The Despotic Totalitarian Snake of "The Law Is The Law"

The Constitution. Every Issue, Every time. No Exceptions, No Excuses. JOIN US HERE

What the hell is "The Law Is The Law" anyway? The despots in the judiciary say it means that ALL laws no matter how unjust & unconstitutional should be obeyed & any violators should be punished unless the judiciary says otherwise. It could be said that if a law is unconstitutional, the person harmed by the government's actions could simply go before the courts & argue the law is illegal or unconstitutional. However, this is rarely the case as judges have nearly no incentive to uphold the law they are bound to uphold. The Supremacy clause applies to ALL judges, not just state judges. It was an awful blow to the rule of law when Federal Judge Edward Lodge of Idaho halted the prosecution of Ruby Ridge sniperer & federal agent Lou Horiuchi who was charged by the state of Idaho for manslaughter in 1997. The Supremacy clause does not grant the federal government immunity from being held accountable for it's actions from the state & local governments if the federal government violates the law. How do the DC despotic elites respond to them apples?

The founding fathers never approved of the judiciary being the sole arbitrator of all legal matters. Thomas Jefferson was against an activist judiciary & wrote alongside with James Madison the Virginia & Kentucky resolutions of 1798 stating that the states & the people have the right to nullify unconstitutional federal laws. This was in response to the Alien & Sedition Acts of 1798 which made it a crime to speak out openly against any public official in the federal government. I know what many are thinking the point that we have elections in which we can just vote the douchebags out of office. However, my point being is that it hardly ever works. The GOP or the "Gang of Plunderers" as I like to now call most of them has ultimately failed to follow in the foot steps of classical liberal presidents like Thomas Jefferson, John Tyler, Grover Cleveland, & Calvin Coolidge of actually cutting spending & lowering taxes & actually limiting government. Ronald Reagan became president from 1981-9 promising the same things as Thomas Jefferson, John Tyler, Grover Cleveland, & Calvin Coolidge. Reagan actually increased spending & deficits dramatically & after signing one of the largest tax cuts in history during his first year of office, he approved of higher taxes the next year. The Tax Reform act of 1986 made the tax laws more complicated & the blood is on the IRS hands for engaging in economic repression by choosing to enforce such horrible laws. When Republicans became the majority party after the 1994 elections, the spending & deficits continued & only got worse under Bush. Obama's agenda for "Change" in 2008 ended up with extreme authoritarian neo-communist government.

Another question that might be asked is if a law is unconstitutional, why not appeal to the courts? Appealing to the courts is not my point. The judiciary is despotic & unless the judges presiding over the cases are benevolent enough to rule in liberty's favor, then you're screwed.

The rule of law has been replaced by rule by lawyers, bureaucrats, & politicians. The position that any violator of any law no matter how tyrannical should be punished harshly in order to maintain order is a position begging for totalitarian government in which people are slaves of the state. Such a state exists in North Korea where people are forced to absolutely obey the supreme rulers known as the Kim family. The Supreme Ruler of North Korea is completely above the people & only answers to himself.

"If we are unwilling to resist tyranny through civil disobedience & contempt for the elites in pursuit of liberty & justice at ALL times, then we will surely live under the guise of tyranny & despotism, creating totalitarian government & a society in which the ruling class comes first & the rest of society will be dependent on the state which views itself as god."-Me, Corey L. Hahn

All I can now say is in Thomas Jefferson's letter to Charles Hammond, 1821
“the germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the federal judiciary: an irresponsible body, working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little to-day and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction until all shall be usurped from the States, and the government of all be consolidated into one. To this I am opposed; because, when all government, domestic and foreign, in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the centre of all it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.”