People will never realize the government is so tyrannical that armed conflict against it is necessary to destroy it's tyranny unless there were some extremely shocking attack against government facilities greater than or just as great as 9/11 but targets only the belligerents such as law enforcement thugs & bureaucrats.
When injustice becomes law, terrorizing big government becomes a patriotic duty. Are you angry with regulatory & law enforcement agencies that ruined your life or compromised your business? Why wait another 4 years or decades for real change to happen? Gun sales have been skyrocketing, meaning people are unwilling to allow government to ruin their life. Too bad certain people can't purchase guns without going to the streets. I'm thinking Colombia has easier gun access where people need guns a lot to defend themselves against the Colombian Drug Cartels.
Elections are finished & Obama re-elected which although disastrous, people will wake-up & find armed insurrection appealing. How are businesses & industry going to defend themselves against regulation when time is of the essence. Machine guns & heavy turrets of course. No kidding, war like weaponry(except radioactive, chemical, biological, & nuclear warfare) is a necessity to protecting America from it's own government.
Seperatism is a hot topic that needs attention. Dixies in the South should reclaim their territory lost in the American Civil War through militant like means. The League of the South promotes seperatism but should write a declaration stating the annexation of the Southern states was illegal & these states are hereby seperate from the United States. No referendum needed. Other speratist movements in North America include Vermont & the Western North American States/Provinces. U.S. & Canada have multiple nations being The Confederate States of America(Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Maryland, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Arkansas, Missouri, Texas, Oklahoma, Arizona, West Virginia, New Mexico, & Louisiana)(Dixies), Cascadia(California, Oregon, Washington State, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Hawaii, Alaska, Yukon, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba)(Cascadians), United States of America(Minnesota, Iowa, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Ontario, Pennsylvania, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland, Labrador, Vermont, Maine)(Yankees).
Did you know over 78% of Americans believe government is broken. 21 million Americans believe it cannot be fixed! You must understand the nature of politics & why politics is the problem & reform can almost never happen with it. What about the increasing number of Hispanic voters voting socialist. They're interest is welfare from government. I understand that many are low income but it's dangerous to have a mobocracy since other votes won't count or have effect. If democracy goes unbalanced, hispanic voters will likely overpower others & create a socialist state.
The right to keep & bear arms is not just about hunting or self-defense. It's also about fighting tyrannical government. Government unlawfully gives itself power it does not originally have. So what do we do? Will it be more effective to just wait for elections from which we have little to no control over? Will it be more effective to fight for your property & freedom through militant means, which is a last resort.
With a U.N. arms treaty being pushed, a terror style attack on U.N. facilities is the right & patriotic thing to do. Little to no damage will be done by tradition shooting, bombing, or even semi-truck bombing. It seems the most effective ways to cause mayhem destruction to those tyrannical institutions is through heavy weaponry like remote controlled missiles, planes, tanks, & armed aircraft. By planes, I'm not talking about hijacking commercial airliners full of innocents but empty planes either having them piloted by suicidal freedom fighters or remote controlled.
I know the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing against a federal building killed many innocents yet very few government scum employees but that doesn't mean we can surrender militant means of holding government accountable. Freedom fighters should be careful about what buildings they strike.
It's not really terrorism if you're resisting a tyrannical government. I must warn you that governments will almost never consider themselves tyrannical & will do anything to supress strong resistance. Federal Thugs are already buying 450 million bullets for killing. In their view a freedom fighter that kills only several government thugs is a terrorist but thugs who kill millions get awards. Taxdollars at work eh? Very tyrannical.
Even local police & private citizens have spread tyranny. Many people believe that they have the right to vote for powers to arrest & detain teen liquor drinkers & if old enough punish them as adults. An act of force numerous ignorants don't understand.
I've seen some very unpatriotic comments on an archive newsarticle documenting on the 2010 Suicide Plane Crash in Austin, Texas & elections don't do jack shit. Often elections were suppose to reform government but lead to more damage. The difference between activism & armed insurrection vs. elections are the message gets better sent with your voice through bullets & civil disobedience. Ballots just go the way of the highest bidder & have failed to take into account fairness of policies.
Keep in mind that if consent of the governed is actually going to mean something, it must be guarded at all times & the most important right of all is the right to keep & bear arms. If the New World Order is to be reisisted, people must be willing to shoot NWO thugs including amred troops loyal to NWO. I also think it would be patriotic for disgruntled patriotic troops to shoot & even kill military superiors engaging in hostilities against freedom.
