“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” —Ben
Franklin
“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from
those who are willing to work and give to those who would
not.”
—Thomas Jefferson
“Democracy ...
wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not
commit suicide.”
—John
Adams
“Democracy is the most vile form of government... democracies
have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention... incompatible with
personal security or the rights of property.”
—James
Madison
“The majority, oppressing an individual, is guilty of a crime,
abuses its strength, and ... breaks up the foundations of
society.”
—Thomas Jefferson
What has history shown about democracy? What about the ill fated Weimar Republic which was a liberal democracy? How well was it guarded from the abuses of tyrannical government? What can we learn from Germany's transition from a democracy to a totalitarian dictatorship to a federal republic?
The Weimar Republic was born from the defeat of the German Empire in 1919 and that was only the beginning of Germany's political troubles. The Treaty of Versailles was signed the same year requiring reparations from Germany to the Allied Powers of World War I. This helped bankrupt Germany's economy to hyperinflation which lasted from 1919-23. Social Democrat President Fredrich Ebert complied with this infringement on Germany's sovereignty and political unrest broke out. When Ebert died in 1925, former German Empire General Paul von Hindenberg became president and while from 1924-29 Germany enjoyed a short lived golden era in the midst of Hitler's Rise to Power, the monopolization of force began with a gun control bill in 1928 which required registration of civilian firearms, which Hitler Nazi regime would use for political gain against opponents. The 1930 elections saw the Nazi Party have big gains with them being just second behind the ruling Social Democratic Party. 1932 elections made the Nazi Party the largest party in parliament. two more elections would succeed with Hitler being appointed Chancellor on january 30, 1933. The Reichteg Fire of February 27, 1933 led to the Enabling Act, giving Hitler and his Nazi Party a monopoly on power, leading to a totalitarian regime.
Question here is how could such a tyrannical politician rise to power and how could the Nazi Party have become the dominant party in parliament? How could the Enabling Act have been stopped from passing and how could the Nazi Party be removed from power and banned without armed conflict? One problem with the Weimar Republic was it tried to monopolize power when it passed gun control in 1928 and failing to have a judicial system equiped to be free of government influence. What role could the courts have in stopping such atrocities? How could judges be free of political influence and be trusted enough not to follow their own political views? The problem with government funded judiciaries is the judges nominated mostly by government have no incentive or consequence for their actions on the bench? How about public officials who knowingly break their oath of office and become tyrannical? How can they be stopped?
Non-Governmental organizations play a role in impartiality since they have no direct interest with government affiliation. for example, NGO are more trustworthy in counting votes and doing justice. This is why new checks and balances should include non-governmental law enforcement and justice systems.
What have government funded law enforcement and judges done? They've abused their power because they have no incentive to be held to account since should no branch step up and stop them, they will continue to become tyrannical. This is why there should be an easier removal of public officials by petition and merit based systems to hold judges, legislators, and executives accountable, being judged by trustworthy NGOs.
An example of judicial checks on political parties and politicians is Turkey, which became a constitutional republic in 1923. Mustafa Kemal established a Westernized Republican Turkey which has a constitution to reflect that. Turkey's constitution prohibits political activity or political parties/officials that violate the constitution. The judiciary can simply remove an official from power because they violate the Turkish Constitution. Why cant the USA have such a check? Better yet, why should we allow government attorneys to have near absolute power over legal matters?
Thomas Jefferson best said "Allow judges to be the sole arbitraitors of constitutional matters breeds tyranny and despotism". Nazi Germany had a judicial system that was funded and established by the Nazi Party. Putting your freedom in the hands of judges is like Jews putting their civil rights in the hands of Roland Freisler.
Another issue is what's our final resort? It comes down to killing government troops in the event of tyrannical government. In US vs. Miller, the US Supreme court ruled that government could not regulate military firearms. That case dealt with a sawed-off shotgun which the court ruled had no military purpose. Machine Guns, AR-15s for example do have military purpose. The final resort is violence against public officials who abuse elections to gain power.
Question here is how can broken government best be reformed. It requires violating the broken and corrupt system through armed conflict against government officials and a rejection of ignorant voters who serve to make matters worse. The Nazi Party rose to power thanks to the ignorance of voters.
