I've never heard of Afflluenza in my life before hearing of a 16 year old rich kid from Texas who drunk-drove killed 4 people and ruined more lives. Affluenza is a bullshit defense in which the kid dodges responsibility on account of being pampered in a rich family. This slaps the face of what responsibility is and points out just how retarded treating teenagers as children is. In the 18th century, a 14 year old could purchase firearms, drink and purchase beer, seek employment, drive carriages, buy and smoke cigarettes, and even live on their own if financially independent and people didn't complain. They felt teens having adult rights gave them a stronger sense of responsibility and are also to be held as responsible as an adult.
Millions of teenagers are forced into adult responsibility while being presumed irresponsible for many adult rights. Rights come from birth, not when surpassing a designated birthday. Knowing right from wrong is evidence of being responsible enough to make adult decisions. The reason a 6 year old has no responsibilities nor adult rights is because the child can't distinguish right from wrong. Morality has to be taught through guidance and when caretakers fail to guide the child to being responsible, they are just as guilty of irresponsible behavior as if the child actually did know right from wrong.
Ethan Couch was given a mansion by his father without sense of responsibility so the father was the real owner since he was taking responsibility for the mansion. I don't feel couch was pressured into taking responsibility for his actions and when the justice system had the opportunity to do what mom & pop didn't do, Judge Jean Boyd stupidly sided with the defense during sentencing and sentenced Ethan Couch to just 10 years probation and treatment.
How can anyone seriously presume under 21 year olds to be irresponsible on some adult accounts while forcing maximum adult responsibilities on them? As for children, aren't parents more responsible for their children since they know the child better than anyone else? Driving a car is a major responsibility and in driving you are taking adult responsibility for your actions. If the youngster can't be held responsible to adult standards, then the parents for example are usually responsible. For example, February 29, 2000 a school shooting in Michigan occurred in which a 6 year old Negro boy from a troubled family took his uncle's gun to school and shot a classmate with it. The 6 year old boy couldn't be charged even in juvenile court because of his age and 6 year olds don't have any legal responsibilities. The youth can't be held legally accountable even after 50-90 years. The uncle was however charged with involuntary manslaughter because he neglected to keep the 6 year old boy from accessing the firearm.
Do we seriously need laws that put law abiding citizens on trial? The fact that someone can be put on adult trial and receive adult sentences is evidence enough of responsibility for firearm ownership, alcohol consumption, cigarettes, and gambling.
The most irresponsible group of people in our society is Congress! Yes, congress like the rest of the federal government refuses to take responsibility and a lack of effective consequences at deterring tyrannical government violating the U.S. Constitution is only maintaining the problem. You have to use force against tyrannical government and that's where armed insurrection(should be used rarely), nullification, and citizen's enforcement of the U.S Constitution and our unalienable rights.
What about government agencies? Over 5,000 have been killed by violent law enforcement since September 11 attacks. Can you honestly say that we need more gun control against private citizens while arming law enforcement jack booted thugs with fully automatic machine guns? Gun control proponents are willing to overlook abuses by government thugs such as accidental contraband raids. If guns caused violence, why can't EVERYBODY including law enforcement and our military disarm? Elitists will never do so since that would jeopardize their grip on power and control of people.
I can just compare laissez-faire markets vs. planned centralized economies and you will see how government industry is less responsible than free market private economies. Take the dysfunctional Oakland Police Department which blames victims for violence, particularly back in 2012 with a 16 year old girl shot by a 36 year old maniac. The 36 year old maniac had more just treatment under the law than the 16 year old victim as the latter couldn't even purchase a handgun let alone carry one. Police have no obligation to protect you but they're better at threatening you with arrest if you do not obey whatever laws politicians make.
How can a public servant(legislator, judge, district attorney, law enforcement officer) demand their masters obey whatever law is passed with the threat of violence? Just look at how Mexican government handles the drug cartel violence and has strict gun control. Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster made the Ukrainian city of Prypiat uninhabitable since the mid 1980's, then under the Soviet Union.
What's the panacea for violence in society? Responsibility! Forcing wrong doers to take responsibility for evil is the best option for combating terrorism, substance abuse, gun violence, and government abuse of power. You can't have a rule of law without armed citizens checking government tyranny. You have to view and treat government thugs like cancerous cells.
Conclusion here is if someone harms another, punish them, don't put prior restraints on gun purchases. Prior restraints only seek to help those in power evade being accountable to the people.
Sunday, January 26, 2014
Tuesday, January 14, 2014
Individual Rights vs. Government Powers
What exactly is natural conception of individual rights and what makes something an individual right? Also, what makes an action a power or privilege?
For individual rights, an individual right is one which someone is at natural and moral liberty to do. Who decides what individual rights are? The individual him/herself does as the rights to life, liberty, and property are of individual nature meaning no other person nor government can abridge or redefine any right that has an individual nature. What is individual nature anyway? If activity is solely consensual and not done with malicious, reckless, or deliberate harm to others and society, then it is an individual right. Some individual rights also check against state tyranny such as freedom of speech, assembly, press, right to keep and bear arms, due process, privacy, trial by jury, freedom of worship, etc. But where do we draw the line between Liberty and Policy? What about "welfare" rights? A person is not automatically entitled to healthcare or education as these services need to be provided by someone. Being served at a restaurant is not an inalienable right since the business has a right to serve whom they wish. A person does have the right to have a contract respected such as having insurance terms respected according to the contract signed.
A power is something delegated to authority by a higher source, the people. God remains above the people so God gives people rights, privileges, and immunities. Government is run by man and any ideas coming from man are not infallible. Science is not always reliable and scientists have abused science to fit agendas. Jews in Nazi Germany were portrayed as sub-human vermin and that the Aryan race was the master race, calling discrimination and genocide science. Science doesn't give government powers and no government can receive powers if the people don't have the power at all. If a person can't murder another human being absent reasons of defensive action, then how can government be given the power to kidnap and kill people without due process? Democracy doesn't have regards for freedom as it can negatively affect freedom just as it had in 1928-33 Germany. Governments have even delegated powers to themselves without regard to people's consent. How can a government claim power to decide individual rights on someone's behalf? Plus, how can government also claim the right to tax anything it wants if people don't know where the money is flowing or if it's being used merely to carry out a delegated power?
How can you tell what powers government legitimately has? For starts, check it's laws such as statures and constitution. If you notice anything either left out or stained in legal documents, you'll know how your government respects rights. If government doesn't recognize certain rights(right to keep and bear arms) yet claims others(Abortion, Same-Sex Marriage, Healthcare, etc.) as rights, you know something's wrong. What if government makes you fear it more than they fear you? Who has the power or rights to defend your rights? Individuals retain right to defend themselves and rights, even if it means slaying dozens of government law enforcement officers and thuggish soldiers.
People have usually relied on the courts for redress but rarely does redress come. Did the Glorious Revolution of 1689 happen through the courts? The British courts had no litigation presented to it because people confronted British troops and succeeded due to the unrestricted right to keep and bear arms and accepting nothing more than victory at all costs, even if it meant harming and killing many British Troops. George Washington also would accept nothing less than Victory as there is no compromising with tyranny at all. You either kill tyranny or let it flourish more. Though the courts have sometimes ruled in favor of freedom, the other two branches and even other jurists ignore these decisions and continue violating people. They do this because they can get away with it and feel no physical or psychological threat.
When do you forfeit your rights? Since early civilization, if someone were to harm another, the perpetrator would if convicted through fair trial be sentenced to loss of freedom such as incarceration and all sentences are handed down by the courts of justice as legislated by the legislature. Due Process is the concept that ensures fairness, justice, and freedom including freedom from coercion. Without due process, government will become arbitrary and people will have no freedom from coercion. The massive confiscation of firearms in Australia in 1996 did not constitute due process as it was Port Arthur Shooter Martin Bryant who was guilty of that crime, not Australia's gun owners. Why didn't Australian gun owners protest and attack law enforcement officers or call for the overthrow of administration? Haven't Australians throughout the 20th century been braver and have more sense of individualism than Americans? Even though Australia lacks a bill of rights, courts have protected some rights and I feel if people had faith in God, rights would be exercised whether government approves or disapproves. You can't be forced to forfeit your rights unless there was an injured party that you were directly responsible for injuring. A convicted criminal being sentenced for a crime with an injured party is considered part of justice, but not if the convicted person is innocent.
Does someone go to jail or face any legal consequences because their neighbor robbed a bank or went on a shooting spree? No, doing so would violate due process which requires that the person be at fault for the crime commit via fair trial. How are people unfairly forced to forfeit their rights such as keeping and bearing arms due to assumption of mass shootings and abuse of weapons? Confiscation without due process of course. Of course you could always appeal but it puts you in the position of being presumed guilty and must prove innocence.
Plus, how could public servants decide what's best for us, especially children, who are known better by family than anyone else? Can government honestly assume it knows best when it comes to child care and how can there be any laws in which you can be treated as a child due to restrictions and prohibitions such as buying guns, alcohol, drugs, tobacco, and sometimes mature entertainment yet be considered fully responsible for adult consequences such as adult prison time? The reason a 6 year old can't vote, drive, buy guns, alcohol, tobacco, sign into contracts, get a full time career, or do many things outside parental consent is because they normally do not have the capacity to be held responsible for their actions. Politician's law says a 17 year old is presumed mostly as irresponsible as a 6 year old yet unlike the 6 year old who can't be charged in any court(not even juvenile) the 17 year old can be tried as an adult.
Does this sound like due process to you? How about armed thugs arriving at your house without proper warning coming to take your guns? No due process hearing just that you fit criteria for prohibited person.
what is the denominator in this? Denominator here is that government cannot act in powers it doesn't have and nor can people delegate powers they themselves lack. Does a person naturally have the right to kill an unborn child? Abortion has been forced on us by the U.S. Supreme Court despite the U.S. Constitution giving courts nor other branches no such power. The courts have also attacked the God of the Bible by prohibiting prayer and bibles in class. Where does the judicial system have authority to make law?
