secular power systems protect and promote religions, which teach of an after-life. Thus, people are taught to abandon defenses against the predators of this life.

6. History, both secular and religious, is a fable conceived in self-serving deceit and promulgated by those who perceive benefits.

7. Religion in its most beneficial form is the symbology of a People and their culture. A multiracial religion destroys the senses of uniqueness, exclusivity and value necessary to the survival of a race.

8. What men call the “super natural” is actually the “natural” not yet understood or revealed.

9. A proliferation of laws with the resultant loss of freedom is a sign of, and directly proportional to, spiritual sickness in a Nation.

10. If a Nation is devoid of spiritual health and moral character, then government and unprincipled men will fill the vacancy. Therefore, freedom prospers in moral values and tyranny thrives in moral decay.

11. Truth requires little explanation. Therefore, beware of verbose doctrines. The great principles are revealed in brevity.

12. Truth does not fear investigation.

13. Unfounded belief is pitfall. A People who do not check the validity and effect of their beliefs with reason will suffer or perish.

14. In accord with Nature’s Laws, nothing is more right than the preservation of one’s own race.

15. No greater motivating force exists than the certain conviction that one is right.

16. Discernment is a sign of a healthy People. In a sick or dying nation, civilization, culture or race, substance is abandoned in favor of appearance.

17. Discernment includes the ability to recognize the difference between belief and demonstrable reality.

18. There exists no such thing as rights or privileges under the Laws of Nature. The deer being stalked by a hungry lion has no right to life. However, he may purchase life by obedience to nature- ordained instincts for vigilance and flight. Similarly, men have no rights to life, liberty or happiness. These circumstances may be purchased by oneself, by one’s family, by one’s tribe or by one’s ancestors, but they are nonetheless purchases and are not rights. Furthermore, the value of these purchases can only be maintained through vigilance and obedience to Natural Law.

19. A people who are not convinced of their uniqueness and value will perish.

20. The White race has suffered invasions and brutality from Africa and Asia for thousands of years. For example, Attila and the Asiatic Huns who invaded Europe in the 5th century, raping, plundering and killing from the Alps to the Baltic and the Caspian Seas. This scenario was repeated by the Mongols of Genghis Khan 800 years later. (Note here that the American Indians are not “Native Americans,” but are racially Mongolians.) In the 8th century, hundreds of years before Negroes were brought to America, the North African Moors of mixed racial background invaded and conquered Portugal, Spain and part of France. So, the attempted guilt-trip placed on the White race by civilization’s executioners is invalid under both historical circumstance and the Natural Law which denies inter-specie compassion. The fact is, all races have benefited immeasurably from the creative genius of the Aryan People.

21. People who allow others not of their race to live among them will perish, because the inevitable result of a racial integration is racial inter-breeding which destroys the characteristics and existence of a race. Forced integration is deliberate and malicious genocide, particularly for a People like the White race, who are now a small minority in the world.

22. In the final analysis, a race or specie is not judged superior or inferior by its accomplishments, but by its will and ability to survive.

23. Political, economic, and religious systems may be destroyed and resurrected by men, but the death of a race is eternal.

24. No race of People can indefinitely continue their existence without territorial imperatives in which to propagate, protect, and promote their own kind.

25. A People without a culture exclusively their own will perish.

26. Nature has put a certain antipathy between races and species to preserve the individuality and existence of each. Violation of the territorial imperative necessary to preserve that antipathy leads to either conflict or mongrelization.

27. It is not constructive to hate those of other races, or even those of mixed races. But a separation must be maintained for the survival of one’s own race. One must, however, hate with a pure and perfect hatred those of one’s own race who commit treason against one’s own kind and against the nations of one’s own kind. One must hate with perfect hatred all those People or practices which destroy one’s People, one’s culture, or the racial exclusiveness of one’s territorial imperative.

28. The concept of a multi-racial society violates every Natural Law for specie preservation.

29. The concept of “equality” is declared a lie by every evidence of Nature. It is a search for the lowest common denominator, and its pursuit will destroy every superior race, nation, or culture. In order for a plow horse to run as fast as a race horse you would first have to cripple the race horse; conversely, in order for a race horse to pull as much as a plow horse, you would first have to cripple the plow horse. In either case, the pursuit of equality is the destruction of excellence.

30. The instincts for racial and specie preservation are ordained by Nature.

31. Instincts are Nature’s perfect mechanism for the survival of each race and specie. The human weakness of rationalizing situations for self-gratification must not be permitted to interfere with these instincts.