The question of government funding for political parties goes unchecked. Do the funders need a terror attack perpetrated against it's facilities just to stop it's abuses? Apparently so. The IRS has become nothing more than an enabler for an out of control regime. Democracy is a cancer ready to suck out due process in politics.
Government is tyrannical because of their exploitation of elections and power with disrespect for due process. Due process is a barrier against government abuse and when inalienable rights are in danger, due process must come to save the day. Sometimes protecting due process requires use of armed force against aggressors.
What should be done about the rise of inverted totalitarian democracy? Having non-governmental checks and balances such as armed citizens and competing justice systems can help secure liberty and justice while making it easier and shorter process to hold public officials accountable. Plus, non-governmental supervision of elections and majority elections with no preferential treatment for political parties. Also allow for a Fully Informed Jury which would be protected by NGO Fully Informed Jury Association.
California can be fixed but only if it's government is brought to compliance with a Republican form of government required by the constitution so federal courts should order a constitutional convention for California as well as have NGO supervise proceedings. The Weimar Republic failed because people believed elections alone could secure freedom when in fact it turned out to do the exact opposite. We also need to secure our elections from ignorant votes and illegal immigrants.
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Friday, April 19, 2013
Why violence against oath breaking tyrants is justifiable
California, Illinois, New York, Connecticut, and now Colorado are experiencing tyranny of gun confiscation as the only way to combat this is if bombs went off at government facilities engaging in gun confiscation. Thanks to registration deception, California Democrats were able to successfully impliment gun confiscation. Why else are they able to do so? What resistance could possibly defeat them?
What if someone were to plant bombs in government facilities and they were to explode, killing government employees, would the perpetraitor be able to successfully use the defense against tyrannical government defense? Depends on their purpose, targets, and whether these government bureaucrats were a threat to people's freedom.
I want to first tell you about the judicial system in this country and many others. Do you know that the judicial system is funded entirely by government money and the judiciary is 100% on government side. It doesn't matter if the judge presiding is benevolent since the legislator acts like god over the laws it makes by creating reprisals for officers and judges who refuse to swear alligence to the legislature laws instead of the constitution. Who's going to hold the tyrannical judiciary accountable?
It's certainly not going to be Congress since they thrive on statist rulings. Have you ever heard of Volksgerichtshof? It was the judicial system of Nazi Germany which conducted show trials and where defense attorneys couldn't stand a fighting chance because it was the presiding judges who held god like power to decide guilt or innocence regardless of the fairness of the trial. Much of the judicial system here acts in a way that gives them god like power over anyone in the courtroom. in some Western countries court officers can be legally reprimanded should they fail to swear blind obedience to the magistrate their serving. When one branch of government reprimands another for failing to obey it's edicts, then the system of checks and balances dissolves and this is what is happening in Colorado. America's judicial system has failed to stay independent because many judges are more concerned with getting rewarded for keeping the statist quo than upholding their oath. No wonder judges refuse to allow jury nullification mentionings in courtrooms.
Ever noticed how numerous government agencies are becoming as feared as Gestapo? This is how bad the situation involving government agencies such as the IRS, BATFE, TSA, and DHS. If people cannot live without fearing their own government, then government is tyrannical an dpeople do have god given right to defend themselves against tyrannical government agencies. Not just these organizations but the Secret Service, FBI, CIA, and even the U.S. Marshals are guilty of instilling the same kind of fear that Gestapo and KGB instilled in their subjects.
Would gun control be dissolved had the gun industry have fought using militant means and using the government's energy against them? Nazi Germany was dissolved in only 12 years due to Allied Powers victory during World War II. defeating a military industrial complex from the outside is difficult but creating a plan for victory is important as using the strongest weapons is important, especially when facing an army with weapons of mass destruction and air force of drones.
Be sure to look at nullification such as going to state and county legislatures. The thing about human nature is action alone decides most of policy and even if one county in California were to resist gun control and other socialist policies, then they could overcome any tyranny headed their way. It's very easy to pressure your city or county council since they are close to the area! A supermajority of Counties in New York have expressed outrage and resistance to New York's Anti-Civil Liberties gun control SAFE Act.