For individual rights, an individual right is one which someone is at natural and moral liberty to do. Who decides what individual rights are? The individual him/herself does as the rights to life, liberty, and property are of individual nature meaning no other person nor government can abridge or redefine any right that has an individual nature. What is individual nature anyway? If activity is solely consensual and not done with malicious, reckless, or deliberate harm to others and society, then it is an individual right. Some individual rights also check against state tyranny such as freedom of speech, assembly, press, right to keep and bear arms, due process, privacy, trial by jury, freedom of worship, etc. But where do we draw the line between Liberty and Policy? What about "welfare" rights? A person is not automatically entitled to healthcare or education as these services need to be provided by someone. Being served at a restaurant is not an inalienable right since the business has a right to serve whom they wish. A person does have the right to have a contract respected such as having insurance terms respected according to the contract signed.
A power is something delegated to authority by a higher source, the people. God remains above the people so God gives people rights, privileges, and immunities. Government is run by man and any ideas coming from man are not infallible. Science is not always reliable and scientists have abused science to fit agendas. Jews in Nazi Germany were portrayed as sub-human vermin and that the Aryan race was the master race, calling discrimination and genocide science. Science doesn't give government powers and no government can receive powers if the people don't have the power at all. If a person can't murder another human being absent reasons of defensive action, then how can government be given the power to kidnap and kill people without due process? Democracy doesn't have regards for freedom as it can negatively affect freedom just as it had in 1928-33 Germany. Governments have even delegated powers to themselves without regard to people's consent. How can a government claim power to decide individual rights on someone's behalf? Plus, how can government also claim the right to tax anything it wants if people don't know where the money is flowing or if it's being used merely to carry out a delegated power?
How can you tell what powers government legitimately has? For starts, check it's laws such as statures and constitution. If you notice anything either left out or stained in legal documents, you'll know how your government respects rights. If government doesn't recognize certain rights(right to keep and bear arms) yet claims others(Abortion, Same-Sex Marriage, Healthcare, etc.) as rights, you know something's wrong. What if government makes you fear it more than they fear you? Who has the power or rights to defend your rights? Individuals retain right to defend themselves and rights, even if it means slaying dozens of government law enforcement officers and thuggish soldiers.
People have usually relied on the courts for redress but rarely does redress come. Did the Glorious Revolution of 1689 happen through the courts? The British courts had no litigation presented to it because people confronted British troops and succeeded due to the unrestricted right to keep and bear arms and accepting nothing more than victory at all costs, even if it meant harming and killing many British Troops. George Washington also would accept nothing less than Victory as there is no compromising with tyranny at all. You either kill tyranny or let it flourish more. Though the courts have sometimes ruled in favor of freedom, the other two branches and even other jurists ignore these decisions and continue violating people. They do this because they can get away with it and feel no physical or psychological threat.
When do you forfeit your rights? Since early civilization, if someone were to harm another, the perpetrator would if convicted through fair trial be sentenced to loss of freedom such as incarceration and all sentences are handed down by the courts of justice as legislated by the legislature. Due Process is the concept that ensures fairness, justice, and freedom including freedom from coercion. Without due process, government will become arbitrary and people will have no freedom from coercion. The massive confiscation of firearms in Australia in 1996 did not constitute due process as it was Port Arthur Shooter Martin Bryant who was guilty of that crime, not Australia's gun owners. Why didn't Australian gun owners protest and attack law enforcement officers or call for the overthrow of administration? Haven't Australians throughout the 20th century been braver and have more sense of individualism than Americans? Even though Australia lacks a bill of rights, courts have protected some rights and I feel if people had faith in God, rights would be exercised whether government approves or disapproves. You can't be forced to forfeit your rights unless there was an injured party that you were directly responsible for injuring. A convicted criminal being sentenced for a crime with an injured party is considered part of justice, but not if the convicted person is innocent.
Does someone go to jail or face any legal consequences because their neighbor robbed a bank or went on a shooting spree? No, doing so would violate due process which requires that the person be at fault for the crime commit via fair trial. How are people unfairly forced to forfeit their rights such as keeping and bearing arms due to assumption of mass shootings and abuse of weapons? Confiscation without due process of course. Of course you could always appeal but it puts you in the position of being presumed guilty and must prove innocence.
Plus, how could public servants decide what's best for us, especially children, who are known better by family than anyone else? Can government honestly assume it knows best when it comes to child care and how can there be any laws in which you can be treated as a child due to restrictions and prohibitions such as buying guns, alcohol, drugs, tobacco, and sometimes mature entertainment yet be considered fully responsible for adult consequences such as adult prison time? The reason a 6 year old can't vote, drive, buy guns, alcohol, tobacco, sign into contracts, get a full time career, or do many things outside parental consent is because they normally do not have the capacity to be held responsible for their actions. Politician's law says a 17 year old is presumed mostly as irresponsible as a 6 year old yet unlike the 6 year old who can't be charged in any court(not even juvenile) the 17 year old can be tried as an adult.
Does this sound like due process to you? How about armed thugs arriving at your house without proper warning coming to take your guns? No due process hearing just that you fit criteria for prohibited person.
what is the denominator in this? Denominator here is that government cannot act in powers it doesn't have and nor can people delegate powers they themselves lack. Does a person naturally have the right to kill an unborn child? Abortion has been forced on us by the U.S. Supreme Court despite the U.S. Constitution giving courts nor other branches no such power. The courts have also attacked the God of the Bible by prohibiting prayer and bibles in class. Where does the judicial system have authority to make law?
From Modern Militia Movement: MILITIA MOBILIZATION ACROSS THE NATION UNDER WAY
Keep in mind that this is not mine and that I am merely reiterating a fellow militia member patriot
Dear Save America Foundation Members and all Patriots across the United States,
Be advised that I am in the process of notifying and contacting all legal and constitutionally created militia groups across the United States to mobilize on Washington DC for “Operation American Spring” currently scheduled for May 16th, 2014 and commanded by my friend Colonel Harry Riley US Army Intelligence (Retired) Silver star.
1.8 million people have already responded in kind and are mobilizing and or supporting this effort. We need 10 million.
The Senate and the Congress feel it is in the best interest of this nation to fund illegal immigrants and keep them sustained with free health care, tax breaks, free education in our schools, EBT cards, public housing and the like. They wish to keep sending tax payer money to foreign countries that hate us. They wish to fund bogus global warming projects in the billions and they refuse to take a pay cut themselves.
Yet they will now deny the wounded veteran his pension COLA increases which he or she earned and depends on while struggling to survive day to day, some are in wheel chairs and without arms and legs. Mr. Politician you are now going to be held accountable.
This vote, to first deny and then block the able bodied and disabled veterans their earned pension COLA raises is unacceptable and an act of treason against the Republic from the Marxists in the government. They must want a war against 25 million veterans. Mr. Communist, Mr. RINO, Mr.. Democrat, Mr. Republican. So be it. You got it.
I called the Marxist Senator (comrade) Harry Reid this morning at 0430 hours and left him a message notifying him that we are now mobilizing and coming to see him soon in Washington. We are not leaving the grounds surrounding our White House or the Congress until Mr. Barry Soetoro, the Muslim imposter, has been removed from office for treason and/or impeached for crimes against the constitution.
Speaker Boehner you may want to start reconsidering his decision not to investigate the inaction by our government in regards to Benghazi too. We are coming to town. Your on the visitation list too. We will NEVER forget Benghazi.
If you would like to call Senate Leader Comrade Harry Reid and relay your own message his number is 202-224-3542. Do not threaten, we come in peace, but we are not leaving Washington DC until Mr. Barry Soetoro, the illegal immigrant from Kenya, who studied as an Indonesian foreign student in this nation, who flew to Pakistan in 1981 on a foreign passport, has been removed from office.
We have the resources, the money the training and the Constitutional protections to take this country back. And we will. You have pushed us too far Mr. Marxist, now you will see who runs this country. It is we the people.
We live in a Constitutional Republic not a Marxist dictatorship. It’s time.
33 million Egyptians took back their country from the terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization supported by and propped up by Barry Soetoro and the former Secretary of State (born again Communist) Hillary Clinton. This is also treason against the United States for aiding and abetting the enemy.
Impeachment charges have been drawn up in the past and presented to the Congress against Mr. Barry Soetoro with NO ACTION, no response. They are spineless gutless cowards with as much intestinal fortitude as a rotting possum run over by a semi.
I want all Tea Party groups – Militia groups and like minded individualswho have the courage (and understand and know) that God and the constitution are on their side, to start to prepare NOW to mobilize for“Operation American Spring” May 16th 2014. location Washington DC.
1.8 million people have already responded in kind and are mobilizing and or supporting this effort. We need 10 million.
The Senate and the Congress feel it is in the best interest of this nation to fund illegal immigrants and keep them sustained with free health care, tax breaks, free education in our schools, EBT cards, public housing and the like. They wish to keep sending tax payer money to foreign countries that hate us. They wish to fund bogus global warming projects in the billions and they refuse to take a pay cut themselves.
Yet they will now deny the wounded veteran his pension COLA increases which he or she earned and depends on while struggling to survive day to day, some are in wheel chairs and without arms and legs. Mr. Politician you are now going to be held accountable.
This vote, to first deny and then block the able bodied and disabled veterans their earned pension COLA raises is unacceptable and an act of treason against the Republic from the Marxists in the government. They must want a war against 25 million veterans. Mr. Communist, Mr. RINO, Mr.. Democrat, Mr. Republican. So be it. You got it.
I called the Marxist Senator (comrade) Harry Reid this morning at 0430 hours and left him a message notifying him that we are now mobilizing and coming to see him soon in Washington. We are not leaving the grounds surrounding our White House or the Congress until Mr. Barry Soetoro, the Muslim imposter, has been removed from office for treason and/or impeached for crimes against the constitution.
Speaker Boehner you may want to start reconsidering his decision not to investigate the inaction by our government in regards to Benghazi too. We are coming to town. Your on the visitation list too. We will NEVER forget Benghazi.
If you would like to call Senate Leader Comrade Harry Reid and relay your own message his number is 202-224-3542. Do not threaten, we come in peace, but we are not leaving Washington DC until Mr. Barry Soetoro, the illegal immigrant from Kenya, who studied as an Indonesian foreign student in this nation, who flew to Pakistan in 1981 on a foreign passport, has been removed from office.
We have the resources, the money the training and the Constitutional protections to take this country back. And we will. You have pushed us too far Mr. Marxist, now you will see who runs this country. It is we the people.
We live in a Constitutional Republic not a Marxist dictatorship. It’s time.
