New California project seeks to partition California

Back in January I've heard of a movement to split a majority of California's counties from the Los Angeles-San Francisco dominated axis of political power. This movement however will do this through the constitutional process under Article IV. Of course, the New California movement seeks to first demonstrate this potential new state can govern itself as a U.S. State. California has become one of the most poorly governed states in the U.S. It's a shame since California has the best geography, vast natural resources, strongest agricultural economy, and most beautiful weather.

Article IV Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution:  

 “New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

This provision was made so the original states such as Virginia & Massachusetts could not have their extra lands arbitrarily stripped and partitioned from them. The California state legislature is unfortunately Democrat controlled and this Democrat controlled legislature is more concerned with consolidating power and making it miserable for opposition to live in California via regulations, high taxes, low supply of housing, illegal immigration, no water storage for droughts, etc.

However, there's another provision that could allow Congress to partition California regardless of what California's corrupt State Legislature has to say about it.

Article IV Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and [the United States] shall protect each of them [the States] against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."

The meaning of this clause has remained a political question to be made by the U.S. Congress ever since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Luther v. Borden(1849). The U.S. Supreme Court ruled then in response to a rebellion in Rhode Island where disaffected urbanites tried to overthrow Rhode Island's government on the grounds it was not a "republican" government. The Dorr Rebellion(1841-2) let by Martin Luther tried to alter Rhode Island's government that overwhelmingly favored rural land owners. Rhode Island still used it's 17th century charter that required voters to own land to vote.

The U.S. Supreme Court however ruled that it was up to the U.S. Congress to define what a "Republican" form of government is under Article 4, Section 4.

California's state government under Jerry Brown and the Democrats in my view are running an unconstitutional mafia state akin to Cuba & Venezuela. What are the grounds for declaring California's state government is unconstitutional and therefore not providing a "Republican" form of government, thereby justifying Congressional legislation to forcibly change California's state government or forcibly partition it.

• Allowing illegal aliens safe harbor from deportation and prioritizing non-citizens over Americans.
• Imposing burdensome and crippling regulations driving businesses and wealth out of California.
• Severe restrictions on building of housing, causing housing prices to rise and be so expensive do to lack of supply
• Extreme centralization of political power and use of voter fraud
• failure to defend California from invasion, including obstruction of enforcement of federal immigration law
• Lowest quality of life with major streets paved with feces and needles(not kidding you)

Basically, California's state government is tyrannical, and therefore illegitimate.

I've heard California has already headed into a recession:
https://theblacksphere.net/2018/03/californias-pending-recession-an-inconvenient-reality/

Since California comprises 22% of U.S. GDP, California's economic problems will have a great impact on the rest of America. Plus, California actually has more oil & natural gas than Saudi Arabia, more Cattle, than Texas, and even more Tourism than Florida. Unfortunately, California's Democrat controlled government sucks!

Fortunately, there is an opportunity to change that, by electing Travis Allen as Governor! This is not a guarantee as it's a difficult road for a Republican to get elected to any statewide office in California.

However, an alternative is to partition California into 3 states to make it easier for Conservatives to live in the Central Valley, Inland Empire, Orange-San Diego Coast, Sacramento region, and Upstate California parts of California. The 3 proposed states would be West California, East California, & Jefferson.

 
East California could include the following counties of Orange, San Diego, Northern Los Angeles, Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, Kern, Inyo, Tulare, Kings, Mono, Fresno, Madera, Merced, Mariposa, Tuolumne, Stanislaus, San Joaquin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, Calaveras, Amador, Alpine, & Yolo. These counties are part of the Central Valley and Inland Empire, bastions of Conservatism in California. However, these counties and regions are deprived of adequate representation as the Coastal elites of Los Angeles and San Francisco Bay Area have controlled much of California's politics and due to the winner-take-all system of awarding all electoral votes to the plural winner no matter by how much these regions are ignored in presidential campaigns.

Also, regulations, taxes, and poor government from Sacramento Democrats have cause a small exodus of non-Democrats from California. California suffers droughts but California's central government has refused to allow new water storage to be built.

Should the counties I've mentioned form their own state, East California would either Lean Republican or be a Tossup battleground state. Also, people who left California or Conservatives in love with California's gorgeous weather could come move to East California and likely make it as conservative as Texas & Arizona(even more conservative than Nevada). Plus, the illegal aliens will not be receiving special treatment in East California and will feel like self-deporting in larger numbers! However, Several more counties could join.