But seriously, will individual armed force members truly have the heart to rival American citizens? the cold blooded commanders like Barack Obama are weak without loyalists. The agents are the enablers of agendas. If we pay these thugs the same respect they pay others we can overcome this "Law is the law." syndrome and break free of the tyrannies ahead. Giving the thugs at BATFE, IRS, Judiciaries, TSA, FEMA, DHS, and Secret Service the same respect you would give Gestapo and KGB agents is important for ending monopolies on force and taking a stand.
I seriously favor non-violent declarations of no unless it is necessary to use armed force to say "NO". Influencing city/county councils and state legislators is more efficient but the regime will use deadly force to stop civil disobedience. Sometimes you just have to shoot a bunch of law enforcement thugs to protect your inalienable rights.
Any government agency or NGO that uses the law to abuse their power and kill your liberty is an appealing target for a terror attack whether people accept this or not. The Patriots did not care about public opinion and neither should you. I wouldn't feel any sadness if IRS or BATFE headquarters for example went up in flames and undermined their operations following the deaths or incapacitations of numerous agents. Such attacks would be the equvilent of bombing KGB and Gestapo headquarters.
In fact, a judge suppressing fully informed juries would be as appealing target for attack as Volksgerichtshof Judge President Roland Freisler's fate in 1945.
Please understand I don't support or won't engage in any acts of violence against non-hostile people and the use of violence should be only for acts of defense of life, liberty, and property. Which is why hundreds of thousands of lives are saved by responsible gun use.
What if someone were to plant bombs in government facilities and they were to explode, killing government employees, would the perpetraitor be able to successfully use the defense against tyrannical government defense? Depends on their purpose, targets, and whether these government bureaucrats were a threat to people's freedom.
I want to first tell you about the judicial system in this country and many others. Do you know that the judicial system is funded entirely by government money and the judiciary is 100% on government side. It doesn't matter if the judge presiding is benevolent since the legislator acts like god over the laws it makes by creating reprisals for officers and judges who refuse to swear alligence to the legislature laws instead of the constitution. Who's going to hold the tyrannical judiciary accountable?
It's certainly not going to be Congress since they thrive on statist rulings. Have you ever heard of Volksgerichtshof? It was the judicial system of Nazi Germany which conducted show trials and where defense attorneys couldn't stand a fighting chance because it was the presiding judges who held god like power to decide guilt or innocence regardless of the fairness of the trial. Much of the judicial system here acts in a way that gives them god like power over anyone in the courtroom. in some Western countries court officers can be legally reprimanded should they fail to swear blind obedience to the magistrate their serving. When one branch of government reprimands another for failing to obey it's edicts, then the system of checks and balances dissolves and this is what is happening in Colorado. America's judicial system has failed to stay independent because many judges are more concerned with getting rewarded for keeping the statist quo than upholding their oath. No wonder judges refuse to allow jury nullification mentionings in courtrooms.
Ever noticed how numerous government agencies are becoming as feared as Gestapo? This is how bad the situation involving government agencies such as the IRS, BATFE, TSA, and DHS. If people cannot live without fearing their own government, then government is tyrannical an dpeople do have god given right to defend themselves against tyrannical government agencies. Not just these organizations but the Secret Service, FBI, CIA, and even the U.S. Marshals are guilty of instilling the same kind of fear that Gestapo and KGB instilled in their subjects.
Would gun control be dissolved had the gun industry have fought using militant means and using the government's energy against them? Nazi Germany was dissolved in only 12 years due to Allied Powers victory during World War II. defeating a military industrial complex from the outside is difficult but creating a plan for victory is important as using the strongest weapons is important, especially when facing an army with weapons of mass destruction and air force of drones.
Be sure to look at nullification such as going to state and county legislatures. The thing about human nature is action alone decides most of policy and even if one county in California were to resist gun control and other socialist policies, then they could overcome any tyranny headed their way. It's very easy to pressure your city or county council since they are close to the area! A supermajority of Counties in New York have expressed outrage and resistance to New York's Anti-Civil Liberties gun control SAFE Act.