33 million Egyptians took back their country from the terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization supported by and propped up by Barry Soetoro and the former Secretary of State (born again Communist) Hillary Clinton. This is also treason against the United States for aiding and abetting the enemy.
Impeachment charges have been drawn up in the past and presented to the Congress against Mr. Barry Soetoro with NO ACTION, no response. They are spineless gutless cowards with as much intestinal fortitude as a rotting possum run over by a semi.
I want all Tea Party groups – Militia groups and like minded individualswho have the courage (and understand and know) that God and the constitution are on their side, to start to prepare NOW to mobilize for“Operation American Spring” May 16th 2014. location Washington DC.
Pass this around.
Just for the record, the Tea Party and Militia Movements as well as my self do not support any terroristic nor criminal behavior as these are the sins we are fighting against. We are fighting against a self-righteous, terroristic, and criminal government. The rule of law has been decided by those who abuse power and therefore people have every right to use aggressive yet defensive force against such criminals.
I intend no copyright or harm to anyone as the Militia Movement's mission is to reclaim self-determination and the rule of law from cynical and tyrannical politicians.
Saturday, January 4, 2014
A New Years Message and Resolution
I'm thinking 2014 should be the year of revolution where people realize that taking up arms against tyrannical government is the ONLY way to solve government coercion. It was the only way to solve government coercion back in the 1770's and 1780's. Do you think a democratically elected legislature should get away with violating the higher laws such as that of the Constitution and God? America has been given a lawless and murderous government due to lack of visible Egyptian style protests like the summer of 2013.
Before I mention the Birth of Lord Savior Jesus Christ, I want to mention the "End Times" biblical verse Matthew 24:21-22 - For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
I have been recommended the King James Bible since it is the most logical and correct one, unlike the demonic NIV for example! Now for a verse stating God giving humanity his only son to save humanity from Lucifer.
John 3:16 - For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
I mentioned Matthew 24:21-22 cause I wanted to shed light on what could happen to Western civilization if good people didn't do enough. It's not enough to vote benevolent politicians into office but fighting police and armies is what brings victory and sends a powerful message of freedom, a definition distorted by the satanic evils pushed through war, casual sex, drug abuse, communism, tyrannical government, moral decay, and occultists.
I also want to mention The Hunger Games Catching Fire as it teaches an excellent story just like in The Hunger Games about how America became totalitarian Panem due to collapse of modern civilization. Do people seriously believe this shit can't happen in America that they're willing to stand idle as people like David Olofson, Adam Kokesh, and Brian Aitken have been prosecuted and jailed for mere possession of supposedly illegal firearms? Gun grabbers want you to forfeit your right to own firearms to the unholy mercy of bureaucrats. Other rights have been put on lockdown by government tyrants such as manipulative jurists undermining the role of a jury such as hearing crucial arguments such as constitutional matters. What power does any sworn jurist have to have final say on legal and constitutional matters?
Also, what does Romans 13 say about authority? BTW, this verse will be from the King James Bible
Romans 13:1, “Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.”
Romans 13 states here that no force is higher than God and that the natural hierarchy falls behind God. If political power is inherent of the people, how come people must rely on politicians for security of rights? Doesn't government receive powers instead of rights? How can government decide what's best for individuals as if the former was God compared to it's citizens? Politicians are less honest than the decent and righteous people(such as Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Robert Rhett, Stonewall Jackson, Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, Grover Cleveland, Calvin Coolidge, John F. Kennedy, Barry Goldwater, Ron Paul, etc.). these men were historical figures known for having integrity and selflessness in fighting for American values, both North but also mostly Southern values.
Would Jesus Christ be in favor of democracy? If democracy was unrestrained without the holy boundaries, that would bring the END TIMES! Abortion, homosexuality, gun control, socialist regulations, unconstitutional wars and taxes plus deficit spending, and corrupt justice systems are law! Jesus Christ roamed Palestine as one with deity, virgin birth, and lack of sin. It was Christ who would be known as the Prince of Peace. No other human being in history was able to achieve what Christ achieved by his departure from the Human World into the spiritual heavens and then resurrected to rise into the heavens by age 33.
American nationalism is a farce as New England, Mid-Atlantic, and Midwestern states unfairly influence American nationalism over the objections of the Southern and Western states.
While America was founded mostly by Northern Freemasons, the Southern states were more Christian than the merchants and bankers of New York, Philadelphia, and Boston.
What should be the new years resolution? For starters, the Arab Spring was considered both a smash hit and a perilous nightmare as while strongmen in both the Arabian peninsula and Levant were ousted but mostly replaced with Islamist governments. However, the Modern Militia Movement would fight for constitutional government and freedom. To tell you the truth, I'd rather have a Goldwater Republican take presidency through a military coup than have an Obama Democrat democratically elected. In Egypt, General Sisi overthrew Islamist President Mohammed Morsi and this is how constitutional republics are preserved and dictatorships are halted, depending on who takes power. Sisi has been a populist hero to the Egyptian people while Obama is a communist tyrant.
America and the West are facing End Times that can only be addressed by taking back our governments, similar to the Arab Springs of 2011. I would mostly recommend civil disobedience tactics that are mostly non-violent by nature but should be able to use counter-force against mobs or police interfering with such actions. A police state has been created via instilling fear and discouraging resistance through militarization of law enforcement and destructive manpower of law enforcement.
The only way to regain lost freedoms is to assert yourself as if you had more authority than the so called "authorities". The Civil Rights Movement was made assertive, successful, and inspiring because people asserted themselves and taking a stand through civil disobedience and keeping pride in their actions. As a result, the Civil Rights Movement of Civil Disobedience became a success, lasting from 1955 to 1964, though the Civil Rights Movement as a whole lasted for decades.
Civil Disobedience can only be victorious through the unity of people who believe in fighting for a noble cause. United We Stand! Southern Nationalists must unite to overthrow DC rule in the Southern States by arming themselves regardless of the illegal DC regime's "laws". Conspiracy theorists must unite regardless of political beliefs to save humanity from illuminati terror and government deception! Gun rights crusaders must unite in fighting not for guns but for seeing this as a fight for freedom noting that with every gun control law interferes with one's ability to fight tyrannical government.
If only many people just started following in the peaceful footsteps of Egyptain protestors back in 2013. Just look at how the Real ID Act of 2005 has been doing it's whole pathetic life. Nullification worked more than the courts and the Real ID Act seems to be as if it isn't law anymore. What about gun control, regulations, and drug prohibition? Complying with government regulations will only subject you to a higher risk of abuse as bureaucrats can more easily abuse you since they know your information. If just 20% of gun dealers refused to license with either the ATF or state agency, gun control laws would be nearly as crippled as government thugs will find it harder to harass and intimidate gun dealers and pot dispensaries out of business.
They key is to follow the mostly non-violent resistance movements that occurred in 1990 Eastern Europe and 2013 Egypt. I recommend millions of regional nationalists walk like Egyptians on their state capitols and peacefully clog the streets just as the Egyptians did in both 2011 and 2013. The message is best sent through such a manner. Obama and the elitists were foaming mad at the overthrow of Mohammed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood. People may need to used armed force to defend their lives and freedoms but peaceful protests are key to gaining some attention.
Before I mention the Birth of Lord Savior Jesus Christ, I want to mention the "End Times" biblical verse Matthew 24:21-22 - For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
I have been recommended the King James Bible since it is the most logical and correct one, unlike the demonic NIV for example! Now for a verse stating God giving humanity his only son to save humanity from Lucifer.
John 3:16 - For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
I mentioned Matthew 24:21-22 cause I wanted to shed light on what could happen to Western civilization if good people didn't do enough. It's not enough to vote benevolent politicians into office but fighting police and armies is what brings victory and sends a powerful message of freedom, a definition distorted by the satanic evils pushed through war, casual sex, drug abuse, communism, tyrannical government, moral decay, and occultists.
I also want to mention The Hunger Games Catching Fire as it teaches an excellent story just like in The Hunger Games about how America became totalitarian Panem due to collapse of modern civilization. Do people seriously believe this shit can't happen in America that they're willing to stand idle as people like David Olofson, Adam Kokesh, and Brian Aitken have been prosecuted and jailed for mere possession of supposedly illegal firearms? Gun grabbers want you to forfeit your right to own firearms to the unholy mercy of bureaucrats. Other rights have been put on lockdown by government tyrants such as manipulative jurists undermining the role of a jury such as hearing crucial arguments such as constitutional matters. What power does any sworn jurist have to have final say on legal and constitutional matters?
Also, what does Romans 13 say about authority? BTW, this verse will be from the King James Bible
Romans 13:1, “Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.”
Romans 13 states here that no force is higher than God and that the natural hierarchy falls behind God. If political power is inherent of the people, how come people must rely on politicians for security of rights? Doesn't government receive powers instead of rights? How can government decide what's best for individuals as if the former was God compared to it's citizens? Politicians are less honest than the decent and righteous people(such as Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Robert Rhett, Stonewall Jackson, Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, Grover Cleveland, Calvin Coolidge, John F. Kennedy, Barry Goldwater, Ron Paul, etc.). these men were historical figures known for having integrity and selflessness in fighting for American values, both North but also mostly Southern values.
Would Jesus Christ be in favor of democracy? If democracy was unrestrained without the holy boundaries, that would bring the END TIMES! Abortion, homosexuality, gun control, socialist regulations, unconstitutional wars and taxes plus deficit spending, and corrupt justice systems are law! Jesus Christ roamed Palestine as one with deity, virgin birth, and lack of sin. It was Christ who would be known as the Prince of Peace. No other human being in history was able to achieve what Christ achieved by his departure from the Human World into the spiritual heavens and then resurrected to rise into the heavens by age 33.
American nationalism is a farce as New England, Mid-Atlantic, and Midwestern states unfairly influence American nationalism over the objections of the Southern and Western states.
While America was founded mostly by Northern Freemasons, the Southern states were more Christian than the merchants and bankers of New York, Philadelphia, and Boston.
What should be the new years resolution? For starters, the Arab Spring was considered both a smash hit and a perilous nightmare as while strongmen in both the Arabian peninsula and Levant were ousted but mostly replaced with Islamist governments. However, the Modern Militia Movement would fight for constitutional government and freedom. To tell you the truth, I'd rather have a Goldwater Republican take presidency through a military coup than have an Obama Democrat democratically elected. In Egypt, General Sisi overthrew Islamist President Mohammed Morsi and this is how constitutional republics are preserved and dictatorships are halted, depending on who takes power. Sisi has been a populist hero to the Egyptian people while Obama is a communist tyrant.