Forgive me for sounding radical but I am most certainly not alone when I make these points. If you knew even a small percentage about the tyranny of our government, you would join an armed revolution.
The threat of tyranny is why any gun control laws that undermine the right to keep & bear arms in anyway must be opposed, even if it means attacking gun grabbers(ex. BATFE). Don't expect federal gun control laws to die without militant means.
Saturday, February 23, 2013
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
The Problem with Unitary New York & California
New York & California are not truly one state but several being controlled primarily by the socialist left. For example, New York State is controlled by New York City & Lower State while California is primarily controlled by Los Angeles, San Francisco, & surrounding Northern California counties close to Sacramento. I also note that Ontario is at odds concerning Toronto & Southeastern Ontario vs. Northwestern Ontario. The problem with New York, California, & Ontario is they're actually not one state but several with conservatives unfairly oppressed by centrists & liberals. How can we solve this problem? The answer here would be to partition these states with their true forms.
New York: New York City is so large that it could qualify as it's own state along with Long Island & Lower New York. Most US Senators from New York have been from either New York City, Long Island, or Lower New York. Upstate New York is mostly centre-right while New York City tri-state area is centre-left to left wing. Upstate New York is more like the conservative Midwest than it is with Lower New York. There's even a difference between East & West Upstate New York where Buffalo could be different from Albany. What is certain is Upstate New York & New York City/Long Island are like two different states. My solution here is have Upstate New York & New York City/Long Island operate like different states with their own legislatures & have them be one state for federal purposes until seperate statehood partition is approved. I assume New York City/Long Island would continue it's leftist policies while Upstate New York would be more moderate conservative.
California: California has over 30 million in population & 3rd largest economy in the world I think but is controlled by the oppressive left wing Los Angeles, San Francisco, & surrounding counties close to Sacramento. How many states does California truly have in reality. The Southern counties with exception of Los Angeles are centre-right to right wing including these being south of 36N. If these counties were to be a seperate state, the state would be called South California & it's capital would be Riverside. Los Angeles would be a seperate county as it has a big enough base for statehood of it's own. Though not as left wing as New York City as a whole, Los Angeles State would be centre-left. San Francisco is in Northern California & the state of North California would have counties excluding San Joaquin Valley over 36N. North California would not be as conservative as South California but would not be as liberal as Los Angeles & San Francisco. North California would be centre at most with some leaning either left or right. San Joaquin Valley would be the only landlocked state partitioned from California & would include counties within the San Joaquin Valley, most of them being North of 36N. SJV would most likely be centre right to right wing. California would remain one state for federal purposes until secession or partition in statehood occurs but the proposed states of North California, South California, San Francisco, Los Angeles, & San Joaquin would have thier own legislatures & new constitutions. These proposed states would act like independent states. California needs a makeover & partition of states is the way to ensure fairness in representation. I also feel the long lost proposed state of Jefferson consisting of Northernmost counties of California & the Southernmost countires of Oregon should be reconsidered.
Ontario: Ontario is in Canada & it's capital is Toronto. Canada's capital is in Ottowa, Ontario. Both cities are in Southeast Ontario. What about Northwest Ontario? Are they different from their Southeast Ontarions? I'm using Northwest & Southeast here because of Ontario's geographical/political shape. The Northwest Ontario is mostly moderate to conservative, much like Ohio. Northwest Ontario's biggest city would be Thunder Bay. Southeast Ontario is more centre left with them controlling most of Ontario. Northwest Ontario would be more socially conservative & I assume it's capital will either be Sault De Marie or Thunder Bay.
New York: New York City is so large that it could qualify as it's own state along with Long Island & Lower New York. Most US Senators from New York have been from either New York City, Long Island, or Lower New York. Upstate New York is mostly centre-right while New York City tri-state area is centre-left to left wing. Upstate New York is more like the conservative Midwest than it is with Lower New York. There's even a difference between East & West Upstate New York where Buffalo could be different from Albany. What is certain is Upstate New York & New York City/Long Island are like two different states. My solution here is have Upstate New York & New York City/Long Island operate like different states with their own legislatures & have them be one state for federal purposes until seperate statehood partition is approved. I assume New York City/Long Island would continue it's leftist policies while Upstate New York would be more moderate conservative.
