Trump Shows Preference for European Immigration? Looks Down Upon 3rd World countries

There's a stir of fake news controversy over Donald Trump referring to countries such as Haiti and El Salvador as "Sh*tholes. Trump has also expressed desire for more immigration to come from countries such as Norway. This is very encouraging as massive immigration both legal and illegal has made America more divided and less prosperous.

Trump's administration has immediately began ordering the expulsion of over 200,000 El Salvador nationals who have been on TPS(Temporary Protective Status) since 2001 and have overstayed their welcome.

Why did Trump call Haiti and El Salvador terrible countries? Trump has been frustrated with lack of Congressional efforts to enact meaningful America First immigration reform.

Given the revelations of Trump's opinion being made into a media circus for days, now the left will be forced to defend their preference for Black African immigration over White European immigration. While the left has praised Scandinavian countries for their social welfare state and socialist principles, the left is being forced to take a position on whether it's better to live in Norway or Haiti. The picture above shows the average Norwegian(left) vs. Haitian(right).

I want to be completely honest here as it is essential to shifting the Overton Window further to the Right in saying the reason why Norway is one of those countries with the best quality of life and high standard of living is in part because it has been racially White Nordic European since the beginning of Western Civilization. The reason why virtually every Black African majority and Black African run country has the worst standards of living and worst qualities of life are in part because the average IQ of Black Sub-Saharan Africans is 70-80.

Sure there are plenty of Black Africans who are close to having the same intelligence as White European and East Asians but the massive immigration of non-Whites into White majority countries has caused division and strife. Plus, different peoples will be more or less likely to assimilate than others. America is not a mere "idea" as those who founded America were not merely of the White European stock but specifically the Anglo-Saxon stock.

The Immigration Act of 1790 restricted all immigration and naturalization to "White me of good character". What that means is this system was designed specifically to favor those closer to Anglo-Saxon heritage without explicitly banning non-Nordic immigration. A majority of immigration under this system was to insure the Nordic Anglo-Saxon culture remained the dominant culture in the United States of America.

With the immigration of Eastern & Central Europeans, Mediterranean Caucasians(Christians mainly), and even East Asians during the mid 19th century until the 1920's, there were no specific ethnic quotas until the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The Chinese immigrants during the 19th century failed to assimilate, causing panic and fear among the American population. The Chinese Exclusion Act banned further Chinese immigration to the United States, not out of bigotry or racism but out of concern of having parts of the Pacific coast colonized by Chinese settlers. While the Chinese settlers of the 19th century were lower skilled and less organized than today's People's Republic of China, China is becoming a rising power and it's important to point out the potential for PRC to encourage mainland Chinese immigration to countries like Canada, United States, Australia, and New Zealand as a method of economic & even cultural colonization where Caucasians could be made 2nd class citizens much like Blacks were in the Deep South from 1870's-1960's.

While I do feel a merit-based immigration approach is miles better than the pro-3rd world immigration system equipped with chain migration and diversity visa lottery(both of which Trump wants abolished), I also want pro-assimilation to be part of this as anyone with high skills and high IQs can still easily immigrate to America without having to assimilate into the value system America was founded on. America was founded on Western & Christian values, and if America still accepts too many high IQ Asians, Muslims, and even Black Africans, not only will it still contribute to a scenario where Whites are not only made 2nd class citizens but also a politically powerless minority group that could see more of the declining White population living similarly to Poor White Appalachians. I did mention Muslims because there are plenty of wealthy Muslims, especially from Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and even Oman. Plus, these Muslim countries have some forms of Sharia Law and favor Arab Muslim interests.

There's a reason why Democrats will NEVER agree to any immigration reform deal that includes an actual wall, end to chain migration, abolition of diversity visa lottery, and merit based immigration, and that's because Democrats rely on unlimited 3rd world immigration to increase their votes in hopes of one day flipping states like Texas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Virginia, and North Carolina solid Democrat, effectively establishing a permanent Democrat stronghold over the Executive branch.

Any kind of amnesty can easily morph into a demographic bomb due to massive rates of fraud and poor vetting of amnesty applicants. DACA for example has an over 50% fraud rate plus 70% of DACA recipients are low-skilled and are a net loss economically.

Certainly a merit based immigration system where ability is the highest virtue for immigration such as self-sufficiency is a great leap forward to stopping America from becoming 3rd world, there are problems associated with allowing so many high IQ Asiatics given they're harder to assimilate than White Europeans. Plus, Mainland Chinese are more tribalist and neo-communistic and if there is no system implicitly limiting or barring this type of immigration, then more of these tribalists whether they be mainland Chinese, Muslims from Pakistan, Indians coming to replace American White Collar workers, or even African(not including Whites) doctors, the character and face of America will be radically transformed but with a more intelligent touch.

However, if immigration were to be shutdown for nearly a decade while immigrants already here either assimilate or leave, this would help solve the demographic crisis America and many Western countries are having so Whites are not replaced in the countries their ancestors have cared for centuries.

Is it truly in America, Canada, Europe, or Australia's best interests to have high IQ non-white immigration become so numerous that Whites would be likely to become a minority? Even birthrates alone need to be addressed given non-hispanic whites are the only ethnic/racial group dying at a faster rate than being born thus making them also below the 2.1 fertility rate.

However, should immigration be shutdown for several years plus the expulsion of unassimilated 3rd world immigrants as well as implicitly pro-white natalist policies, White Americans as well as Whites in Canada, Europe, and Australia should see themselves preventing their own replacement, adopting similar policies Israel has to preserve it's Jewish identity.