America and the West are facing End Times that can only be addressed by taking back our governments, similar to the Arab Springs of 2011. I would mostly recommend civil disobedience tactics that are mostly non-violent by nature but should be able to use counter-force against mobs or police interfering with such actions. A police state has been created via instilling fear and discouraging resistance through militarization of law enforcement and destructive manpower of law enforcement.
The only way to regain lost freedoms is to assert yourself as if you had more authority than the so called "authorities". The Civil Rights Movement was made assertive, successful, and inspiring because people asserted themselves and taking a stand through civil disobedience and keeping pride in their actions. As a result, the Civil Rights Movement of Civil Disobedience became a success, lasting from 1955 to 1964, though the Civil Rights Movement as a whole lasted for decades.
Civil Disobedience can only be victorious through the unity of people who believe in fighting for a noble cause. United We Stand! Southern Nationalists must unite to overthrow DC rule in the Southern States by arming themselves regardless of the illegal DC regime's "laws". Conspiracy theorists must unite regardless of political beliefs to save humanity from illuminati terror and government deception! Gun rights crusaders must unite in fighting not for guns but for seeing this as a fight for freedom noting that with every gun control law interferes with one's ability to fight tyrannical government.
If only many people just started following in the peaceful footsteps of Egyptain protestors back in 2013. Just look at how the Real ID Act of 2005 has been doing it's whole pathetic life. Nullification worked more than the courts and the Real ID Act seems to be as if it isn't law anymore. What about gun control, regulations, and drug prohibition? Complying with government regulations will only subject you to a higher risk of abuse as bureaucrats can more easily abuse you since they know your information. If just 20% of gun dealers refused to license with either the ATF or state agency, gun control laws would be nearly as crippled as government thugs will find it harder to harass and intimidate gun dealers and pot dispensaries out of business.
They key is to follow the mostly non-violent resistance movements that occurred in 1990 Eastern Europe and 2013 Egypt. I recommend millions of regional nationalists walk like Egyptians on their state capitols and peacefully clog the streets just as the Egyptians did in both 2011 and 2013. The message is best sent through such a manner. Obama and the elitists were foaming mad at the overthrow of Mohammed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood. People may need to used armed force to defend their lives and freedoms but peaceful protests are key to gaining some attention.
Sunday, November 24, 2013
How Dependence on government is Ruining Lives and Creating Dictatorships
With Socialists winning many elections despite their obvious failures, how come they are voted for with 60-70% of votes? Voters have handouts on the line despite alternatives existing to replace the failing welfare systems. Social security was paid for by individuals through social security tax and we could simply stock up on firearms and ammunition to resist law enforcement officers trying to harm us for resisting a tyrannical tax code. Isn't the right to keep and bear arms meant to secure us from a rogue government?
Plus, what if universal healthcare worked like public defender system established more often after Gideon vs. Wainwright(1963)? You don't have people worrying about losing that should conservatives win elections. The judiciary is there to deal with more sensitive issues that require non-partisanship such as unalienable rights. The judiciary however won't act human in such as reason being a basis for decisions.
What it's come down to is giving government more power that many won't normally accept but feel they are outgunned. I feel people don't take a stand and they should because it would send a message that we don't need permission from government for our rights to be protected.
One of our rights I must mention is Right to Petition Government for redress Grievances. What it means is someone files a complaint against government and expects redress for any grievance committed by government against people. The Founders never expected people to rely on politics to secure their freedoms since politics are often abused. Even the justice system is slovenly and judges undeserving of having the title "Honorable" in front of their names. What Petitioning for redress of grievences means is having your complaint heard and addressed impartially so you don't have to have rights put at the mercy of law enforcement officers, politicians, and lawyers.
Plus, if more people like Cookie Thornton, Joseph Kane, Jerry Kane Jr., and Carl Drega took a stand in their respective events and had only been smarter in resistance such as more powerful firearms, law enforcement and government would get the message more clearly than by using words. People need to stop viewing people like Thornton and Kane as sick individuals and be reminded of the brave Patriots who shot British troops indiscriminately in the 1770's and how freedom sometimes can only be defended by shooting police officers and armed force members on the tyrant's side. How can people forsake that as a mere memory when had it not been for Patriots having better weapons than the British army, the British would have won. Tyrants like Adolf Hitler have preferred gun control as means to control people.
Plus, the artificially high cost and rarity of finding the same firearms jack booted thugs like the BATFE, who have fucking machine guns while the easiest people to acquire them are gangs. The BATFE is a vile, hoplophobic gang that opposes the true meaning of keep and bear arms! Armed citizens pose a threat to tyranny and preserve free society. It was April 19, 1775 where citizens used firearms to prevent their confiscation, starting the American Revolution. Why can't people open fire on law enforcement thugs enforcing tyrannical laws? If just a handful of gun dealers refused to be licensed by the BATFE, gun control would be ineffective.
Once they deprive people means of having superior firearms than government, whats to stop tyranny? Will our other rights be protected? Good luck with the appeals since your rights will only be in the hands of government employees who need to be harmed severely. Do you think judges have been guardians of liberty or enemies? What did Thomas Jefferson say about judges? “You seem . . . to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so . . . and their power [is] the more dangerous, as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots.” (Letter to William Jarvis, Sept. 28, 1820)
Who is the final arbitrator? The people of course. I'm not talking about murderers, rapists, robbers, thieves, and tyrants. I'm talking about the liberty defending folk willing to fight for freedom the same way the Sons of Liberty in the Continential Army did during the American Revolution and the Allied Troops of World War II. We need people like these fighting law enforcement thugs and defending our freedoms from our own government.
What can we do to weaken and undermine tyrannical government while freeing imprisoned freedom fighters? We can first reject the legitimacy of government action as Thomas Jefferson stated in the 1797 Kentucky resolutions "
“That the several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes — delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force.”
This means people can and should fight law enforcement officers enforcing such laws which abridge our freedoms. Others should save imprisoned comrades to send the tyrants a powerful message, which will also terrify and embarrass the courts. Plus, why hasn't the militia movement grown to the strength of Al-Qaeda. Had Timothy McVeigh been more influential than Osama Bin Laden, tyrannical government wouldn't be a major problem and people would assert their rights more.
There are so many undelegated powers government assumes such as deciding who owns a gun, what speech is fair, what constitutes a fair trial, what sentence is fair, and what we drink and what age we consume alcohol and cannabis. How can you resist tyranny if your rights to firearms are limited so government has an unfair advantage. the people need a stronger advantage since they outrank government.
Plus, what if universal healthcare worked like public defender system established more often after Gideon vs. Wainwright(1963)? You don't have people worrying about losing that should conservatives win elections. The judiciary is there to deal with more sensitive issues that require non-partisanship such as unalienable rights. The judiciary however won't act human in such as reason being a basis for decisions.
What it's come down to is giving government more power that many won't normally accept but feel they are outgunned. I feel people don't take a stand and they should because it would send a message that we don't need permission from government for our rights to be protected.
One of our rights I must mention is Right to Petition Government for redress Grievances. What it means is someone files a complaint against government and expects redress for any grievance committed by government against people. The Founders never expected people to rely on politics to secure their freedoms since politics are often abused. Even the justice system is slovenly and judges undeserving of having the title "Honorable" in front of their names. What Petitioning for redress of grievences means is having your complaint heard and addressed impartially so you don't have to have rights put at the mercy of law enforcement officers, politicians, and lawyers.
Plus, if more people like Cookie Thornton, Joseph Kane, Jerry Kane Jr., and Carl Drega took a stand in their respective events and had only been smarter in resistance such as more powerful firearms, law enforcement and government would get the message more clearly than by using words. People need to stop viewing people like Thornton and Kane as sick individuals and be reminded of the brave Patriots who shot British troops indiscriminately in the 1770's and how freedom sometimes can only be defended by shooting police officers and armed force members on the tyrant's side. How can people forsake that as a mere memory when had it not been for Patriots having better weapons than the British army, the British would have won. Tyrants like Adolf Hitler have preferred gun control as means to control people.
Plus, the artificially high cost and rarity of finding the same firearms jack booted thugs like the BATFE, who have fucking machine guns while the easiest people to acquire them are gangs. The BATFE is a vile, hoplophobic gang that opposes the true meaning of keep and bear arms! Armed citizens pose a threat to tyranny and preserve free society. It was April 19, 1775 where citizens used firearms to prevent their confiscation, starting the American Revolution. Why can't people open fire on law enforcement thugs enforcing tyrannical laws? If just a handful of gun dealers refused to be licensed by the BATFE, gun control would be ineffective.
Once they deprive people means of having superior firearms than government, whats to stop tyranny? Will our other rights be protected? Good luck with the appeals since your rights will only be in the hands of government employees who need to be harmed severely. Do you think judges have been guardians of liberty or enemies? What did Thomas Jefferson say about judges? “You seem . . . to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so . . . and their power [is] the more dangerous, as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots.” (Letter to William Jarvis, Sept. 28, 1820)
Who is the final arbitrator? The people of course. I'm not talking about murderers, rapists, robbers, thieves, and tyrants. I'm talking about the liberty defending folk willing to fight for freedom the same way the Sons of Liberty in the Continential Army did during the American Revolution and the Allied Troops of World War II. We need people like these fighting law enforcement thugs and defending our freedoms from our own government.
What can we do to weaken and undermine tyrannical government while freeing imprisoned freedom fighters? We can first reject the legitimacy of government action as Thomas Jefferson stated in the 1797 Kentucky resolutions "
“That the several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes — delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force.”
This means people can and should fight law enforcement officers enforcing such laws which abridge our freedoms. Others should save imprisoned comrades to send the tyrants a powerful message, which will also terrify and embarrass the courts. Plus, why hasn't the militia movement grown to the strength of Al-Qaeda. Had Timothy McVeigh been more influential than Osama Bin Laden, tyrannical government wouldn't be a major problem and people would assert their rights more.
There are so many undelegated powers government assumes such as deciding who owns a gun, what speech is fair, what constitutes a fair trial, what sentence is fair, and what we drink and what age we consume alcohol and cannabis. How can you resist tyranny if your rights to firearms are limited so government has an unfair advantage. the people need a stronger advantage since they outrank government.
