Marco Rubio is actually a Neoconservative Fascist

Two years ago, Marco Rubio was a Tea Party Superstar in Florida. He was said to be a conservative John F. Kennedy. What really gives me the disappointing impression that Rubio is in fact a Neoconservative Fascist is his support for globalism led by the United Soviet States of America. He supports endless world war & has come in support of certain National Socialist & Fascist Democrats such as Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, & Scoop Jackson who were all neoconservatives. Rubio has also bashed Paleoconservatives & libertarians & any Tea Partiers opposing intervention in Libya or close to that.

The chilling statement made by once Tea Party praised Rubio:

“Until very recently, the general perception was that American Conservatism believed in a robust and muscular foreign policy … But when I arrived in the Senate last year I found that some of the traditional sides in the foreign policy debate had shifted. On the one hand, I found liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans working together to advocate our withdrawal from Afghanistan, and staying out of Libya. On the other hand I found myself partnering with Democrats … on a more forceful foreign policy … I recently joked that today, in the US Senate, on foreign policy, if you go far enough to the right, you wind up on the left.”

Does Rubio seriously think that anyone opposed to foreign intervention is a socialist or communist? Does that mean Ron Paul & his followers are all socialists? This is a backwards motion that is insulting to some anti-establishments who supported Rubio over Christ two years ago. Rubio is also antagonistic towards Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, & Jim DeMint in the US Senate.

Another Rubio quote set to send disappointment chills to true conservatives, social liberals & libertarians:

 “What happens all over the world is our business. Every aspect of [our] lives is directly impacted by global events. The security of our cities is connected to the security of small hamlets in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.”

Problem is that there are deadly consequences stemming from imperialism that include deficit spending, debt, foreign hatred for America, & eventually the downfall of the regime which is actually good for capitalists who want to limit government.

Marco Rubio also favors international trade alliances which actually hurt free trade through international regulations.

On the issue of Iran having a nuclear weapon, the Soviets had nearly as many weapons as the U.S. did & yet the policy of containment was done without mass military attacks. Rubio advocates striking Iran:

 “Iran’s dangerous nuclear ambitions are about more than just weapons. Iran wants to become the most dominant power in the Middle East … The prospect of a nuclear capable Iran is so unacceptable that we must be prepared to act with or without [the consent of others].”

No libertarian would ever dream of living in a country like Iran or for Iran to have nuclear weapons but acts of war such as sanctions, blockades, & military attacks are dangerous to peace & security with other nations. Rubio is planning for a war with Iran as one of his many dreams.

Rubio is also unreluctant of using military force in Uganda on the Joseph Kony issue after the Kony 2012 short film was made.

The world is not a battle between good v. evil. The USSA is demented in it's own filth & Rubio seems to have the mind of a warlord, not a paleoconservative concerned about limited the federal government. He's already endorsed National Socialist Mitt Romney & even plans to be that SOB's veep.

This gives me the impression that if any states were to secede, Rubio would be one of those horrible monsters that would advocate using military force to prevent peaceful secession. No true libertarian, paleoconservative, social liberal, or capitalist should ever endorse the use of military force to prevent secession form tyrannical government.