West California would likely consist of the following counties of Los Angeles(excluding Rural North), Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, San Benito, Santa Cruz, Santa Clara, San Mateo, Alameda, San Francisco, Marin, Sonoma, & Napa counties. This state would be the spiritual successor to California in a political sense. West California contains the political elite of California running the state into the ground.

West California would be a Solid Democrat state though there would be a better chance for this state to have a better government than it's predecessor, given the population would be smaller. Also, gathering signatures for ballot initiatives would be easier and in a few years time, West California could resemble Nevada politically should voter fraud be suppressed, illegal immigrants deported, forced union dues abolished, and burdensome regulations make unconstitutional. However, West California could resemble Oregon rather than Nevada or Colorado.

Jefferson has been mentioned for decades, but for this blog I'll mention the California counties of the proposed State of Jefferson. Jefferson also includes counties in Southern Oregon though the California portion is the most likely to be established and partitioned off first. California counties would include El Dorado, Placer, Nevada, Sierra, Plumas, Lassen, Modoc, Siskiyou, Shasta, Tehama, Glenn, Butte, Yuba, Sutter, Colusa, Lake, Mendocino, Trinity, Humbolt, & Del Norte while Oregon counties would/could include Curry, Josephine, Jackson, Klamath, Lake, Douglas, & Coos. Politically, Jefferson would be the Montana on the Pacific, being a Solid Republican state, one of the most Conservative & Republican states in the country. Conservatives could be encouraged to move there from liberal states like Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and California.

Of course, California could also be partitioned like the map above as there are two other noteworthy proposals I should mention:

Proposal to the left is former Riverside County Supervisor Jeff Stone's 2011 proposal to establish the state of "South California"(I'd call it East California) while the proposal to the right include's then Assemblyman Bill Maze's 2009 proposal to establish a Solid Democrat state known as "Coastal California"(I'd call it West California).

Jeff Stone's South California would include the following counties of San Diego, Orange, Imperial, San Bernardino, Riverside, Kern, Kings, Tulare, Kings, Mono, Fresno, Madera, Mariposa, & Mono.

Bill Maze's West California would include the following counties of Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Orbispo, Monterey, San Benito, Santa Cruz, Santa Clara, San Mateo, San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Alameda.

However, modifications to these proposals are inevitable as some counties may end up joining these two proposed states.

Whatever California's future holds, the Status Quo is unacceptable and Article 4, Section 3 must be invoked to abolish the tyrannical California state government run by a dominant Democrat Party rule favoring job killing regulations causing people to leave California, increasing Democrat political power.

President Donald Trump has visited California for the first time as president and he intends to do something about California's lawless, tyrannical, and unconstitutional state government.

Proposal for an Afrikaner State & Partition of South Africa

South Africa is forgoing the final stages of an all out race war between Bantus and Afrikaners. Virtually all of the World is uninterested in intervening to prevent racial conflict and save lives in South Africa by proposing a partition of South Africa similar to how India was partitioned in 1947.

Since 1994, South Africa has been a failed experiment for a quote "Rainbow" nation that including all racial and ethnic groups in South Africa. Non-Blacks have been discriminated viciously in terms of economic opportunity, resulting in record poverty levels for Whites, Coloreds, and Asiatics. Since Bantus comprise 80% of South Africa's population, they are favored by the ruling ANC regime. Also, South Africa's far-left parliament voted to allow land to be seized from mainly White farmers WITHOUT compensation. The brutal attacks on White farmers by kaffirs has been ongoing for more than a decade, intensifying in the past few years.

Though right-wing populist governments have been elected in Central and Eastern Europe during the mid 2010's, emigrating from South Africa is still not easy enough as Afrikaners are not counted as refugees. Despite having a right-wing populist president in the USA, the administration branch still needs to be overhauled to establish more efficiency and response to these tragedies. While US politicians demand action to protect the Rohingya Muslim refugees from Myanmar, no words said about Afrikaners and other non-bantus facing persecution by the Bantu supremacist ANC regime.

Here's my take of what a likely Afrikaner state would be like. The above map shows the areas that are majority Afrikaner(both White & Colored), it also includes potential subdivisions.

I also want to bring up this Alternate History map of a possible partition where the Apartheid government would cut off massive portions of land to separate Whites from Bantus. The Bantus would be relocated to the state of their ethnicity. For example, Xhosa would be relocated to Xhosaland in the Eastern Cape and Zulus relocated to KwaZulu-Natal. Tswana would have their lands in South Africa annexed by Botswana.