Monday, October 7, 2013
Syria Under Seige: The New Axis of Evil and the Darkness of Islam
As well known, Obama is eager to support the Al-Qaeda rebels in Syria against the Assad Government. John McCain falsely claims these rebels are heroes and moderates when in fact these rebels resemble the Bolsheviks of 1917 if they terrorized Christians.
However, the real issue is whether involvement in Syria is a US matter. For one, Free Syrian Army rebels are Al-Qaeda. Second, the Islamist rebels are launching a genocidal campaign against the Christians. Finally, the plans for Syria after overthrowing Assad include the establishment of a totalitarian Islamic State much like Iran and Taliban Afghanistan.
this Axis of evil includes Obama's USA, Erdogan's Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Muslim brotherhood, and more. Don't forget most of these rebels hold anti-Western sentiment. Supporting them would be like Jews supporting Nazi Germany. Not to condone crimes committed by either side but the fact of the matter is Assad did not use chemical weapons while Al-Qaedan rebels did. So many questions to be asked here as to why beautiful women such as the now McCain stooge Elizabeth O'Bagy is blessing the Al-Qaeda rebels. Don't people know that Islam was born from the sword of force? Many of the hate preaching Mullahs and Imans have lied to the Muslim World to retain power. Many Muslim Countries were once part of Roman Civilization. The Levant(Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Iraq, Jordan, Cyprus, and Sinai Egypt) and North Africa(Egypt & Sudan, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, and Western Sahara) and Caucasus region used to be Western Civilized. It was thanks to Islamic conquerers that they became Islamic. If only people knew the dark history of Islam as a death cult beyond it's kneeling head towards floor prayers to the Moon God Allah and Arab culture. Before Islam, much of the Levant and North Africa was like Europe with Western Roman Civilization(France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Morocco, Tunisia, Britain, Austria-Hungary, Southern Germany) being Roman Catholic(exception of Britain after 16th century which became Angelican-Protestant) and Eastern Roman Civilization(Balkan States, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Iraq, Cyprus, Jordan, Caucasus, and Egypt-Sudan) being Eastern Orthodox. Angelicanism, Protestantism, Roman Catholicism, and Eastern Orthodoxy are Christian denominations. Parts of Northern Saudi Arabia used to be part of Roman Civilization.
To understand how Islam became the deadly virus it has been, you must understand it's origins. I'm not preaching hate but nothing but the cold hard truth and the truth is Islam was created by one intolerant and sinful being on the Arabian Peninsula. Mohammed's early life was filled with hardships as he became an orphan as a young child and after being with his grandfather, he stayed with his hard-working uncle and cruel aunt after Mohammed's grandfather died. Mohammed's hardships as a child contributed to his mysogeny and lust for money, power, and sex. Jesus Christ was the only being born without sin, having been born of a virgin(St. Mary) and performing many miracles such as turning water into wine, walking on water, and healing a blind man. Mohammed never did any of the wonderful things Jesus accomplished. Mohammed lived his life as a robber, murder, thief, and sexual deviant while Jesus lived without sin. God is very clear that he has a son while Mohammed lived like any sinner. Mohammed even admitted he was a sinner. Islam was created by Mohammed in 610 when he claimed the angel Gabriel came to him in a cave(which was used to stash Mohammed's loot). When the Jewish and Christian tribes of Mecca and Medina refused to accept Mohammed's message, he waged war against the Meccans and Medinans with forced conversions to Islam. Mohammed even married and had sexual relations with a 6-9 year old girl named Aisha when he was between the ages of 45-52. Aisha was the daughter of Mohammed's disciple Abu Bakr(who became the first Caliph of Islam after Mohammed's death in 632).
Jesus never led armies but had one mission which is to preach a new beginning of love and forgiveness. As Jesus died on the cross in Judea, Palestine he forgave the thief on the cross simply because that thief acknowleged only Jesus could forgive sin. God chose to conceive a son of his own instead of calling on any prophet for the ultimate mission of forgiveness because any other prophet would be sinners. Jesus Christ warned of false prophets and Mohammed was one of them. What is with many Muslims who accept Mohammed as a perfect example even though he was a mere sinner who died in 632 without Christ. This would make Mohammed the Anti-Christ of his time. An Anti-Christ who would help gradually destroy traces of a tolerant civilization where Christians and Jews lived without sectarian conflicts. Martin Luther, the father of Germanic seperatism(Lutheranism) would call Mohammed "First born son of Satan." Luther was right. Mohammed was full of demonic sin, violating nearly ever commandment laid down by God, including idolatry(Moon God Allah), Murder(against non-believers), Theft(against non-believers), Adulery and Sexual Demons(Polygamy and Child Bride Aisha), and even lying to non-believers to promote Islam as a religion of peace when in fact history and actions of Islamic Fundamentalists tell otherwise. Well after Mohammed's death, his legacy of forced conversions and sectarian hatred and violence against non-believers expanded well beyond the Arabian Peninsula into the Zorostarian Persia, Eastern Orthodox Levant and Balkan Peninsula, and even as far as the Iberian Peninsula.
The Islamic Caliphates were counter-attacked by the Crusades of the 11th-13th century and Spanish Inquisition of the 16th century. What the Crusaders did was attempt to restore Western Civilization to it's former Roman glory which was somewhat successful but somewhat a failure. The Spanish Inquisition however was more successful but harsh as it was more of giving birth to Spanish nationalism under Queen Isabella of Catille and King Ferdinand. Though the Inquisition went too far such as forced conversions, it did establish Roman Catholicism as the national religion of many Roman European countries. What history should have been was having the Levant, North Africa, Balkan Peninsula, Caucasus, Arabia, and Persia being liberated from Islamic rule. However, Arabia and persia were not considered part of Roman Civilization. The Crusades and Spanish Inquisition serve as prime examples of history where Islam met strong resistance. Had Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand not pursuded the nationalist Inquisition, Spain and many other Roman Western Countries wouldn't be Western Civilized. Western Civilizations in the Old World other than Roman include the Germanic, Celtic, Anglo, Nordic, and Slavic Civilizations. Germanic Civilizations include Germany, Austria, Netherlands, South Africa, Great Britain, Sweden, Iceland, Norway, Finland, Flanders, and Poland.
What should be done about Syria? Better yet, what if the Middle East was westernized and the ignorant savages were kept under the control of Western powers and the Muslim Brotherhood destroyed? If it weren't for Islam, Egypt would be a Coptic Orthodox state like the Papal States but have a Pharoah as head of state monarch, Coptic Pope as Head of the upper house of bishops, and a Prime Minister of the lower house which would follow the line of parliamentary democracy plus having some Anglo roots. Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco would be Roman Catholic republics with Libya being mostly Italian, Tunisia and Algeria being mostly French, and Morocco being a blend of Spanish and French roots. Lebanon and Syria have their own versions of Christianity being the Meronite and Melkonite Catholic sects but also share Greek Orthodox roots. Turkey is supposed to be a secular and nationalist republic but before the fall of Constantinople in 1453, turkey was mostly Greek Orthodox so Turkey should have their own Orthodox church dubbed Turkish Orthodox.
If it weren't for Islam, most of the Arab and Levant world would have the same standards of living as Western Europe and North America. Reality is the only Muslim country in the World to be a 1st world country is Turkey, due to rejecting jihad and sharia and endorsing modernization and Western ideals.
I know this blog post isn't talking directly much about Syria but the fact of the matter is Islam is most certainly NOT a religion of peace but I don't say that about all Muslims. I'm saying here is that Islam is a cult that centers around one sinner, Mohammed. Most people are Muslims because they fear violent retaliation if they reject and/or leave Islam, plus many Muslim's ancestors from the 7th century were forced to convert to Islam or face dire consequences at the hand of a bloody sword. Also keep in mind I don't harbor resentment against Muslims who oppose the totalitarian tyranny of Sharia law and jihad. I do however show resentment towards the cult of death known as Islam and it's many hypocrisies, lies, and arrogance that are supported by history dating back from as far as Mohammed's childhood and rise as so called "prophet".
What also makes Islam a Pagan religion is one, part of Islam includes worship of the moon god Allah, which has been worshiped since ancient civilization, two, it offers very little to no forgiveness for humanity with goals for World domination and subjugation of all other faiths and cultures, and three, was the brainchild of one sinner's imagination and bias, Mohammed.
What I think Islam is, is a merger of the Pagan Moon God worship(Allah) of Arabian culture and the cult of Mohammed. Most Islamic values are centered around Mohammed's life, making it mostly a cult similar to Jim Jones' Peoples Temple and Warren Jeffs' FLDS. All men are/were sinners and many Imans and Mullahs know Mohammed was a sinner and while they acknowledge Mohammed did the sins he did, they blindly follow his "perfect" example so as to not offend Mohammed's image. The people who wrote the Holy Bible scriptures over the thousands of years were sinners(except Jesus Christ). Jesus never asked for money or pity since his mission on Earth was to bring forgiveness to sinners.
Islam is mostly Arabian culture as you can tell the difference between Arabian and Roman cultures. Islamists celebrate the 1453 Fall of Constantinople and prey for a Caliph of Islam to destroy the West just as their ancestors did centuries before. If North Africa and the Levant are supposed to be Arab states, what about Portugal, Spain, Greece, Southern Italy, Cyprus, Armenia, and the Balkan states for example? I could imagine had Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand not have heroically re-Westernized Spain what Spain would be like. People speaking Arabic instead of Portuguese, Spanish, Greek, Italian, and other Balkan languages. Turkey has it's own language and culture separate from that of Arabia.
Let's face it, the Syrian rebels just like other Islamists do harm to other religions and cultures to not only dominate them but remove traces of Christian culture for example to further cement Arab-Islamic rule. You see terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, and Hamas call for the extermination of the Jews so the Islamists could further cement their rule outside of Arabia and rule the World.
Conclusion on what Islam is. It's mostly an Arabian belief concocted by Mohammed to state that Arabs are the supreme rulers of the World and so called "Allah" has commanded the Muslims-Arabians conquer the World for Allah. That's the same mentality Adolf Hitler brought when he came to power and eventually invaded and conquered much of Europe. The Nazis and Islamists share the same goals of World Domination and Antisemitism. The Crusades on the other hand related more to the Western Allies of World War II rather than invaders since they were reclaiming Arab conquered lands. The Arab Muslims wanted to conquer the known World while the Crusaders wanted to reclaim their Christian Holy Lands in Europe, North Africa, and the Levant.