California: California has over 30 million in population & 3rd largest economy in the world I think but is controlled by the oppressive left wing Los Angeles, San Francisco, & surrounding counties close to Sacramento. How many states does California truly have in reality. The Southern counties with exception of Los Angeles are centre-right to right wing including these being south of 36N. If these counties were to be a seperate state, the state would be called South California & it's capital would be Riverside. Los Angeles would be a seperate county as it has a big enough base for statehood of it's own. Though not as left wing as New York City as a whole, Los Angeles State would be centre-left. San Francisco is in Northern California & the state of North California would have counties excluding San Joaquin Valley over 36N. North California would not be as conservative as South California but would not be as liberal as Los Angeles & San Francisco. North California would be centre at most with some leaning either left or right. San Joaquin Valley would be the only landlocked state partitioned from California & would include counties within the San Joaquin Valley, most of them being North of 36N. SJV would most likely be centre right to right wing. California would remain one state for federal purposes until secession or partition in statehood occurs but the proposed states of North California, South California, San Francisco, Los Angeles, & San Joaquin would have thier own legislatures & new constitutions. These proposed states would act like independent states. California needs a makeover & partition of states is the way to ensure fairness in representation. I also feel the long lost proposed state of Jefferson consisting of Northernmost counties of California & the Southernmost countires of Oregon should be reconsidered.
Ontario: Ontario is in Canada & it's capital is Toronto. Canada's capital is in Ottowa, Ontario. Both cities are in Southeast Ontario. What about Northwest Ontario? Are they different from their Southeast Ontarions? I'm using Northwest & Southeast here because of Ontario's geographical/political shape. The Northwest Ontario is mostly moderate to conservative, much like Ohio. Northwest Ontario's biggest city would be Thunder Bay. Southeast Ontario is more centre left with them controlling most of Ontario. Northwest Ontario would be more socially conservative & I assume it's capital will either be Sault De Marie or Thunder Bay.
Saturday, February 9, 2013
Sovereignty Resolutions For North America
Former Confederate States of America(Texas, Louisiana, South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Virginia, West Virginia, New Mexico, Arizona, & Maryland*).
The State of (state) hereby through passing of this resolution no longer recognizes the Federal Government of the United States of America's claim over (state). Instead, (state) is rightfully a state of the Confederate States of America, which was illegally conquered through military force in 1865. This means all laws made by the Federal Government of the United States of America have no & never had any legal effect on (state) since 1861. All debts, laws, & mandates incured due to influence from the Federal Government of the United States of America were never made to be law & never had any legal effect making them presently null & void. A gradual process shall be made to insure final business & assets with the Federal Government of the United States of America are resolved including social security claims & citizenship. All armed forces within (state) are now (state) command. Dual sovereignty shall be explored as a temporary option.
*Maryland was prevented from holding secession petition & therefore fits this catagory.
Republic of Vermont
Vermont hereby declares a debate on secession from the United States of America. The Federal Government of the United States of America has violated the rule of law through threat of force & has forced Vermont into unconstitutional mandates. Vermont also has a culture seperate from the rest of the states. This declaration calls for delegates to be elected & a convention of delegates to be called for secession. Part of resolution also voids any state laws enacted due to influence from the Federal Government of the United States of America. Armed Forces will be under command of the Republic of Vermont upon secession with the duty of able bodies males ages 17-45 to arm themselves.
Pacific/Northwest United States & Canada(California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Washington State, Oregon, British Columbia, Yukon, NWT, Nunavut, Alaska)
(state) wishes to recognize cultural, social, & economic differences from Northeast United States & East Canada in hopes of nullifying any unconstitutional federal laws while calling for a convention on secession. Suffering decades of abuse from (federal government), (state) wishes to reconsider union with (federal government). (state) hereby rescinds any laws incured due to federal influence & any laws found unconstitutional under originalist interpretation are hereby null & void without question. (state) is to have a republican form of government.
Hawaii
Hawaii hereby investigates legitimacy of sovereignty held by the United States of America. The forced dissolution of the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1893 should be investigated in order to debunk any claims of U.S. sovereignty over Hawaii. Hawaii enjoys a rich & foreign culture foreign from that of United States. Hawaii is also an island in Oceania, not North America. Any laws passed by Hawaii legislature as a result of federal influence are hereby null & void. Resolution also calls for consideration of secession.