32. Miscegenation, that is race-mixing, is and has always been, the greatest threat to the survival of the Aryan race.

33. Inter-specie compassion is contrary to the Laws of Nature and is, therefore, suicidal. If a wolf were to intercede to save a lamb from a lion, he would be killed. Today, we see the White man taxed so heavily that he cannot afford children. The taxes raised are then used to support the breeding of tens of millions of non-whites, many of whom then demand the last White females for breeding partners. As you can see, man is subject to all the Laws of Nature. This has nothing to do with morality, hatred, good or evil. Nature does not recognize the concepts of good and evil in inter-specie relationships. If the lion eats the lamb, it is good for the lion and evil for the lamb. If the lamb escapes and the lion starves, it is good for the lamb and evil for the lion. So, we see the same incident is labeled both good and evil. This cannot be, for there are no contradictions within Nature’s Laws.

34. The instinct for sexual union is part of Nature’s perfect mechanism for specie preservation. It begins early in life and often continues until late in life. It must not be repressed; its purpose, reproduction, must not be thwarted either. Understand that for thousands of years our females bore children at an early age. Now, in an attempt to conform to and compete in an alien culture, they deny their Nature-ordained instincts and duties. Teach responsibility, but, also, have understanding. The life of a race springs from the wombs of its women. He who would judge must first understand the difference between what is good and what is right.

35. Homosexuality is a crime against Nature. All Nature declares the purpose of the instinct for sexual union is reproduction and thus, preservations of the specie. The overpowering male sex drive must be channeled toward possession of females, as well as elements such as territory and power, which are necessary to keep them.

36. Sexual pornography degrades the Nature of all who are involved. A beautiful nude woman is art; a camera between her knees to explore her private parts is pornography.

37. That race whose males will not fight to death to keep and mate with their females will perish. Any White man with healthy instincts feels disgust and revulsion when he sees a woman of his race with a man of another race. Those, who today control the media and affairs of the Western World, teach that this is wrong and shameful. They label it “racism.” As any “ism,” for instance the word “nationalism,” means to promote one’s own nation; “racism” merely means to promote and protect the life of one’s own race. It is, perhaps, the proudest word in existence. Any man who disobey these instincts is anti-Nature.

38. In a sick and dying nation, culture, race or civilization, political dissent and traditional values will be labeled and persecuted as heinous crimes by inquisitors clothing themselves in jingoistic patriotism.

39. A People who are ignorant of their past will defile the present and destroy the future.

40. A race must honor above all earthly things, those who have given their lives or freedom for the preservation of the folk.

41. The folk, namely the members of the race, are the Nation. Racial loyalties must always supersede geographical and national boundaries. If this is taught and understood, it will end fratricidal wars. Wars must not be fought for the benefit of another race.

42. The Nations’ leaders are not rulers, they are servants and guardians. They are not to serve for personal gain. Choose only a guardian who has no interest in the accumulation of material things.

43. Choose and judge your leaders, also called guardians, thus: Those who seek always to limit the power of government are of good heart and conscience. Those who seek to expand the power of government are base tyrants.

44. No government can give anything to anybody without first taking it from another. Government is, by its very nature, legalized taking. A limited amount of government is a necessary burden for national defense and internal order. Anything more is counterproductive to freedom and liberty.

45. The Organic founding Law, namely the Constitution of a Nation, must not be amendable by any method other than unanimous consent of all parties thereto and with all parties present. Otherwise, the doors are opened for the advent of that most dangerous and deadly form of government, democracy.

46. In a democracy those who control the media, and thus the minds of the electorate, have power undreamed by kings or dictators.

47. The simplest way to describe a democracy is this: Three people form a government, each having one vote. Then two of them vote to steal the wealth of the third.

48. The latter stages of a democracy are filled with foreign wars, because the bankrupt system attempts to preserve itself by plundering other nations.

49. In a democracy that which is legal is seldom moral, and that which is moral is often illegal.

50. A democracy is always followed by a strongman... some call him dictator. It is the only way to restore order out of the chaos caused by a democracy. Pick your strongman wisely! He must be a guardian in his heart. He must be one who has shown that his only purpose in life is the preservation of the folk. His ultimate aim must be to restore the rule of Law based on the perfect Laws of Nature. Do not choose him by his words. Choose one who has sacrificed all in the face of tyranny; choose one who has endured and persevered. This is the only reliable evidence of his worthiness and motives.

51. A power system will do anything, no matter how corrupt or brutal, to preserve itself.

52. Tyrannies cannot be ended without the use of force.

53. Those who commit treason disguise their deeds in proclamations of patriotism.

54. Propaganda is major component in all power systems, both secular and religious; false propaganda is a major component of unprincipled power systems. All power systems endeavor to convince their subjects that the system is good, just, beneficent and noble, as well as worthy of perpetuation and defense. The more jingoistic propaganda issued, the more suspicious one should be of its truth.

55. Political power, in the final analysis, is created and maintained by force.

56. A power system, secular or religious, which employs extensive calls to patriotism or requires verbosity and rhetoric for its preservation, is masking tyranny.