Reality is that the Arab World should only consist of the Arabian Peninsula based on both the political and geographical definitions while that West of it consists of Roman Civilization and East of it consists of Persia.
However, the real issue is whether involvement in Syria is a US matter. For one, Free Syrian Army rebels are Al-Qaeda. Second, the Islamist rebels are launching a genocidal campaign against the Christians. Finally, the plans for Syria after overthrowing Assad include the establishment of a totalitarian Islamic State much like Iran and Taliban Afghanistan.
this Axis of evil includes Obama's USA, Erdogan's Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Muslim brotherhood, and more. Don't forget most of these rebels hold anti-Western sentiment. Supporting them would be like Jews supporting Nazi Germany. Not to condone crimes committed by either side but the fact of the matter is Assad did not use chemical weapons while Al-Qaedan rebels did. So many questions to be asked here as to why beautiful women such as the now McCain stooge Elizabeth O'Bagy is blessing the Al-Qaeda rebels. Don't people know that Islam was born from the sword of force? Many of the hate preaching Mullahs and Imans have lied to the Muslim World to retain power. Many Muslim Countries were once part of Roman Civilization. The Levant(Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Iraq, Jordan, Cyprus, and Sinai Egypt) and North Africa(Egypt & Sudan, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, and Western Sahara) and Caucasus region used to be Western Civilized. It was thanks to Islamic conquerers that they became Islamic. If only people knew the dark history of Islam as a death cult beyond it's kneeling head towards floor prayers to the Moon God Allah and Arab culture. Before Islam, much of the Levant and North Africa was like Europe with Western Roman Civilization(France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Morocco, Tunisia, Britain, Austria-Hungary, Southern Germany) being Roman Catholic(exception of Britain after 16th century which became Angelican-Protestant) and Eastern Roman Civilization(Balkan States, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Iraq, Cyprus, Jordan, Caucasus, and Egypt-Sudan) being Eastern Orthodox. Angelicanism, Protestantism, Roman Catholicism, and Eastern Orthodoxy are Christian denominations. Parts of Northern Saudi Arabia used to be part of Roman Civilization.
To understand how Islam became the deadly virus it has been, you must understand it's origins. I'm not preaching hate but nothing but the cold hard truth and the truth is Islam was created by one intolerant and sinful being on the Arabian Peninsula. Mohammed's early life was filled with hardships as he became an orphan as a young child and after being with his grandfather, he stayed with his hard-working uncle and cruel aunt after Mohammed's grandfather died. Mohammed's hardships as a child contributed to his mysogeny and lust for money, power, and sex. Jesus Christ was the only being born without sin, having been born of a virgin(St. Mary) and performing many miracles such as turning water into wine, walking on water, and healing a blind man. Mohammed never did any of the wonderful things Jesus accomplished. Mohammed lived his life as a robber, murder, thief, and sexual deviant while Jesus lived without sin. God is very clear that he has a son while Mohammed lived like any sinner. Mohammed even admitted he was a sinner. Islam was created by Mohammed in 610 when he claimed the angel Gabriel came to him in a cave(which was used to stash Mohammed's loot). When the Jewish and Christian tribes of Mecca and Medina refused to accept Mohammed's message, he waged war against the Meccans and Medinans with forced conversions to Islam. Mohammed even married and had sexual relations with a 6-9 year old girl named Aisha when he was between the ages of 45-52. Aisha was the daughter of Mohammed's disciple Abu Bakr(who became the first Caliph of Islam after Mohammed's death in 632).
Jesus never led armies but had one mission which is to preach a new beginning of love and forgiveness. As Jesus died on the cross in Judea, Palestine he forgave the thief on the cross simply because that thief acknowleged only Jesus could forgive sin. God chose to conceive a son of his own instead of calling on any prophet for the ultimate mission of forgiveness because any other prophet would be sinners. Jesus Christ warned of false prophets and Mohammed was one of them. What is with many Muslims who accept Mohammed as a perfect example even though he was a mere sinner who died in 632 without Christ. This would make Mohammed the Anti-Christ of his time. An Anti-Christ who would help gradually destroy traces of a tolerant civilization where Christians and Jews lived without sectarian conflicts. Martin Luther, the father of Germanic seperatism(Lutheranism) would call Mohammed "First born son of Satan." Luther was right. Mohammed was full of demonic sin, violating nearly ever commandment laid down by God, including idolatry(Moon God Allah), Murder(against non-believers), Theft(against non-believers), Adulery and Sexual Demons(Polygamy and Child Bride Aisha), and even lying to non-believers to promote Islam as a religion of peace when in fact history and actions of Islamic Fundamentalists tell otherwise. Well after Mohammed's death, his legacy of forced conversions and sectarian hatred and violence against non-believers expanded well beyond the Arabian Peninsula into the Zorostarian Persia, Eastern Orthodox Levant and Balkan Peninsula, and even as far as the Iberian Peninsula.
The Islamic Caliphates were counter-attacked by the Crusades of the 11th-13th century and Spanish Inquisition of the 16th century. What the Crusaders did was attempt to restore Western Civilization to it's former Roman glory which was somewhat successful but somewhat a failure. The Spanish Inquisition however was more successful but harsh as it was more of giving birth to Spanish nationalism under Queen Isabella of Catille and King Ferdinand. Though the Inquisition went too far such as forced conversions, it did establish Roman Catholicism as the national religion of many Roman European countries. What history should have been was having the Levant, North Africa, Balkan Peninsula, Caucasus, Arabia, and Persia being liberated from Islamic rule. However, Arabia and persia were not considered part of Roman Civilization. The Crusades and Spanish Inquisition serve as prime examples of history where Islam met strong resistance. Had Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand not pursuded the nationalist Inquisition, Spain and many other Roman Western Countries wouldn't be Western Civilized. Western Civilizations in the Old World other than Roman include the Germanic, Celtic, Anglo, Nordic, and Slavic Civilizations. Germanic Civilizations include Germany, Austria, Netherlands, South Africa, Great Britain, Sweden, Iceland, Norway, Finland, Flanders, and Poland.
What should be done about Syria? Better yet, what if the Middle East was westernized and the ignorant savages were kept under the control of Western powers and the Muslim Brotherhood destroyed? If it weren't for Islam, Egypt would be a Coptic Orthodox state like the Papal States but have a Pharoah as head of state monarch, Coptic Pope as Head of the upper house of bishops, and a Prime Minister of the lower house which would follow the line of parliamentary democracy plus having some Anglo roots. Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco would be Roman Catholic republics with Libya being mostly Italian, Tunisia and Algeria being mostly French, and Morocco being a blend of Spanish and French roots. Lebanon and Syria have their own versions of Christianity being the Meronite and Melkonite Catholic sects but also share Greek Orthodox roots. Turkey is supposed to be a secular and nationalist republic but before the fall of Constantinople in 1453, turkey was mostly Greek Orthodox so Turkey should have their own Orthodox church dubbed Turkish Orthodox.
If it weren't for Islam, most of the Arab and Levant world would have the same standards of living as Western Europe and North America. Reality is the only Muslim country in the World to be a 1st world country is Turkey, due to rejecting jihad and sharia and endorsing modernization and Western ideals.
I know this blog post isn't talking directly much about Syria but the fact of the matter is Islam is most certainly NOT a religion of peace but I don't say that about all Muslims. I'm saying here is that Islam is a cult that centers around one sinner, Mohammed. Most people are Muslims because they fear violent retaliation if they reject and/or leave Islam, plus many Muslim's ancestors from the 7th century were forced to convert to Islam or face dire consequences at the hand of a bloody sword. Also keep in mind I don't harbor resentment against Muslims who oppose the totalitarian tyranny of Sharia law and jihad. I do however show resentment towards the cult of death known as Islam and it's many hypocrisies, lies, and arrogance that are supported by history dating back from as far as Mohammed's childhood and rise as so called "prophet".
What also makes Islam a Pagan religion is one, part of Islam includes worship of the moon god Allah, which has been worshiped since ancient civilization, two, it offers very little to no forgiveness for humanity with goals for World domination and subjugation of all other faiths and cultures, and three, was the brainchild of one sinner's imagination and bias, Mohammed.
What I think Islam is, is a merger of the Pagan Moon God worship(Allah) of Arabian culture and the cult of Mohammed. Most Islamic values are centered around Mohammed's life, making it mostly a cult similar to Jim Jones' Peoples Temple and Warren Jeffs' FLDS. All men are/were sinners and many Imans and Mullahs know Mohammed was a sinner and while they acknowledge Mohammed did the sins he did, they blindly follow his "perfect" example so as to not offend Mohammed's image. The people who wrote the Holy Bible scriptures over the thousands of years were sinners(except Jesus Christ). Jesus never asked for money or pity since his mission on Earth was to bring forgiveness to sinners.
Islam is mostly Arabian culture as you can tell the difference between Arabian and Roman cultures. Islamists celebrate the 1453 Fall of Constantinople and prey for a Caliph of Islam to destroy the West just as their ancestors did centuries before. If North Africa and the Levant are supposed to be Arab states, what about Portugal, Spain, Greece, Southern Italy, Cyprus, Armenia, and the Balkan states for example? I could imagine had Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand not have heroically re-Westernized Spain what Spain would be like. People speaking Arabic instead of Portuguese, Spanish, Greek, Italian, and other Balkan languages. Turkey has it's own language and culture separate from that of Arabia.
Let's face it, the Syrian rebels just like other Islamists do harm to other religions and cultures to not only dominate them but remove traces of Christian culture for example to further cement Arab-Islamic rule. You see terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, and Hamas call for the extermination of the Jews so the Islamists could further cement their rule outside of Arabia and rule the World.
Conclusion on what Islam is. It's mostly an Arabian belief concocted by Mohammed to state that Arabs are the supreme rulers of the World and so called "Allah" has commanded the Muslims-Arabians conquer the World for Allah. That's the same mentality Adolf Hitler brought when he came to power and eventually invaded and conquered much of Europe. The Nazis and Islamists share the same goals of World Domination and Antisemitism. The Crusades on the other hand related more to the Western Allies of World War II rather than invaders since they were reclaiming Arab conquered lands. The Arab Muslims wanted to conquer the known World while the Crusaders wanted to reclaim their Christian Holy Lands in Europe, North Africa, and the Levant.