Northeast United States/Canada(New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Delaware, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Ontario*)
(state) hereby calls for nullification of unconstitutional federal laws & secession if necessary. The South & West states have foreign cultures from Northeast & (state) wishes for voluntary union. The United States of America is anything but a voluntary union. The U.S. government has become lawless & tyrannical. Any (state) laws made as a result of federal influence are hereby null & void.
*While Ontario is Canada, Ontario shares a lot in common with the Northeast & Midwest United States of America.
Keep in mind this is not for me to directly say but it is my suggestion for adapting defiance against a tyrannical federal government. Clause that voids state laws due to federal influence mean for example that any state with a drinking age of 18, 19, or 20 for example before the mid 1980's would be reverted back to that age limit from 21. This way, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, South Dakota, Montana, Idaho, Alaska, Hawaii, Vermont, New York, Ohio, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Massachusetts, & Kansas for examples would under the resolution have their drinking ages reverted back to the ways they were back before 1985. This would also void zero tolerence & administrative license revoction laws in states that were forced to adapt on pain of having a net loss of federal fundings vs. tax payments. If this resolution were to come into effect, administrative license revoction laws would be reprealed in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, New York, Montana for some examples.
Income tax would also have never been legal within Confederate State territory, especially in Texas. I can expect quite a boatload of states to draft these resolutions. Wouldn't it be nice to go back in time to the Battle of Jackson & ensure the Confederacy's victory over the Union? That would be a real game changer there with the Confederate States of America living on.
The State of (state) hereby through passing of this resolution no longer recognizes the Federal Government of the United States of America's claim over (state). Instead, (state) is rightfully a state of the Confederate States of America, which was illegally conquered through military force in 1865. This means all laws made by the Federal Government of the United States of America have no & never had any legal effect on (state) since 1861. All debts, laws, & mandates incured due to influence from the Federal Government of the United States of America were never made to be law & never had any legal effect making them presently null & void. A gradual process shall be made to insure final business & assets with the Federal Government of the United States of America are resolved including social security claims & citizenship. All armed forces within (state) are now (state) command. Dual sovereignty shall be explored as a temporary option.
*Maryland was prevented from holding secession petition & therefore fits this catagory.
Republic of Vermont
Vermont hereby declares a debate on secession from the United States of America. The Federal Government of the United States of America has violated the rule of law through threat of force & has forced Vermont into unconstitutional mandates. Vermont also has a culture seperate from the rest of the states. This declaration calls for delegates to be elected & a convention of delegates to be called for secession. Part of resolution also voids any state laws enacted due to influence from the Federal Government of the United States of America. Armed Forces will be under command of the Republic of Vermont upon secession with the duty of able bodies males ages 17-45 to arm themselves.
Pacific/Northwest United States & Canada(California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Washington State, Oregon, British Columbia, Yukon, NWT, Nunavut, Alaska)
(state) wishes to recognize cultural, social, & economic differences from Northeast United States & East Canada in hopes of nullifying any unconstitutional federal laws while calling for a convention on secession. Suffering decades of abuse from (federal government), (state) wishes to reconsider union with (federal government). (state) hereby rescinds any laws incured due to federal influence & any laws found unconstitutional under originalist interpretation are hereby null & void without question. (state) is to have a republican form of government.
Hawaii
Hawaii hereby investigates legitimacy of sovereignty held by the United States of America. The forced dissolution of the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1893 should be investigated in order to debunk any claims of U.S. sovereignty over Hawaii. Hawaii enjoys a rich & foreign culture foreign from that of United States. Hawaii is also an island in Oceania, not North America. Any laws passed by Hawaii legislature as a result of federal influence are hereby null & void. Resolution also calls for consideration of secession.
Northeast United States/Canada(New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Delaware, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Ontario*)
(state) hereby calls for nullification of unconstitutional federal laws & secession if necessary. The South & West states have foreign cultures from Northeast & (state) wishes for voluntary union. The United States of America is anything but a voluntary union. The U.S. government has become lawless & tyrannical. Any (state) laws made as a result of federal influence are hereby null & void.
*While Ontario is Canada, Ontario shares a lot in common with the Northeast & Midwest United States of America.