In addition to the Western & Northern Cape provinces as well as the Western & Port Elizabeth districts of the Eastern Cape province, western portions of the Xhariep & Motheo districts, most of the Lejweleputswa & Northern Free State districts of the Free State province, southern and eastern districts of North-West province, the entire Gauteng Province, far-western portions of the Mpumalanga province, far-southern portions and Kruger National Park corridor portions of the Limpopo Province, and the Durban-Pietermaritzburg corridor region of KwaZulu-Natal province.

The final partition will have to be determined through diplomatic means, getting the United States, Russia, India, China, Brazil, and Visegrad countries to get involved in partitioning South Africa and supervising a population exchange.

Once South Africa is properly partitioned, population exchanges between Whites, Coloreds, and Asiatics & Bantus will take place in a peaceful & humane way. Any U.S. Troops stationed in Africa for example should be used to protect racial minority groups in South Africa while a partition is underway.

However, the Trump Administration can act unilaterally by making the Afrikaner farmers and persecuted Afrikaners a refugee priority:
http://www.vdare.com/articles/congress-passed-lautenberg-amendment-to-rescue-soviet-jews-why-not-for-white-south-africans-but-trump-can-take-executive-action-now

the difficult part about getting that done is Trump is the busiest person in the World as he may not receive the message. Contacting the Bureau of Population, Refugees, & Migration would help get the Trump Administration's attention given Trump himself is busy but if the head of the Bureau I've mention received these cries for help, he would meet with President Trump, informing him to take action and help save Afrikaners!

Nationalism, Conservatism, and Populism win big in Italy

The results are in and the Centre-right coalition and the Five Star Movement outperformed my expectations as the governing centre-left coalition suffered a humiliating defeat as a result of their pro-migrant, anti-white policies! I remind you that 62% of Italian Parliament is elected through proportional method while 37-38% are elected by single-district first-past-the-post. Both chambers of Italy's parliament were up for election.

Matteo Salvini's Lega Nord won a plurality within the centre-right coalition and as a result ousted Forza Italia's Silvio Berlusconi as the leader of the coalition. This surprised me as Lega Nord won a plurality within the centre-right coalition, gaining 17.3% of the vote.

Meanwhile, the Five Star Movement outperformed my expectations, winning 32.6% of the vote. Luigi Di Maio is the political head of the Five Star Movement, hopefully should the Centre-Right coalition & Five Star Movement enter an agreement to form a government, this would be a powerful force against the EU's plan to Genocide Whites in Europe. The floods of Africans/Muslims into Italy has ignited anger against the governing anti-White centre-left coalition.

Five Star in my view could also be known as the "Lone Star" movement given their platform and ideologies differing from the competing coalitions. However, the Centre-Right & Five Star Movement both agree Italy has the duty to preserve her natural racial & cultural heritage from kaffirization, both from the Middle East & from Africa.

From what I know as of March 8, 2018; the Centre-Right coalition with the following parties got the # of seats for both chambers of Italy's parliament:

• Lega Nord: 126 deputies/57 senators
• Forza Italia: 101 deputies/57 senators
• Brothers of Italy: 33 deputies/17 senators
• Us with Italy: 0 deputies/4 senators

The Centre-right coalition has a total of 265 deputies(42%) & 137 senators(42.6%).

The Five Star Movement has a total of 227 deputies(36%) & 112 senators(34.9%).

Combine the centre-right & Five Star Movement and they have a combined total of 492 deputies & 249 senators, comprising 78% of the Chamber of Deputies & 77.5% of the Senate.

The centre-left coalition suffered possibly the worst loss for a governing coalition since the mid 1990's. The Democratic Party of Italy(pictured left) became the only major party in the centre-left coalition to win seats. There's another left-wing party that elected 14 deputies and 4 senators known as Free & Equal, being a more severe version of the centre-left coalition.

The centre-left was left with 122 deputies(19.3%) and 60 senators(18.7%), having previously held a majority in the Chamber of Deputies. Even if you combine both the centre-left & Free & Equal, they would only have 136 deputies(21.5%), and 64 senators(19.9%).

What can I say? The Africanization and de-Whitening of European cities has cause angst and fear among Caucasian Christian Italians, especially with the recent migrant crisis. This is not to say every non-White in Italy is to be targeted for exclusion and eventual expulsion as having a very small amount of these peoples will not harm Italy's national identity, should these individuals not hold anti-White, pro-invasionist sentiments.