57. Propaganda is a legitimate and necessary weapon in any struggle. The elements of successful propaganda are: simplicity, emotion, repetition, and brevity. Also, since men believe what they want to believe, and since they want to believe that which they perceive as beneficial to themselves, then successful propaganda must appeal to the perceived selfinterest of those to whom it is disseminated.

58. Tyrannies teach what to think; free men learn how to think.

59. Beware of men who increase their wealth by the use of words. Particularly beware of the lawyers or priests who deny Natural Law.

60. The patriot, being led to the inquisition’s dungeons or the executioner’s axe, will be condemned the loudest by his former friends and allies; for thus they seek to escape the same fate.

61. The sweet goddess of Peace lives only under the protective arm of the ready God of War.

62. The organic founding Law of a Nation must state with unmistakable and irrevocable specificity the identity of the homogeneous racial, cultural group for whose welfare it was formed, and that the continued existence of the Nation is singularly for all time for the welfare of that specific group only.

63. That race or culture which lets others influence or control any of the following will perish:
• Organs of information;
• Educational institutions;
• Religious institutions;
• Political offices;
• Creation of their money;
• Judicial institutions;
• Cultural institutions;
• Economic life.

64. Just Laws require little explanation. Their meaning is irrevocable in simplicity and specificity.

65. Men’s emotions are stirred far more effectively by the spoken word than by the written word. This is why a ruling tyranny will react more violently to gatherings of dissenters than to books or pamphlets.

66. The organic founding Law of the Nation, or any law, is exactly as pertinent as the will and power to enforce it.

67. An unarmed or non-militant People will be enslaved.

68. Some say the pen is more powerful than the sword. Perhaps so. Yet, the pen without the sword has no authority.

69. Tyrannies are usually built step by step and disguised by noble rhetoric.

70. The difference between a terrorist and a patriot is control of the press.

71. The judgments of the guardians, the leaders, must be true to Natural Law and tempered by reason.

72. Materialism is base and destructive. The guardians of a Nation must constantly warn against and combat a materialistic spirit in the Nation. Acquisition of wealth and property, as need for the well-being of one’s family and obtained by honorable means is right and proper. Exploitation, particularly through usury, is destructive to a nation.

73. Materialism leads men to seek artificial status through wealth or property. True social status comes from service to Family, Race and Nation.

74. Materialism ultimately leads to conspicuous, unnecessary consumption, which in turn leads to the rape of Nature and destruction of the environment. It is unnatural. The true guardians of the Nation must be wholly untainted by materialism.

75. The function of a merchant or salesman is to provide a method of exchange. A merchant who promotes unnecessary consumption and materialism must not be tolerated.

76. The only lawful functions of money are as a medium of exchange and especially usury are unlawful. Usury (interest) at any percentage is a high crime which cannot be tolerated.

77. A nation with an aristocracy of money, lawyers or merchants will become a tyranny.

78. The simplest way to describe a usury-based central banking system is this: The bankers demand the property of the Nation as collateral for their loans. At interest, more money is owed them that they created with the loans. So, eventually, the bankers foreclose on the Nation.

79. Usury (interest), inflation, and oppressive taxation are the theft by deception and destroy the moral fabric of the Nation.

80. Wealth gained without sacrifices or honest labor will usually be misused.

81. Nothing in Nature is static; either the life force grows and expands or it decays and dies.

82. Respect must be earned; it cannot be demanded or assumed.

83. Avoid a vexatious man, for his venom will poison your own nature.

84. Self discipline is a mark of higher man.

85. One measure of a man is cheerfulness in adversity.

86. A fool judges others by their words. A wise man judges others by their actions and accomplishments.

87. In our relationships or interactions, as in all of Nature’s Laws, to each action there is a reaction. That which we plant will be harvested, if not by ourselves, then by another.

88. These are sure signs of a sick or dying Nation. If you see any of them, your guardians are committing treason.
• Mixing and destruction of the founding race;
• Destruction of the family units;
• Oppressive taxation;
• Corruption of the Law;
• Terror and suppression against those who warn of the Nation’s error;
• Immorality: drugs, drunkenness, etc.;
• Infanticide (now called abortion);
• Destruction of the currency (inflation or usury);
• Aliens in the land, alien culture;
• Materialism;
• Foreign wars;
• Guardians (leaders) who pursue wealth or glory;
• Homosexuality;
• Religion not based on Natural Law.


Hard to believe an "evil racist" skinhead leaning White racial loyalist like David Lane would write these amazing principles. If Western Civilization(free from Zionist control) followed these principles, there would be a smaller Third World and a larger more prosperous First World, outnumbering the Third World(but only barely).

The Cosmopolitanism pushed by "human rights" organizations fails to address natural principles and utterly follows a left-wing Marxist agenda. Not even the African countries that the left campaigned for their independence believe in the bullshit propagated by left-wing Judeo-Marxist organizations such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and United Nations.