Reality is that the Arab World should only consist of the Arabian Peninsula based on both the political and geographical definitions while that West of it consists of Roman Civilization and East of it consists of Persia.
Monday, August 19, 2013
What if There Were A Modern Crusades?
Sorry I haven't posted much lately but I come to say that what if Freedom fighters became more like the Crusades and what if colonial powers asserted themselves more?
The crusades from the late 11th century to the late 13th century fought off Arab colonizers and reclaimed most of Islamic occupied Europe such as Spain, Portugal, Sicily, Greece for examples but failed to hold grip on the Levant(Israel, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt) and North Africa.
Before the Arab invasions Europe, Levant, and North Africa were Christian and Western civilizations. Jesus Christ lived his entire life near Jerusalem and nearly all Biblical tales took place on the Levant and in North Africa. The Roman Empire spanned most of Europe, Levant, and coasts of North Africa. Greece composed of Southeast Europe, Cyprus, and Turkey. Even Russia and other Orthodox nations under it's empire are Western in nature such as Ukraine, Belarus, Baltic States, Finland, etc. There are a couple European countries today that are Islamic such as Bosnia and Albania. Israel today is a Zionist controlled British state.
The Byzantine Empire was a Christian society in which it was conquered by the ottoman Empire on May 29, 1453 with the fall of Constantinople, today Istanbul, Turkey. Should Turkey be legitimately considered a Muslim state? While a secular Turkey protects freedom of religion, it would be fair to say that it is truly a Greek Orthodox country. Turkey becoming a secular republic and the expulsion of the Caliphate of Islam did justice for Western civilization as thanks to the greatest Turk of all time Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Turkey has been the only Muslim majority country to be First World. It's a member of NATO alongside North America and Western, Central, and Southern Europe.
Islam began as an Arab Nationalist philosophy founded by Mohammed, who is himself an Arab from Mecca. Mohammed could have made Islam a peaceful and non-oppressive nationalist ideology restricted to the Arabian Peninsula(Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Yemen, United Arab Emirates, and Southeast Iraq) and Persia(Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Steppes of the Russian Empire, Bangladesh, and parts of Northern India) that related to Christianity. Instead Islam is a jingoist, totalitarian philosophy of death, abuse of women, children, and non-believers, no respect for freedom, and Third World standards of living with the exception of the high class Muslims such as royalty, government, and imans. Even before Mohammed preached his inhumane philosophy, he was a robber and murderer in his youth trying to fulfill his desires for money. Many of the Islamic practices are due to Mohammed's sickening examples of taking multiple marriages, a child bride(Aisha), robbing and killing non-believers with Jizya, Jihad, and Sharia, forced conversions, death for apostasy, hatred against Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and Athiests, even Muslims who disagreed with Mohammed.
I'm not calling for the persecution of anybody but denouncing the persecution under Islam that started with Mohammed and continues to this day. There have been reform movements in Islam that call for more human rights and more freedom such as Bahai and Ahmadiyya movements for example challenged the Sunni and Shia establishments in Islam though Bahai is not of the Islamic faith. Reform movements in Islam seek more secular freedoms and human rights that Muslim Countries don't have.
Other than the Muslim World there's the matter of North America which has several societies. The United States and Canada aren't nations but multicultural empires. The United States goes no more South than Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Iowa, and Nebraska and no more West than North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska. What other nations should exist?
Well for one the Confederate States of America consists of the Southern States and much of what used to be New Spain. The Northern Mexican border states plus the Yucatan peninsula are truly Southern Dixie as well. Had the Confederacy kept independence, they would be the largest superpower in the World, have the largest economy and the largest military in the World like the U.S. Dixies even wanted to expand more Southward as Central America and the Caribbean became a gold mine of land for Southerners. William Walker of the 1850's should be remembered as a hero for a Southern Manifest Destiny. During the American Revolution it was the South that won the war against the British and established limited government in America. Not saying this to insult the Northern states but it's true that Dixies are a larger population than Yankees. Southern-Confederate society is mostly Catholic, Baptist, and agrarian wheres Yankees are more Protestant, urban, rust belt, and Nordic. If the South won the Civil War, the United States would be smaller but also have some non-plantation oriented Islands in the Caribbean such as Bahamas and Bermuda for examples. The Confederate States would consist of plantation style states such as Cuba, Haiti, Dominican Republic as add on states.
In the End, the Confederate States of America would have consisted of South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, Tennessee, Arkansas, Oklahoma, West Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri, South Illinois, New Mexico, Arizona, Kansas, Colorado, Utah, Northern Nevada, Southern Nevada, Southern California, Northern California(excluding Sonoma), Rio Grande, Sierra Madre, Chihuahua, Sonora, Baja California, Baja California Sur, Yucatan peninsula, and more plantation islands. Others could include Central America. the CSA capital would be Ft. Davis-Lee near Dallas, Texas.
Plus, what if Russia asserted itself more in North America? What governates would Russia have? Would the Pacific Northwest also be of Russian descent? Alaska was settled by Russia circa 1800 and the Russian Empire settled as far as Fort Ross in Somona County, California. Fort Ross is north of San Francisco Bay. Alaska wouldn't be just confined to one state peninsula but would also include the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountains North of Colorado, Utah, Northern Nevada, and Northern California. It would be called the Alaskan Democratic Federative Republic which before was a federated colony of the Russian Empire. After the Russian Revolution of 1917, Alaska became a mandate under the British and Yankee governments until 1923, which became an independent parliamentary republic. The federated states would be called Oblasts as they were called in Russia. Real states that would be part of Alaska would be the Pacifc and Far North Californias north of San Francisco Bay(Sonoma), Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Washington(Columbia), British Columbia(Columbia, New Caledonia, Vancouver, Charlotte, Tongass, Sitka, Borealia), Alaska(Sitka, Denali, Kodiak, Kenai, Far North, Aleutia, New Irkutski), Yukon, Northwest territories(Yukon), Nunavut(Borealia), Alberta(Alberta, Borealia), Saskatchewan(Saskatchewan, Borealia), and Manitoba(pre-1912 Manitoba, Borealia).
Alaskan Democratic Federative Republic would be much like the United States and Confederate States of America in terms of democratic and republican government but would be parliamentary like the United Kingdom and late 19th to early 20th century Russia. The legilsatures would be called Duma, which is also the name of the Russian legislature. Culture is influenced by Russian, British, and American culture with main languages being Russian and English. Main religions include Russian Orthodox, Protestantism, and Catholicism. Many cities and names are Russian and Anglo. The Head of State would be called general President elected by a college of electors while the Head of Government would be Prime Minister that is based on Parliament. The largest ethnic group in Alaska would be Russians, especially when Anti-Communist White Russians fled from Bolshevik terror. From the Early 19th century to 1917, Alaska was known as Russian America and also part of the Russian Empire with the Tsar of Russia as Head of State. Most of ADFR territory was before part of the United States of America and the British Empire. Other ethnic groups would include Brits, Yankees, Dixies, Germanic people, and indigenous peoples as well as others such as Far East Asians(Chinese, Japanese, etc.). Subdivisions of the Oblasts will be called Uyezds. The main political parties would include Constitutional Democratic and Socialist Revolutionary. After the 1930's, they were changed to Evergreen and Workers Party.
Other nations in North America would include Quebec, Acadia(New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Labrador, Nova Scotia, and Cape Breton), and Ontario would be divided Southeast and Northwest with the Southeast being called Ontario and the Northwest joining the U.S. State of Superior. Ontario would also be a U.S. State.
Other countries to talk about here are Southern Africa, Westralia, and Israel.
Countries in Southern Africa that are rightfully White are South Africa, Rhodesia(now Zimbabwe), and Southwest Africa(now Namibia) and the rest of Southern Africa. Most of Southern Africa was primarily colonized by the British Empire with the exceptions of Southwest Africa(German), Tanzania & Zanzibar(German), Cape Colony(Dutch), ?. The late 20th century in Southern Africa saw the Pagan indigenous Blacks conquering these White lands through stealth with assistance from the internationalists. Was the European settlements of the Americas and Australia plus New Zealand wrong because it put White-Western civilization at the highest sovereignty? The precedents set in Rhodesia and South Africa send a bad message that Europeans had no right to settle in vast, pagan lands and instead must be punished with minority status as pagans rule over them in a pure democracy. Nearly all of Southern Africa is full of White nations that were wronged of their identity. Apartheid in South Africa and Rhodesia could have ended by giving coloured indigenous people opportunity to assimilate into Afrikaner and Ango-African society, therefore loosening the inhumane aspects of Apartheid while retaining Afrikaner nationalism. Non-assimilated indigenous people can stay on reserves and have autonomy within their reserves similar to the indigenous peoples of the Americas and Australia. The Bantusan System in south Africa and Rhodesia should have been retained for Blacks unwilling to accept Afrikaner society. South Africa could have also became a confederation with the four provinces becoming republics. Have you ever heard that "The Truth is hate speech only to those who hate it?" Well to be honest the White race and Western civilization are superior to the Third World and if it wasn't for European settlers, the World would be worse off since resources would be far more limited and people would be living lower standards of living and would be set back centuries. Cecil Rhodes, a British Subject was the chief of the Scramble of Africa which sought to expand Western Civilization in ways it was destined for. I don't condone any abuses committed by colonial governments but I do feel that South Africa for example should be a White governed country.
Israel is a Zionist occupied holy land where Jesus Christ lived. The Israelites were Whites and British heritage descends from the land of Israel. It's a mistake to believe Israel should be ruled by Jews or Muslims or anyone other than Christians. So unbelievable is the fact that there have been several proposals for a Jewish state other than Palestine. Where the Jewish state should have landed was on Charlotte Island adjacent to British Columbia as it is vast and easy to build. Another option would have been to accept part of British East Africa. Israel is rightfully a British Christian nation. Charlotte Island is larger than Israel. I'm not saying that Jews shouldn't live in Israel but that Israel should not be dominated by Zionism. If only Charlotte Island was considered, it would have better suited Jewish culture considering the atmosphere.