As small Italian villages have been flooded with African/Muslim migrants, causing Caucasian Christians to flee these villages either for major cities or for other countries. Whenever a foreign/alien race floods a town, city, or country in such massive numbers and the demographics shift so severely, the identity of such city, town, or country is affected and reflects the dominant racial group. When South Africa's White minority government surrendered their sovereignty to the Bantu majority in 1994, non-bantus(Whites, Coloureds, Asiatics, Khoi-Sans) were considered less important and even alien to the ruling ANC Bantu-majority elite.

Lombardy & Sicily regions have been hurt the most by the migrant crisis, with a majority of Sicilian youth unemployed. Very much how the rise of Communism and economic depression have fueled the rise of ultra-nationalism in Germany under Adolf Hitler, the migrant crisis plus economic depression have caused the rise of national populism in Italy and the severe downfall of the centre-left and left wing in Italy.

Calling the Italians racist and bigoted will not work on them as the Italian nation through the recent election have fiercely rejected the subjugation of the White Caucasian race within their country. The kaffir invaders will NEVER subjugate nore demand equal footing with the Italian nation. In fact, Salvini has pledged to expel hunderds of thousands of kaffir savages from Italy back to their bantustans in Africa!

Another election taking place on March 4, 2018 was the Lombard regional election where the centre-right coalition led by Attilio Fontana won 49 of 80 seats in Lombardy's regional parliament compared to centre-left's 29 seats(lost 4 seats to Five Star Movement).

Fontana campaigned on expelling the African migrants in order to "Save the White Race". Now that's the kind of boldness needed to wake White people up around the world. The White race is under attack around the world and White people need to organize to repel and exterminate this threat against them.

It's wonderful to know there are powerful people openly defending the White race! South Africa is about to have a bloody race war where Whites will be pushed off their farms as they have been clandestinely for years. It's great to see Italy has joined several other European countries that favor Whiteness over other races. Just as African countries like Liberia favor Negros and Israel favoring Jews, European countries should open their hearts to persecuted White Africans being dispossessed and deprived of an identity by forced integration.

The other two major parties in the centre-right coalition include Forza Italia led by Silvio Berlusconi(pictured left), and Brothers of Italy led by Giorgia Meloni(pictured right). Forza Italia is a more traditionalist Conservative party having been led by former Prime Minister and political veteran Silvio Berlusconi(now over 81), having been overshadowed by Matteo Salvini's League. Forza Italia does have a strong populist streak, making talks to form a government with the Five Star Movement very possible. Since the Five Star Movement is focused most on opposing government corruption and populism, Berlusconi could be seen as an elitist from several years ago, having been leader of centre-right coalition during the 2013 Italian election that put the centre-left into power.

Brothers of Italy in contrast is closer to Salvini's League by having a more Nationalist-Conservative structure. Brothers of Italy was founded in 2012, 3 years after Five Star Movement was founded. Giorgina Meloni is much closer in political ideology to Matteo Salvini.

Though Forza Italia net gained 3 deputies, they suffered a net loss of 41 senators, so it's clear from this that Forza Italia is the closest non-left party to the elitism that was defeated in the recent election.

Brothers of Italy however net gained 24 deputies and 17 senators. It's very clear from the net gains achieved by the Five Star Movement, League, and Brothers of Italy that Italy has rejected the elitism and pro-migration policies of the centre-left Democratic Party and to a certain degree centre-right Forza Italia. Forza Italia avoided greater losses by opposing mass immigration of 3rd world Africans and Muslims.

Issues uniting centre-right & Five Star Movement include opposition to centralization of economic and political power in the European Union, seceding from the Eurozone, and making Italy sovereign again.

Can Travis Allen be California's Next Governor? Examples of much tougher races say so.

I sometimes read about or hear about when surfing the internet about the chances of a Republican Governor of California. Some will tell you California is a lost cause and that Conservatives and even Moderates should simply leave the state altogether. If you were to listen only to these sentiments, you wouldn't bother trying to Take California Back from the Semi-Communist Democrats. However, Republicans since the late 1990's have failed to have a true principled Republican who acts like a true opposition leader to the San Francisco Democrat machine. The 2003 recall that brought Arnold Schwarzenegger to become GOP Governor of California was a short lived and long-term failed attempt to make the GOP in California more competitive in fighting the corruption of California Democrats.