Keep in mind this is not for me to directly say but it is my suggestion for adapting defiance against a tyrannical federal government. Clause that voids state laws due to federal influence mean for example that any state with a drinking age of 18, 19, or 20 for example before the mid 1980's would be reverted back to that age limit from 21. This way, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, South Dakota, Montana, Idaho, Alaska, Hawaii, Vermont, New York, Ohio, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Massachusetts, & Kansas for examples would under the resolution have their drinking ages reverted back to the ways they were back before 1985. This would also void zero tolerence & administrative license revoction laws in states that were forced to adapt on pain of having a net loss of federal fundings vs. tax payments. If this resolution were to come into effect, administrative license revoction laws would be reprealed in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, New York, Montana for some examples.
Income tax would also have never been legal within Confederate State territory, especially in Texas. I can expect quite a boatload of states to draft these resolutions. Wouldn't it be nice to go back in time to the Battle of Jackson & ensure the Confederacy's victory over the Union? That would be a real game changer there with the Confederate States of America living on.
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Tyrannical Judiciary vs. Secession
In 2006, some asshole judges on Alaska's highest court blocked a proposal for secession of Alaska from the DC empire on the grounds such action would be unconstitutional. This ruling has never been challenged by force. Are all rulings made by high courts always right? The way the founders saw it was no.
The judiciary was never meant to be used for redress. Neither were elections. Why am I saying this & how can we successfully seek redress? When people feel their constitutional rights have been violated, they file for redress from the courts. Unfortunately, this rarely becomes successful. Elections fail to change a damn thing, with Switzerland being one of some exceptions.
Thomas Jefferson is one of my favorite heroes because his words of wisdom involves attacks on gun control & activist judges as well as centralized banking. The last resort unfortunately means using terror like attacks against bureaucracies & law enforcement agencies responsible for such deadly attacks on our freedoms & right to self determination. This is why the right to keep & bear arms should be protected for everybody unless they've been proven through due process untrustworthy of firearm ownership(ex. prison term, dangerous mental illness, habitual violence, display of clearly threatning behavior).
The judiciary was intended to apply laws impartially & independently. The role of the judiciary however is not to assert judicial review in a way that abuses power & increases power of government. Power comes from people governed & by blocking secession proposals the judiciary is subverting the will of the people. TV Evangalist Pat Robertson was right about judges being a threat more serious than bearded terrorists!
When the British came to confiscate firearms, it was clear the Patriots had the right to kill aggressing British troops into submission. Why has gun control been tolerated for decades & what is being done to reverse the effects of the Federal Gun Control Act of 1968? The same who did so 1993 Waco were not helped in anyway & mainstream media captured the minds of people into accepting government is above people. Timothy McVeigh & Terry Nichols were outraged by this & decided something must be done to destroy the tyrannical federal government. Conspiracy here is the Oklahoma City Bombing of April 19, 1995 was intended by the federal government & that McVeigh was possibly deceived into striking the wrong facility given the wrong outcome. If patriots bombed British military facilities in the 1770's, this would be hailed as heroic & symbolic to liberty. The Oklahoma City Bombing was intended to mimick the Patriots of the 1770's but unintentionally resulted in so many innocent lives destroyed with very few consequences for the federal government. A memorial was held to symbolize the reaction of this tragedy as one of healing & courage. I think the Oklahoma City Bombing represents a need to learn of the truth & a call to view our federal government the same way people would view foreign invaders.
To this day, OKC has victimized not only the American people but the freedom loving patriots as well while the Federal Government became more tyrannical. I consider McVeigh & Nichols American heroes for trying to spark a new American Revolution & terrorize a tyrannical government while making the American people wake up to this fact. I admit the federal government is not going to automatically fall with just some beginner guerilla warfare tactics. I also admit peaceful solutions are necessary & should be considered first since violent insurrection is very extreme. However, a country cannot survive without the ability & willingness to engage in armed conflict with aggressive foreign invaders. This is even more true in Afghanistan & Iraq as the US Military wages war crimes against innocent Arabs.
For those of you who may condemn my comments on McVeigh & Nichols being American Heroes let me make this perfectly clear that I am hung verdict on whether McVeigh truly wished harm on innocents or if he was mislead into targeting the wrong target. We know the Oklahoma City Bombing killed many innocents & is one horrific mistake that should not be repeated but the question here is whether McVeigh truly intended to kill innocent people.