But seriously, will individual armed force members truly have the heart to rival American citizens? the cold blooded commanders like Barack Obama are weak without loyalists. The agents are the enablers of agendas. If we pay these thugs the same respect they pay others we can overcome this "Law is the law." syndrome and break free of the tyrannies ahead. Giving the thugs at BATFE, IRS, Judiciaries, TSA, FEMA, DHS, and Secret Service the same respect you would give Gestapo and KGB agents is important for ending monopolies on force and taking a stand.
I seriously favor non-violent declarations of no unless it is necessary to use armed force to say "NO". Influencing city/county councils and state legislators is more efficient but the regime will use deadly force to stop civil disobedience. Sometimes you just have to shoot a bunch of law enforcement thugs to protect your inalienable rights.
Any government agency or NGO that uses the law to abuse their power and kill your liberty is an appealing target for a terror attack whether people accept this or not. The Patriots did not care about public opinion and neither should you. I wouldn't feel any sadness if IRS or BATFE headquarters for example went up in flames and undermined their operations following the deaths or incapacitations of numerous agents. Such attacks would be the equvilent of bombing KGB and Gestapo headquarters.
In fact, a judge suppressing fully informed juries would be as appealing target for attack as Volksgerichtshof Judge President Roland Freisler's fate in 1945.
Please understand I don't support or won't engage in any acts of violence against non-hostile people and the use of violence should be only for acts of defense of life, liberty, and property. Which is why hundreds of thousands of lives are saved by responsible gun use.
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Patriots of America: Fighting Without Stronger Weapons
Ever wonder how Nazi Germany was able to invade Poland on September 1, 1939 without breaking a sweat? The Polish army had obsolete and inferior weapons compared to the frightning might of the Nazi Army led by the ferocious Adolf Hitler and his iron generals.
Could the Confederate States of America have won had they've had access to deadlier weapons? The answer is yes! The key to winning wars is to strive in being stronger than your enemy. If you fight using sissors and your enemies have AR-15s, then you don't stand a very big chance!
Learning from the U.N. Peacekeeping invasion and destruction of the Free African State of Katanga in the early 1960's, you can see how dangerous it is for your freedom and independence to allow your rivals to be stronger than you.
The reason the government is winning the war on freedom is not because they are "good" and "holy" but because any resistance to tyrannical government has been dealt by not pushing the envelope and not trying to outmatch them. It seems the biggest resistance to the U.S. Government is mostly Islamic Jihad groups like Al-Qaeda. Too long and too much have good people complied with a criminal government and that's how tyrannical government thrives.
Nazi Germany thrived because the German people were willing to accept Adolf Hitler as a saint and infallible. The best and only way this came to an end and West Germans were freer than in the Weimar Republic era was when the Allied Forces liberated them and destroyed Nazi Germany. How can America under the hybrid regime of Democrat-Republican be compared to Nazi Germany? After 9/11, Americans for a brief moment threw aside politics to remember the victims but soon after they became more supportive of their government and George W. Bush has higher approval ratings. What a fucking joke! Bush deserved every assassination attempt on his life just like Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Bill Clinton, and now Barack Obama and their cronies did/do.
Many Americans today are to a certain degree more willing to submit to their government just as Germans did in Nazi Germany during the 1930's and 40's while accepting the widespread abuses of government power against patriots just like the Jews suffered at the hands of Nazi Germany. The reason Americans have accepted their abusive government just like the German people of Nazi Germany was because they believe the mainstream propaganda too much and fail to have a sense of right vs. wrong when it comes to politics. Although more Americans are coming to resent their government, too many still believe the propaganda machine. CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News for example are no better than Joseph Goebels cause they try to portray a sadistic government in a positive way while demonizing freedom fighters and democide victims in America.
Take a look at abortion! over 50 million unborn children killed since 1973! What about the drones over the Middle East? I don't support much of Arab culture attitudes on freedom but to say it's alright for government to drone attack innocent Arabs is like the jingoist crimes committed by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Yet DC continues to accept multiculturalism of the Third World so long as it benefits the empire and destroys any intelligence in civilization.