General Sisi in Egypt is working to restore order and destroy the Muslim Brotherhood. The Egyptian military is taking real action to restore peace and stability by crushing Muslim Brotherhood supporters. I say there needs to be war against the Muslim brotherhood because unless they're destroyed, they'll just keep invading and terrorizing. Expel Sharia and jihad to the Arabian Peninsula and Persia! Liberate the Levant and North Africa from Islamic domination!
The crusades from the late 11th century to the late 13th century fought off Arab colonizers and reclaimed most of Islamic occupied Europe such as Spain, Portugal, Sicily, Greece for examples but failed to hold grip on the Levant(Israel, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt) and North Africa.
Before the Arab invasions Europe, Levant, and North Africa were Christian and Western civilizations. Jesus Christ lived his entire life near Jerusalem and nearly all Biblical tales took place on the Levant and in North Africa. The Roman Empire spanned most of Europe, Levant, and coasts of North Africa. Greece composed of Southeast Europe, Cyprus, and Turkey. Even Russia and other Orthodox nations under it's empire are Western in nature such as Ukraine, Belarus, Baltic States, Finland, etc. There are a couple European countries today that are Islamic such as Bosnia and Albania. Israel today is a Zionist controlled British state.
The Byzantine Empire was a Christian society in which it was conquered by the ottoman Empire on May 29, 1453 with the fall of Constantinople, today Istanbul, Turkey. Should Turkey be legitimately considered a Muslim state? While a secular Turkey protects freedom of religion, it would be fair to say that it is truly a Greek Orthodox country. Turkey becoming a secular republic and the expulsion of the Caliphate of Islam did justice for Western civilization as thanks to the greatest Turk of all time Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Turkey has been the only Muslim majority country to be First World. It's a member of NATO alongside North America and Western, Central, and Southern Europe.
Islam began as an Arab Nationalist philosophy founded by Mohammed, who is himself an Arab from Mecca. Mohammed could have made Islam a peaceful and non-oppressive nationalist ideology restricted to the Arabian Peninsula(Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Yemen, United Arab Emirates, and Southeast Iraq) and Persia(Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Steppes of the Russian Empire, Bangladesh, and parts of Northern India) that related to Christianity. Instead Islam is a jingoist, totalitarian philosophy of death, abuse of women, children, and non-believers, no respect for freedom, and Third World standards of living with the exception of the high class Muslims such as royalty, government, and imans. Even before Mohammed preached his inhumane philosophy, he was a robber and murderer in his youth trying to fulfill his desires for money. Many of the Islamic practices are due to Mohammed's sickening examples of taking multiple marriages, a child bride(Aisha), robbing and killing non-believers with Jizya, Jihad, and Sharia, forced conversions, death for apostasy, hatred against Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and Athiests, even Muslims who disagreed with Mohammed.
I'm not calling for the persecution of anybody but denouncing the persecution under Islam that started with Mohammed and continues to this day. There have been reform movements in Islam that call for more human rights and more freedom such as Bahai and Ahmadiyya movements for example challenged the Sunni and Shia establishments in Islam though Bahai is not of the Islamic faith. Reform movements in Islam seek more secular freedoms and human rights that Muslim Countries don't have.
Other than the Muslim World there's the matter of North America which has several societies. The United States and Canada aren't nations but multicultural empires. The United States goes no more South than Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Iowa, and Nebraska and no more West than North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska. What other nations should exist?
Well for one the Confederate States of America consists of the Southern States and much of what used to be New Spain. The Northern Mexican border states plus the Yucatan peninsula are truly Southern Dixie as well. Had the Confederacy kept independence, they would be the largest superpower in the World, have the largest economy and the largest military in the World like the U.S. Dixies even wanted to expand more Southward as Central America and the Caribbean became a gold mine of land for Southerners. William Walker of the 1850's should be remembered as a hero for a Southern Manifest Destiny. During the American Revolution it was the South that won the war against the British and established limited government in America. Not saying this to insult the Northern states but it's true that Dixies are a larger population than Yankees. Southern-Confederate society is mostly Catholic, Baptist, and agrarian wheres Yankees are more Protestant, urban, rust belt, and Nordic. If the South won the Civil War, the United States would be smaller but also have some non-plantation oriented Islands in the Caribbean such as Bahamas and Bermuda for examples. The Confederate States would consist of plantation style states such as Cuba, Haiti, Dominican Republic as add on states.
In the End, the Confederate States of America would have consisted of South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, Tennessee, Arkansas, Oklahoma, West Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri, South Illinois, New Mexico, Arizona, Kansas, Colorado, Utah, Northern Nevada, Southern Nevada, Southern California, Northern California(excluding Sonoma), Rio Grande, Sierra Madre, Chihuahua, Sonora, Baja California, Baja California Sur, Yucatan peninsula, and more plantation islands. Others could include Central America. the CSA capital would be Ft. Davis-Lee near Dallas, Texas.
Plus, what if Russia asserted itself more in North America? What governates would Russia have? Would the Pacific Northwest also be of Russian descent? Alaska was settled by Russia circa 1800 and the Russian Empire settled as far as Fort Ross in Somona County, California. Fort Ross is north of San Francisco Bay. Alaska wouldn't be just confined to one state peninsula but would also include the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountains North of Colorado, Utah, Northern Nevada, and Northern California. It would be called the Alaskan Democratic Federative Republic which before was a federated colony of the Russian Empire. After the Russian Revolution of 1917, Alaska became a mandate under the British and Yankee governments until 1923, which became an independent parliamentary republic. The federated states would be called Oblasts as they were called in Russia. Real states that would be part of Alaska would be the Pacifc and Far North Californias north of San Francisco Bay(Sonoma), Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Washington(Columbia), British Columbia(Columbia, New Caledonia, Vancouver, Charlotte, Tongass, Sitka, Borealia), Alaska(Sitka, Denali, Kodiak, Kenai, Far North, Aleutia, New Irkutski), Yukon, Northwest territories(Yukon), Nunavut(Borealia), Alberta(Alberta, Borealia), Saskatchewan(Saskatchewan, Borealia), and Manitoba(pre-1912 Manitoba, Borealia).
Alaskan Democratic Federative Republic would be much like the United States and Confederate States of America in terms of democratic and republican government but would be parliamentary like the United Kingdom and late 19th to early 20th century Russia. The legilsatures would be called Duma, which is also the name of the Russian legislature. Culture is influenced by Russian, British, and American culture with main languages being Russian and English. Main religions include Russian Orthodox, Protestantism, and Catholicism. Many cities and names are Russian and Anglo. The Head of State would be called general President elected by a college of electors while the Head of Government would be Prime Minister that is based on Parliament. The largest ethnic group in Alaska would be Russians, especially when Anti-Communist White Russians fled from Bolshevik terror. From the Early 19th century to 1917, Alaska was known as Russian America and also part of the Russian Empire with the Tsar of Russia as Head of State. Most of ADFR territory was before part of the United States of America and the British Empire. Other ethnic groups would include Brits, Yankees, Dixies, Germanic people, and indigenous peoples as well as others such as Far East Asians(Chinese, Japanese, etc.). Subdivisions of the Oblasts will be called Uyezds. The main political parties would include Constitutional Democratic and Socialist Revolutionary. After the 1930's, they were changed to Evergreen and Workers Party.
Other nations in North America would include Quebec, Acadia(New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Labrador, Nova Scotia, and Cape Breton), and Ontario would be divided Southeast and Northwest with the Southeast being called Ontario and the Northwest joining the U.S. State of Superior. Ontario would also be a U.S. State.
Other countries to talk about here are Southern Africa, Westralia, and Israel.
Countries in Southern Africa that are rightfully White are South Africa, Rhodesia(now Zimbabwe), and Southwest Africa(now Namibia) and the rest of Southern Africa. Most of Southern Africa was primarily colonized by the British Empire with the exceptions of Southwest Africa(German), Tanzania & Zanzibar(German), Cape Colony(Dutch), ?. The late 20th century in Southern Africa saw the Pagan indigenous Blacks conquering these White lands through stealth with assistance from the internationalists. Was the European settlements of the Americas and Australia plus New Zealand wrong because it put White-Western civilization at the highest sovereignty? The precedents set in Rhodesia and South Africa send a bad message that Europeans had no right to settle in vast, pagan lands and instead must be punished with minority status as pagans rule over them in a pure democracy. Nearly all of Southern Africa is full of White nations that were wronged of their identity. Apartheid in South Africa and Rhodesia could have ended by giving coloured indigenous people opportunity to assimilate into Afrikaner and Ango-African society, therefore loosening the inhumane aspects of Apartheid while retaining Afrikaner nationalism. Non-assimilated indigenous people can stay on reserves and have autonomy within their reserves similar to the indigenous peoples of the Americas and Australia. The Bantusan System in south Africa and Rhodesia should have been retained for Blacks unwilling to accept Afrikaner society. South Africa could have also became a confederation with the four provinces becoming republics. Have you ever heard that "The Truth is hate speech only to those who hate it?" Well to be honest the White race and Western civilization are superior to the Third World and if it wasn't for European settlers, the World would be worse off since resources would be far more limited and people would be living lower standards of living and would be set back centuries. Cecil Rhodes, a British Subject was the chief of the Scramble of Africa which sought to expand Western Civilization in ways it was destined for. I don't condone any abuses committed by colonial governments but I do feel that South Africa for example should be a White governed country.
Israel is a Zionist occupied holy land where Jesus Christ lived. The Israelites were Whites and British heritage descends from the land of Israel. It's a mistake to believe Israel should be ruled by Jews or Muslims or anyone other than Christians. So unbelievable is the fact that there have been several proposals for a Jewish state other than Palestine. Where the Jewish state should have landed was on Charlotte Island adjacent to British Columbia as it is vast and easy to build. Another option would have been to accept part of British East Africa. Israel is rightfully a British Christian nation. Charlotte Island is larger than Israel. I'm not saying that Jews shouldn't live in Israel but that Israel should not be dominated by Zionism. If only Charlotte Island was considered, it would have better suited Jewish culture considering the atmosphere.
General Sisi in Egypt is working to restore order and destroy the Muslim Brotherhood. The Egyptian military is taking real action to restore peace and stability by crushing Muslim Brotherhood supporters. I say there needs to be war against the Muslim brotherhood because unless they're destroyed, they'll just keep invading and terrorizing. Expel Sharia and jihad to the Arabian Peninsula and Persia! Liberate the Levant and North Africa from Islamic domination!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)