Forget about McVeigh for now & I will say what my point is. Point here is allowing any branch of government infallability is dangerous & no legislator, governor, law enforcement officer, or magistrate is above anyone else. The difference here is they have delegated authority & have no special implied powers outside of delegation. Government is created by charter & any artificial ordinance is subordinate to terms & conditions(aka constitution). Who truly enforces the laws? The people who made them of course. We The People is about exercising rights without getting government permission. We are born with inalienable rights which means it cannot be deprived from us without fairness of due process of law.
What if the Confederate States of America prevailed in the aftermath of the American Civil War? North America would be different culturally, socially, & economically as the South would be foreign to the Northeast & West coasts. Would the Western states & provinces of the United States & Canada be their own seperate nation? The U.S. & Canada are not their own nations but multicultural dystopias. U.S. & Canada actually make up over Three nationalities including Yankees of the Northeast, Dixies of the South, Cascadians of the West, Atlantic Arcadians of the Upper Atlantic East Coast, & French Canadians of Quebec. Hawaii in my view is truly a completely foreign country with Yankee influences. Hawaii is not on North America but in Oceania. It's unbelievable how foreign people in these regions are from each other. Had the South not have been forcibly annexed by the U.S., North America would have different cultures & nationailities without multiculturalism. The South would also be more conservative & have a stronger Dixie culture with lack of illegal immigration. If you look at the U.S., it's a multicultural empire & therefore should have no more legitimate authority over any state.
I could only imagine what a United States of Europe would be like. UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, & others would lose their cultural identities for a multicultural Europe. That's not consent of the governed but more like the popular government America's founders despised.
A North American Union only centralizes more power with all U.S., Canadian, & Mexican states/provinces being consolidated into one imperial union of force born from a treaty.
What can we do about this? Right now, any former Confederate State or Territory is not legally or constitutionally part of the United States of America. So any Dixie living in any former Confederate States of America territory is rightfully a citizen of the Confederate States of America. The legitimacy of U.S. sovereignty over Alaska & Hawaii should also be questioned as the U.S. has used force abroad following the Civil War. Any attempts to expell U.S. Authorities from these lands are leigitmate & should be fully supported as if they were the Allied Troops of World War II.
Movements other than neo-Confederate are in Vermont, West Canada(British Columbia, Yukon, NWT, Nunavut, Alberta, Saskatchewan, & Manitoba), Alaska, Hawaii, Quebec, & some Western States.
Had the U.S. not have been successful in these imperial pursuits, North Americans would have more freedom & society would be different.
Rejecting authority is key to regaining independence & taking a paramilitary approach is very important. Let's start by commanding the Texas Legislature to draft a resolution voiding all U.S. authority within the borders of Texas & any federal laws or state laws influenced by federal government. This means any federal gun control laws as well as mandates for example are no longer law in Texas. Texas would also proclaim itself to be a true state of the Confederate States of America.
The judiciary was never meant to be used for redress. Neither were elections. Why am I saying this & how can we successfully seek redress? When people feel their constitutional rights have been violated, they file for redress from the courts. Unfortunately, this rarely becomes successful. Elections fail to change a damn thing, with Switzerland being one of some exceptions.
Thomas Jefferson is one of my favorite heroes because his words of wisdom involves attacks on gun control & activist judges as well as centralized banking. The last resort unfortunately means using terror like attacks against bureaucracies & law enforcement agencies responsible for such deadly attacks on our freedoms & right to self determination. This is why the right to keep & bear arms should be protected for everybody unless they've been proven through due process untrustworthy of firearm ownership(ex. prison term, dangerous mental illness, habitual violence, display of clearly threatning behavior).
The judiciary was intended to apply laws impartially & independently. The role of the judiciary however is not to assert judicial review in a way that abuses power & increases power of government. Power comes from people governed & by blocking secession proposals the judiciary is subverting the will of the people. TV Evangalist Pat Robertson was right about judges being a threat more serious than bearded terrorists!
When the British came to confiscate firearms, it was clear the Patriots had the right to kill aggressing British troops into submission. Why has gun control been tolerated for decades & what is being done to reverse the effects of the Federal Gun Control Act of 1968? The same who did so 1993 Waco were not helped in anyway & mainstream media captured the minds of people into accepting government is above people. Timothy McVeigh & Terry Nichols were outraged by this & decided something must be done to destroy the tyrannical federal government. Conspiracy here is the Oklahoma City Bombing of April 19, 1995 was intended by the federal government & that McVeigh was possibly deceived into striking the wrong facility given the wrong outcome. If patriots bombed British military facilities in the 1770's, this would be hailed as heroic & symbolic to liberty. The Oklahoma City Bombing was intended to mimick the Patriots of the 1770's but unintentionally resulted in so many innocent lives destroyed with very few consequences for the federal government. A memorial was held to symbolize the reaction of this tragedy as one of healing & courage. I think the Oklahoma City Bombing represents a need to learn of the truth & a call to view our federal government the same way people would view foreign invaders.