Prisons are now made to be miniature police states of psychological pain and suffering. Guantanamo and ADX Supermax are two examples of prisons that are in need of serious reform. Inhumanities that occur there are endless time in solitary confinement meant to destroy the prisoner's mind and sadistic tricks the sadistic guards use without regard for humanity. The New World Order will include treating prisoners like animals instead of human beings which is exactly what totalitarian regimes like Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and North Korea do. So sickening as it seems liberals are more preferrable on this issue than conservatives.
If gun industry has big guns, why hasn't it declared war on the gun grabbing politicians and law enforcement? Is not doing enough and being weaker than federal law enforcement the reason there are still many gun control laws? If just a small faction of armed and militant patriots in California caused mayhem and destruction to government buildings in Sacramento, California Democrats would be seriously terrorized by shock of resistance.
How about state legislatures in Colorado for example threatening sheriffs with dislodging should they fail to support the regime gun control laws? Forcing law enforcement to obey legislatures and activist judiciaries contributes to tyranny and it would be great if every single anti-gun democrat in Colorado were injured or even finished off by nail bombs for example. If militant patriots used explosives to damage government and progressive buildings such as Democratic Party headquarters, that would be wonderful. If mainstream media compunds were attacked with any kind of biological or chemical weapon such as anthrax or cyanide, it would stop the propaganda machines of tyranny from thriving and allow fairness in public opinion. If a despotic magistrate were to meet his/her demise with the blast of an explosive, it would send a powerful message that controlling your government may require commiting acts of terrorism against government facilities and their active supporters.
The thing about the Patriot Movement is taking a stand by fighting for what is right and not trying to de-fickle those fickle souls. Bombing BATFE headquarters and killing BATFE thugs is taking a stand. Begging before Congress to change is submitting to a corrupt system. Retaliating against law enforcement with guerilla warfare style ambush attacks is taking a stand. Going before the courts with little chance of victory is submission!
Bombing a federal office building that has agencies dedicated to destroying your freedoms is not in anyway murderous or criminal but justifiable homicide. Thomas Jefferson best said "the tree of liberty must from time to time be grown from the blood of patriots and tyrants." also saying 'When the people fear the government there is tyranny, when government fears the people there is liberty."
How can we make government fear the people? Terrorism is a method of communication mixed with action in an extreme fashion intended to strike fear into the enemy. Osama Bin Laden and Timothy McVeigh are on the same terror coin but are on different sides of it. Both favored militant means of advancing their achievements. Al-Qaeda advocates Islamic domination over the World while Patriots favor control over their own government by any means necessary and at any necessary cost, even if it means killing hundreds of thousands of government bureaucrats and their accomplices working for the evil DC Empire.
How will the evil empire respond? It shall respond as if it were truly a victim and believe people are ignorant enough to believe the lies of DC. Terrorism is a very powerful tool used to communicate a message that cannot be communicated non-violently. The difference between Islamists and Patriots are people in western Civilization will never surrender to Sharia rule just like they refused surrender to Nazism and Communism. Patriots have the side of truth and holiness to conquer the evil empire. Taking a stand sometimes requires you to shed the blood of your enemies without mercy and without taking prisoners. If an evil empire employee is screaming at the sight of an upcoming execution style gunshot, are they pleading for redemption or are they simply scared for their pathetic life?
Can the walls of ADX Supermax be destroyed with the might of explosions and a militia of patriotic liberators free our political prisoners? The Great Escape was a heroic story of escaping from a Nazi Concentration Camp and should patriots put their minds to it they shall liberate federal prisons across America and terrorize the mainstream media with their inability to lie out of the heroic deeds of the Patriotic Minutemen!
I wish to make clear the message I am trying to send. My point here is fighting evil may require you to be harsh towards your enemies while being wise enough not to become madmen hell bent on sensless destruction. Would you rather continue to live under oppression of tyrannical government or accept the reality that terrorism against government targets is the only way for regime change?