In both 2010 & 2014, Governor Jerry Brown was elected twice mostly because his two GOP challengers Meg Whitman(2010) & Neal Kashkari(2014) were RINOs who supported Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama for president respectively. What kind of self respecting Republican or Independent would vote for someone who acts half-Democrat? Why would Democrats and left-leaning Independents vote for Democrat-Lite when they can get the full meat? Also, the California GOP has failed to have proper direction nor a battle plan to become more competitive in California elections.

Fortunately, there is a GOP crusader running for Governor of California who is not only a principled Republican but also fully supported Donald Trump for President in 2016. Travis Allen is campaigning to Make California Great Again by cutting taxes, getting tough on crime, fixing roads & reducing traffic, massively improve education, & complete state water storage project. Travis Allen tells voters in a straight forward way of what must be done to make California great once again.

Travis Allen is the leading Republican in most polls and has gotten lots of statewide news attention and an army of volunteers.

I'll give you a brief political history of Travis Allen here. Back in 2012 when he was first elected to the CA state assembly, he was not expected to win against a very well known and power establishment GOP candidate(top two) and was massively outspent. However, Allen performed a massive upset against the hand-picked GOP establishment candidate winning 55.7% of the vote. Allen also led a volunteer effort to get GOP candidate Andy Vidak elected in a vacated State Senate district that was 20-22% Democrat advantage over GOP in 2013 but won with 51.9% of the vote(by 3.8%). Plus the district Vidak ran in had a greater Democrat advantage than statewide in 2018. Allen's volunteer army were responsible for electing GOP councilman Kevin Falconer as Mayor of San Diego in 2013 after Bob Filner(D) was ejected from office for sexual harassment. Plus, his volunteer army participated in 12 assembly and senate races, winning 11 of them and breaking the 2/3rd Democrat supermajorities in both legislative chambers. In 2016, Travis Allen won re-election with 58% of the vote(16% margin) when Hillary Clinton won Travis Allen's district(72nd assembly) with 51.4% compared to Trump's 43.1%.

The 2016 72nd assembly district results alone should show that supporting President Donald Trump does not damage your ability at re-election. http://news.gallup.com/poll/181475/massachusetts-maryland-democratic-states.aspx

The other major GOP contender businessman John Cox voted for Gary Johnson in the last election. BTW, Gary Johnson is a hardcore social liberal favoring legalized drugs, legalized prostitution, and open borders! Cox has tried acting like one of MAGA but has failed miserably to get the affection of delegates and spectators watching him at debates. Plus, Cox has lied about Travis Allen being Pro-Choice as well as lied about his Neighborhood Legislature being on the ballot. Cox has also lied about winning debates, while Travis Allen get's overwhelming support from Republicans!

Also, John Cox in a political sense is a big loser. Cox has been a typical milquetoast centre Progressive Republican wen he lived in Chicago, Illinois. Cox has only lived in California for less than 7 years while Travis Allen is California born, having family and friends leave to states like Oregon, Arizona, and Texas.

Cox has bold ambitions to become a career politician, having lost EVERY race he ran in, and lost miserably. John Cox not only has a legacy of failure in the political arena but resembles a typical GOPe RINO, relying on the broken and unreliable consultant class. Travis Allen received the endorsement of the California Republican Assembly. Conservatives and even Moderates see John Cox as Democrat Lite, which fails most miserably in Solid Democrat states.

Now it's time to mention examples of races won by Republicans when not expected to win:

State Senator Andy Vidak(pictured left) & Mayor Kevin Faulconer(pictured right) won races they were never expected to win for both State Senate & Mayor of San Diego respectively.

Andy Vidak was running for State Senate in a district with 20-22% more Democrats than Republicans in a 2013 special election. In fact, he managed to win 49.8% of the open primary vote as the only Republican in that race, then won with 51.9% of the vote, by a 3.8% margin. Vidak won a full term in 2014 with 54.1% of the vote, by an 8.2% margin. BTW, Vidak's State Senate district is more than 70% Latino population. In 2014, Governor Jerry Brown won Vidak's district with 55.5% of the votes, double-digit margin.

Kevin Faulconer ran for Mayor of San Diego after Democrat Mayor Bob Filner resigned due to backlash over sexual harassment. Faulconer would poll at 22% September 2013 but rose to 40% by November 2013, winning 1st place in top two as the only major Republican in the race. He faced off against Democrat David Alvarez and won with 52.9%, a 5.8% margin. Faulconer won re-election in 2016 with 57.2% of the vote.