To this day, OKC has victimized not only the American people but the freedom loving patriots as well while the Federal Government became more tyrannical. I consider McVeigh & Nichols American heroes for trying to spark a new American Revolution & terrorize a tyrannical government while making the American people wake up to this fact. I admit the federal government is not going to automatically fall with just some beginner guerilla warfare tactics. I also admit peaceful solutions are necessary & should be considered first since violent insurrection is very extreme. However, a country cannot survive without the ability & willingness to engage in armed conflict with aggressive foreign invaders. This is even more true in Afghanistan & Iraq as the US Military wages war crimes against innocent Arabs.
For those of you who may condemn my comments on McVeigh & Nichols being American Heroes let me make this perfectly clear that I am hung verdict on whether McVeigh truly wished harm on innocents or if he was mislead into targeting the wrong target. We know the Oklahoma City Bombing killed many innocents & is one horrific mistake that should not be repeated but the question here is whether McVeigh truly intended to kill innocent people.
Forget about McVeigh for now & I will say what my point is. Point here is allowing any branch of government infallability is dangerous & no legislator, governor, law enforcement officer, or magistrate is above anyone else. The difference here is they have delegated authority & have no special implied powers outside of delegation. Government is created by charter & any artificial ordinance is subordinate to terms & conditions(aka constitution). Who truly enforces the laws? The people who made them of course. We The People is about exercising rights without getting government permission. We are born with inalienable rights which means it cannot be deprived from us without fairness of due process of law.
What if the Confederate States of America prevailed in the aftermath of the American Civil War? North America would be different culturally, socially, & economically as the South would be foreign to the Northeast & West coasts. Would the Western states & provinces of the United States & Canada be their own seperate nation? The U.S. & Canada are not their own nations but multicultural dystopias. U.S. & Canada actually make up over Three nationalities including Yankees of the Northeast, Dixies of the South, Cascadians of the West, Atlantic Arcadians of the Upper Atlantic East Coast, & French Canadians of Quebec. Hawaii in my view is truly a completely foreign country with Yankee influences. Hawaii is not on North America but in Oceania. It's unbelievable how foreign people in these regions are from each other. Had the South not have been forcibly annexed by the U.S., North America would have different cultures & nationailities without multiculturalism. The South would also be more conservative & have a stronger Dixie culture with lack of illegal immigration. If you look at the U.S., it's a multicultural empire & therefore should have no more legitimate authority over any state.
I could only imagine what a United States of Europe would be like. UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, & others would lose their cultural identities for a multicultural Europe. That's not consent of the governed but more like the popular government America's founders despised.
A North American Union only centralizes more power with all U.S., Canadian, & Mexican states/provinces being consolidated into one imperial union of force born from a treaty.
What can we do about this? Right now, any former Confederate State or Territory is not legally or constitutionally part of the United States of America. So any Dixie living in any former Confederate States of America territory is rightfully a citizen of the Confederate States of America. The legitimacy of U.S. sovereignty over Alaska & Hawaii should also be questioned as the U.S. has used force abroad following the Civil War. Any attempts to expell U.S. Authorities from these lands are leigitmate & should be fully supported as if they were the Allied Troops of World War II.
Movements other than neo-Confederate are in Vermont, West Canada(British Columbia, Yukon, NWT, Nunavut, Alberta, Saskatchewan, & Manitoba), Alaska, Hawaii, Quebec, & some Western States.
Had the U.S. not have been successful in these imperial pursuits, North Americans would have more freedom & society would be different.
Rejecting authority is key to regaining independence & taking a paramilitary approach is very important. Let's start by commanding the Texas Legislature to draft a resolution voiding all U.S. authority within the borders of Texas & any federal laws or state laws influenced by federal government. This means any federal gun control laws as well as mandates for example are no longer law in Texas. Texas would also proclaim itself to be a true state of the Confederate States of America.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)