“keep and seek for all the commandments of the LORD your God: that ye may possess this good land, and leave it for an inheritance for your children after you for ever.” 1 Chronicles 28:8
Is it a sin to open fire on IRS, BATFE, and other regime enforcement agents if you're defending your country from a tyrannical government? Is armed and explosive insurrection the only defense against tyrannical government? No and yes. The Patriots did their duty in defeating British troops even if it meant committing acts of terror in the name of liberty. The Patriots were not cold blooded killers willing to kill innocents but killed British troops because they had to.
I must tell you of a dredful yet cave of treasures agency. Homeland Security has begun their war on liberty and they have a gold mine of firearms and hollow point bullets. Obtaining these weapons is important for militant patriots as it will not only give tools needed for victory but also be DHS worst nightmare as for them losing these weapons means a shocking defeat for the regime.
Even though it may frighten people, terror is the only method that can paralyze and destroy tI'yrannical government. Terrorism is a method that can be abused by those seeking to gain power for themselves such as Al-Qaeda tactics of killing civilians and non-believers of Islam. The Anthrax attacks of 2001 while using the U.S. Postal service endangered some innocent lives it did have legitimate targets that could have been eliminated through more precise means. Using care to avoid collateral damage is important as preserving humanity is important as well to avoid a Phyrric victory.
General Douglas McArthur said "There is no substitute for victory." If we shall ever be free again, we must be willing to do whatever it takes to win the DC War on Liberty and Self-Determination, even if it means resorting to use of weapons of mass destruction, which hopefully will have rare use. In times of war, points are best made with bombs and destruction of enemy livelihoods, not words. Appeasement has been a miserable failure noting the 1938 Munich Agreement in which Adolf Hitler begain invading much of Europe in 1939-40. Nazi Germany was brought to an end thanks to the Allied Forces of World War II. Had it not have been for leaders unwilling to surrender, Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan would have conquered most of the World.
Would America still exist had it not have been for leaders like Winston Chruchill and General George Patton? Had McVeigh been more like Osama Bin Laden, would the militia movement rival the federal armed forces? Had George Washington not have led the patriot army through militant means, would the colonies have gained independence from Great Britain? All I'm arguing here is that guerilla warfare against government in the form of terror attacks against government belligerants in the War on Liberty maybe our only way of preserving our constitutional republic. Elections and the courts have been relied on as means for redress but are lengthy and yield unsatisfactory results lacking enough safeguards such as non-governmental organizations defending freedom.
Bottom line here is a terrorist attack similar to the Oklahoma City Bombing while avoiding collateral damage will unfortunately be the best way to send the simple message of "NO!" to an uber-tyrannical government. You can fight the law and win but only if there is a paramilitary organization willing to go through whatever lengths necessary for achieving victory. Don't assume I'm just a crazy terror loving psycho because I'm suggesting that the only way this tyrannical government will be defeated is through guerilla warfare-terrorism. Freedom isn't free and if it means millions of regime soldiers must be destroyed, it is what we as freemen must do. I'm ready to give the government as much respect as they do to the constitution! Next blog will have a list of traitorous individuals and organizations as well as heroic patriots who will help us.
Could the Confederate States of America have won had they've had access to deadlier weapons? The answer is yes! The key to winning wars is to strive in being stronger than your enemy. If you fight using sissors and your enemies have AR-15s, then you don't stand a very big chance!
Learning from the U.N. Peacekeeping invasion and destruction of the Free African State of Katanga in the early 1960's, you can see how dangerous it is for your freedom and independence to allow your rivals to be stronger than you.
The reason the government is winning the war on freedom is not because they are "good" and "holy" but because any resistance to tyrannical government has been dealt by not pushing the envelope and not trying to outmatch them. It seems the biggest resistance to the U.S. Government is mostly Islamic Jihad groups like Al-Qaeda. Too long and too much have good people complied with a criminal government and that's how tyrannical government thrives.
Nazi Germany thrived because the German people were willing to accept Adolf Hitler as a saint and infallible. The best and only way this came to an end and West Germans were freer than in the Weimar Republic era was when the Allied Forces liberated them and destroyed Nazi Germany. How can America under the hybrid regime of Democrat-Republican be compared to Nazi Germany? After 9/11, Americans for a brief moment threw aside politics to remember the victims but soon after they became more supportive of their government and George W. Bush has higher approval ratings. What a fucking joke! Bush deserved every assassination attempt on his life just like Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Bill Clinton, and now Barack Obama and their cronies did/do.