Massachusetts and Maryland had the greatest Dem-Rep margins in 2014 yet elected Republican governors.  http://news.gallup.com/poll/181475/massachusetts-maryland-democratic-states.aspx

In fact, these states are more liberal than California. Without furtherado, I will present you with Governors Charlie Baker(Massachusetts), and Larry Hogan(Maryland).


Charlie Baker(pictured left), and Larry Hogan(pictured right) were elected Governor in 2014 in Massachusetts & Maryland respectively. Charlie Baker had an easier time getting elected Governor than Larry Hogan did.

I want to mention Maryland's 2014 Gubernatorial election in a state that had 20% more Democrats than Republicans. Larry Hogan trailed between 12-18 points behind Democrat Anthony G. Brown(who was Lt. Governor) until just 3 weeks before the election with the final poll released(internal poll) showing Hogan leading Brown 44-39, the only poll to show Logan leading Brown.

The results came in on November 4, 2014 showing Larry Hogan winning with 51% of the vote compared to Anthony Brown's 47.2%, a 3.8% margin of victory for Hogan, a larger margin than Charlie Baker winning 48.4% of the vote compared to Martha Coakley's 46.5%, a 1.9% margin of victory for Baker.

A bonus to give an example of how a Safe Democrat U.S. Senate seat was flipped Republican:


Scott Brown would go on to win not just a Safe Democrat U.S. Senate seat but the same seat held by Ted Kennedy(who died August 25, 2009).

On approx. December 30, 2009, Scott Brown aired a remarkable ad starting out with JFK announcing and explaining tax cuts to America with the picture fading to Scott Brown while still in classic 1960's black & white, reminding Massachusetts of the economic benefits tax cuts bring.

Coincidentally, Scott Brown went from trailing an average of between 25-30% behind Martha Coakley(D) in November of 2009 to making the race a "tossup" and even polling ahead by an average of 4-9% ahead of Coakley by Mid-January 2010(just days before the special election). Massachusetts' U.S. Senate special election 2010 became nationwide news due to the fact a Republican was never intended to win that seat. Scott Brown polled as much as 30% behind Coakley just weeks before but managed to have a higher chance of winning just several days before the January 19, 2010 election.

January 19, 2010 came and Scott Brown was announced the winner of the special election to replace the late Ted Kennedy. Scott Brown didn't receive any assistance from the RNC yet managed to win with 1,168,107 votes, winning 51.9% of the vote, winning by a 4.8% margin. Scott Brown won more popular votes in that special election than John McCain received in Massachusetts during the 2008 U.S. Presidential election(McCain received 1,108,854 votes, just 36% of the vote).

Scott Brown received roughly 5% MORE of the votes than John McCain while Martha Coakley(received 1,058,682 votes compared to Obama's 1,904,098 votes for Massachusetts in 2008) received just 55% of the votes Obama won in 2008 Massachusetts.

Jerry Brown received roughly 4.3 million votes in his 2014 re-election bid, Donald Trump's nearly 4.5 million exceed's Jerry Brown's 2014 count.

In fact, Travis Allen in my view could win as much as roughly 5.2 million votes while Newsom could receive as little as 3.8 million.

California patriots must however not assume this race to be an easy battle as they must turnout enough Republicans, Independents, and even some moderate Democrats to vote for someone independent of the tyrannical mono-party regime of the Democratic Party. In my opinion, the Republican Party of California needs to be transformed into the Independent-Republican Alliance to attract Independents into a coalition with Republicans against the Democrat Juggernaut.

California's Republican Party has failed to act as a true opposition party and challenge the Democrat regime for more than 20 years. California has failed to be a competitive state since the mid to late 1990's because leading Republicans have cowered and failed to fight a real fight. CaGOP has been shirking it's responsibility and duty to Make California a better state to live in once again!

Fortunately, Republicans and Independents have had enough of milquetoast, low-energy RINOs letting the Democrats get away with ransacking California dry. As California's primary season gets hot this Spring, Republican and Independent voters will follow and cast their votes for Travis Allen, seeing him as a true outsider California has waited for over 20 years to have.

Under the leadership of Travis Allen, the California GOP will be radically reformed along with California, becoming a true populist big-tent party opposing the radical leftist and communistic agenda of the vile Democrats.