Many Americans today are to a certain degree more willing to submit to their government just as Germans did in Nazi Germany during the 1930's and 40's while accepting the widespread abuses of government power against patriots just like the Jews suffered at the hands of Nazi Germany. The reason Americans have accepted their abusive government just like the German people of Nazi Germany was because they believe the mainstream propaganda too much and fail to have a sense of right vs. wrong when it comes to politics. Although more Americans are coming to resent their government, too many still believe the propaganda machine. CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News for example are no better than Joseph Goebels cause they try to portray a sadistic government in a positive way while demonizing freedom fighters and democide victims in America.
Take a look at abortion! over 50 million unborn children killed since 1973! What about the drones over the Middle East? I don't support much of Arab culture attitudes on freedom but to say it's alright for government to drone attack innocent Arabs is like the jingoist crimes committed by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Yet DC continues to accept multiculturalism of the Third World so long as it benefits the empire and destroys any intelligence in civilization.
Prisons are now made to be miniature police states of psychological pain and suffering. Guantanamo and ADX Supermax are two examples of prisons that are in need of serious reform. Inhumanities that occur there are endless time in solitary confinement meant to destroy the prisoner's mind and sadistic tricks the sadistic guards use without regard for humanity. The New World Order will include treating prisoners like animals instead of human beings which is exactly what totalitarian regimes like Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and North Korea do. So sickening as it seems liberals are more preferrable on this issue than conservatives.
If gun industry has big guns, why hasn't it declared war on the gun grabbing politicians and law enforcement? Is not doing enough and being weaker than federal law enforcement the reason there are still many gun control laws? If just a small faction of armed and militant patriots in California caused mayhem and destruction to government buildings in Sacramento, California Democrats would be seriously terrorized by shock of resistance.
How about state legislatures in Colorado for example threatening sheriffs with dislodging should they fail to support the regime gun control laws? Forcing law enforcement to obey legislatures and activist judiciaries contributes to tyranny and it would be great if every single anti-gun democrat in Colorado were injured or even finished off by nail bombs for example. If militant patriots used explosives to damage government and progressive buildings such as Democratic Party headquarters, that would be wonderful. If mainstream media compunds were attacked with any kind of biological or chemical weapon such as anthrax or cyanide, it would stop the propaganda machines of tyranny from thriving and allow fairness in public opinion. If a despotic magistrate were to meet his/her demise with the blast of an explosive, it would send a powerful message that controlling your government may require commiting acts of terrorism against government facilities and their active supporters.
The thing about the Patriot Movement is taking a stand by fighting for what is right and not trying to de-fickle those fickle souls. Bombing BATFE headquarters and killing BATFE thugs is taking a stand. Begging before Congress to change is submitting to a corrupt system. Retaliating against law enforcement with guerilla warfare style ambush attacks is taking a stand. Going before the courts with little chance of victory is submission!
Bombing a federal office building that has agencies dedicated to destroying your freedoms is not in anyway murderous or criminal but justifiable homicide. Thomas Jefferson best said "the tree of liberty must from time to time be grown from the blood of patriots and tyrants." also saying 'When the people fear the government there is tyranny, when government fears the people there is liberty."
How can we make government fear the people? Terrorism is a method of communication mixed with action in an extreme fashion intended to strike fear into the enemy. Osama Bin Laden and Timothy McVeigh are on the same terror coin but are on different sides of it. Both favored militant means of advancing their achievements. Al-Qaeda advocates Islamic domination over the World while Patriots favor control over their own government by any means necessary and at any necessary cost, even if it means killing hundreds of thousands of government bureaucrats and their accomplices working for the evil DC Empire.
How will the evil empire respond? It shall respond as if it were truly a victim and believe people are ignorant enough to believe the lies of DC. Terrorism is a very powerful tool used to communicate a message that cannot be communicated non-violently. The difference between Islamists and Patriots are people in western Civilization will never surrender to Sharia rule just like they refused surrender to Nazism and Communism. Patriots have the side of truth and holiness to conquer the evil empire. Taking a stand sometimes requires you to shed the blood of your enemies without mercy and without taking prisoners. If an evil empire employee is screaming at the sight of an upcoming execution style gunshot, are they pleading for redemption or are they simply scared for their pathetic life?
Can the walls of ADX Supermax be destroyed with the might of explosions and a militia of patriotic liberators free our political prisoners? The Great Escape was a heroic story of escaping from a Nazi Concentration Camp and should patriots put their minds to it they shall liberate federal prisons across America and terrorize the mainstream media with their inability to lie out of the heroic deeds of the Patriotic Minutemen!
I wish to make clear the message I am trying to send. My point here is fighting evil may require you to be harsh towards your enemies while being wise enough not to become madmen hell bent on sensless destruction. Would you rather continue to live under oppression of tyrannical government or accept the reality that terrorism against government targets is the only way for regime change?
“keep and seek for all the commandments of the LORD your God: that ye may possess this good land, and leave it for an inheritance for your children after you for ever.” 1 Chronicles 28:8
Is it a sin to open fire on IRS, BATFE, and other regime enforcement agents if you're defending your country from a tyrannical government? Is armed and explosive insurrection the only defense against tyrannical government? No and yes. The Patriots did their duty in defeating British troops even if it meant committing acts of terror in the name of liberty. The Patriots were not cold blooded killers willing to kill innocents but killed British troops because they had to.
I must tell you of a dredful yet cave of treasures agency. Homeland Security has begun their war on liberty and they have a gold mine of firearms and hollow point bullets. Obtaining these weapons is important for militant patriots as it will not only give tools needed for victory but also be DHS worst nightmare as for them losing these weapons means a shocking defeat for the regime.
Even though it may frighten people, terror is the only method that can paralyze and destroy tI'yrannical government. Terrorism is a method that can be abused by those seeking to gain power for themselves such as Al-Qaeda tactics of killing civilians and non-believers of Islam. The Anthrax attacks of 2001 while using the U.S. Postal service endangered some innocent lives it did have legitimate targets that could have been eliminated through more precise means. Using care to avoid collateral damage is important as preserving humanity is important as well to avoid a Phyrric victory.
General Douglas McArthur said "There is no substitute for victory." If we shall ever be free again, we must be willing to do whatever it takes to win the DC War on Liberty and Self-Determination, even if it means resorting to use of weapons of mass destruction, which hopefully will have rare use. In times of war, points are best made with bombs and destruction of enemy livelihoods, not words. Appeasement has been a miserable failure noting the 1938 Munich Agreement in which Adolf Hitler begain invading much of Europe in 1939-40. Nazi Germany was brought to an end thanks to the Allied Forces of World War II. Had it not have been for leaders unwilling to surrender, Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan would have conquered most of the World.
Would America still exist had it not have been for leaders like Winston Chruchill and General George Patton? Had McVeigh been more like Osama Bin Laden, would the militia movement rival the federal armed forces? Had George Washington not have led the patriot army through militant means, would the colonies have gained independence from Great Britain? All I'm arguing here is that guerilla warfare against government in the form of terror attacks against government belligerants in the War on Liberty maybe our only way of preserving our constitutional republic. Elections and the courts have been relied on as means for redress but are lengthy and yield unsatisfactory results lacking enough safeguards such as non-governmental organizations defending freedom.
Bottom line here is a terrorist attack similar to the Oklahoma City Bombing while avoiding collateral damage will unfortunately be the best way to send the simple message of "NO!" to an uber-tyrannical government. You can fight the law and win but only if there is a paramilitary organization willing to go through whatever lengths necessary for achieving victory. Don't assume I'm just a crazy terror loving psycho because I'm suggesting that the only way this tyrannical government will be defeated is through guerilla warfare-terrorism. Freedom isn't free and if it means millions of regime soldiers must be destroyed, it is what we as freemen must do. I'm ready to give the government as much respect as they do to the constitution! Next blog will have a list of traitorous individuals and organizations as well as heroic patriots who will help us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)